MDT vs ISRG vs OMCL Stock Comparison

Medtronic, Intuitive Surgical and Omnicell Prices as of Nov 5, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (RMD) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
MDT Medtronic plc
$104.83 +20.4% 1M +16.0% 1Y
Market cap
$134.19B
P/E
25.6x
Revenue (TTM)
$37.54B
Div. yield
2.73%
Medical Devices Healthcare
3 wins
ISRG Intuitive Surgical Inc
$468.52 +15.8% 1M -14.6% 1Y
Market cap
$162.39B
P/E
55.3x
Revenue (TTM)
$11.58B
Div. yield
–
Medical Devices Healthcare
5 wins
OMCL Omnicell, Inc.
$38.03 +7.2% 1M +6.4% 1Y
Market cap
$1.75B
P/E
39.1x
Revenue (TTM)
$1.24B
Div. yield
–
Medical Devices Healthcare
1 win

Head to Head

9 decided of 12

Intuitive Surgical leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (Intuitive Surgical 5, Medtronic 3, Omnicell 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionMDTISRGOMCLLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $134.19B $162.39B $1.75B ISRG
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 25.6x 55.3x 39.1x MDT
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 18.8x 40.7x 15.8x OMCL
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +9.8% +20.5% +5.6% ISRG
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 13.9% 25.5% 3.6% ISRG
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 6.9% — — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 2.0x — — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 2.73% — — –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +16.0% -14.6% +6.4% MDT
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -3.1%/yr +5.1%/yr -26.5%/yr ISRG
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 25.6% 35.9% 49.8% MDT
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 64/100 79/100 63/100 ISRG

Percentile Scorecard

MDTISRGOMCL

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisMDTISRGOMCL
Valuation 80 #47 of 229 47 #123 of 229 97 #9 of 229
Growth 50 #112 of 221 81 #44 of 221 76 #53 of 221
Profitability 88 #26 of 210 97 #7 of 210 73 #57 of 210
Financial Health 50 #120 of 240 81 #47 of 240 41 #142 of 240
Shareholder Returns 54 #68 of 147 93 #12 of 147 27 #107 of 147
Overall 64 79 63
  • MDT ranked among 247 companies in Medical Devices and Diagnostics
  • ISRG ranked among 247 companies in Medical Devices and Diagnostics
  • OMCL ranked among 247 companies in Medical Devices and Diagnostics

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodMDTISRGOMCLSPY
1 month +20.4%+15.8%+7.2% -5.9%
3 months +22.0%+25.4%+5.2% -4.6%
6 months +34.5%+3.3%-12.2% +0.2%
Year to date +9.1%-17.3%-16.0% +7.5%
1 year +16.0%-14.6%+6.4% +8.2%
3 years +42.8%+69.0%+28.9% +68.3%
3 years, per year +12.6%+19.1%+8.8% +19.0%
5 years -14.8%+28.4%-78.6% +56.5%
5 years, per year -3.1%+5.1%-26.5% +9.4%
10 years +27.6%+528.0%+21.9% +251.5%
10 years, per year +2.5%+20.2%+2.0% +13.4%

Risk

MeasureMDTISRGOMCLSPY
Volatility, 1Y 25.6%35.9%49.8% 13.6%
Downside volatility, 1Y 22.0%38.0%49.7% 14.2%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.140.931.12 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.62-0.410.13 0.60
Max drawdown, 5Y -43.6%-49.9%-86.6% -25.4%
From 52-week high -0.5%-21.0%-26.0% -5.9%
52-week high $105.35$592.85$51.39 $779.14
52-week low $73.75$332.02$32.23 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleMDTISRGOMCL
P/E now vs peer median 25.6xmedian 26.9x 55.3xmedian 26.9x 39.1xmedian 26.9x
P/S now vs peer median 3.6xmedian 2.9x 14.0xmedian 2.9x 1.4xmedian 2.9x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 15.8xmedian 17.5x 38.7xmedian 17.5x 10.1xmedian 17.5x
P/FCF now vs peer median 21.9xmedian 26.4x 45.1xmedian 26.4x 12.0xmedian 26.4x
P/B now vs peer median 2.6xmedian 2.3x 10.1xmedian 2.3x 1.3xmedian 2.3x
PEG now vs peer median 1.77median 0.88 2.15median 0.88 0.81median 0.88

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsMDTISRGOMCL
Revenue $37.54B $11.58B $1.24B
Gross profit $24.41B $7.78B $561.45M
Operating income $6.79B $3.28B $64.65M
Net income $5.27B $2.97B $44.67M
Free cash flow $6.13B $3.60B $145.77M
R&D $2.92B $1.49B $86.72M
EPS (diluted) $4.07 $8.41 $0.96
Cash & equivalents $1.69B $2.98B $314.90M
Total debt $28.15B – –
Shares (diluted) 1.29B 351.60M 46.47M
Enterprise value $100.06B $142.81B $706.31M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricMDTISRGOMCL
P/E 25.6x 55.3x 39.1x
P/FCF 21.9x 45.1x 12.0x
P/Operating cash flow 16.7x 39.7x 9.4x
P/S 3.6x 14.0x 1.4x
P/B 2.6x 10.1x 1.3x
P/Tangible book 3.3x 10.9x 1.5x
EV/EBITDA 15.8x 38.7x 10.1x
EV/EBIT 22.6x 48.2x 22.2x
EV/Revenue 4.1x 13.7x 1.2x
EV/FCF 25.0x 44.0x 9.8x
EV/Operating cash flow 19.1x 38.7x 7.7x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 1.77 2.15 0.81

