MAGH vs PWR vs APG Stock Comparison

Magnitude International, Quanta Services and APi Prices as of Oct 28, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (FIX) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
PWR Quanta Services, Inc.
$635.18 -2.6% 1M +41.6% 1Y
Market cap
$92.93B
P/E
55.2x
Revenue (TTM)
$37.29B
Div. yield
–
Utility Construction Industrials
4 wins
APG APi Group Corp
$45.00 +16.1% 1M +30.6% 1Y
Market cap
$19.01B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$8.91B
Div. yield
–
Facility Services Industrials
2 wins

Head to Head

7 decided of 12

Quanta Services leads on 4 of the 12 questions below (Quanta Services 4, APi 2, Magnitude International 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionMAGHPWRAPGLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $236.60M $92.93B $19.01B PWR
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -127.4x 55.2x -82.6x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — 40.0x 26.6x APG
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months — +37.1% +16.4% PWR
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months — — -2.6% –
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — — 6.8% –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — — 3.2x –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield — 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +304.8% +41.6% +30.6% MAGH
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years — +39.3%/yr +25.4%/yr PWR
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 62.0% 45.2% 31.2% APG
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers — 46/100 44/100 PWR

Percentile Scorecard

MAGHPWRAPG

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisMAGHPWRAPG
Valuation 8 #48 of 52 20 #42 of 52 24 #86 of 113
Growth – 78 #9 of 37 78 #22 of 96
Profitability – 72 #11 of 37 54 #42 of 91
Financial Health 61 #23 of 57 41 #34 of 57 40 #74 of 122
Shareholder Returns – 19 #22 of 27 26 #49 of 66
Overall – 46 44
  • MAGH ranked among 57 companies in Construction Services
  • PWR ranked among 57 companies in Construction Services
  • APG ranked among 130 companies in Business Services

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodMAGHPWRAPGSPY
1 month 0.0%-2.6%+16.1% +0.7%
3 months 0.0%-3.5%+14.7% +3.7%
6 months 0.0%-12.7%-1.6% +7.1%
Year to date 0.0%+50.5%+17.6% +12.8%
1 year +304.8%+41.6%+30.6% +11.9%
3 years —+285.5%+162.4% +85.2%
3 years, per year —+56.8%+38.0% +22.8%
5 years —+423.7%+209.9% +67.6%
5 years, per year —+39.3%+25.4% +10.9%
10 years —+2,124.0%— +262.0%
10 years, per year —+36.4%— +13.7%

Risk

MeasureMAGHPWRAPGSPY
Volatility, 1Y 62.0%45.2%31.2% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 61.9%42.8%31.1% 12.6%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y -0.531.721.26 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 4.920.920.98 0.94
Max drawdown, 5Y -74.9%-33.9%-49.6% -25.4%
From 52-week high 0.0%-19.1%-8.9% -1.2%
52-week high $6.76$785.24$49.40 $779.14
52-week low $1.37$413.17$34.46 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleMAGHPWRAPG
P/E now vs peer median -127.4xmedian 28.1x 56.7xmedian 28.1x -84.3xmedian 21.9x
P/S now vs peer median 15.8xmedian 0.8x 2.6xmedian 0.8x 2.1xmedian 0.9x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 12.7x —median 12.7x 22.2xmedian 11.9x
P/FCF now vs peer median -155.2xmedian 25.0x 42.8xmedian 25.0x 28.4xmedian 14.4x
P/B now vs peer median 61.0xmedian 2.5x 9.0xmedian 2.5x 5.5xmedian 2.4x
PEG now vs peer median —median 0.60 1.71median 0.60 1.42median 0.97

