LRN vs PRDO vs GHC Stock Comparison

Stride, Perdoceo Education and Graham Holdings Prices as of Oct 29, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (UTI) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
LRN Stride, Inc.
$80.70 +6.7% 1M +15.2% 1Y
Market cap
$3.35B
P/E
10.3x
Revenue (TTM)
$2.54B
Div. yield
–
Education Services Consumer Discretionary
2 wins
PRDO PERDOCEO EDUCATION Corp
$31.38 +4.2% 1M -9.4% 1Y
Market cap
$1.96B
P/E
11.1x
Revenue (TTM)
$858.61M
Div. yield
1.98%
Education Services Consumer Discretionary
4 wins
GHC Graham Holdings Co
$1,161.43 +2.8% 1M +11.4% 1Y
Market cap
$4.95B
P/E
10.0x
Revenue (TTM)
$5.12B
Div. yield
0.65%
Education Services Consumer Discretionary
3 wins

Head to Head

9 decided of 12

Perdoceo Education leads on 4 of the 12 questions below (Perdoceo Education 4, Graham Holdings 3, Stride 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionLRNPRDOGHCLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $3.35B $1.96B $4.95B GHC
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 10.3x 11.1x 10.0x GHC
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 9.6x 10.2x 15.3x LRN
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +2.5% +11.7% +4.3% PRDO
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months — 20.6% — –
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — — — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — — — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield — 1.98% 0.65% PRDO
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +15.2% -9.4% +11.4% LRN
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +17.9%/yr +24.2%/yr +14.7%/yr PRDO
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 42.1% 35.4% 23.2% GHC
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 74/100 79/100 47/100 PRDO

Percentile Scorecard

LRNPRDOGHC

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisLRNPRDOGHC
Valuation 69 #11 of 33 84 #6 of 33 81 #7 of 33
Growth 55 #14 of 30 35 #20 of 30 59 #13 of 30
Profitability 82 #6 of 28 96 #2 of 28 –
Financial Health 92 #4 of 37 97 #2 of 37 –
Shareholder Returns – 82 #3 of 12 0 #12 of 12
Overall 74 79 47
  • LRN ranked among 39 companies in Consumer Services
  • PRDO ranked among 39 companies in Consumer Services
  • GHC ranked among 39 companies in Consumer Services

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodLRNPRDOGHCSPY
1 month +6.7%+4.2%+2.8% +0.7%
3 months -2.9%-3.3%-5.5% +3.7%
6 months -16.9%-7.5%+3.5% +7.1%
Year to date +24.3%+7.0%+5.7% +12.8%
1 year +15.2%-9.4%+11.4% +11.9%
3 years +46.1%+73.6%+101.7% +85.2%
3 years, per year +13.5%+20.2%+26.4% +22.8%
5 years +127.3%+195.5%+98.2% +67.6%
5 years, per year +17.9%+24.2%+14.7% +10.9%
10 years +659.2%+343.8%+145.4% +262.0%
10 years, per year +22.5%+16.1%+9.4% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureLRNPRDOGHCSPY
Volatility, 1Y 42.1%35.4%23.2% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 45.6%42.0%23.3% 12.6%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y -0.08-0.030.27 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.36-0.270.49 0.94
Max drawdown, 5Y -64.1%-27.4%-20.3% -25.4%
From 52-week high -20.9%-17.3%-6.2% -1.2%
52-week high $102.03$37.95$1,238.69 $779.14
52-week low $61.02$27.41$1,012.13 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleLRNPRDOGHC
P/E now vs peer median 10.3xmedian 13.3x 11.1xmedian 13.3x 10.0xmedian 13.3x
P/S now vs peer median 1.3xmedian 1.2x 2.3xmedian 1.2x 1.0xmedian 1.2x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 9.3x 2.6xmedian 9.3x —median 9.3x
P/FCF now vs peer median 7.2xmedian 14.1x 9.0xmedian 14.1x 19.4xmedian 14.1x
P/B now vs peer median 2.0xmedian 2.0x 1.9xmedian 2.0x —median 2.0x
PEG now vs peer median 0.41median 0.27 0.77median 0.27 0.20median 0.27

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsLRNPRDOGHC
Revenue $2.54B $858.61M $5.12B
Gross profit $949.60M $661.90M –
Operating income $466.05M $210.88M $274.58M
Net income $334.31M $177.12M –
Free cash flow – $217.98M –
EPS (diluted) $7.06 $2.79 $114.65
Cash & equivalents $547.75M $734.82M –
Shares (diluted) 47.33M 63.59M 4.31M
Enterprise value $3.35B -$2.85B $4.95B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricLRNPRDOGHC
P/E 10.3x 11.1x 10.0x
P/FCF 7.2x 9.0x 19.4x
P/Operating cash flow 6.6x 8.7x –
P/S 1.3x 2.3x 1.0x
P/B 2.0x 1.9x –
P/Tangible book 2.0x 2.0x –
EV/EBITDA – 2.6x –
EV/EBIT – 3.1x –
EV/Revenue 1.3x 0.8x 1.0x
EV/FCF – 3.0x –
EV/Operating cash flow 6.6x 2.9x –
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.41 0.77 0.20

