LU vs ATLC vs UPBD Stock Comparison

Lufax Holding, Atlanticus Holdings and Upbound Prices as of Oct 28, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (JCAP) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
LU Lufax Holding Ltd
$8.15 +552.0% 1M +173.5% 1Y
Market cap
$697.25M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$3.75B
Div. yield
–
Specialty Finance Financial Services
2 wins
ATLC Atlanticus Holdings Corp
$91.64 +5.2% 1M +56.0% 1Y
Market cap
$1.47B
P/E
10.0x
Revenue (TTM)
$2.65B
Div. yield
–
Specialty Finance Financial Services
6 wins
UPBD Upbound Group, Inc.
$16.91 +7.1% 1M -28.3% 1Y
Market cap
$1.12B
P/E
12.4x
Revenue (TTM)
$4.74B
Div. yield
–
Specialty Finance Financial Services
3 wins

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Atlanticus Holdings leads on 6 of the 12 questions below (Atlanticus Holdings 6, Upbound 3, Lufax Holding 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionLUATLCUPBDLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $697.25M $1.47B $1.12B ATLC
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -1.7x 10.0x 12.4x ATLC
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — 9.5x 3.9x UPBD
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +194.2% +83.7% +5.9% LU
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months -11.1% 5.5% 1.9% ATLC
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 0.0% 20.9% 7.8% ATLC
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — 2.9x 0.8x UPBD
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +173.5% +56.0% -28.3% LU
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -20.2%/yr +3.4%/yr -20.5%/yr ATLC
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 235.2% 51.9% 45.0% UPBD
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 51/100 67/100 63/100 ATLC

Percentile Scorecard

LUATLCUPBD

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisLUATLCUPBD
Valuation 88 #21 of 169 89 #20 of 169 96 #8 of 169
Growth 46 #88 of 162 91 #15 of 162 73 #45 of 162
Profitability 31 #103 of 149 95 #9 of 149 62 #58 of 149
Financial Health 40 #96 of 158 26 #118 of 158 52 #76 of 158
Shareholder Returns – 36 #88 of 136 31 #94 of 136
Overall 51 67 63
  • LU ranked among 174 companies in Lending and Credit
  • ATLC ranked among 174 companies in Lending and Credit
  • UPBD ranked among 174 companies in Lending and Credit

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodLUATLCUPBDSPY
1 month +552.0%+5.2%+7.1% +0.9%
3 months +429.2%-12.0%-19.3% +5.9%
6 months +338.2%+19.5%-10.7% +8.5%
Year to date +218.4%+36.9%-3.7% +13.3%
1 year +173.5%+56.0%-28.3% +12.4%
3 years +114.5%+220.0%-33.1% +88.1%
3 years, per year +29.0%+47.4%-12.5% +23.5%
5 years -67.7%+18.3%-68.3% +68.2%
5 years, per year -20.2%+3.4%-20.5% +11.0%
10 years —+2,525.8%+69.1% +263.4%
10 years, per year —+38.7%+5.4% +13.8%

Risk

MeasureLUATLCUPBDSPY
Volatility, 1Y 235.2%51.9%45.0% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 57.5%57.2%46.4% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.081.551.28 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.741.08-0.63 0.98
Max drawdown, 5Y -97.2%-74.9%-72.2% -25.4%
From 52-week high -4.1%-18.0%-28.3% -0.9%
52-week high $8.50$111.79$23.60 $779.14
52-week low $0.83$47.96$15.36 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleLUATLCUPBD
P/E now vs peer median -1.7xmedian 11.4x 9.4xmedian 11.4x 10.9xmedian 11.4x
P/S now vs peer median 0.2xmedian 2.7x 0.5xmedian 2.7x 0.2xmedian 2.7x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 11.3x 3.6xmedian 11.3x 1.4xmedian 11.3x
P/FCF now vs peer median 0.5xmedian 6.9x 1.5xmedian 6.9x 2.8xmedian 6.9x
P/B now vs peer median 0.1xmedian 0.7x 2.0xmedian 0.7x 1.3xmedian 0.7x
PEG now vs peer median 0.03median 0.34 0.48median 0.34 0.04median 0.34

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsLUATLCUPBD
Revenue $3.75B $2.65B $4.74B
Gross profit – $2.46B $2.33B
Operating income – $1.93B $241.70M
Net income -$368.79M $153.50M $90.34M
Free cash flow $1.38B $936.46M $355.95M
EPS (diluted) $-4.79 $7.68 $1.54
Cash & equivalents – $555.22M $105.30M
Total debt $10.83B $25.15B $5.98B
Shares (diluted) 86.67M 19.17M 58.71M
Enterprise value -$4.04B -$686.67M $691.68M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricLUATLCUPBD
P/E -1.7x 9.4x 10.9x
P/FCF 0.5x 1.5x 2.8x
P/Operating cash flow 0.5x 1.5x 2.3x
P/S 0.2x 0.5x 0.2x
P/B 0.1x 2.0x 1.3x
P/Tangible book 0.1x 2.1x 2.4x
EV/EBITDA – 3.6x 1.4x
EV/EBIT -67.8x 3.7x 9.5x
EV/Revenue 2.9x 2.7x 0.5x
EV/FCF 7.8x 7.6x 6.5x
EV/Operating cash flow 7.8x 7.6x 5.4x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.03 0.48 0.04

