MCO vs SPGI vs ICE Stock Comparison

Moodys, S&P Global and Intercontinental Exchange Prices as of Oct 29, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (TW) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
MCO Moodys Corp /De/
$488.83 +7.5% 1M +3.6% 1Y
Market cap
$84.27B
P/E
29.3x
Revenue (TTM)
$8.18B
Div. yield
0.82%
Financial Data and Analytics Financial Services
3 wins
SPGI S&P Global Inc.
$460.50 +17.3% 1M -2.7% 1Y
Market cap
$133.50B
P/E
26.9x
Revenue (TTM)
$17.21B
Div. yield
0.84%
Financial Data and Analytics Financial Services
4 wins

Head to Head

12 decided of 12

Intercontinental Exchange leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (Intercontinental Exchange 5, S&P Global 4, Moodys 3). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionMCOSPGIICELeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $84.27B $133.50B $91.46B SPGI
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 29.3x 26.9x 22.1x ICE
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 27.3x 24.4x 18.8x ICE
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +9.0% +18.2% +12.1% SPGI
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 35.3% 29.0% — MCO
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 27.9% 14.9% — MCO
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 1.3x 1.2x — SPGI
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.82% 0.84% 1.25% ICE
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +3.6% -2.7% +8.2% ICE
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +3.9%/yr -0.6%/yr +3.3%/yr MCO
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 28.3% 30.6% 25.8% ICE
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 60/100 62/100 50/100 SPGI

Percentile Scorecard

MCOSPGIICE

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisMCOSPGIICE
Valuation 19 #767 of 941 26 #700 of 941 53 #46 of 96
Growth 71 #178 of 615 76 #148 of 615 45 #36 of 65
Profitability 96 #24 of 586 93 #45 of 586 58 #28 of 65
Financial Health 55 #303 of 667 65 #233 of 667 53 #44 of 93
Shareholder Returns 61 #278 of 704 52 #336 of 704 41 #24 of 40
Overall 60 62 50
  • MCO ranked among 1,003 companies in Financial Services
  • SPGI ranked among 1,003 companies in Financial Services
  • ICE ranked among 110 companies in Capital Markets

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodMCOSPGIICESPY
1 month +7.5%+17.3%+7.1% +0.7%
3 months +1.3%+11.0%+4.3% +3.7%
6 months +5.8%+6.8%+3.1% +7.1%
Year to date -4.3%-11.9%+0.7% +12.8%
1 year +3.6%-2.7%+8.2% +11.9%
3 years +59.6%+33.5%+53.8% +85.2%
3 years, per year +16.9%+10.1%+15.4% +22.8%
5 years +21.0%-2.9%+17.7% +67.6%
5 years, per year +3.9%-0.6%+3.3% +10.9%
10 years +383.2%+276.6%+204.3% +262.0%
10 years, per year +17.1%+14.2%+11.8% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureMCOSPGIICESPY
Volatility, 1Y 28.3%30.6%25.8% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 29.9%35.1%26.9% 12.6%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.480.320.15 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.13-0.090.32 0.94
Max drawdown, 5Y -41.4%-40.2%-35.1% -25.4%
From 52-week high -9.4%-15.7%-6.9% -1.2%
52-week high $539.61$546.35$175.10 $779.14
52-week low $412.23$386.35$122.91 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleMCOSPGIICE
P/E now vs peer median 29.3xmedian 13.0x 26.9xmedian 13.0x 22.1xmedian 29.6x
P/S now vs peer median 10.3xmedian 3.2x 7.8xmedian 3.2x 6.5xmedian 3.1x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 21.6xmedian 7.7x 15.8xmedian 7.7x —median 13.0x
P/FCF now vs peer median 28.3xmedian 10.7x 22.9xmedian 10.7x 16.8xmedian 16.5x
P/B now vs peer median 24.7xmedian 1.2x 6.7xmedian 1.2x 3.1xmedian 2.3x
PEG now vs peer median 1.11median 0.90 0.90median 0.90 1.12median 0.48

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsMCOSPGIICE
Revenue $8.18B $17.21B $14.05B
Gross profit $6.10B $12.21B –
Operating income $3.64B $7.77B $5.70B
Net income $2.89B $5.40B –
Free cash flow $2.98B $5.84B –
EPS (diluted) $16.64 $17.10 $7.35
Cash & equivalents $1.51B $2.44B $936.00M
Total debt $6.91B $13.06B –
Shares (diluted) 173.30M 291.60M 566.00M
Enterprise value $77.34B $128.70B $91.51B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricMCOSPGIICE
P/E 29.3x 26.9x 22.1x
P/FCF 28.3x 22.9x 16.8x
P/Operating cash flow 25.3x 22.3x 15.9x
P/S 10.3x 7.8x 6.5x
P/B 24.7x 6.7x 3.1x
P/Tangible book 49.1x 16.9x 6.0x
EV/EBITDA 21.6x 15.8x –
EV/EBIT 24.6x 18.5x –
EV/Revenue 11.0x 8.4x 6.5x
EV/FCF 30.1x 24.7x –
EV/Operating cash flow 26.9x 24.0x 15.9x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 1.11 0.90 1.12

