LRCX vs ONTO vs CAMT Stock Comparison

Lam Research, Onto Innovation and Camtek Prices as of Nov 2, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (ASML) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
LRCX Lam Research Corp
$227.56 -34.5% 1M +44.5% 1Y
Market cap
$279.68B
P/E
33.1x
Revenue (TTM)
$26.13B
Div. yield
–
Semiconductor Equipment Technology
9 wins
ONTO Onto Innovation Inc.
$191.40 -41.6% 1M +41.8% 1Y
Market cap
$9.14B
P/E
69.0x
Revenue (TTM)
$1.12B
Div. yield
–
Semiconductor Equipment Technology
CAMT Camtek Ltd
$108.25 -34.5% 1M -12.6% 1Y
Market cap
$4.65B
P/E
123.4x
Revenue (TTM)
$509.02M
Div. yield
–
Semiconductor Equipment Technology

Head to Head

9 decided of 12

Lam Research leads on 9 of the 12 questions below (Lam Research 9). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionLRCXONTOCAMTLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $279.68B $9.14B $4.65B LRCX
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 33.1x 69.0x 123.4x LRCX
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 22.8x 24.0x 32.5x LRCX
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +33.4% +8.1% +7.9% LRCX
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 32.3% 11.8% 7.4% LRCX
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 49.6% — — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA -0.4x — — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +44.5% +41.8% -12.6% LRCX
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +31.4%/yr +17.8%/yr +21.9%/yr LRCX
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 66.3% 73.1% 72.1% LRCX
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 67/100 61/100 44/100 LRCX

Percentile Scorecard

LRCXONTOCAMT

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisLRCXONTOCAMT
Valuation 51 #47 of 94 60 #38 of 94 40 #57 of 94
Growth 84 #16 of 92 32 #63 of 92 30 #65 of 92
Profitability 96 #5 of 90 58 #38 of 90 53 #43 of 90
Financial Health 45 #56 of 101 58 #43 of 101 53 #48 of 101
Shareholder Returns 60 #30 of 74 95 #5 of 74 –
Overall 67 61 44
  • LRCX ranked among 103 companies in Semiconductors
  • ONTO ranked among 103 companies in Semiconductors
  • CAMT ranked among 103 companies in Semiconductors

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodLRCXONTOCAMTSPY
1 month -34.5%-41.6%-34.5% -2.3%
3 months -22.8%-28.7%-22.6% -0.7%
6 months -12.0%-36.1%-40.8% +4.8%
Year to date +32.9%+21.2%+1.8% +10.3%
1 year +44.5%+41.8%-12.6% +10.3%
3 years +258.9%+61.0%+91.7% +73.0%
3 years, per year +53.1%+17.2%+24.2% +20.1%
5 years +291.4%+127.1%+169.1% +61.9%
5 years, per year +31.4%+17.8%+21.9% +10.1%
10 years +2,272.9%—+3,632.8% +258.6%
10 years, per year +37.3%—+43.6% +13.6%

Risk

MeasureLRCXONTOCAMTSPY
Volatility, 1Y 66.3%73.1%72.1% 12.8%
Downside volatility, 1Y 65.9%74.8%76.0% 12.8%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 3.303.272.92 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.670.57-0.17 0.80
Max drawdown, 5Y -56.8%-62.8%-63.2% -25.4%
From 52-week high -47.5%-49.4%-47.8% -3.5%
52-week high $433.33$378.45$207.46 $779.14
52-week low $139.59$124.09$94.40 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleLRCXONTOCAMT
P/E now vs peer median 33.7xmedian 41.3x 71.3xmedian 41.3x 131.3xmedian 41.3x
P/S now vs peer median 10.9xmedian 6.6x 8.4xmedian 6.6x 9.7xmedian 6.6x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 27.7xmedian 26.2x 34.4xmedian 26.2x —median 26.2x
P/FCF now vs peer median 43.5xmedian 37.7x 37.2xmedian 37.7x —median 37.7x
P/B now vs peer median 20.4xmedian 4.3x 4.9xmedian 4.3x 7.0xmedian 4.3x
PEG now vs peer median 1.08median 1.81 -8.10median 1.81 -5.91median 1.81

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsLRCXONTOCAMT
Revenue $26.13B $1.12B $509.02M
Gross profit $13.34B $564.06M $254.77M
Operating income $9.65B $134.61M $118.02M
Net income $8.45B $132.61M $56.14M
Free cash flow $6.54B $252.47M –
R&D $2.47B $142.63M $57.52M
EPS (diluted) $6.73 $2.67 $0.76
Cash & equivalents $7.44B $1.25B $215.23M
Total debt $3.74B – –
Shares (diluted) 1.26B 49.68M 49.37M
Enterprise value $255.74B $4.99B $3.54B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricLRCXONTOCAMT
P/E 33.7x 71.3x 131.3x
P/FCF 43.5x 37.2x –
P/Operating cash flow 37.5x 35.3x –
P/S 10.9x 8.4x 9.7x
P/B 20.4x 4.9x 7.0x
P/Tangible book 20.4x 5.6x 7.2x
EV/EBITDA 27.7x 34.4x –
EV/EBIT 29.1x 55.7x 39.5x
EV/Revenue 10.7x 6.7x 9.2x
EV/FCF 42.9x 29.7x –
EV/Operating cash flow 37.0x 28.2x –
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 1.08 -8.10 -5.91

