MCO vs VRSK vs TW Stock Comparison

Moodys, Verisk Analytics and Tradeweb Markets Prices as of Nov 2, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (CBOE) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
MCO Moodys Corp /De/
$505.87 +14.6% 1M +5.3% 1Y
Market cap
$87.21B
P/E
30.3x
Revenue (TTM)
$8.18B
Div. yield
0.80%
Financial Data and Analytics Financial Services
3 wins
VRSK Verisk Analytics, Inc.
$201.50 +23.0% 1M -7.9% 1Y
Market cap
$26.22B
P/E
29.8x
Revenue (TTM)
$3.14B
Div. yield
0.97%
Financial Data and Analytics Financial Services
3 wins
TW Tradeweb Markets Inc.
$124.02 +21.3% 1M +17.7% 1Y
Market cap
$29.04B
P/E
29.0x
Revenue (TTM)
$2.28B
Div. yield
0.44%
Exchanges Financial Services
6 wins

Head to Head

12 decided of 12

Tradeweb Markets leads on 6 of the 12 questions below (Tradeweb Markets 6, Moodys 3, Verisk Analytics 3). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionMCOVRSKTWLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $87.21B $26.22B $29.04B MCO
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 30.3x 29.8x 29.0x TW
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 28.2x 25.3x 29.5x VRSK
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +9.0% +5.0% +14.4% TW
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 35.3% 28.2% 39.8% TW
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 27.9% 31.9% — VRSK
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 1.3x 2.3x — MCO
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.80% 0.97% 0.44% VRSK
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +5.3% -7.9% +17.7% TW
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +5.5%/yr -1.2%/yr +6.0%/yr TW
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 28.4% 35.8% 31.0% MCO
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 59/100 54/100 74/100 TW

Percentile Scorecard

MCOVRSKTW

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisMCOVRSKTW
Valuation 17 #779 of 939 26 #695 of 939 50 #49 of 96
Growth 72 #231 of 814 44 #453 of 814 64 #25 of 68
Profitability 97 #29 of 828 97 #28 of 828 97 #3 of 70
Financial Health 52 #431 of 898 32 #610 of 898 98 #3 of 99
Shareholder Returns 57 #313 of 725 72 #202 of 725 60 #17 of 41
Overall 59 54 74
  • MCO ranked among 1,003 companies in Financial Services
  • VRSK ranked among 1,003 companies in Financial Services
  • TW ranked among 110 companies in Capital Markets

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodMCOVRSKTWSPY
1 month +14.6%+23.0%+21.3% -2.3%
3 months +4.7%+4.3%+22.8% -0.7%
6 months +12.5%+12.8%+10.2% +4.8%
Year to date -1.0%-9.9%+15.3% +10.3%
1 year +5.3%-7.9%+17.7% +10.3%
3 years +52.6%-12.6%+34.9% +73.0%
3 years, per year +15.1%-4.4%+10.5% +20.1%
5 years +30.9%-6.0%+33.6% +61.9%
5 years, per year +5.5%-1.2%+6.0% +10.1%
10 years +416.4%+145.1%— +258.6%
10 years, per year +17.8%+9.4%— +13.6%

Risk

MeasureMCOVRSKTWSPY
Volatility, 1Y 28.4%35.8%31.0% 12.8%
Downside volatility, 1Y 29.9%36.4%31.2% 12.8%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.46-0.48-0.27 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.19-0.220.57 0.80
Max drawdown, 5Y -41.4%-51.2%-48.8% -25.4%
From 52-week high -6.3%-10.5%-2.0% -3.5%
52-week high $539.61$225.07$126.57 $779.14
52-week low $412.23$156.84$91.50 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleMCOVRSKTW
P/E now vs peer median 30.3xmedian 13.6x 29.8xmedian 13.6x 29.0xmedian 29.1x
P/S now vs peer median 10.7xmedian 3.3x 8.4xmedian 3.3x 12.7xmedian 2.5x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 22.3xmedian 6.0x 17.5xmedian 6.0x 21.5xmedian 13.6x
P/FCF now vs peer median 29.3xmedian 11.0x 21.2xmedian 11.0x 25.1xmedian 16.8x
P/B now vs peer median 25.6xmedian 1.2x -22.1xmedian 1.2x 4.0xmedian 2.2x
PEG now vs peer median 1.15median 0.92 1.19median 0.92 0.81median 0.52

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsMCOVRSKTW
Revenue $8.18B $3.14B $2.28B
Gross profit $6.10B $2.20B –
Operating income $3.64B $1.38B $1.01B
Net income $2.89B $885.50M $1.03B
Free cash flow $2.98B $1.24B $1.15B
EPS (diluted) $16.64 $6.77 $4.27
Cash & equivalents $1.51B $551.40M $2.11B
Total debt $6.91B $4.47B –
Shares (diluted) 173.30M 130.85M 212.80M
Enterprise value $80.28B $20.86B $21.55B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricMCOVRSKTW
P/E 30.3x 29.8x 29.0x
P/FCF 29.3x 21.2x 25.1x
P/Operating cash flow 26.2x 17.4x 24.2x
P/S 10.7x 8.4x 12.7x
P/B 25.6x -22.1x 4.0x
P/Tangible book 50.8x -17.5x 4.6x
EV/EBITDA 22.3x 17.5x 21.5x
EV/EBIT 25.4x 21.9x 26.7x
EV/Revenue 11.3x 9.6x 11.8x
EV/FCF 31.1x 24.4x 23.3x
EV/Operating cash flow 27.8x 20.1x 22.4x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 1.15 1.19 0.81

