LRCX vs BRSL vs KLAC Stock Comparison

Lam Research, Brightstar Lottery and Kla Prices as of Oct 29, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (ASML) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
LRCX Lam Research Corp
$254.39 -21.5% 1M +58.3% 1Y
Market cap
$297.52B
P/E
35.2x
Revenue (TTM)
$26.13B
Div. yield
–
Semiconductor Equipment Technology
7 wins
KLAC Kla Corp
$167.43 -14.8% 1M +35.5% 1Y
Market cap
$205.56B
P/E
39.1x
Revenue (TTM)
$14.51B
Div. yield
0.01%
Semiconductor Equipment Technology
1 win

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Lam Research leads on 7 of the 12 questions below (Lam Research 7, Brightstar Lottery 3, Kla 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionLRCXBRSLKLACLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $297.52B $1.88B $205.56B LRCX
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 35.2x 7.6x 39.1x BRSL
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 25.1x 17.2x 29.5x BRSL
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +33.4% +0.7% +15.8% LRCX
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 32.3% 10.0% 36.2% KLAC
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 49.6% 14.1% 43.4% LRCX
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA -0.4x 2.4x 0.6x LRCX
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.01% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +58.3% -42.4% +35.5% LRCX
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +35.2%/yr -20.1%/yr +35.1%/yr LRCX
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 65.7% 32.8% 61.7% BRSL
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 66/100 42/100 59/100 LRCX

Percentile Scorecard

LRCXBRSLKLAC

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisLRCXBRSLKLAC
Valuation 47 #50 of 94 62 #39 of 101 39 #58 of 94
Growth 82 #17 of 92 24 #74 of 97 56 #41 of 92
Profitability 94 #6 of 88 59 #39 of 93 95 #5 of 88
Financial Health 45 #53 of 96 29 #77 of 108 20 #77 of 96
Shareholder Returns 62 #28 of 72 34 #42 of 63 83 #13 of 72
Overall 66 42 59
  • LRCX ranked among 103 companies in Semiconductors
  • BRSL ranked among 114 companies in Business Applications
  • KLAC ranked among 103 companies in Semiconductors

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodLRCXBRSLKLACSPY
1 month -21.5%-3.4%-14.8% +0.7%
3 months -14.6%-5.4%-7.2% +3.7%
6 months -1.3%-26.8%-4.3% +7.1%
Year to date +48.6%-37.9%+37.8% +12.8%
1 year +58.3%-42.4%+35.5% +11.9%
3 years +336.0%-63.6%+264.3% +85.2%
3 years, per year +63.4%-28.6%+53.9% +22.8%
5 years +351.4%-67.4%+349.2% +67.6%
5 years, per year +35.2%-20.1%+35.1% +10.9%
10 years +2,544.4%-66.4%+2,142.6% +262.0%
10 years, per year +38.8%-10.3%+36.5% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureLRCXBRSLKLACSPY
Volatility, 1Y 65.7%32.8%61.7% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 65.3%34.2%65.7% 12.6%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 3.260.822.79 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.89-1.290.58 0.94
Max drawdown, 5Y -56.8%-72.7%-51.7% -25.4%
From 52-week high -41.3%-43.2%-44.5% -1.2%
52-week high $433.33$16.91$301.71 $779.14
52-week low $139.59$9.22$109.71 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleLRCXBRSLKLAC
P/E now vs peer median 37.7xmedian 46.4x 7.6xmedian 28.0x 41.6xmedian 46.4x
P/S now vs peer median 12.2xmedian 7.8x 0.7xmedian 2.8x 15.0xmedian 7.8x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 31.0xmedian 27.5x 3.5xmedian 16.9x 33.8xmedian 27.5x
P/FCF now vs peer median 48.6xmedian 40.1x -1.2xmedian 15.9x 54.0xmedian 40.1x
P/B now vs peer median 22.8xmedian 4.7x 0.9xmedian 3.2x 33.4xmedian 4.7x
PEG now vs peer median 1.21median 2.10 -0.82median 0.89 1.98median 2.10

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsLRCXBRSLKLAC
Revenue $26.13B $2.47B $14.51B
Gross profit $13.34B $1.32B $8.92B
Operating income $9.65B $1.07B $6.19B
Net income $8.45B $366.00M $5.26B
Free cash flow $6.54B -$1.47B $4.04B
R&D $2.47B $52.00M $1.57B
EPS (diluted) $6.73 $1.26 $4.01
Cash & equivalents $7.44B $558.00M $1.53B
Total debt $16.44B $4.35B $5.72B
Shares (diluted) 1.26B 197.00M 1.31B
Enterprise value $273.57B -$2.97B $198.14B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricLRCXBRSLKLAC
P/E 37.7x 7.6x 41.6x
P/FCF 48.6x -1.2x 54.0x
P/Operating cash flow 41.9x -1.0x 48.3x
P/S 12.2x 0.7x 15.0x
P/B 22.8x 0.9x 33.4x
P/Tangible book 22.8x 0.9x 34.6x
EV/EBITDA 31.0x 3.5x 33.8x
EV/EBIT 32.5x 5.3x 35.9x
EV/Revenue 12.0x 2.3x 15.3x
EV/FCF 48.0x -3.8x 55.1x
EV/Operating cash flow 41.5x -3.0x 49.3x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 1.21 -0.82 1.98

