LUMN vs TV vs GLIBA Stock Comparison

Lumen Technologies, Grupo Televisa, S.A.B and Liberty Capital Prices as of Nov 5, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (UNIT) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
LUMN Lumen Technologies, Inc.
$3.98 -32.7% 1M -63.4% 1Y
Market cap
$4.10B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$11.46B
Div. yield
–
Broadband and Cable Communication Services
1 win
TV Grupo Televisa, S.A.B.
$2.33 +2.2% 1M -17.4% 1Y
Market cap
$144.98B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$3.26B
Div. yield
–
Broadband and Cable Communication Services
5 wins
GLIBA Liberty Capital Corp/NV
$24.71 +4.5% 1M -29.6% 1Y
Market cap
$885.93M
P/E
12.8x
Revenue (TTM)
$1.05B
Div. yield
11.65%
Broadband and Cable Communication Services
4 wins

Head to Head

10 decided of 12

Grupo Televisa, S.A.B leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (Grupo Televisa, S.A.B 5, Liberty Capital 4, Lumen Technologies 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionLUMNTVGLIBALeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $4.10B $144.98B $885.93M TV
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -6.0x -475.3x 12.8x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — 12.9x 10.3x GLIBA
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months -9.7% +7.4% -0.1% TV
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months -5.8% -9.4% 7.4% GLIBA
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 0.9% 4.4% 3.1% TV
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 4.3x 14.6x 1.9x GLIBA
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 11.65% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -63.4% -17.4% -29.6% TV
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -22.4%/yr -26.1%/yr — LUMN
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 72.6% 38.8% 46.1% TV
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 35/100 43/100 73/100 GLIBA

Percentile Scorecard

LUMNTVGLIBA

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisLUMNTVGLIBA
Valuation 63 #19 of 49 4 #47 of 49 85 #8 of 49
Growth 30 #33 of 47 67 #16 of 47 63 #18 of 47
Profitability 31 #32 of 46 36 #30 of 46 51 #23 of 46
Financial Health 15 #42 of 49 65 #18 of 49 69 #16 of 49
Shareholder Returns – – 94 #3 of 36
Overall 35 43 73
  • LUMN ranked among 51 companies in Telecommunications
  • TV ranked among 51 companies in Telecommunications
  • GLIBA ranked among 51 companies in Telecommunications

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodLUMNTVGLIBASPY
1 month -32.7%+2.2%+4.5% -5.9%
3 months -32.4%-18.0%+1.2% -4.6%
6 months -53.0%-17.7%-9.0% +0.2%
Year to date -48.8%-19.9%-33.0% +7.5%
1 year -63.4%-17.4%-29.6% +8.2%
3 years +201.5%-9.3%— +68.3%
3 years, per year +44.5%-3.2%— +19.0%
5 years -71.8%-77.9%— +56.5%
5 years, per year -22.4%-26.1%— +9.4%
10 years -82.7%-90.4%— +251.5%
10 years, per year -16.1%-20.9%— +13.4%

Risk

MeasureLUMNTVGLIBASPY
Volatility, 1Y 72.6%38.8%46.1% 13.6%
Downside volatility, 1Y 76.3%40.2%51.2% 14.2%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 2.320.62-0.17 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.87-0.45-0.64 0.60
Max drawdown, 5Y -93.1%-86.3%-51.3% -25.4%
From 52-week high -63.8%-32.3%-38.6% -5.9%
52-week high $10.99$3.44$40.23 $779.14
52-week low $3.98$2.03$19.61 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleLUMNTVGLIBA
P/E now vs peer median -6.0xmedian 11.9x -475.3xmedian 11.9x 12.8xmedian 11.9x
P/S now vs peer median 0.4xmedian 1.1x 44.5xmedian 1.1x 0.8xmedian 1.1x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 5.8xmedian 6.6x 483.4xmedian 6.6x 4.2xmedian 6.6x
P/FCF now vs peer median -4.2xmedian 4.7x —median 4.7x 29.5xmedian 4.7x
P/B now vs peer median -2.4xmedian 1.5x 23.4xmedian 1.5x 0.5xmedian 1.5x
PEG now vs peer median -0.10median 0.27 -20.23median 0.27 —median 0.27

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsLUMNTVGLIBA
Revenue $11.46B $3.26B $1.05B
Gross profit $5.55B $2.11B –
Operating income $147.00M $477.63M $127.00M
Net income -$668.00M $85.50M $77.00M
Free cash flow -$987.00M – $30.00M
EPS (diluted) $-0.66 $0.00 $1.93
Cash & equivalents $978.00M – $387.00M
Total debt $13.19B $4.53B $1.10B
Shares (diluted) 1.00B 68.12B 40.00M
Enterprise value -$1.38B $145.52B -$826.07M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricLUMNTVGLIBA
P/E -6.0x -475.3x 12.8x
P/FCF -4.2x – 29.5x
P/Operating cash flow 1.2x – 2.8x
P/S 0.4x 44.5x 0.8x
P/B -2.4x 23.4x 0.5x
P/Tangible book -0.7x 23.4x 0.6x
EV/EBITDA 5.8x 483.4x 4.2x
EV/EBIT 111.0x 313.0x 12.6x
EV/Revenue 1.4x 45.9x 1.5x
EV/FCF -16.5x – 53.4x
EV/Operating cash flow 4.8x – 5.2x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) -0.10 -20.23 –