Growth

14 metrics
MetricLRNPRDOGHC
Revenue growth (1Y) 2.5% 11.7% 4.3%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 10.3% 5.7% 5.9%
Gross profit growth (1Y) -2.1% 9.1% –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 11.2% 3.4% –
Operating income growth (1Y) 22.1% 13.9% 5.7%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 33.1% 13.7% 131.6%
Net income growth (1Y) 5.8% 14.7% –
Net income CAGR (3Y) 29.4% 11.7% –
EPS growth (1Y) 10.1% 20.1% -31.5%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 25.3% 14.5% 49.4%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 33.2% 6.1% –
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 33.7% 12.2% –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) – 6.1% –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 13.2% –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricLRNPRDOGHC
Gross margin – 77.1% –
EBITDA margin – 29.0% –
Operating margin – 24.6% –
Pretax margin – 26.9% –
Net margin – 20.6% –
FCF margin – 25.4% –
Operating cash flow margin 19.9% 26.2% –
Return on equity 20.3% 17.3% –
Return on assets 13.5% 13.4% –
Return on invested capital – – –
Return on capital employed – 18.5% –
Asset turnover 1.0x 0.7x –
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.5x 1.3x –
Stock comp / revenue 0.9% 1.5% –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricLRNPRDOGHC
Debt / assets – – –
Debt / equity – – –
Net debt / EBITDA – – –
Debt / FCF – – –
Liabilities / assets 33.9% 22.6% –
Equity / assets 66.1% 77.4% –
Interest coverage – 34.1x –
Current ratio 2.6x 4.7x –
Quick ratio – 7.9x –
Cash ratio – 7.6x –
Altman Z-score – 6.49 –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricLRNPRDOGHC
Dividend yield – 2.0% 0.6%
Net buyback yield – 4.5% –
Shareholder yield – 6.5% 0.6%
Payout ratio (earnings) – 21.9% –
Payout ratio (FCF) – 17.8% –
Dividend growth (1Y) – 11.6% –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusLRNPRDOGHC
Forward P/E 9.6xFY2027 10.2xFY2026 15.3xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $8.42FY2027 $3.08FY2026 $76.14FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +17.9%FY2027 +27.3%FY2026 +14.5%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after -6.4% +4.9% -16.0%
Revenue, next fiscal year $2.42BFY2027 $877.60MFY2026 $4.97BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY -3.9%FY2027 +3.7%FY2026 +1.3%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +16.4% -5.8% +2.0%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersLRNPRDOGHC
Held by institutions 100.0% 100.0% 83.3%
Institutions holding 411 340 337
Change in shares held, QoQ +1.2% +1.9% +0.4%
Institutions buying 212 173 149
Institutions selling 135 113 110
Buyers to sellers 1.57 1.53 1.35

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

LRNPRDOGHC
LRN 1.00 0.40 0.21
PRDO 0.40 1.00 0.40
GHC 0.21 0.40 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, LRN, PRDO and GHC?

Graham Holdings (GHC) is the largest by market capitalisation: Stride (LRN) $3.35B, Perdoceo Education (PRDO) $1.96B, Graham Holdings (GHC) $4.95B.

Which stock is cheaper, LRN, PRDO and GHC?

Graham Holdings (GHC) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Stride (LRN) 10.3x, Perdoceo Education (PRDO) 11.1x, Graham Holdings (GHC) 10.0x). On next year's consensus earnings, Stride (LRN) is cheapest (Stride (LRN) 9.6x, Perdoceo Education (PRDO) 10.2x, Graham Holdings (GHC) 15.3x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Perdoceo Education (PRDO) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Stride (LRN) +2.5%, Perdoceo Education (PRDO) +11.7%, Graham Holdings (GHC) +4.3%.

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Stride (LRN) returned the most: Stride (LRN) +15.2%, Perdoceo Education (PRDO) -9.4%, Graham Holdings (GHC) +11.4%. Over five years, Perdoceo Education (PRDO) compounded fastest (Stride (LRN) +17.9%/yr, Perdoceo Education (PRDO) +24.2%/yr, Graham Holdings (GHC) +14.7%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Perdoceo Education (PRDO) has the highest dividend yield: Perdoceo Education (PRDO) 1.98%, Graham Holdings (GHC) 0.65%. Stride (LRN) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Graham Holdings (GHC) has been the steadiest (Stride (LRN) 42.1%, Perdoceo Education (PRDO) 35.4%, Graham Holdings (GHC) 23.2%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, LRN, PRDO and GHC?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Perdoceo Education (PRDO) leads on 4. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.