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsMAGHPWRAPG
Revenue – $37.29B $8.91B
Gross profit – $5.88B $2.77B
Operating income – $2.55B $644.00M
Net income – – $367.00M
Free cash flow – – $673.00M
EPS (diluted) – $11.04 $-0.53
Cash & equivalents $890.32K $2.32B $373.00M
Total debt $1.59M – $3.57B
Shares (diluted) 34.53M 152.44M 432.00M
Enterprise value $231.66M $92.93B $16.23B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricMAGHPWRAPG
P/E -127.4x 56.7x -84.3x
P/FCF -155.2x 42.8x 28.4x
P/Operating cash flow – – 24.7x
P/S 15.8x 2.6x 2.1x
P/B 61.0x 9.0x 5.5x
P/Tangible book 61.0x 12.8x 12.3x
EV/EBITDA – – 22.2x
EV/EBIT – – 34.7x
EV/Revenue – 2.6x 2.5x
EV/FCF – – 33.2x
EV/Operating cash flow – – 28.8x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) – 1.71 1.42

Growth

14 metrics
MetricMAGHPWRAPG
Revenue growth (1Y) – 37.1% 16.4%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – 24.1% 9.0%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – 42.6% 16.2%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – 27.9% 13.5%
Operating income growth (1Y) – 61.2% 27.3%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – 33.7% 24.6%
Net income growth (1Y) – – 34.9%
Net income CAGR (3Y) – – 34.7%
EPS growth (1Y) – 64.2% -246.6%
EPS CAGR (3Y) – 33.1% -59.2%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) – – 17.4%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – – 24.2%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) – – 17.7%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – – 27.9%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricMAGHPWRAPG
Gross margin – – 31.1%
EBITDA margin – – 11.3%
Operating margin – – 7.2%
Pretax margin – – 5.5%
Net margin – – -2.6%
FCF margin – – 7.6%
Operating cash flow margin – – 8.7%
Return on equity – 16.8% 10.5%
Return on assets – 5.6% 3.6%
Return on invested capital – – 6.8%
Return on capital employed – – 8.9%
Asset turnover – 1.2x 0.9x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) – – 2.1x
Stock comp / revenue – – 0.6%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricMAGHPWRAPG
Debt / assets 15.4% – 34.8%
Debt / equity 0.4x – 1.0x
Net debt / EBITDA – – 3.2x
Debt / FCF – – 5.3x
Liabilities / assets 62.5% 67.6% 66.1%
Equity / assets 37.5% 32.4% 33.9%
Interest coverage – – 4.4x
Current ratio 1.8x 1.2x 1.2x
Quick ratio 0.8x – 1.0x
Cash ratio 0.2x – 0.1x
Altman Z-score – – 2.93

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricMAGHPWRAPG
Dividend yield – 0.1% –
Net buyback yield – – 1.3%
Shareholder yield – 0.1% 1.3%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusMAGHPWRAPG
Forward P/E – 40.0xFY2026 26.6xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year – $15.88FY2026 $1.69FY2026
EPS growth, next FY – +47.7%FY2026 +14.2%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after – +27.0% +16.0%
Revenue, next fiscal year – $40.73BFY2026 $9.25BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY – +43.0%FY2026 +16.9%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after – +9.6% +8.4%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersMAGHPWRAPG
Held by institutions – 88.9% 84.5%
Institutions holding – 1,921 582
Change in shares held, QoQ – +13.5% +5.1%
Institutions buying – 972 307
Institutions selling – 705 205
Buyers to sellers – 1.38 1.50

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

MAGHPWRAPG
MAGH 1.00 -0.05 -0.02
PWR -0.05 1.00 0.49
APG -0.02 0.49 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, MAGH, PWR and APG?

Quanta Services (PWR) is the largest by market capitalisation: Magnitude International (MAGH) $236.60M, Quanta Services (PWR) $92.93B, APi (APG) $19.01B.

Which company is growing faster?

Quanta Services (PWR) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Quanta Services (PWR) +37.1%, APi (APG) +16.4%.

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Magnitude International (MAGH) returned the most: Magnitude International (MAGH) +304.8%, Quanta Services (PWR) +41.6%, APi (APG) +30.6%. Over five years, Quanta Services (PWR) compounded fastest (Quanta Services (PWR) +39.3%/yr, APi (APG) +25.4%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, APi (APG) has been the steadiest (Magnitude International (MAGH) 62.0%, Quanta Services (PWR) 45.2%, APi (APG) 31.2%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, MAGH, PWR and APG?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Quanta Services (PWR) leads on 4. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.