MCO vs SPGI vs TW Stock Comparison

Moodys, S&P Global and Tradeweb Markets Prices as of Oct 23, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (ICE) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
MCO Moodys Corp /De/
$483.45 +2.0% 1M +0.9% 1Y
Market cap
$83.73B
P/E
29.0x
Revenue (TTM)
$8.18B
Div. yield
0.01%
Financial Data and Analytics Financial Services
3 wins
SPGI S&P Global Inc.
$450.20 +10.7% 1M -6.7% 1Y
Market cap
$132.84B
P/E
27.0x
Revenue (TTM)
$16.12B
Div. yield
0.01%
Financial Data and Analytics Financial Services
4 wins
TW Tradeweb Markets Inc.
$122.57 +22.3% 1M +10.7% 1Y
Market cap
$26.23B
P/E
29.2x
Revenue (TTM)
$2.21B
Div. yield
0.00%
Exchanges Financial Services
5 wins

Head to Head

12 decided of 12

Tradeweb Markets leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (Tradeweb Markets 5, S&P Global 4, Moodys 3). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionMCOSPGITWLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $83.73B $132.84B $26.23B SPGI
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 29.0x 27.0x 29.2x SPGI
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 26.8x 23.9x 29.2x SPGI
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +9.0% +9.7% +14.0% TW
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 35.3% 30.5% 40.7% TW
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 27.9% 12.1% — MCO
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 1.3x 1.3x — MCO
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.01% 0.01% 0.00% SPGI
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +0.9% -6.7% +10.7% TW
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +4.8%/yr 0.0%/yr +7.4%/yr TW
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 28.5% 30.9% 30.8% MCO
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 60/100 58/100 77/100 TW

Percentile Scorecard

MCOSPGITW

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisMCOSPGITW
Valuation 18 #771 of 945 24 #722 of 945 52 #47 of 97
Growth 73 #219 of 822 68 #261 of 822 74 #19 of 69
Profitability 97 #26 of 835 89 #95 of 835 97 #3 of 70
Financial Health 53 #424 of 905 67 #298 of 905 98 #3 of 101
Shareholder Returns 58 #304 of 726 43 #411 of 726 64 #15 of 40
Overall 60 58 77
  • MCO ranked among 1,011 companies in Financial Services
  • SPGI ranked among 1,011 companies in Financial Services
  • TW ranked among 112 companies in Capital Markets

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodMCOSPGITWSPY
1 month +2.0%+10.7%+22.3% -1.0%
3 months +2.5%+5.6%+22.8% +2.9%
6 months +6.0%+3.1%+8.2% +6.4%
Year to date -5.4%-13.9%+14.0% +11.4%
1 year +0.9%-6.7%+10.7% +13.1%
3 years +58.2%+29.4%+46.8% +79.4%
3 years, per year +16.5%+9.0%+13.7% +21.5%
5 years +26.7%-0.1%+43.0% +67.7%
5 years, per year +4.8%0.0%+7.4% +10.9%
10 years +372.9%+263.1%— +255.2%
10 years, per year +16.8%+13.8%— +13.5%

Risk

MeasureMCOSPGITWSPY
Volatility, 1Y 28.5%30.9%30.8% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 30.2%35.5%30.9% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.510.34-0.24 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.03-0.220.35 1.03
Max drawdown, 5Y -42.2%-40.2%-48.8% -25.4%
From 52-week high -10.4%-17.6%-3.2% -2.5%
52-week high $539.61$546.35$126.57 $779.14
52-week low $412.23$386.35$91.50 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleMCOSPGITW
P/E now vs peer median 29.0xmedian 13.4x 27.0xmedian 13.4x 29.0xmedian 29.4x
P/S now vs peer median 10.2xmedian 3.2x 8.2xmedian 3.2x 13.0xmedian 2.8x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 21.4xmedian 5.9x 17.2xmedian 5.9x 22.0xmedian 12.8x
P/FCF now vs peer median 28.0xmedian 11.1x 23.8xmedian 11.1x 25.1xmedian 15.9x
P/B now vs peer median 24.4xmedian 1.2x 4.2xmedian 1.2x 3.9xmedian 2.5x
PEG now vs peer median 1.09median 0.89 0.86median 0.89 0.75median 0.51

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsMCOSPGITW
Revenue $8.18B $16.12B $2.21B
Gross profit $6.10B $11.43B –
Operating income $3.64B $7.16B $963.90M
Net income $2.89B $5.32B $1.02B
Free cash flow $2.98B $5.57B $1.14B
EPS (diluted) $16.64 $16.66 $4.22
Cash & equivalents $1.51B $4.13B $2.06B
Total debt $6.91B $15.17B –
Shares (diluted) 173.30M 295.50M 212.80M
Enterprise value $76.65B $123.43B $18.24B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricMCOSPGITW
P/E 29.0x 27.0x 29.0x
P/FCF 28.0x 23.8x 25.1x
P/Operating cash flow 25.0x 23.2x 24.0x
P/S 10.2x 8.2x 13.0x
P/B 24.4x 4.2x 3.9x
P/Tangible book 48.5x 8.3x 4.6x
EV/EBITDA 21.4x 17.2x 22.0x
EV/EBIT 24.3x 20.1x 27.6x
EV/Revenue 10.8x 8.9x 12.1x
EV/FCF 29.8x 25.8x 23.3x
EV/Operating cash flow 26.6x 25.1x 22.3x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 1.09 0.86 0.75