Growth

14 metrics
MetricMCOVRSKTW
Revenue growth (1Y) 9.0% 5.0% 14.4%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 12.6% 6.9% 21.9%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 10.3% 6.2% –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 14.6% 8.3% –
Operating income growth (1Y) 16.0% 4.8% 25.4%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 23.3% 6.6% 30.3%
Net income growth (1Y) 28.5% -3.3% 44.5%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 24.0% 20.7% 35.5%
EPS growth (1Y) 33.1% 3.7% 45.8%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 26.5% 25.0% 35.8%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 22.5% 21.1% 9.8%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 17.5% 11.4% 19.2%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 24.1% 21.2% 10.2%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 18.8% 14.6% 18.9%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricMCOVRSKTW
Gross margin 74.6% 70.2% –
EBITDA margin 50.6% 55.0% 54.8%
Operating margin 44.6% 43.9% 44.1%
Pretax margin 45.2% 37.0% 57.8%
Net margin 35.3% 28.2% 39.8%
FCF margin 36.4% 39.4% 50.6%
Operating cash flow margin 40.7% 47.9% 52.6%
Return on equity 87.8% – 14.1%
Return on assets 19.6% 19.5% 12.4%
Return on invested capital 27.9% 31.9% –
Return on capital employed 31.8% 40.1% –
Asset turnover 0.6x 0.7x 0.3x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.2x 1.7x 1.2x
Stock comp / revenue 2.8% 1.8% 4.8%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricMCOVRSKTW
Debt / assets 46.6% 99.5% –
Debt / equity 2.0x -3.8x –
Net debt / EBITDA 1.3x 2.3x –
Debt / FCF 2.3x 3.6x –
Liabilities / assets 77.0% 126.4% 13.0%
Equity / assets 23.0% -26.4% 87.0%
Interest coverage – 7.0x 490.2x
Current ratio 1.3x 1.0x –
Quick ratio 1.3x 0.9x –
Cash ratio 0.5x 0.5x –
Altman Z-score 7.87 7.01 –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricMCOVRSKTW
Dividend yield 0.8% 1.0% 0.4%
Net buyback yield 3.4% 7.1% 1.9%
Shareholder yield 4.2% 8.1% 2.3%
Payout ratio (earnings) 24.6% – 11.1%
Payout ratio (FCF) 23.8% – 9.9%
Dividend growth (1Y) 3.0% – 16.7%
Dividend CAGR (3Y) 8.8% – 15.9%

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusMCOVRSKTW
Forward P/E 28.2xFY2026 25.3xFY2026 29.5xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $17.93FY2026 $7.97FY2026 $4.20FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +20.0%FY2026 +11.3%FY2026 +21.0%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after -1.5% +5.1% +17.1%
Revenue, next fiscal year $8.69BFY2026 $3.33BFY2026 $2.30BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +12.6%FY2026 +8.6%FY2026 +12.1%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after -2.0% +6.7% +21.0%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersMCOVRSKTW
Held by institutions 90.8% 97.6% 100.0%
Institutions holding 1,406 955 563
Change in shares held, QoQ -1.6% -0.4% +0.3%
Institutions buying 645 489 302
Institutions selling 523 349 211
Buyers to sellers 1.23 1.40 1.43

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

MCOVRSKTW
MCO 1.00 0.59 0.27
VRSK 0.59 1.00 0.33
TW 0.27 0.33 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, MCO, VRSK and TW?

Moodys (MCO) is the largest by market capitalisation: Moodys (MCO) $87.21B, Verisk Analytics (VRSK) $26.22B, Tradeweb Markets (TW) $29.04B.

Which stock is cheaper, MCO, VRSK and TW?

Tradeweb Markets (TW) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Moodys (MCO) 30.3x, Verisk Analytics (VRSK) 29.8x, Tradeweb Markets (TW) 29.0x). On next year's consensus earnings, Verisk Analytics (VRSK) is cheapest (Moodys (MCO) 28.2x, Verisk Analytics (VRSK) 25.3x, Tradeweb Markets (TW) 29.5x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Tradeweb Markets (TW) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Moodys (MCO) +9.0%, Verisk Analytics (VRSK) +5.0%, Tradeweb Markets (TW) +14.4%.

Which company is more profitable?

Tradeweb Markets (TW) has the highest net margin (Moodys (MCO) 35.3%, Verisk Analytics (VRSK) 28.2%, Tradeweb Markets (TW) 39.8%). On return on invested capital, Verisk Analytics (VRSK) leads (Moodys (MCO) 27.9%, Verisk Analytics (VRSK) 31.9%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Tradeweb Markets (TW) returned the most: Moodys (MCO) +5.3%, Verisk Analytics (VRSK) -7.9%, Tradeweb Markets (TW) +17.7%. Over five years, Tradeweb Markets (TW) compounded fastest (Moodys (MCO) +5.5%/yr, Verisk Analytics (VRSK) -1.2%/yr, Tradeweb Markets (TW) +6.0%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Verisk Analytics (VRSK) has the highest dividend yield: Moodys (MCO) 0.80%, Verisk Analytics (VRSK) 0.97%, Tradeweb Markets (TW) 0.44%.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Moodys (MCO) has been the steadiest (Moodys (MCO) 28.4%, Verisk Analytics (VRSK) 35.8%, Tradeweb Markets (TW) 31.0%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, MCO, VRSK and TW?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Tradeweb Markets (TW) leads on 6. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.