LU vs RGLD vs RPRX Stock Comparison

Lufax Holding, Royal Gold and Royalty Pharma Prices as of Nov 2, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (OR) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
LU Lufax Holding Ltd
$8.35 +718.6% 1M +167.6% 1Y
Market cap
$723.69M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$3.75B
Div. yield
–
Specialty Finance Financial Services
2 wins
RGLD Royal Gold Inc
$235.99 +0.6% 1M +35.0% 1Y
Market cap
$19.98B
P/E
27.1x
Revenue (TTM)
$1.55B
Div. yield
0.80%
Specialty Finance Financial Services
5 wins
RPRX Royalty Pharma plc
$66.52 +16.4% 1M +77.2% 1Y
Market cap
$38.25B
P/E
36.3x
Revenue (TTM)
$2.54B
Div. yield
1.37%
Specialty Finance Financial Services
4 wins

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Royal Gold leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (Royal Gold 5, Royalty Pharma 4, Lufax Holding 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionLURGLDRPRXLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $723.69M $19.98B $38.25B RPRX
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -1.7x 27.1x 36.3x RGLD
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — 21.8x 11.8x RPRX
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +194.2% +93.5% +10.0% LU
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months -11.1% 47.7% 32.1% RGLD
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 0.0% 9.7% — RGLD
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — 0.2x — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.80% 1.37% RPRX
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +167.6% +35.0% +77.2% LU
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -20.0%/yr +18.1%/yr +11.0%/yr RGLD
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 235.3% 41.4% 23.7% RPRX
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 51/100 68/100 58/100 RGLD

Percentile Scorecard

LURGLDRPRX

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisLURGLDRPRX
Valuation 87 #23 of 169 19 #138 of 169 21 #133 of 169
Growth 47 #88 of 164 94 #11 of 164 67 #55 of 164
Profitability 31 #107 of 154 95 #9 of 154 99 #3 of 154
Financial Health 40 #98 of 163 93 #13 of 163 83 #28 of 163
Shareholder Returns – 43 #79 of 137 20 #110 of 137
Overall 51 68 58
  • LU ranked among 174 companies in Lending and Credit
  • RGLD ranked among 174 companies in Lending and Credit
  • RPRX ranked among 174 companies in Lending and Credit

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodLURGLDRPRXSPY
1 month +718.6%+0.6%+16.4% -2.3%
3 months +453.0%+16.8%+16.4% -0.7%
6 months +323.9%+3.3%+32.5% +4.8%
Year to date +226.2%+6.2%+72.2% +10.3%
1 year +167.6%+35.0%+77.2% +10.3%
3 years +89.8%+112.9%+138.0% +73.0%
3 years, per year +23.8%+28.7%+33.5% +20.1%
5 years -67.3%+130.1%+68.4% +61.9%
5 years, per year -20.0%+18.1%+11.0% +10.1%
10 years —+241.6%— +258.6%
10 years, per year —+13.1%— +13.6%

Risk

MeasureLURGLDRPRXSPY
Volatility, 1Y 235.3%41.4%23.7% 12.8%
Downside volatility, 1Y 57.2%41.9%22.7% 12.8%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.021.510.20 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.710.853.26 0.80
Max drawdown, 5Y -97.2%-40.9%-45.6% -25.4%
From 52-week high -1.8%-22.4%-1.0% -3.5%
52-week high $8.50$304.29$67.18 $779.14
52-week low $0.83$169.08$37.30 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleLURGLDRPRX
P/E now vs peer median -1.7xmedian 11.6x 27.1xmedian 11.6x 36.3xmedian 11.6x
P/S now vs peer median 0.2xmedian 2.7x 12.9xmedian 2.7x 15.1xmedian 2.7x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 13.1x 16.2xmedian 13.1x —median 13.1x
P/FCF now vs peer median 0.5xmedian 6.0x 34,157xmedian 6.0x 12.9xmedian 6.0x
P/B now vs peer median 0.1xmedian 0.7x 2.6xmedian 0.7x 3.9xmedian 0.7x
PEG now vs peer median 0.03median 0.34 0.76median 0.34 0.71median 0.34

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsLURGLDRPRX
Revenue $3.75B $1.55B $2.54B
Gross profit – $1.34B –
Operating income – $950.24M $1.51B
Net income -$368.79M $739.81M $1.35B
Free cash flow $1.38B $585.00K $2.98B
R&D – – $238.70M
EPS (diluted) $-4.79 $8.68 $1.46
Cash & equivalents – $182.47M $811.99M
Total debt $10.83B $395.89M $8.96B
Shares (diluted) 86.67M 85.05M 556.90M
Enterprise value -$3.64B $19.21B $38.16B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricLURGLDRPRX
P/E -1.7x 27.1x 36.3x
P/FCF 0.5x 34,157x 12.9x
P/Operating cash flow 0.5x 19.1x 12.9x
P/S 0.2x 12.9x 15.1x
P/B 0.1x 2.6x 3.9x
P/Tangible book 0.1x 2.6x 3.9x
EV/EBITDA – 16.2x –
EV/EBIT -67.9x 21.3x 30.7x
EV/Revenue 2.9x 13.1x 18.3x
EV/FCF 7.8x 34,522x 15.6x
EV/Operating cash flow 7.8x 19.3x 15.6x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.03 0.76 0.71