Growth

14 metrics
MetricMDTISRGOMCL
Revenue growth (1Y) 9.8% 20.5% 5.6%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 6.0% 19.1% 1.6%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 9.3% 21.9% 9.0%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 5.6% 19.5% 3.0%
Operating income growth (1Y) 10.9% 16.6% 277.2%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 6.4% 24.8% 48.8%
Net income growth (1Y) 12.4% 7.5% 124.2%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 13.0% 24.4% 48.9%
EPS growth (1Y) 12.4% 10.8% 121.5%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 14.5% 25.7% 48.5%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 12.4% 38.1% 21.5%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 11.3% 26.4% -6.1%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 15.6% 58.4% 30.8%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 11.3% 42.0% -6.6%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricMDTISRGOMCL
Gross margin 65.0% 67.2% 45.1%
EBITDA margin 25.9% 35.3% 11.4%
Operating margin 18.1% 28.4% 5.2%
Pretax margin 17.6% 31.3% 5.4%
Net margin 13.9% 25.5% 3.6%
FCF margin 16.3% 31.1% 11.7%
Operating cash flow margin 21.4% 35.3% 15.0%
Return on equity 10.4% 17.3% 3.4%
Return on assets 5.7% 14.8% 2.2%
Return on invested capital 6.9% – –
Return on capital employed 8.3% 18.7% 4.2%
Asset turnover 0.4x 0.6x 0.6x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.5x 1.4x 4.2x
Stock comp / revenue 1.3% 7.2% 3.6%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricMDTISRGOMCL
Debt / assets 30.2% – –
Debt / equity 0.6x – –
Net debt / EBITDA 2.0x – –
Debt / FCF 4.6x – –
Liabilities / assets 45.5% 16.7% 36.0%
Equity / assets 54.5% 83.3% 64.0%
Interest coverage 9.4x – –
Current ratio 2.1x 3.3x 1.7x
Quick ratio 1.3x 2.3x 1.2x
Cash ratio 0.7x 1.6x 0.7x
Altman Z-score 3.20 32.00 2.60

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricMDTISRGOMCL
Dividend yield 2.7% – –
Net buyback yield 0.1% 2.6% -0.9%
Shareholder yield 2.9% 2.6% -0.9%
Payout ratio (earnings) 69.3% – –
Payout ratio (FCF) 59.5% – –
Dividend growth (1Y) 1.4% – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) 0.2% – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusMDTISRGOMCL
Forward P/E 18.8xFY2026 40.7xFY2026 15.8xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $5.57FY2026 $11.51FY2026 $2.41FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +0.7%FY2026 +28.9%FY2026 +48.8%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +7.2% +4.5% -19.1%
Revenue, next fiscal year $39.92BFY2026 $11.61BFY2026 $1.15BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +9.8%FY2026 +15.4%FY2026 -2.6%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after -4.7% +11.2% +3.8%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersMDTISRGOMCL
Held by institutions 85.1% 86.2% 100.0%
Institutions holding 2,127 2,240 309
Change in shares held, QoQ -0.2% +4.6% +2.6%
Institutions buying 1,014 1,072 176
Institutions selling 915 879 90
Buyers to sellers 1.11 1.22 1.96

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

MDTISRGOMCL
MDT 1.00 0.47 0.21
ISRG 0.47 1.00 0.35
OMCL 0.21 0.35 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, MDT, ISRG and OMCL?

Intuitive Surgical (ISRG) is the largest by market capitalisation: Medtronic (MDT) $134.19B, Intuitive Surgical (ISRG) $162.39B, Omnicell (OMCL) $1.75B.

Which stock is cheaper, MDT, ISRG and OMCL?

Medtronic (MDT) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Medtronic (MDT) 25.6x, Intuitive Surgical (ISRG) 55.3x, Omnicell (OMCL) 39.1x). On next year's consensus earnings, Omnicell (OMCL) is cheapest (Medtronic (MDT) 18.8x, Intuitive Surgical (ISRG) 40.7x, Omnicell (OMCL) 15.8x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Intuitive Surgical (ISRG) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Medtronic (MDT) +9.8%, Intuitive Surgical (ISRG) +20.5%, Omnicell (OMCL) +5.6%.

Which company is more profitable?

Intuitive Surgical (ISRG) has the highest net margin (Medtronic (MDT) 13.9%, Intuitive Surgical (ISRG) 25.5%, Omnicell (OMCL) 3.6%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Medtronic (MDT) returned the most: Medtronic (MDT) +16.0%, Intuitive Surgical (ISRG) -14.6%, Omnicell (OMCL) +6.4%. Over five years, Intuitive Surgical (ISRG) compounded fastest (Medtronic (MDT) -3.1%/yr, Intuitive Surgical (ISRG) +5.1%/yr, Omnicell (OMCL) -26.5%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Medtronic (MDT) 2.73%. Intuitive Surgical (ISRG) and Omnicell (OMCL) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Medtronic (MDT) has been the steadiest (Medtronic (MDT) 25.6%, Intuitive Surgical (ISRG) 35.9%, Omnicell (OMCL) 49.8%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, MDT, ISRG and OMCL?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Intuitive Surgical (ISRG) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.