Growth

14 metrics
MetricMCOSPGITW
Revenue growth (1Y) 9.0% 9.7% 14.0%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 12.6% 10.2% 21.8%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 10.3% 11.5% –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 14.6% 12.9% –
Operating income growth (1Y) 16.0% 22.0% 28.2%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 23.3% 25.5% 30.5%
Net income growth (1Y) 28.5% 22.3% 60.5%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 24.0% 26.8% 38.3%
EPS growth (1Y) 33.1% 27.1% 62.4%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 26.5% 31.4% 39.0%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 22.5% 2.6% 14.6%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 17.5% 20.3% 19.9%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 24.1% 3.0% 13.7%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 18.8% 20.5% 19.3%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricMCOSPGITW
Gross margin 74.6% 70.9% –
EBITDA margin 50.6% 51.9% 54.9%
Operating margin 44.6% 44.4% 43.7%
Pretax margin 45.2% 42.6% 58.9%
Net margin 35.3% 30.5% 40.7%
FCF margin 36.4% 34.6% 51.9%
Operating cash flow margin 40.7% 35.5% 54.2%
Return on equity 87.8% 16.9% 13.9%
Return on assets 19.6% 8.6% 12.3%
Return on invested capital 27.9% 12.1% –
Return on capital employed 31.8% 13.6% –
Asset turnover 0.6x 0.3x 0.3x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.2x 1.1x 1.2x
Stock comp / revenue 2.8% 1.5% 5.0%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricMCOSPGITW
Debt / assets 46.6% 24.1% –
Debt / equity 2.0x 0.5x –
Net debt / EBITDA 1.3x 1.3x –
Debt / FCF 2.3x 2.7x –
Liabilities / assets 77.0% 49.7% 11.1%
Equity / assets 23.0% 50.3% 88.9%
Interest coverage – 22.7x 469.3x
Current ratio 1.3x 1.0x –
Quick ratio 1.3x 0.8x –
Cash ratio 0.5x 0.5x –
Altman Z-score 7.67 3.74 –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricMCOSPGITW
Dividend yield 0.8% 0.9% 0.4%
Net buyback yield 3.5% 3.5% 1.2%
Shareholder yield 4.4% 4.4% 1.6%
Payout ratio (earnings) 24.6% 21.7% 10.9%
Payout ratio (FCF) 23.8% 20.7% 9.7%
Dividend growth (1Y) 3.0% 0.4% 18.0%
Dividend CAGR (3Y) 8.8% 0.8% 15.9%

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusMCOSPGITW
Forward P/E 26.8xFY2026 23.9xFY2026 29.2xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $18.07FY2026 $18.87FY2026 $4.20FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +21.0%FY2026 +11.9%FY2026 +21.0%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after -1.2% +12.9% +16.9%
Revenue, next fiscal year $8.74BFY2026 $15.46BFY2026 $2.30BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +13.2%FY2026 +0.8%FY2026 +12.1%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after -1.8% +6.6% +20.1%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersMCOSPGITW
Held by institutions 90.8% 87.5% 49.9%
Institutions holding 1,404 2,001 561
Change in shares held, QoQ -1.6% +1.6% +0.3%
Institutions buying 644 871 300
Institutions selling 522 876 211
Buyers to sellers 1.23 0.99 1.42

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

MCOSPGITW
MCO 1.00 0.88 0.27
SPGI 0.88 1.00 0.30
TW 0.27 0.30 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, MCO, SPGI and TW?

S&P Global (SPGI) is the largest by market capitalisation: Moodys (MCO) $83.73B, S&P Global (SPGI) $132.84B, Tradeweb Markets (TW) $26.23B.

Which stock is cheaper, MCO, SPGI and TW?

S&P Global (SPGI) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Moodys (MCO) 29.0x, S&P Global (SPGI) 27.0x, Tradeweb Markets (TW) 29.2x). On next year's consensus earnings, S&P Global (SPGI) is cheapest (Moodys (MCO) 26.8x, S&P Global (SPGI) 23.9x, Tradeweb Markets (TW) 29.2x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Tradeweb Markets (TW) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Moodys (MCO) +9.0%, S&P Global (SPGI) +9.7%, Tradeweb Markets (TW) +14.0%.

Which company is more profitable?

Tradeweb Markets (TW) has the highest net margin (Moodys (MCO) 35.3%, S&P Global (SPGI) 30.5%, Tradeweb Markets (TW) 40.7%). On return on invested capital, Moodys (MCO) leads (Moodys (MCO) 27.9%, S&P Global (SPGI) 12.1%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Tradeweb Markets (TW) returned the most: Moodys (MCO) +0.9%, S&P Global (SPGI) -6.7%, Tradeweb Markets (TW) +10.7%. Over five years, Tradeweb Markets (TW) compounded fastest (Moodys (MCO) +4.8%/yr, S&P Global (SPGI) 0.0%/yr, Tradeweb Markets (TW) +7.4%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

S&P Global (SPGI) has the highest dividend yield: Moodys (MCO) 0.01%, S&P Global (SPGI) 0.01%, Tradeweb Markets (TW) 0.00%.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Moodys (MCO) has been the steadiest (Moodys (MCO) 28.5%, S&P Global (SPGI) 30.9%, Tradeweb Markets (TW) 30.8%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, MCO, SPGI and TW?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Tradeweb Markets (TW) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.