Growth

14 metrics
MetricLURGLDRPRX
Revenue growth (1Y) 194.2% 93.5% 10.0%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) -12.7% 36.5% 2.4%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – 92.3% –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – 37.9% –
Operating income growth (1Y) – 83.7% -17.9%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – 48.0% 51.2%
Net income growth (1Y) 12.6% 64.5% -19.1%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -65.4% 47.6% 42.1%
EPS growth (1Y) 28.6% 27.1% -19.6%
EPS CAGR (3Y) -61.2% 35.5% 51.5%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 114.2% 84.2% 23.7%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -13.7% 36.3% 2.7%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 114.2% -99.8% 23.7%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -13.7% 26.0% 2.7%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricLURGLDRPRX
Gross margin – 86.9% –
EBITDA margin – 80.8% –
Operating margin – 61.4% 59.6%
Pretax margin -2.9% 58.8% 53.2%
Net margin -11.1% 47.7% 32.1%
FCF margin 36.7% 0.0% 117.4%
Operating cash flow margin 36.7% 67.5% 117.4%
Return on equity -3.1% 9.9% 13.7%
Return on assets -1.2% 7.9% 6.8%
Return on invested capital 0.0% 9.7% –
Return on capital employed – 10.2% 7.9%
Asset turnover 0.1x 0.2x 0.1x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) -3.7x 1.4x 2.2x
Stock comp / revenue – 0.8% –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricLURGLDRPRX
Debt / assets 35.0% 4.2% 45.2%
Debt / equity 0.9x 0.1x 0.9x
Net debt / EBITDA – 0.2x –
Debt / FCF 7.9x 676.7x 3.0x
Liabilities / assets 61.5% 19.2% 50.6%
Equity / assets 38.5% 80.8% 49.4%
Interest coverage -3.2x 19.2x 4.2x
Current ratio – 2.9x 2.8x
Quick ratio – 2.5x 1.3x
Cash ratio – 1.4x 1.3x
Altman Z-score – 7.38 2.91

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricLURGLDRPRX
Dividend yield – 0.8% 1.4%
Net buyback yield – 0.0% 0.8%
Shareholder yield 0.0% 0.8% 2.2%
Payout ratio (earnings) – 18.9% –
Payout ratio (FCF) – 23,897% –
Dividend growth (1Y) – 25.0% –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – 13.6% –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusLURGLDRPRX
Forward P/E – 21.8xFY2026 11.8xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $-3.19FY2026 $10.85FY2026 $5.62FY2026
EPS growth, next FY – +48.0%FY2026 +16.4%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after – +24.1% +8.7%
Revenue, next fiscal year $4.01BFY2026 $1.96BFY2026 $3.74BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +3.3%FY2026 +90.4%FY2026 +15.0%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after -9.3% +4.5% +7.9%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersLURGLDRPRX
Held by institutions 8.1% 83.5% 82.3%
Institutions holding 75 764 642
Change in shares held, QoQ -12.0% +1.2% +2.7%
Institutions buying 31 379 395
Institutions selling 29 265 178
Buyers to sellers 1.07 1.43 2.22

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

LURGLDRPRX
LU 1.00 -0.07 0.02
RGLD -0.07 1.00 0.13
RPRX 0.02 0.13 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, LU, RGLD and RPRX?

Royalty Pharma (RPRX) is the largest by market capitalisation: Lufax Holding (LU) $723.69M, Royal Gold (RGLD) $19.98B, Royalty Pharma (RPRX) $38.25B.

Which stock is cheaper, LU, RGLD and RPRX?

Royal Gold (RGLD) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Lufax Holding (LU) -1.7x, Royal Gold (RGLD) 27.1x, Royalty Pharma (RPRX) 36.3x). On next year's consensus earnings, Royalty Pharma (RPRX) is cheapest (Royal Gold (RGLD) 21.8x, Royalty Pharma (RPRX) 11.8x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Lufax Holding (LU) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Lufax Holding (LU) +194.2%, Royal Gold (RGLD) +93.5%, Royalty Pharma (RPRX) +10.0%.

Which company is more profitable?

Royal Gold (RGLD) has the highest net margin (Lufax Holding (LU) -11.1%, Royal Gold (RGLD) 47.7%, Royalty Pharma (RPRX) 32.1%). On return on invested capital, Royal Gold (RGLD) leads (Lufax Holding (LU) 0.0%, Royal Gold (RGLD) 9.7%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Lufax Holding (LU) returned the most: Lufax Holding (LU) +167.6%, Royal Gold (RGLD) +35.0%, Royalty Pharma (RPRX) +77.2%. Over five years, Royal Gold (RGLD) compounded fastest (Lufax Holding (LU) -20.0%/yr, Royal Gold (RGLD) +18.1%/yr, Royalty Pharma (RPRX) +11.0%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Royalty Pharma (RPRX) has the highest dividend yield: Lufax Holding (LU) 0.00%, Royal Gold (RGLD) 0.80%, Royalty Pharma (RPRX) 1.37%. Lufax Holding (LU) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Royalty Pharma (RPRX) has been the steadiest (Lufax Holding (LU) 235.3%, Royal Gold (RGLD) 41.4%, Royalty Pharma (RPRX) 23.7%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, LU, RGLD and RPRX?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Royal Gold (RGLD) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.