LPLA vs CIB vs TIGR Stock Comparison

LPL Financial Holdings, Grupo Cibest and UP Fintech Holding Prices as of Oct 28, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (XP) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
CIB Grupo Cibest S.A.
$94.57 +2.3% 1M +66.7% 1Y
Market cap
$48.19B
P/E
0.0x
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
–
Money Center Banks Financial Services
6 wins
TIGR UP Fintech Holding Ltd
$4.11 -11.6% 1M -61.2% 1Y
Market cap
$714.17M
P/E
6.0x
Revenue (TTM)
$687.88M
Div. yield
–
Retail Brokerage Financial Services
2 wins

Head to Head

8 decided of 12

Grupo Cibest leads on 6 of the 12 questions below (Grupo Cibest 6, UP Fintech Holding 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionLPLACIBTIGRLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $22.20B $48.19B $714.17M CIB
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 15.9x 0.0x 6.0x CIB
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 11.9x 7.8x 7.8x CIB
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +31.0% — +41.4% TIGR
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months — — 17.4% –
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — -5.9% — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — 1.4x — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -21.5% +66.7% -61.2% CIB
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +10.4%/yr +21.4%/yr -8.7%/yr CIB
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 40.5% 33.7% 58.1% CIB
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 41/100 61/100 72/100 TIGR

Percentile Scorecard

LPLACIBTIGR

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisLPLACIBTIGR
Valuation 38 #60 of 96 72 #102 of 361 99 #2 of 96
Growth 67 #22 of 65 – 80 #14 of 65
Profitability – 15 #127 of 149 67 #22 of 65
Financial Health – 61 #63 of 158 43 #53 of 92
Shareholder Returns 19 #31 of 38 95 #18 of 338 –
Overall 41 61 72
  • LPLA ranked among 110 companies in Capital Markets
  • CIB ranked among 368 companies in Banking
  • TIGR ranked among 110 companies in Capital Markets

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodLPLACIBTIGRSPY
1 month -13.9%+2.3%-11.6% +0.9%
3 months -20.3%+5.5%-14.2% +5.9%
6 months -18.6%+40.5%-37.0% +8.5%
Year to date -24.6%+48.7%-57.0% +13.3%
1 year -21.5%+66.7%-61.2% +12.4%
3 years +21.6%+270.7%-10.7% +88.1%
3 years, per year +6.7%+54.8%-3.7% +23.5%
5 years +64.1%+163.2%-36.5% +68.2%
5 years, per year +10.4%+21.4%-8.7% +11.0%
10 years +760.6%+146.5%— +263.4%
10 years, per year +24.0%+9.4%— +13.8%

Risk

MeasureLPLACIBTIGRSPY
Volatility, 1Y 40.5%33.7%58.1% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 46.9%32.5%64.3% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.890.781.68 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.531.98-1.05 0.98
Max drawdown, 5Y -33.4%-50.9%-68.9% -25.4%
From 52-week high -31.5%-8.4%-63.0% -0.9%
52-week high $393.25$103.26$11.12 $779.14
52-week low $265.86$56.73$4.04 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleLPLACIBTIGR
P/E now vs peer median 15.4xmedian 30.1x 0.0xmedian 12.1x 6.1xmedian 30.1x
P/S now vs peer median 1.0xmedian 3.0x 0.0xmedian 3.4x 1.1xmedian 3.0x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 14.1x 1.4xmedian 5.1x 1.1xmedian 14.1x
P/FCF now vs peer median -26.0xmedian 15.8x -0.2xmedian 10.8x —median 15.8x
P/B now vs peer median 3.6xmedian 2.4x 0.0xmedian 1.2x 0.8xmedian 2.4x
PEG now vs peer median 3.24median 0.54 —median 1.32 0.10median 0.54

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsLPLACIBTIGR
Revenue $20.40B – $687.88M
Operating income – – $163.65M
Net income – $5.74T $112.10M
Free cash flow – -$426.96B –
EPS (diluted) $17.40 – $0.64
Cash & equivalents $1.06B $27.74T $542.51M
Total debt – $31.85T –
Shares (diluted) 80.03M – 187.18M
Enterprise value $22.20B -$149.11T -$1.80B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricLPLACIBTIGR
P/E 15.4x 0.0x 6.1x
P/FCF -26.0x -0.2x –
P/Operating cash flow – -0.1x –
P/S 1.0x 0.0x 1.1x
P/B 3.6x 0.0x 0.8x
P/Tangible book 9.1x 0.0x 0.8x
EV/EBITDA – 1.4x 1.1x
EV/EBIT – 1.6x 1.0x
EV/Revenue 1.0x – 0.3x
EV/FCF – 88.0x –
EV/Operating cash flow – 58.4x –
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 3.24 – 0.10