Growth

14 metrics
MetricMCOSPGIICE
Revenue growth (1Y) 9.0% 18.2% 12.1%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 12.6% 11.9% 13.5%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 10.3% 19.7% –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 14.6% 14.4% –
Operating income growth (1Y) 16.0% 29.7% 19.6%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 23.3% 26.4% 16.2%
Net income growth (1Y) 28.5% 18.3% –
Net income CAGR (3Y) 24.0% 25.3% –
EPS growth (1Y) 33.1% 23.4% 33.5%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 26.5% 29.9% 19.7%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 22.5% 18.5% 17.7%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 17.5% 19.8% 16.3%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 24.1% 19.4% –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 18.8% 20.2% –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricMCOSPGIICE
Gross margin 74.6% 70.9% –
EBITDA margin 50.6% 53.1% –
Operating margin 44.6% 45.1% –
Pretax margin 45.2% 43.4% –
Net margin 35.3% 29.0% –
FCF margin 36.4% 33.9% –
Operating cash flow margin 40.7% 34.8% 41.0%
Return on equity 87.8% 21.0% 14.2%
Return on assets 19.6% 9.7% 2.4%
Return on invested capital 27.9% 14.9% –
Return on capital employed 31.8% 16.6% –
Asset turnover 0.6x 0.3x 0.1x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.2x 1.1x –
Stock comp / revenue 2.8% 1.2% –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricMCOSPGIICE
Debt / assets 46.6% 27.2% –
Debt / equity 2.0x 0.7x –
Net debt / EBITDA 1.3x 1.2x –
Debt / FCF 2.3x 2.2x –
Liabilities / assets 77.0% 58.7% 83.1%
Equity / assets 23.0% 41.3% 16.9%
Interest coverage – 24.0x –
Current ratio 1.3x 0.7x 1.0x
Quick ratio 1.3x 0.6x –
Cash ratio 0.5x 0.3x –
Altman Z-score 7.72 4.16 –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricMCOSPGIICE
Dividend yield 0.8% 0.8% 1.3%
Net buyback yield 3.5% 4.9% –
Shareholder yield 4.3% 5.8% 1.3%
Payout ratio (earnings) 24.6% 21.2% –
Payout ratio (FCF) 23.8% 19.6% –
Dividend growth (1Y) 3.0% -1.2% –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) 8.8% 0.2% –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusMCOSPGIICE
Forward P/E 27.3xFY2026 24.4xFY2026 18.8xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $17.93FY2026 $18.86FY2026 $8.69FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +20.0%FY2026 +11.9%FY2026 +25.0%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after -1.5% +12.9% -3.2%
Revenue, next fiscal year $8.69BFY2026 $15.46BFY2026 $10.54BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +12.6%FY2026 +0.8%FY2026 +6.1%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after -2.0% +6.6% +16.0%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersMCOSPGIICE
Held by institutions 90.8% 87.5% 92.5%
Institutions holding 1,405 2,003 1,654
Change in shares held, QoQ -1.6% +1.6% +1.4%
Institutions buying 645 873 736
Institutions selling 522 876 694
Buyers to sellers 1.24 1.00 1.06

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

MCOSPGIICE
MCO 1.00 0.88 0.56
SPGI 0.88 1.00 0.58
ICE 0.56 0.58 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, MCO, SPGI and ICE?

S&P Global (SPGI) is the largest by market capitalisation: Moodys (MCO) $84.27B, S&P Global (SPGI) $133.50B, Intercontinental Exchange (ICE) $91.46B.

Which stock is cheaper, MCO, SPGI and ICE?

Intercontinental Exchange (ICE) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Moodys (MCO) 29.3x, S&P Global (SPGI) 26.9x, Intercontinental Exchange (ICE) 22.1x). On next year's consensus earnings, Intercontinental Exchange (ICE) is cheapest (Moodys (MCO) 27.3x, S&P Global (SPGI) 24.4x, Intercontinental Exchange (ICE) 18.8x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

S&P Global (SPGI) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Moodys (MCO) +9.0%, S&P Global (SPGI) +18.2%, Intercontinental Exchange (ICE) +12.1%.

Which company is more profitable?

Moodys (MCO) has the highest net margin (Moodys (MCO) 35.3%, S&P Global (SPGI) 29.0%). On return on invested capital, Moodys (MCO) leads (Moodys (MCO) 27.9%, S&P Global (SPGI) 14.9%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Intercontinental Exchange (ICE) returned the most: Moodys (MCO) +3.6%, S&P Global (SPGI) -2.7%, Intercontinental Exchange (ICE) +8.2%. Over five years, Moodys (MCO) compounded fastest (Moodys (MCO) +3.9%/yr, S&P Global (SPGI) -0.6%/yr, Intercontinental Exchange (ICE) +3.3%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Intercontinental Exchange (ICE) has the highest dividend yield: Moodys (MCO) 0.82%, S&P Global (SPGI) 0.84%, Intercontinental Exchange (ICE) 1.25%.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Intercontinental Exchange (ICE) has been the steadiest (Moodys (MCO) 28.3%, S&P Global (SPGI) 30.6%, Intercontinental Exchange (ICE) 25.8%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, MCO, SPGI and ICE?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Intercontinental Exchange (ICE) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.