MGA vs ALV vs LEA Stock Comparison

Magna International, Autoliv and Lear Prices as of Oct 23, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (ADNT) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
MGA Magna International Inc
$63.99 +0.4% 1M +38.9% 1Y
Market cap
$18.05B
P/E
7.6x
Revenue (TTM)
$31.92B
Div. yield
–
Auto Parts Consumer Discretionary
4 wins
ALV Autoliv Inc
$114.71 -0.5% 1M -0.8% 1Y
Market cap
$8.37B
P/E
13.5x
Revenue (TTM)
$11.07B
Div. yield
0.03%
Auto Parts Consumer Discretionary
5 wins
LEA Lear Corp
$116.68 -4.1% 1M +15.8% 1Y
Market cap
$5.86B
P/E
10.5x
Revenue (TTM)
$23.70B
Div. yield
0.03%
Auto Parts Consumer Discretionary
3 wins

Head to Head

12 decided of 12

Autoliv leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (Autoliv 5, Magna International 4, Lear 3). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionMGAALVLEALeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $18.05B $8.37B $5.86B MGA
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 7.6x 13.5x 10.5x MGA
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 9.6x 10.8x 8.3x LEA
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months -54.1% +4.3% +3.5% ALV
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 7.5% 5.6% 2.3% MGA
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — 15.9% 8.8% ALV
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — 1.2x 1.2x LEA
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.03% 0.03% ALV
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +38.9% -0.8% +15.8% MGA
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -4.4%/yr +4.5%/yr -7.2%/yr ALV
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 37.1% 28.5% 34.5% ALV
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 64/100 74/100 77/100 LEA

Percentile Scorecard

MGAALVLEA

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisMGAALVLEA
Valuation 92 #5 of 50 67 #17 of 50 96 #3 of 50
Growth 25 #37 of 49 69 #16 of 49 77 #12 of 49
Profitability 75 #13 of 48 96 #3 of 48 79 #11 of 48
Financial Health – 53 #26 of 54 68 #18 of 54
Shareholder Returns 63 #12 of 31 83 #6 of 31 67 #11 of 31
Overall 64 74 77
  • MGA ranked among 56 companies in Automobiles and Components
  • ALV ranked among 56 companies in Automobiles and Components
  • LEA ranked among 56 companies in Automobiles and Components

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodMGAALVLEASPY
1 month +0.4%-0.5%-4.1% -1.0%
3 months -2.5%-2.4%-18.7% +2.9%
6 months +1.7%-2.6%-9.1% +6.4%
Year to date +20.1%-3.4%+1.8% +11.4%
1 year +38.9%-0.8%+15.8% +13.1%
3 years +25.9%+19.5%-10.5% +79.4%
3 years, per year +8.0%+6.1%-3.6% +21.5%
5 years -20.3%+24.3%-31.2% +67.7%
5 years, per year -4.4%+4.5%-7.2% +10.9%
10 years +58.9%+60.1%+1.1% +255.2%
10 years, per year +4.7%+4.8%+0.1% +13.5%

Risk

MeasureMGAALVLEASPY
Volatility, 1Y 37.1%28.5%34.5% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 31.0%27.6%32.7% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.241.081.00 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 1.05-0.030.46 1.03
Max drawdown, 5Y -65.5%-40.5%-61.0% -25.4%
From 52-week high -12.4%-12.9%-21.4% -2.5%
52-week high $73.05$131.69$148.51 $779.14
52-week low $44.65$100.34$99.28 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleMGAALVLEA
P/E now vs peer median 7.6xmedian 18.9x 13.4xmedian 18.9x 10.6xmedian 18.9x
P/S now vs peer median 0.6xmedian 0.5x 0.7xmedian 0.5x 0.2xmedian 0.5x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 8.5x 7.0xmedian 8.5x 5.0xmedian 8.5x
P/FCF now vs peer median 2.7xmedian 8.8x 11.3xmedian 8.8x 6.8xmedian 8.8x
P/B now vs peer median —median 0.9x 3.3xmedian 0.9x 1.1xmedian 0.9x
PEG now vs peer median 1.30median 1.35 0.66median 1.35 1.40median 1.35

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsMGAALVLEA
Revenue $31.92B $11.07B $23.70B
Gross profit -$4.47B $2.10B $1.63B
Operating income -$5.31B $1.00B $890.00M
Net income $814.00M $624.00M $637.10M
Free cash flow $6.59B $729.00M $849.40M
R&D – $435.00M –
EPS (diluted) $8.42 $8.53 $10.94
Cash & equivalents $1.43B $197.00M $1.00B
Total debt $20.90B $8.22B $2.75B
Shares (diluted) 282.50M 72.90M 50.82M
Enterprise value $12.07B $6.85B $1.94B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricMGAALVLEA
P/E 7.6x 13.4x 10.6x
P/FCF 2.7x 11.3x 6.8x
P/Operating cash flow 4.0x 7.2x 3.9x
P/S 0.6x 0.7x 0.2x
P/B – 3.3x 1.1x
P/Tangible book – 3.3x 1.1x
EV/EBITDA – 7.0x 5.0x
EV/EBIT -4.0x 10.0x 8.4x
EV/Revenue 0.7x 0.9x 0.3x
EV/FCF 3.2x 13.7x 8.8x
EV/Operating cash flow 4.7x 8.8x 5.1x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 1.30 0.66 1.40