Growth

14 metrics
MetricLRCXBRSLKLAC
Revenue growth (1Y) 33.4% 0.7% 15.8%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 18.2% 9.1% 12.6%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 38.1% -4.0% 16.1%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 23.4% 151.4% 13.8%
Operating income growth (1Y) 49.3% 88.2% 18.2%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 29.0% -2.1% 17.8%
Net income growth (1Y) 45.4% 8.9% 24.1%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 28.6% -4.5% 19.2%
EPS growth (1Y) 47.0% 33.1% 25.3%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 31.1% -9.4% 21.0%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 18.7% -265.1% 6.2%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 15.3% -60.6% 8.4%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 17.8% -207.8% 4.1%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 13.2% -58.7% 7.9%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricLRCXBRSLKLAC
Gross margin 51.1% 53.5% 61.5%
EBITDA margin 38.7% 65.3% 45.4%
Operating margin 37.0% 43.2% 42.6%
Pretax margin 37.2% 24.4% 42.2%
Net margin 32.3% 10.0% 36.2%
FCF margin 25.0% -59.6% 27.8%
Operating cash flow margin 29.0% -74.7% 31.1%
Return on equity 64.1% 17.7% 81.7%
Return on assets 33.9% 4.2% 28.9%
Return on invested capital 49.6% 14.1% 43.4%
Return on capital employed 54.8% 14.2% 45.4%
Asset turnover 1.0x 0.3x 0.8x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 0.9x -5.0x 0.9x
Stock comp / revenue 1.5% 0.7% 2.2%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricLRCXBRSLKLAC
Debt / assets 14.2% 54.2% 31.1%
Debt / equity 0.3x 2.2x 0.9x
Net debt / EBITDA -0.4x 2.4x 0.6x
Debt / FCF 0.6x -3.0x 1.4x
Liabilities / assets 47.2% 74.9% 64.6%
Equity / assets 52.8% 25.1% 35.4%
Interest coverage – – 22.0x
Current ratio 2.5x 1.1x 2.8x
Quick ratio 1.8x 0.5x 1.0x
Cash ratio 1.0x 0.5x 0.3x
Altman Z-score 19.99 0.87 13.74

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricLRCXBRSLKLAC
Dividend yield 0.4% 9.5% 0.3%
Net buyback yield 1.2% -17.5% 1.2%
Shareholder yield 1.6% -8.1% 1.5%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – 21.1%
Payout ratio (FCF) – – 27.5%
Dividend growth (1Y) – – 15.7%
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – 15.2%

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusLRCXBRSLKLAC
Forward P/E 25.1xFY2027 17.2xFY2026 29.5xFY2027
EPS, next fiscal year $10.12FY2027 $0.56FY2026 $5.67FY2027
EPS growth, next FY +73.9%FY2027 -38.5%FY2026 +50.8%FY2027
EPS growth, the year after +12.6% +28.6% +16.6%
Revenue, next fiscal year $32.96BFY2027 $2.56BFY2026 $19.18BFY2027
Revenue growth, next FY +41.9%FY2027 +2.1%FY2026 +41.2%FY2027
Revenue growth, the year after +25.0% -2.1% +8.6%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersLRCXBRSLKLAC
Held by institutions 85.6% 44.1% 91.0%
Institutions holding 3,133 200 2,479
Change in shares held, QoQ +6.2% +3.8% +4.2%
Institutions buying 1,697 97 1,285
Institutions selling 1,163 58 983
Buyers to sellers 1.46 1.67 1.31

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

LRCXBRSLKLAC
LRCX 1.00 0.07 0.88
BRSL 0.07 1.00 0.05
KLAC 0.88 0.05 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, LRCX, BRSL and KLAC?

Lam Research (LRCX) is the largest by market capitalisation: Lam Research (LRCX) $297.52B, Brightstar Lottery (BRSL) $1.88B, Kla (KLAC) $205.56B.

Which stock is cheaper, LRCX, BRSL and KLAC?

Brightstar Lottery (BRSL) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Lam Research (LRCX) 35.2x, Brightstar Lottery (BRSL) 7.6x, Kla (KLAC) 39.1x). On next year's consensus earnings, Brightstar Lottery (BRSL) is cheapest (Lam Research (LRCX) 25.1x, Brightstar Lottery (BRSL) 17.2x, Kla (KLAC) 29.5x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Lam Research (LRCX) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Lam Research (LRCX) +33.4%, Brightstar Lottery (BRSL) +0.7%, Kla (KLAC) +15.8%.

Which company is more profitable?

Kla (KLAC) has the highest net margin (Lam Research (LRCX) 32.3%, Brightstar Lottery (BRSL) 10.0%, Kla (KLAC) 36.2%). On return on invested capital, Lam Research (LRCX) leads (Lam Research (LRCX) 49.6%, Brightstar Lottery (BRSL) 14.1%, Kla (KLAC) 43.4%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Lam Research (LRCX) returned the most: Lam Research (LRCX) +58.3%, Brightstar Lottery (BRSL) -42.4%, Kla (KLAC) +35.5%. Over five years, Lam Research (LRCX) compounded fastest (Lam Research (LRCX) +35.2%/yr, Brightstar Lottery (BRSL) -20.1%/yr, Kla (KLAC) +35.1%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Lam Research (LRCX) 0.00%, Brightstar Lottery (BRSL) 0.00%, Kla (KLAC) 0.01%. Lam Research (LRCX) and Brightstar Lottery (BRSL) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Brightstar Lottery (BRSL) has been the steadiest (Lam Research (LRCX) 65.7%, Brightstar Lottery (BRSL) 32.8%, Kla (KLAC) 61.7%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, LRCX, BRSL and KLAC?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Lam Research (LRCX) leads on 7. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.