MBUU vs WGO vs PII Stock Comparison

Malibu Boats, Winnebago Industries and Polaris Prices as of Nov 5, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (HOG) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
MBUU Malibu Boats, Inc.
$20.64 -9.3% 1M -25.8% 1Y
Market cap
$407.61M
P/E
48.8x
Revenue (TTM)
$972.80M
Div. yield
0.00%
Recreational Vehicles Consumer Discretionary
2 wins
WGO Winnebago Industries Inc
$33.12 +32.8% 1M -11.4% 1Y
Market cap
$891.40M
P/E
25.8x
Revenue (TTM)
$2.70B
Div. yield
0.04%
Recreational Vehicles Consumer Discretionary
7 wins
PII Polaris Inc.
$64.32 +21.8% 1M -2.0% 1Y
Market cap
$3.66B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
0.04%
Recreational Vehicles Consumer Discretionary
3 wins

Head to Head

12 decided of 12

Winnebago Industries leads on 7 of the 12 questions below (Winnebago Industries 7, Polaris 3, Malibu Boats 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionMBUUWGOPIILeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $407.61M $891.40M $3.66B PII
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 48.8x 25.8x -17.8x WGO
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 8.0x 15.8x 17.9x MBUU
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +17.1% -3.4% — MBUU
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 0.9% 1.3% — WGO
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 1.9% 3.1% — WGO
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 2.1x 2.0x — WGO
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.04% 0.04% WGO
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -25.8% -11.4% -2.0% PII
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -23.2%/yr -14.5%/yr -12.3%/yr PII
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 50.6% 46.2% 48.0% WGO
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 46/100 66/100 30/100 WGO

Percentile Scorecard

MBUUWGOPII

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisMBUUWGOPII
Valuation 56 #22 of 49 92 #5 of 49 35 #32 of 49
Growth 6 #46 of 49 27 #36 of 49 10 #44 of 49
Profitability 59 #20 of 47 61 #19 of 47 –
Financial Health 60 #22 of 53 85 #9 of 53 17 #44 of 53
Shareholder Returns 52 #15 of 30 66 #11 of 30 55 #14 of 30
Overall 46 66 30
  • MBUU ranked among 55 companies in Automobiles and Components
  • WGO ranked among 55 companies in Automobiles and Components
  • PII ranked among 55 companies in Automobiles and Components

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodMBUUWGOPIISPY
1 month -9.3%+32.8%+21.8% -5.9%
3 months -27.9%+5.8%-8.2% -4.6%
6 months -18.7%+3.9%-4.1% +0.2%
Year to date -26.8%-18.3%+1.7% +7.5%
1 year -25.8%-11.4%-2.0% +8.2%
3 years -54.0%-46.7%-29.3% +68.3%
3 years, per year -22.8%-18.9%-10.9% +19.0%
5 years -73.2%-54.4%-48.0% +56.5%
5 years, per year -23.2%-14.5%-12.3% +9.4%
10 years +32.1%+23.1%-16.2% +251.5%
10 years, per year +2.8%+2.1%-1.7% +13.4%

Risk

MeasureMBUUWGOPIISPY
Volatility, 1Y 50.6%46.2%48.0% 13.6%
Downside volatility, 1Y 52.5%42.0%49.0% 14.2%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.620.751.27 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.51-0.25-0.04 0.60
Max drawdown, 5Y -72.6%-70.7%-76.7% -25.4%
From 52-week high -40.4%-33.6%-14.2% -5.9%
52-week high $34.61$49.85$74.93 $779.14
52-week low $20.64$22.68$47.88 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleMBUUWGOPII
P/E now vs peer median 48.8xmedian 20.2x 27.1xmedian 20.2x -18.0xmedian 20.2x
P/S now vs peer median 0.4xmedian 0.5x 0.3xmedian 0.5x —median 0.5x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 8.4xmedian 8.3x 9.4xmedian 8.3x —median 8.3x
P/FCF now vs peer median 354.1xmedian 9.9x 6.5xmedian 9.9x 13.8xmedian 9.9x
P/B now vs peer median 0.8xmedian 0.9x 0.8xmedian 0.9x 4.3xmedian 0.9x
PEG now vs peer median -0.90median 0.73 -0.65median 0.73 0.55median 0.73

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsMBUUWGOPII
Revenue $972.80M $2.70B –
Gross profit $156.43M $350.20M –
Operating income $17.09M $66.20M –
Net income $8.52M $34.50M -$205.80M
Free cash flow $1.15M $144.60M $265.50M
EPS (diluted) $0.42 $1.21 $-3.51
Cash & equivalents $40.34M $181.40M $301.70M
Total debt $172.87M $443.30M $1.63B
Shares (diluted) 19.94M 28.40M 58.50M
Enterprise value $214.47M $423.80M $2.64B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricMBUUWGOPII
P/E 48.8x 27.1x -18.0x
P/FCF 354.1x 6.5x 13.8x
P/Operating cash flow 13.6x 5.6x 7.8x
P/S 0.4x 0.3x –
P/B 0.8x 0.8x 4.3x
P/Tangible book 1.7x 1.2x 4.3x
EV/EBITDA 8.4x 9.4x –
EV/EBIT 31.6x 18.2x –
EV/Revenue 0.6x 0.4x –
EV/FCF 469.2x 8.3x 18.8x
EV/Operating cash flow 18.1x 7.1x 10.6x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) -0.90 -0.65 0.55