Growth

14 metrics
MetricLPLACIBTIGR
Revenue growth (1Y) 31.0% – 41.4%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 27.9% – 39.8%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – – –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – – –
Operating income growth (1Y) – – 136.3%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – – –
Net income growth (1Y) – 12.2% -5.2%
Net income CAGR (3Y) – – 63.1%
EPS growth (1Y) 67.9% – -18.5%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 4.8% – 62.9%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) – – –
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – – –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) – – –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – – –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricLPLACIBTIGR
Gross margin – – –
EBITDA margin – – 24.9%
Operating margin – – 23.8%
Pretax margin – – 22.9%
Net margin – – 17.4%
FCF margin – – –
Operating cash flow margin – – –
Return on equity – 2.3% 13.0%
Return on assets – 2.6% 1.2%
Return on invested capital – -5.9% –
Return on capital employed – – 36.2%
Asset turnover 1.0x – 0.1x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) – -0.1x –
Stock comp / revenue – – –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricLPLACIBTIGR
Debt / assets – 8.8% –
Debt / equity – 0.1x –
Net debt / EBITDA – 1.4x –
Debt / FCF – -74.6x –
Liabilities / assets 70.7% – 90.9%
Equity / assets 29.3% 100.0% 9.1%
Interest coverage – -1.0x 2.3x
Current ratio – – 1.1x
Quick ratio – – 0.1x
Cash ratio – – 0.1x
Altman Z-score – – 0.32

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricLPLACIBTIGR
Dividend yield 0.4% 5.0% –
Net buyback yield – – –
Shareholder yield 0.4% 5.0% 0.0%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusLPLACIBTIGR
Forward P/E 11.9xFY2026 7.8xFY2026 7.8xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $22.53FY2026 $12.20FY2026 $0.53FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +12.1%FY2026 +179.2%FY2026 -47.5%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +30.1% +5.5% +35.8%
Revenue, next fiscal year $20.12BFY2026 $9.57BFY2026 $591.32MFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +18.4%FY2026 +45.0%FY2026 -3.4%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +24.3% +19.0% +7.5%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersLPLACIBTIGR
Held by institutions 100.0% 4.2% 33.7%
Institutions holding 765 212 117
Change in shares held, QoQ +0.7% +20.8% +6.6%
Institutions buying 351 110 65
Institutions selling 301 82 36
Buyers to sellers 1.17 1.34 1.81

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

LPLACIBTIGR
LPLA 1.00 0.10 0.19
CIB 0.10 1.00 0.29
TIGR 0.19 0.29 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, LPLA, CIB and TIGR?

Grupo Cibest (CIB) is the largest by market capitalisation: LPL Financial Holdings (LPLA) $22.20B, Grupo Cibest (CIB) $48.19B, UP Fintech Holding (TIGR) $714.17M.

Which stock is cheaper, LPLA, CIB and TIGR?

Grupo Cibest (CIB) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (LPL Financial Holdings (LPLA) 15.9x, Grupo Cibest (CIB) 0.0x, UP Fintech Holding (TIGR) 6.0x). On next year's consensus earnings, Grupo Cibest (CIB) is cheapest (LPL Financial Holdings (LPLA) 11.9x, Grupo Cibest (CIB) 7.8x, UP Fintech Holding (TIGR) 7.8x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

UP Fintech Holding (TIGR) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: LPL Financial Holdings (LPLA) +31.0%, UP Fintech Holding (TIGR) +41.4%.

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Grupo Cibest (CIB) returned the most: LPL Financial Holdings (LPLA) -21.5%, Grupo Cibest (CIB) +66.7%, UP Fintech Holding (TIGR) -61.2%. Over five years, Grupo Cibest (CIB) compounded fastest (LPL Financial Holdings (LPLA) +10.4%/yr, Grupo Cibest (CIB) +21.4%/yr, UP Fintech Holding (TIGR) -8.7%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Grupo Cibest (CIB) has been the steadiest (LPL Financial Holdings (LPLA) 40.5%, Grupo Cibest (CIB) 33.7%, UP Fintech Holding (TIGR) 58.1%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, LPLA, CIB and TIGR?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Grupo Cibest (CIB) leads on 6. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.