LSTR vs R vs XPO Stock Comparison

Landstar System, Ryder System and Xpo Prices as of Nov 2, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (EXPD) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
LSTR Landstar System Inc
$147.53 -15.0% 1M +14.9% 1Y
Market cap
$4.97B
P/E
31.2x
Revenue (TTM)
$5.29B
Div. yield
2.47%
Logistics Industrials
4 wins
R Ryder System Inc
$285.61 +20.5% 1M +68.8% 1Y
Market cap
$10.92B
P/E
21.0x
Revenue (TTM)
$13.08B
Div. yield
1.31%
Logistics Industrials
5 wins
XPO XPO, Inc.
$191.75 +3.1% 1M +33.3% 1Y
Market cap
$22.43B
P/E
44.6x
Revenue (TTM)
$8.84B
Div. yield
–
Trucking Industrials
3 wins

Head to Head

12 decided of 12

Ryder System leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (Ryder System 5, Landstar System 4, Xpo 3). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionLSTRRXPOLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $4.97B $10.92B $22.43B XPO
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 31.2x 21.0x 44.6x R
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 24.0x 19.8x 32.4x R
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +10.7% +3.2% +9.5% LSTR
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 3.0% 4.0% 5.7% XPO
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 17.9% 7.9% 12.7% LSTR
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA -1.1x 2.5x 2.0x LSTR
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 2.47% 1.31% — LSTR
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +14.9% +68.8% +33.3% R
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -4.1%/yr +26.4%/yr +32.2%/yr XPO
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 40.2% 32.2% 41.0% R
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 49/100 52/100 48/100 R

Percentile Scorecard

LSTRRXPO

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisLSTRRXPO
Valuation 22 #107 of 137 57 #59 of 137 16 #115 of 137
Growth 24 #95 of 124 66 #43 of 124 89 #14 of 124
Profitability 55 #56 of 122 52 #59 of 122 67 #41 of 122
Financial Health 87 #20 of 147 14 #127 of 147 25 #110 of 147
Shareholder Returns 58 #36 of 85 69 #27 of 85 42 #50 of 85
Overall 49 52 48
  • LSTR ranked among 150 companies in Transportation
  • R ranked among 150 companies in Transportation
  • XPO ranked among 150 companies in Transportation

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodLSTRRXPOSPY
1 month -15.0%+20.5%+3.1% -2.3%
3 months -16.5%+8.9%-2.7% -0.7%
6 months -16.6%+22.6%-4.1% +4.8%
Year to date +2.7%+49.2%+41.1% +10.3%
1 year +14.9%+68.8%+33.3% +10.3%
3 years -13.3%+183.3%+141.1% +73.0%
3 years, per year -4.6%+41.5%+34.1% +20.1%
5 years -18.7%+222.7%+302.9% +61.9%
5 years, per year -4.1%+26.4%+32.2% +10.1%
10 years +105.3%+315.3%+1,601.4% +258.6%
10 years, per year +7.5%+15.3%+32.8% +13.6%

Risk

MeasureLSTRRXPOSPY
Volatility, 1Y 40.2%32.2%41.0% 12.8%
Downside volatility, 1Y 46.5%29.3%39.4% 12.8%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.640.981.19 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.372.130.81 0.80
Max drawdown, 5Y -41.2%-28.8%-48.4% -25.4%
From 52-week high -34.5%0.0%-16.0% -3.5%
52-week high $225.37$285.61$228.37 $779.14
52-week low $121.51$162.50$125.64 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleLSTRRXPO
P/E now vs peer median 31.2xmedian 16.1x 21.0xmedian 16.1x 44.6xmedian 16.1x
P/S now vs peer median 0.9xmedian 0.9x 0.8xmedian 0.9x 2.5xmedian 0.9x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 18.3xmedian 8.1x 6.4xmedian 8.1x 18.0xmedian 8.1x
P/FCF now vs peer median 31.6xmedian 11.4x 11.4xmedian 11.4x 34.1xmedian 11.4x
P/B now vs peer median 6.0xmedian 1.2x 3.7xmedian 1.2x 11.4xmedian 1.2x
PEG now vs peer median -1.81median 0.75 2.52median 0.75 0.32median 0.75

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsLSTRRXPO
Revenue $5.29B $13.08B $8.84B
Gross profit – $2.56B –
Operating income $214.56M $1.10B $876.00M
Net income $160.38M $520.00M $503.00M
Free cash flow $157.62M $954.00M $657.00M
EPS (diluted) $4.73 $13.41 $4.26
Cash & equivalents $297.32M $198.00M $260.00M
Total debt $68.71M $7.21B $3.12B
Shares (diluted) 33.87M 38.79M 118.00M
Enterprise value $3.41B $10.12B $21.33B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricLSTRRXPO
P/E 31.2x 21.0x 44.6x
P/FCF 31.6x 11.4x 34.1x
P/Operating cash flow 29.0x 4.0x 19.8x
P/S 0.9x 0.8x 2.5x
P/B 6.0x 3.7x 11.4x
P/Tangible book 6.0x 4.2x 13.1x
EV/EBITDA 18.3x 6.4x 18.0x
EV/EBIT 21.9x 16.4x 28.9x
EV/Revenue 0.9x 1.4x 2.9x
EV/FCF 29.8x 18.8x 38.5x
EV/Operating cash flow 27.4x 6.6x 22.3x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) -1.81 2.52 0.32

