LRCX vs ASML vs KLAC Stock Comparison

Lam Research, Asml Holding and Kla Prices as of Nov 5, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (MKSI) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
LRCX Lam Research Corp
$185.20 -44.5% 1M +12.2% 1Y
Market cap
$231.34B
P/E
27.4x
Revenue (TTM)
$26.13B
Div. yield
0.60%
Semiconductor Equipment Technology
6 wins
ASML Asml Holding Nv
$1,356.65 -26.0% 1M +30.0% 1Y
Market cap
$522.88B
P/E
48.2x
Revenue (TTM)
$37.62B
Div. yield
0.68%
Semiconductor Equipment Technology
4 wins
KLAC Kla Corp
$129.80 -34.3% 1M +5.8% 1Y
Market cap
$169.12B
P/E
32.2x
Revenue (TTM)
$14.51B
Div. yield
0.36%
Semiconductor Equipment Technology
2 wins

Head to Head

12 decided of 12

Lam Research leads on 6 of the 12 questions below (Lam Research 6, Asml Holding 4, Kla 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionLRCXASMLKLACLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $231.34B $522.88B $169.12B ASML
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 27.4x 48.2x 32.2x LRCX
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 18.4x 28.4x 22.9x LRCX
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +33.4% +22.9% +15.8% LRCX
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 32.3% 29.1% 36.2% KLAC
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 49.6% — 43.4% LRCX
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA -0.4x — 0.6x LRCX
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.60% 0.68% 0.36% ASML
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +12.2% +30.0% +5.8% ASML
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +24.9%/yr +9.9%/yr +25.5%/yr KLAC
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 68.4% 48.4% 63.7% ASML
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 69/100 45/100 60/100 LRCX

Percentile Scorecard

LRCXASMLKLAC

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisLRCXASMLKLAC
Valuation 54 #44 of 94 13 #82 of 94 42 #55 of 94
Growth 82 #17 of 92 79 #20 of 92 51 #46 of 92
Profitability 96 #5 of 90 76 #22 of 90 97 #4 of 90
Financial Health 46 #55 of 101 13 #88 of 101 21 #80 of 101
Shareholder Returns 68 #27 of 81 43 #47 of 81 88 #11 of 81
Overall 69 45 60
  • LRCX ranked among 103 companies in Semiconductors
  • ASML ranked among 103 companies in Semiconductors
  • KLAC ranked among 103 companies in Semiconductors

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodLRCXASMLKLACSPY
1 month -44.5%-26.0%-34.3% -5.9%
3 months -39.4%-20.4%-32.8% -4.6%
6 months -35.4%-10.5%-26.4% +0.2%
Year to date +8.2%+26.8%+6.8% +7.5%
1 year +12.2%+30.0%+5.8% +8.2%
3 years +189.8%+112.8%+160.2% +68.3%
3 years, per year +42.6%+28.7%+37.6% +19.0%
5 years +203.2%+60.2%+211.5% +56.5%
5 years, per year +24.9%+9.9%+25.5% +9.4%
10 years +1,849.5%+1,223.7%+1,641.8% +251.5%
10 years, per year +34.6%+29.5%+33.1% +13.4%

Risk

MeasureLRCXASMLKLACSPY
Volatility, 1Y 68.4%48.4%63.7% 13.6%
Downside volatility, 1Y 70.6%49.5%69.6% 14.2%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 3.292.242.78 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.180.620.09 0.60
Max drawdown, 5Y -57.3%-56.9%-57.0% -25.4%
From 52-week high -57.3%-31.8%-57.0% -5.9%
52-week high $433.33$1,989.44$301.71 $779.14
52-week low $139.59$966.57$109.71 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleLRCXASMLKLAC
P/E now vs peer median 27.4xmedian 35.6x 48.2xmedian 35.6x 32.2xmedian 35.6x
P/S now vs peer median 8.9xmedian 5.8x 13.9xmedian 5.8x 11.7xmedian 5.8x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 22.5xmedian 21.9x —median 21.9x 26.3xmedian 21.9x
P/FCF now vs peer median 35.4xmedian 30.7x 41.8xmedian 30.7x 41.9xmedian 30.7x
P/B now vs peer median 16.6xmedian 3.5x 22.7xmedian 3.5x 25.9xmedian 3.5x
PEG now vs peer median 0.88median 1.25 1.99median 1.25 1.53median 1.25

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsLRCXASMLKLAC
Revenue $26.13B $37.62B $14.51B
Gross profit $13.34B $19.58B $8.92B
Operating income $9.65B – $6.19B
Net income $8.45B – $5.26B
Free cash flow $6.54B – $4.04B
R&D $2.47B – $1.57B
EPS (diluted) $6.73 $28.13 $4.01
Cash & equivalents $7.44B $15.17B $1.53B
Total debt $3.74B $5.16B $5.72B
Shares (diluted) 1.26B 388.90M 1.31B
Enterprise value $207.39B $478.56B $161.70B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricLRCXASMLKLAC
P/E 27.4x 48.2x 32.2x
P/FCF 35.4x 41.8x 41.9x
P/Operating cash flow 30.5x – 37.5x
P/S 8.9x 13.9x 11.7x
P/B 16.6x 22.7x 25.9x
P/Tangible book 16.6x 23.3x 26.8x
EV/EBITDA 22.5x – 26.3x
EV/EBIT 23.6x – 28.0x
EV/Revenue 8.7x 13.6x 11.9x
EV/FCF 34.8x – 42.9x
EV/Operating cash flow 30.0x – 38.4x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.88 1.99 1.53