Growth

14 metrics
MetricMGAALVLEA
Revenue growth (1Y) -54.1% 4.3% 3.5%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) -7.6% 3.2% 1.8%
Gross profit growth (1Y) -113.3% 2.5% 2.3%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) -42.5% 7.6% -0.2%
Operating income growth (1Y) -116.1% -10.6% -0.1%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -55.8% 13.6% -1.8%
Net income growth (1Y) -36.9% -17.2% 12.8%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -5.9% 14.3% 1.6%
EPS growth (1Y) -5.6% -13.0% 25.9%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 5.8% 20.3% 7.5%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 35.4% 10.6% 43.3%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 25.9% 4.6% 11.6%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 1.3% 27.7% 77.6%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 8.0% 21.1% 23.6%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricMGAALVLEA
Gross margin -14.0% 19.0% 6.9%
EBITDA margin – 13.0% 6.3%
Operating margin -16.6% 9.1% 3.8%
Pretax margin 4.0% 7.9% 3.1%
Net margin 7.5% 5.6% 2.3%
FCF margin 20.7% 6.6% 3.6%
Operating cash flow margin 14.2% 10.3% 6.2%
Return on equity – 25.1% 12.0%
Return on assets – 7.4% 4.1%
Return on invested capital – 15.9% 8.8%
Return on capital employed – 21.8% 9.7%
Asset turnover – 1.3x 1.5x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 5.6x 1.8x 2.3x
Stock comp / revenue – – –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricMGAALVLEA
Debt / assets – 23.0% 17.5%
Debt / equity – 0.8x 0.5x
Net debt / EBITDA – 1.2x 1.2x
Debt / FCF 0.7x 2.7x 3.2x
Liabilities / assets – 70.7% 66.0%
Equity / assets – 29.3% 34.0%
Interest coverage – 9.9x 9.0x
Current ratio – 1.0x 1.3x
Quick ratio – 0.7x 0.8x
Cash ratio – 0.1x 0.2x
Altman Z-score – 2.92 2.77

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricMGAALVLEA
Dividend yield 3.0% 3.0% 2.6%
Net buyback yield 0.1% 6.1% 7.9%
Shareholder yield 3.1% 9.1% 10.5%
Payout ratio (earnings) – 41.2% 25.3%
Payout ratio (FCF) – 35.3% 19.0%
Dividend growth (1Y) – 12.7% -4.5%
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – 4.4% -4.3%

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusMGAALVLEA
Forward P/E 9.6xFY2026 10.8xFY2026 8.3xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $6.64FY2026 $10.65FY2026 $13.99FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +16.7%FY2026 +8.1%FY2026 +9.3%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +12.2% +18.4% +24.7%
Revenue, next fiscal year $39.28BFY2026 $11.43BFY2026 $23.22BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY -5.8%FY2026 +5.7%FY2026 -0.2%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +13.3% -5.3% +7.8%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersMGAALVLEA
Held by institutions 63.5% 67.7% 100.0%
Institutions holding 450 411 516
Change in shares held, QoQ -2.2% +4.1% +1.1%
Institutions buying 207 217 273
Institutions selling 168 129 166
Buyers to sellers 1.23 1.68 1.64

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

MGAALVLEA
MGA 1.00 0.64 0.65
ALV 0.64 1.00 0.72
LEA 0.65 0.72 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, MGA, ALV and LEA?

Magna International (MGA) is the largest by market capitalisation: Magna International (MGA) $18.05B, Autoliv (ALV) $8.37B, Lear (LEA) $5.86B.

Which stock is cheaper, MGA, ALV and LEA?

Magna International (MGA) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Magna International (MGA) 7.6x, Autoliv (ALV) 13.5x, Lear (LEA) 10.5x). On next year's consensus earnings, Lear (LEA) is cheapest (Magna International (MGA) 9.6x, Autoliv (ALV) 10.8x, Lear (LEA) 8.3x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Autoliv (ALV) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Magna International (MGA) -54.1%, Autoliv (ALV) +4.3%, Lear (LEA) +3.5%.

Which company is more profitable?

Magna International (MGA) has the highest net margin (Magna International (MGA) 7.5%, Autoliv (ALV) 5.6%, Lear (LEA) 2.3%). On return on invested capital, Autoliv (ALV) leads (Autoliv (ALV) 15.9%, Lear (LEA) 8.8%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Magna International (MGA) returned the most: Magna International (MGA) +38.9%, Autoliv (ALV) -0.8%, Lear (LEA) +15.8%. Over five years, Autoliv (ALV) compounded fastest (Magna International (MGA) -4.4%/yr, Autoliv (ALV) +4.5%/yr, Lear (LEA) -7.2%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Autoliv (ALV) has the highest dividend yield: Magna International (MGA) 0.00%, Autoliv (ALV) 0.03%, Lear (LEA) 0.03%. Magna International (MGA) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Autoliv (ALV) has been the steadiest (Magna International (MGA) 37.1%, Autoliv (ALV) 28.5%, Lear (LEA) 34.5%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, MGA, ALV and LEA?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Autoliv (ALV) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.