Growth

14 metrics
MetricLSTRRXPO
Revenue growth (1Y) 10.7% 3.2% 9.5%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) -2.9% 3.4% 5.0%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – -0.4% –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – 3.6% –
Operating income growth (1Y) 19.3% 0.3% 32.3%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -18.3% 2.3% 39.5%
Net income growth (1Y) 16.8% 3.6% 51.5%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -18.8% 2.1% 138.7%
EPS growth (1Y) 19.3% 11.2% 54.1%
EPS CAGR (3Y) -17.2% 8.3% 139.3%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -19.6% 13.8% 19.3%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -29.5% 4.9% 21.0%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -20.7% 1,184% 183.2%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -30.5% 47.1% 217.0%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricLSTRRXPO
Gross margin – 19.6% –
EBITDA margin 4.8% 21.4% 15.9%
Operating margin 4.1% 8.4% 9.9%
Pretax margin 4.0% 5.4% 7.6%
Net margin 3.0% 4.0% 5.7%
FCF margin 3.0% 7.3% 7.4%
Operating cash flow margin 3.2% 20.9% 12.8%
Return on equity 19.2% 17.8% 25.5%
Return on assets 9.0% 3.2% 6.0%
Return on invested capital 17.9% 7.9% 12.7%
Return on capital employed 21.3% 8.9% 13.4%
Asset turnover 3.0x 0.8x 1.1x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.1x 5.3x 2.3x
Stock comp / revenue 0.2% – 0.9%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricLSTRRXPO
Debt / assets 3.8% 44.6% 37.6%
Debt / equity 0.1x 2.4x 1.6x
Net debt / EBITDA -1.1x 2.5x 2.0x
Debt / FCF 0.4x 7.6x 4.8x
Liabilities / assets 54.1% 81.6% 76.3%
Equity / assets 45.9% 18.4% 23.7%
Interest coverage 111.1x 2.8x 4.2x
Current ratio 1.8x 0.7x 1.0x
Quick ratio 1.7x 0.6x 0.8x
Cash ratio 0.5x 0.1x 0.1x
Altman Z-score 9.05 1.65 3.76

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricLSTRRXPO
Dividend yield 2.5% 1.3% –
Net buyback yield 2.0% 5.0% 1.4%
Shareholder yield 4.5% 6.4% 1.4%
Payout ratio (earnings) – 28.8% –
Payout ratio (FCF) – 15.7% –
Dividend growth (1Y) – 5.6% –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – 6.3% –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusLSTRRXPO
Forward P/E 24.0xFY2026 19.8xFY2026 32.4xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $6.15FY2026 $14.45FY2026 $5.91FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +85.8%FY2026 +11.8%FY2026 +58.4%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +27.8% +30.6% +6.3%
Revenue, next fiscal year $5.45BFY2026 $14.12BFY2026 $9.30BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +15.1%FY2026 +11.5%FY2026 +13.9%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +17.6% +2.3% +5.4%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersLSTRRXPO
Held by institutions 100.0% 90.8% 100.0%
Institutions holding 544 581 752
Change in shares held, QoQ -2.8% -0.6% +2.2%
Institutions buying 297 309 434
Institutions selling 153 177 211
Buyers to sellers 1.94 1.75 2.06

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

LSTRRXPO
LSTR 1.00 0.46 0.57
R 0.46 1.00 0.62
XPO 0.57 0.62 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, LSTR, R and XPO?

Xpo (XPO) is the largest by market capitalisation: Landstar System (LSTR) $4.97B, Ryder System (R) $10.92B, Xpo (XPO) $22.43B.

Which stock is cheaper, LSTR, R and XPO?

Ryder System (R) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Landstar System (LSTR) 31.2x, Ryder System (R) 21.0x, Xpo (XPO) 44.6x). On next year's consensus earnings, Ryder System (R) is cheapest (Landstar System (LSTR) 24.0x, Ryder System (R) 19.8x, Xpo (XPO) 32.4x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Landstar System (LSTR) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Landstar System (LSTR) +10.7%, Ryder System (R) +3.2%, Xpo (XPO) +9.5%.

Which company is more profitable?

Xpo (XPO) has the highest net margin (Landstar System (LSTR) 3.0%, Ryder System (R) 4.0%, Xpo (XPO) 5.7%). On return on invested capital, Landstar System (LSTR) leads (Landstar System (LSTR) 17.9%, Ryder System (R) 7.9%, Xpo (XPO) 12.7%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Ryder System (R) returned the most: Landstar System (LSTR) +14.9%, Ryder System (R) +68.8%, Xpo (XPO) +33.3%. Over five years, Xpo (XPO) compounded fastest (Landstar System (LSTR) -4.1%/yr, Ryder System (R) +26.4%/yr, Xpo (XPO) +32.2%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Landstar System (LSTR) has the highest dividend yield: Landstar System (LSTR) 2.47%, Ryder System (R) 1.31%. Xpo (XPO) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Ryder System (R) has been the steadiest (Landstar System (LSTR) 40.2%, Ryder System (R) 32.2%, Xpo (XPO) 41.0%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, LSTR, R and XPO?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Ryder System (R) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.