Growth

14 metrics
MetricMBUUWGOPII
Revenue growth (1Y) 17.1% -3.4% –
Revenue CAGR (3Y) -10.2% -8.2% –
Gross profit growth (1Y) 8.8% -4.1% –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) -22.3% -15.8% –
Operating income growth (1Y) -35.6% 15.7% –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -48.5% -39.6% –
Net income growth (1Y) -56.7% 34.2% -36.2%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -54.8% -45.7% -32.9%
EPS growth (1Y) -57.9% 33.8% -32.2%
EPS CAGR (3Y) -54.1% -41.6% -32.8%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -58.2% 30.9% -38.8%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -34.1% -16.9% -15.2%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -97.6% 61.6% -54.3%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -62.9% -11.9% -8.5%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricMBUUWGOPII
Gross margin 16.1% 13.0% –
EBITDA margin 6.6% 4.8% –
Operating margin 1.8% 2.4% –
Pretax margin 1.1% 1.6% –
Net margin 0.9% 1.3% –
FCF margin 0.1% 5.3% –
Operating cash flow margin 3.1% 6.2% –
Return on equity 1.6% 2.8% -24.3%
Return on assets 0.9% 1.7% -4.0%
Return on invested capital 1.9% 3.1% –
Return on capital employed 2.2% 3.9% –
Asset turnover 1.0x 1.3x –
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 3.5x 4.9x -2.3x
Stock comp / revenue 0.6% 0.6% –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricMBUUWGOPII
Debt / assets 17.2% 21.1% 32.2%
Debt / equity 0.3x 0.4x 1.9x
Net debt / EBITDA 2.1x 2.0x –
Debt / FCF 150.2x 3.1x 6.1x
Liabilities / assets 46.6% 41.2% 83.2%
Equity / assets 53.4% 58.8% 16.8%
Interest coverage 3.3x 3.2x –
Current ratio 1.5x 2.2x 1.1x
Quick ratio 0.4x 0.9x 0.3x
Cash ratio 0.2x 0.5x 0.1x
Altman Z-score 2.37 3.42 –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricMBUUWGOPII
Dividend yield – 4.3% 4.2%
Net buyback yield – 0.2% 0.1%
Shareholder yield – 4.4% 4.3%
Payout ratio (earnings) 0.7% 115.7% -74.6%
Payout ratio (FCF) 5.2% 27.6% 57.9%
Dividend growth (1Y) -47.4% 2.6% 2.4%
Dividend CAGR (3Y) -73.2% 6.3% 1.5%

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusMBUUWGOPII
Forward P/E 8.0xFY2027 15.8xFY2027 17.9xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $2.58FY2027 $2.09FY2027 $3.59FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +69.7%FY2027 +16.8%FY2027 –
EPS growth, the year after +18.2% +13.9% -8.4%
Revenue, next fiscal year $1.17BFY2027 $2.80BFY2027 $7.73BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +28.4%FY2027 +3.7%FY2027 +8.1%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +6.6% +5.1% +4.3%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersMBUUWGOPII
Held by institutions 91.4% 100.0% 89.0%
Institutions holding 142 246 478
Change in shares held, QoQ -32.7% +2.6% -6.9%
Institutions buying 90 125 257
Institutions selling 35 85 144
Buyers to sellers 2.57 1.47 1.78

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

MBUUWGOPII
MBUU 1.00 0.53 0.59
WGO 0.53 1.00 0.54
PII 0.59 0.54 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, MBUU, WGO and PII?

Polaris (PII) is the largest by market capitalisation: Malibu Boats (MBUU) $407.61M, Winnebago Industries (WGO) $891.40M, Polaris (PII) $3.66B.

Which stock is cheaper, MBUU, WGO and PII?

Winnebago Industries (WGO) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Malibu Boats (MBUU) 48.8x, Winnebago Industries (WGO) 25.8x, Polaris (PII) -17.8x). On next year's consensus earnings, Malibu Boats (MBUU) is cheapest (Malibu Boats (MBUU) 8.0x, Winnebago Industries (WGO) 15.8x, Polaris (PII) 17.9x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Malibu Boats (MBUU) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Malibu Boats (MBUU) +17.1%, Winnebago Industries (WGO) -3.4%.

Which company is more profitable?

Winnebago Industries (WGO) has the highest net margin (Malibu Boats (MBUU) 0.9%, Winnebago Industries (WGO) 1.3%). On return on invested capital, Winnebago Industries (WGO) leads (Malibu Boats (MBUU) 1.9%, Winnebago Industries (WGO) 3.1%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Polaris (PII) returned the most: Malibu Boats (MBUU) -25.8%, Winnebago Industries (WGO) -11.4%, Polaris (PII) -2.0%. Over five years, Polaris (PII) compounded fastest (Malibu Boats (MBUU) -23.2%/yr, Winnebago Industries (WGO) -14.5%/yr, Polaris (PII) -12.3%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Winnebago Industries (WGO) has the highest dividend yield: Malibu Boats (MBUU) 0.00%, Winnebago Industries (WGO) 0.04%, Polaris (PII) 0.04%.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Winnebago Industries (WGO) has been the steadiest (Malibu Boats (MBUU) 50.6%, Winnebago Industries (WGO) 46.2%, Polaris (PII) 48.0%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, MBUU, WGO and PII?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Winnebago Industries (WGO) leads on 7. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.