LULU vs PVH vs WRBY Stock Comparison

Lululemon Athletica, Pvh and Warby Parker Prices as of Oct 23, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (COLM) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
LULU lululemon athletica inc.
$99.01 -3.2% 1M -44.7% 1Y
Market cap
$11.63B
P/E
8.2x
Revenue (TTM)
$11.09B
Div. yield
–
Apparel Consumer Discretionary
5 wins
PVH Pvh Corp. /De/
$85.00 +12.7% 1M -1.9% 1Y
Market cap
$3.99B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$8.92B
Div. yield
0.00%
Apparel Consumer Discretionary
2 wins
WRBY Warby Parker Inc.
$25.91 +10.8% 1M +16.9% 1Y
Market cap
$3.14B
P/E
405.6x
Revenue (TTM)
$911.61M
Div. yield
–
Apparel Consumer Discretionary
2 wins

Head to Head

9 decided of 12

Lululemon Athletica leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (Lululemon Athletica 5, Pvh 2, Warby Parker 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionLULUPVHWRBYLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $11.63B $3.99B $3.14B LULU
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 8.2x -23.6x 405.6x LULU
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 9.6x 7.3x 57.6x PVH
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +1.7% +1.6% +11.0% WRBY
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 12.8% -1.9% 0.8% LULU
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — 0.0% — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — 2.1x — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -44.7% -1.9% +16.9% WRBY
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -25.2%/yr -5.4%/yr -14.6%/yr PVH
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 46.8% 48.0% 75.7% LULU
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 78/100 44/100 46/100 LULU

Percentile Scorecard

LULUPVHWRBY

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisLULUPVHWRBY
Valuation 87 #7 of 46 84 #8 of 46 7 #43 of 46
Growth 31 #30 of 43 21 #34 of 43 83 #8 of 43
Profitability 98 #2 of 42 37 #27 of 42 34 #28 of 42
Financial Health 77 #13 of 53 44 #30 of 53 83 #10 of 53
Shareholder Returns 97 #2 of 34 33 #23 of 34 21 #27 of 34
Overall 78 44 46
  • LULU ranked among 53 companies in Apparel and Luxury
  • PVH ranked among 53 companies in Apparel and Luxury
  • WRBY ranked among 53 companies in Apparel and Luxury

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodLULUPVHWRBYSPY
1 month -3.2%+12.7%+10.8% -1.0%
3 months -13.4%+5.7%+5.5% +2.9%
6 months -31.1%-9.2%+13.6% +6.4%
Year to date -52.4%+26.8%+18.9% +11.4%
1 year -44.7%-1.9%+16.9% +13.1%
3 years -75.5%+11.5%+86.4% +79.4%
3 years, per year -37.4%+3.7%+23.1% +21.5%
5 years -76.5%-24.1%-54.5% +67.7%
5 years, per year -25.2%-5.4%-14.6% +10.9%
10 years +73.7%-22.3%— +255.2%
10 years, per year +5.7%-2.5%— +13.5%

Risk

MeasureLULUPVHWRBYSPY
Volatility, 1Y 46.8%48.0%75.7% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 51.8%52.5%67.9% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.181.092.12 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.96-0.040.22 1.03
Max drawdown, 5Y -82.0%-63.7%-83.7% -25.4%
From 52-week high -54.1%-14.0%-14.6% -2.5%
52-week high $215.88$98.81$30.34 $779.14
52-week low $91.88$60.87$16.49 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleLULUPVHWRBY
P/E now vs peer median 7.9xmedian 15.9x -23.2xmedian 15.9x 414.8xmedian 15.9x
P/S now vs peer median 1.0xmedian 0.7x 0.4xmedian 0.7x 3.5xmedian 0.7x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 3.6xmedian 9.2x 8.4xmedian 9.2x 49.2xmedian 9.2x
P/FCF now vs peer median 7.8xmedian 12.2x 5.5xmedian 12.2x 146.9xmedian 12.2x
P/B now vs peer median 2.2xmedian 2.2x 0.8xmedian 2.2x 8.2xmedian 2.2x
PEG now vs peer median 0.47median 0.57 0.48median 0.57 14.77median 0.57

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsLULUPVHWRBY
Revenue $11.09B $8.92B $911.61M
Gross profit $6.22B $5.24B $498.49M
Operating income $1.98B $363.00M $1.55M
Net income $1.42B -$169.00M $7.74M
Free cash flow $1.35B $715.00M $21.75M
EPS (diluted) $12.56 $-3.67 $0.06
Cash & equivalents $1.39B $965.90M $292.67M
Total debt – $2.25B –
Shares (diluted) 112.92M 46.10M 125.75M
Enterprise value $5.88B $1.57B $1.99B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricLULUPVHWRBY
P/E 7.9x -23.2x 414.8x
P/FCF 7.8x 5.5x 146.9x
P/Operating cash flow 5.3x 4.5x 33.5x
P/S 1.0x 0.4x 3.5x
P/B 2.2x 0.8x 8.2x
P/Tangible book 2.2x 1.8x 8.2x
EV/EBITDA 3.6x 8.4x 49.2x
EV/EBIT 4.6x 14.3x 1,870x
EV/Revenue 0.8x 0.6x 3.2x
EV/FCF 6.8x 7.3x 133.5x
EV/Operating cash flow 4.6x 5.9x 30.4x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.47 0.48 14.77