Growth

14 metrics
MetricLRCXONTOCAMT
Revenue growth (1Y) 33.4% 8.1% 7.9%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 18.2% 7.7% 17.9%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 38.1% 5.6% 7.4%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 23.4% 5.4% 19.7%
Operating income growth (1Y) 49.3% -29.5% -6.0%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 29.0% -8.3% 18.9%
Net income growth (1Y) 45.4% -33.7% -65.6%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 28.6% -8.6% -16.3%
EPS growth (1Y) 47.0% -34.5% -71.8%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 31.1% -8.8% -22.2%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 18.7% -2.5% –
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 15.3% 17.7% –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 17.8% 5.9% –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 13.2% 22.0% –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricLRCXONTOCAMT
Gross margin 51.1% 50.4% 50.1%
EBITDA margin 38.7% 19.5% –
Operating margin 37.0% 12.0% 23.2%
Pretax margin 37.2% 14.1% 9.2%
Net margin 32.3% 11.8% 7.4%
FCF margin 25.0% 22.5% –
Operating cash flow margin 29.0% 23.8% –
Return on equity 64.1% 6.5% 8.1%
Return on assets 33.9% 4.4% 4.3%
Return on invested capital 49.6% – –
Return on capital employed 54.8% 4.8% 9.9%
Asset turnover 1.0x 0.4x 0.4x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 0.9x 2.0x –
Stock comp / revenue 1.5% 2.8% –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricLRCXONTOCAMT
Debt / assets 14.2% – –
Debt / equity 0.3x – –
Net debt / EBITDA -0.4x – –
Debt / FCF 0.6x – –
Liabilities / assets 47.2% 48.0% 47.0%
Equity / assets 52.8% 52.0% 53.0%
Interest coverage – – –
Current ratio 2.5x 9.7x 7.4x
Quick ratio 1.8x 8.2x 3.6x
Cash ratio 1.0x 6.9x 2.4x
Altman Z-score 18.38 4.68 6.58

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricLRCXONTOCAMT
Dividend yield 0.5% – –
Net buyback yield 1.3% 2.0% –
Shareholder yield 1.8% 2.0% 0.0%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusLRCXONTOCAMT
Forward P/E 22.8xFY2027 24.0xFY2026 32.5xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $10.12FY2027 $8.42FY2026 $3.46FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +73.9%FY2027 +70.4%FY2026 +6.1%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +12.6% +43.5% +53.2%
Revenue, next fiscal year $32.96BFY2027 $1.37BFY2026 $568.64MFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +41.9%FY2027 +35.5%FY2026 +14.6%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +25.0% +41.1% +42.5%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersLRCXONTOCAMT
Held by institutions 85.6% 98.3% 41.7%
Institutions holding 3,134 690 235
Change in shares held, QoQ +6.2% +2.3% -12.5%
Institutions buying 1,698 376 126
Institutions selling 1,163 232 68
Buyers to sellers 1.46 1.62 1.85

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

LRCXONTOCAMT
LRCX 1.00 0.84 0.74
ONTO 0.84 1.00 0.77
CAMT 0.74 0.77 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, LRCX, ONTO and CAMT?

Lam Research (LRCX) is the largest by market capitalisation: Lam Research (LRCX) $279.68B, Onto Innovation (ONTO) $9.14B, Camtek (CAMT) $4.65B.

Which stock is cheaper, LRCX, ONTO and CAMT?

Lam Research (LRCX) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Lam Research (LRCX) 33.1x, Onto Innovation (ONTO) 69.0x, Camtek (CAMT) 123.4x). On next year's consensus earnings, Lam Research (LRCX) is cheapest (Lam Research (LRCX) 22.8x, Onto Innovation (ONTO) 24.0x, Camtek (CAMT) 32.5x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Lam Research (LRCX) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Lam Research (LRCX) +33.4%, Onto Innovation (ONTO) +8.1%, Camtek (CAMT) +7.9%.

Which company is more profitable?

Lam Research (LRCX) has the highest net margin (Lam Research (LRCX) 32.3%, Onto Innovation (ONTO) 11.8%, Camtek (CAMT) 7.4%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Lam Research (LRCX) returned the most: Lam Research (LRCX) +44.5%, Onto Innovation (ONTO) +41.8%, Camtek (CAMT) -12.6%. Over five years, Lam Research (LRCX) compounded fastest (Lam Research (LRCX) +31.4%/yr, Onto Innovation (ONTO) +17.8%/yr, Camtek (CAMT) +21.9%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Lam Research (LRCX) has been the steadiest (Lam Research (LRCX) 66.3%, Onto Innovation (ONTO) 73.1%, Camtek (CAMT) 72.1%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, LRCX, ONTO and CAMT?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Lam Research (LRCX) leads on 9. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.