Growth

14 metrics
MetricLUMNTVGLIBA
Revenue growth (1Y) -9.7% 7.4% -0.1%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) -8.3% -12.4% –
Gross profit growth (1Y) -7.1% -22.0% –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) -10.0% -4.8% –
Operating income growth (1Y) 132.1% 803.2% 136.6%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 26.3% 55.3% –
Net income growth (1Y) 59.6% 117.0% 124.9%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 61.1% 28.5% –
EPS growth (1Y) 59.9% 40.1% 118.1%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 61.4% 23.5% –
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -30.6% – -12.9%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 15.0% – –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -180.5% – -74.8%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -3.3% – –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricLUMNTVGLIBA
Gross margin 48.4% 64.9% –
EBITDA margin 24.6% 9.5% 36.5%
Operating margin 1.3% 14.7% 12.1%
Pretax margin -8.0% 8.1% 10.2%
Net margin -5.8% -9.4% 7.4%
FCF margin -8.6% – 2.9%
Operating cash flow margin 29.4% – 29.7%
Return on equity – 1.4% 4.4%
Return on assets -2.2% 0.6% 2.2%
Return on invested capital 0.9% 4.4% 3.1%
Return on capital employed 0.6% 5.3% 3.9%
Asset turnover 0.4x 0.2x 0.3x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) -5.1x – 4.0x
Stock comp / revenue 0.5% – 2.4%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricLUMNTVGLIBA
Debt / assets 42.9% 34.5% 31.9%
Debt / equity -7.7x 0.7x 0.6x
Net debt / EBITDA 4.3x 14.6x 1.9x
Debt / FCF -13.4x – 36.8x
Liabilities / assets 105.6% 52.8% 49.0%
Equity / assets -5.6% 47.2% 51.0%
Interest coverage 0.2x 32.4x 2.8x
Current ratio 0.7x – 2.9x
Quick ratio 0.5x – 3.3x
Cash ratio 0.2x – 1.8x
Altman Z-score -0.52 – 0.63

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricLUMNTVGLIBA
Dividend yield – – 11.6%
Net buyback yield – – –
Shareholder yield 0.0% 0.0% 11.6%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusLUMNTVGLIBA
Forward P/E – 12.9xFY2026 10.3xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $-0.87FY2026 $0.18FY2026 $2.41FY2026
EPS growth, the year after – -22.2% +38.6%
Revenue, next fiscal year $10.70BFY2026 $3.07BFY2026 $1.10BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY -13.7%FY2026 -9.0%FY2026 +4.4%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after -5.9% -4.0% +5.4%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersLUMNTVGLIBA
Held by institutions 70.7% 0.2% 7.4%
Institutions holding 624 106 126
Change in shares held, QoQ +2.6% -4.9% +13.5%
Institutions buying 290 44 76
Institutions selling 180 33 32
Buyers to sellers 1.61 1.33 2.38

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

LUMNTVGLIBA
LUMN 1.00 0.09 0.06
TV 0.09 1.00 0.06
GLIBA 0.06 0.06 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, LUMN, TV and GLIBA?

Grupo Televisa, S.A.B (TV) is the largest by market capitalisation: Lumen Technologies (LUMN) $4.10B, Grupo Televisa, S.A.B (TV) $144.98B, Liberty Capital (GLIBA) $885.93M.

Which company is growing faster?

Grupo Televisa, S.A.B (TV) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Lumen Technologies (LUMN) -9.7%, Grupo Televisa, S.A.B (TV) +7.4%, Liberty Capital (GLIBA) -0.1%.

Which company is more profitable?

Liberty Capital (GLIBA) has the highest net margin (Lumen Technologies (LUMN) -5.8%, Grupo Televisa, S.A.B (TV) -9.4%, Liberty Capital (GLIBA) 7.4%). On return on invested capital, Grupo Televisa, S.A.B (TV) leads (Lumen Technologies (LUMN) 0.9%, Grupo Televisa, S.A.B (TV) 4.4%, Liberty Capital (GLIBA) 3.1%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Grupo Televisa, S.A.B (TV) returned the most: Lumen Technologies (LUMN) -63.4%, Grupo Televisa, S.A.B (TV) -17.4%, Liberty Capital (GLIBA) -29.6%. Over five years, Lumen Technologies (LUMN) compounded fastest (Lumen Technologies (LUMN) -22.4%/yr, Grupo Televisa, S.A.B (TV) -26.1%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Lumen Technologies (LUMN) 0.00%, Grupo Televisa, S.A.B (TV) 0.00%, Liberty Capital (GLIBA) 11.65%. Lumen Technologies (LUMN) and Grupo Televisa, S.A.B (TV) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Grupo Televisa, S.A.B (TV) has been the steadiest (Lumen Technologies (LUMN) 72.6%, Grupo Televisa, S.A.B (TV) 38.8%, Liberty Capital (GLIBA) 46.1%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, LUMN, TV and GLIBA?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Grupo Televisa, S.A.B (TV) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.