Growth

14 metrics
MetricLULUPVHWRBY
Revenue growth (1Y) 1.7% 1.6% 11.0%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 7.9% -0.8% 12.9%
Gross profit growth (1Y) -3.4% 2.6% 11.4%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 7.5% 0.4% 12.5%
Operating income growth (1Y) -20.7% 86.8% 108.6%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 8.5% -5.2% 26.4%
Net income growth (1Y) -20.6% -136.1% 183.9%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 12.1% -43.1% 28.7%
EPS growth (1Y) -15.8% -138.0% 181.8%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 16.6% -48.3% 28.1%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 3.7% 33.2% -18.3%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 6.6% 30.0% 22.1%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 15.9% 38.6% -58.5%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 11.8% 91.9% 249.8%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricLULUPVHWRBY
Gross margin 56.1% 58.8% 54.7%
EBITDA margin 22.7% 6.9% 6.5%
Operating margin 17.8% 4.1% 0.2%
Pretax margin 18.1% 3.3% 1.1%
Net margin 12.8% -1.9% 0.8%
FCF margin 12.2% 8.0% 2.4%
Operating cash flow margin 17.9% 9.8% 10.5%
Return on equity 29.5% -3.5% 2.0%
Return on assets 16.7% -1.5% 1.0%
Return on invested capital – 0.0% –
Return on capital employed 29.5% 4.0% 0.3%
Asset turnover 1.3x 0.8x 1.2x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.4x -5.2x 12.3x
Stock comp / revenue 0.8% 0.5% 3.8%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricLULUPVHWRBY
Debt / assets – 19.7% –
Debt / equity – 0.5x –
Net debt / EBITDA – 2.1x –
Debt / FCF – 3.1x –
Liabilities / assets 43.5% 58.0% 49.2%
Equity / assets 56.5% 42.0% 50.8%
Interest coverage – 4.0x –
Current ratio 2.2x 1.6x 2.3x
Quick ratio 0.9x 0.8x 1.8x
Cash ratio 0.8x 0.4x 1.8x
Altman Z-score 4.81 2.14 5.32

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricLULUPVHWRBY
Dividend yield – 0.2% –
Net buyback yield 10.9% 0.4% -0.1%
Shareholder yield 10.9% 0.6% -0.1%
Payout ratio (earnings) – -4.2% –
Payout ratio (FCF) – 1.0% –
Dividend growth (1Y) – -13.4% –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – -9.9% –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusLULUPVHWRBY
Forward P/E 9.6xFY2026 7.3xFY2026 57.6xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $10.28FY2026 $11.69FY2026 $0.45FY2026
EPS growth, next FY -22.5%FY2026 +2.5%FY2026 +25.0%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after -16.1% +0.1% +33.3%
Revenue, next fiscal year $11.00BFY2026 $8.34BFY2026 $922.07MFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY -0.9%FY2026 -6.8%FY2026 +5.8%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after -9.7% +3.5% +31.7%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersLULUPVHWRBY
Held by institutions 71.6% 100.0% 100.0%
Institutions holding 846 384 301
Change in shares held, QoQ -2.1% +1.7% +15.2%
Institutions buying 407 186 195
Institutions selling 330 128 77
Buyers to sellers 1.23 1.45 2.53

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

LULUPVHWRBY
LULU 1.00 0.30 0.18
PVH 0.30 1.00 0.21
WRBY 0.18 0.21 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, LULU, PVH and WRBY?

Lululemon Athletica (LULU) is the largest by market capitalisation: Lululemon Athletica (LULU) $11.63B, Pvh (PVH) $3.99B, Warby Parker (WRBY) $3.14B.

Which stock is cheaper, LULU, PVH and WRBY?

Lululemon Athletica (LULU) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Lululemon Athletica (LULU) 8.2x, Pvh (PVH) -23.6x, Warby Parker (WRBY) 405.6x). On next year's consensus earnings, Pvh (PVH) is cheapest (Lululemon Athletica (LULU) 9.6x, Pvh (PVH) 7.3x, Warby Parker (WRBY) 57.6x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Warby Parker (WRBY) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Lululemon Athletica (LULU) +1.7%, Pvh (PVH) +1.6%, Warby Parker (WRBY) +11.0%.

Which company is more profitable?

Lululemon Athletica (LULU) has the highest net margin (Lululemon Athletica (LULU) 12.8%, Pvh (PVH) -1.9%, Warby Parker (WRBY) 0.8%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Warby Parker (WRBY) returned the most: Lululemon Athletica (LULU) -44.7%, Pvh (PVH) -1.9%, Warby Parker (WRBY) +16.9%. Over five years, Pvh (PVH) compounded fastest (Lululemon Athletica (LULU) -25.2%/yr, Pvh (PVH) -5.4%/yr, Warby Parker (WRBY) -14.6%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Lululemon Athletica (LULU) 0.00%, Pvh (PVH) 0.00%, Warby Parker (WRBY) 0.00%. Lululemon Athletica (LULU) and Warby Parker (WRBY) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Lululemon Athletica (LULU) has been the steadiest (Lululemon Athletica (LULU) 46.8%, Pvh (PVH) 48.0%, Warby Parker (WRBY) 75.7%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, LULU, PVH and WRBY?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Lululemon Athletica (LULU) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.