Growth

14 metrics
MetricLUATLCUPBD
Revenue growth (1Y) 194.2% 83.7% 5.9%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) -12.7% 34.1% 5.8%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – 86.9% 8.9%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – 34.8% 5.0%
Operating income growth (1Y) – 90.3% -7.9%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – 34.8% 23.5%
Net income growth (1Y) 12.6% 26.3% -11.5%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -65.4% 12.9% 303.4%
EPS growth (1Y) 28.6% 36.1% -11.6%
EPS CAGR (3Y) -61.2% 19.6% 295.6%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 114.2% 87.7% 94.9%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -13.7% 32.3% 9.6%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 114.2% 90.0% 123.2%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -13.7% 33.1% 9.5%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricLUATLCUPBD
Gross margin – 92.6% 49.1%
EBITDA margin – 74.2% 35.5%
Operating margin – 72.7% 5.1%
Pretax margin -2.9% 7.7% 2.7%
Net margin -11.1% 5.5% 1.9%
FCF margin 36.7% 35.3% 7.5%
Operating cash flow margin 36.7% 35.3% 9.0%
Return on equity -3.1% 22.8% 12.5%
Return on assets -1.2% 2.1% 2.9%
Return on invested capital 0.0% 20.9% 7.8%
Return on capital employed – – –
Asset turnover 0.1x 0.4x 1.5x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) -3.7x 6.1x 4.7x
Stock comp / revenue – 0.3% 1.1%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricLUATLCUPBD
Debt / assets 35.0% 83.7% 45.9%
Debt / equity 0.9x 8.9x 1.9x
Net debt / EBITDA – 2.9x 0.8x
Debt / FCF 7.9x 6.7x 4.0x
Liabilities / assets 61.5% 90.6% 76.4%
Equity / assets 38.5% 9.4% 23.6%
Interest coverage -3.2x 4.3x 2.2x
Current ratio – – –
Quick ratio – – –
Cash ratio – – –
Altman Z-score – – –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricLUATLCUPBD
Dividend yield – – 9.2%
Net buyback yield – 0.9% -0.1%
Shareholder yield 0.0% 0.9% 9.2%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusLUATLCUPBD
Forward P/E – 9.5xFY2026 3.9xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $-3.19FY2026 $9.61FY2026 $4.36FY2026
EPS growth, next FY – +61.2%FY2026 +5.6%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after – +45.4% +8.9%
Revenue, next fiscal year $4.01BFY2026 $3.18BFY2026 $5.00BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +3.3%FY2026 +61.3%FY2026 +6.3%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after -9.3% +13.4% -4.8%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersLUATLCUPBD
Held by institutions 8.1% 26.0% 99.3%
Institutions holding 75 146 256
Change in shares held, QoQ -12.0% +7.9% +3.3%
Institutions buying 31 93 146
Institutions selling 29 36 69
Buyers to sellers 1.07 2.58 2.12

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

LUATLCUPBD
LU 1.00 -0.11 -0.04
ATLC -0.11 1.00 0.39
UPBD -0.04 0.39 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, LU, ATLC and UPBD?

Atlanticus Holdings (ATLC) is the largest by market capitalisation: Lufax Holding (LU) $697.25M, Atlanticus Holdings (ATLC) $1.47B, Upbound (UPBD) $1.12B.

Which stock is cheaper, LU, ATLC and UPBD?

Atlanticus Holdings (ATLC) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Lufax Holding (LU) -1.7x, Atlanticus Holdings (ATLC) 10.0x, Upbound (UPBD) 12.4x). On next year's consensus earnings, Upbound (UPBD) is cheapest (Atlanticus Holdings (ATLC) 9.5x, Upbound (UPBD) 3.9x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Lufax Holding (LU) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Lufax Holding (LU) +194.2%, Atlanticus Holdings (ATLC) +83.7%, Upbound (UPBD) +5.9%.

Which company is more profitable?

Atlanticus Holdings (ATLC) has the highest net margin (Lufax Holding (LU) -11.1%, Atlanticus Holdings (ATLC) 5.5%, Upbound (UPBD) 1.9%). On return on invested capital, Atlanticus Holdings (ATLC) leads (Lufax Holding (LU) 0.0%, Atlanticus Holdings (ATLC) 20.9%, Upbound (UPBD) 7.8%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Lufax Holding (LU) returned the most: Lufax Holding (LU) +173.5%, Atlanticus Holdings (ATLC) +56.0%, Upbound (UPBD) -28.3%. Over five years, Atlanticus Holdings (ATLC) compounded fastest (Lufax Holding (LU) -20.2%/yr, Atlanticus Holdings (ATLC) +3.4%/yr, Upbound (UPBD) -20.5%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Upbound (UPBD) has been the steadiest (Lufax Holding (LU) 235.2%, Atlanticus Holdings (ATLC) 51.9%, Upbound (UPBD) 45.0%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, LU, ATLC and UPBD?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Atlanticus Holdings (ATLC) leads on 6. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.