Growth

14 metrics
MetricLRCXASMLKLAC
Revenue growth (1Y) 33.4% 22.9% 15.8%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 18.2% 19.4% 12.6%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 38.1% 24.9% 16.1%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 23.4% 20.6% 13.8%
Operating income growth (1Y) 49.3% – 18.2%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 29.0% – 17.8%
Net income growth (1Y) 45.4% – 24.1%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 28.6% – 19.2%
EPS growth (1Y) 47.0% 35.2% 25.3%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 31.1% 24.2% 21.0%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 18.7% – 6.2%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 15.3% – 8.4%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 17.8% – 4.1%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 13.2% – 7.9%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricLRCXASMLKLAC
Gross margin 51.1% 52.0% 61.5%
EBITDA margin 38.7% – 45.4%
Operating margin 37.0% – 42.6%
Pretax margin 37.2% – 42.2%
Net margin 32.3% 29.1% 36.2%
FCF margin 25.0% – 27.8%
Operating cash flow margin 29.0% – 31.1%
Return on equity 64.1% – 81.7%
Return on assets 33.9% – 28.9%
Return on invested capital 49.6% – 43.4%
Return on capital employed 54.8% – 45.4%
Asset turnover 1.0x 0.7x 0.8x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 0.9x – 0.9x
Stock comp / revenue 1.5% – 2.2%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricLRCXASMLKLAC
Debt / assets 14.2% 8.7% 31.1%
Debt / equity 0.3x 0.2x 0.9x
Net debt / EBITDA -0.4x – 0.6x
Debt / FCF 0.6x – 1.4x
Liabilities / assets 47.2% 61.2% 64.6%
Equity / assets 52.8% 38.8% 35.4%
Interest coverage – – 22.0x
Current ratio 2.5x 1.3x 2.8x
Quick ratio 1.8x 0.7x 1.0x
Cash ratio 1.0x 0.5x 0.3x
Altman Z-score 15.83 – 11.26

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricLRCXASMLKLAC
Dividend yield 0.6% 0.7% 0.4%
Net buyback yield 1.6% – 1.5%
Shareholder yield 2.2% 0.7% 1.9%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – 21.1%
Payout ratio (FCF) – – 27.5%
Dividend growth (1Y) – – 15.7%
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – 15.2%

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusLRCXASMLKLAC
Forward P/E 18.4xFY2027 28.4xFY2026 22.9xFY2027
EPS, next fiscal year $10.09FY2027 $47.70FY2026 $5.67FY2027
EPS growth, next FY +73.4%FY2027 +61.5%FY2026 +50.8%FY2027
EPS growth, the year after +12.0% +42.2% +16.6%
Revenue, next fiscal year $32.92BFY2027 $47.17BFY2026 $19.18BFY2027
Revenue growth, next FY +41.7%FY2027 +20.9%FY2026 +41.2%FY2027
Revenue growth, the year after +24.6% +43.0% +8.6%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersLRCXASMLKLAC
Held by institutions 85.6% 19.8% 91.0%
Institutions holding 3,138 2,493 2,483
Change in shares held, QoQ +6.2% +8.0% +4.2%
Institutions buying 1,701 1,359 1,287
Institutions selling 1,164 783 985
Buyers to sellers 1.46 1.74 1.31

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

LRCXASMLKLAC
LRCX 1.00 0.86 0.88
ASML 0.86 1.00 0.82
KLAC 0.88 0.82 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, LRCX, ASML and KLAC?

Asml Holding (ASML) is the largest by market capitalisation: Lam Research (LRCX) $231.34B, Asml Holding (ASML) $522.88B, Kla (KLAC) $169.12B.

Which stock is cheaper, LRCX, ASML and KLAC?

Lam Research (LRCX) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Lam Research (LRCX) 27.4x, Asml Holding (ASML) 48.2x, Kla (KLAC) 32.2x). On next year's consensus earnings, Lam Research (LRCX) is cheapest (Lam Research (LRCX) 18.4x, Asml Holding (ASML) 28.4x, Kla (KLAC) 22.9x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Lam Research (LRCX) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Lam Research (LRCX) +33.4%, Asml Holding (ASML) +22.9%, Kla (KLAC) +15.8%.

Which company is more profitable?

Kla (KLAC) has the highest net margin (Lam Research (LRCX) 32.3%, Asml Holding (ASML) 29.1%, Kla (KLAC) 36.2%). On return on invested capital, Lam Research (LRCX) leads (Lam Research (LRCX) 49.6%, Kla (KLAC) 43.4%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Asml Holding (ASML) returned the most: Lam Research (LRCX) +12.2%, Asml Holding (ASML) +30.0%, Kla (KLAC) +5.8%. Over five years, Kla (KLAC) compounded fastest (Lam Research (LRCX) +24.9%/yr, Asml Holding (ASML) +9.9%/yr, Kla (KLAC) +25.5%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Asml Holding (ASML) has the highest dividend yield: Lam Research (LRCX) 0.60%, Asml Holding (ASML) 0.68%, Kla (KLAC) 0.36%.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Asml Holding (ASML) has been the steadiest (Lam Research (LRCX) 68.4%, Asml Holding (ASML) 48.4%, Kla (KLAC) 63.7%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, LRCX, ASML and KLAC?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Lam Research (LRCX) leads on 6. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.