LPA vs OZ vs RNGE Stock Comparison

Logistic Properties of the Americas, Belpointe PREP and Range Impact Prices as of Oct 29, 2026 Peers: Industry group
OZ Belpointe PREP, LLC
$34.37 -17.8% 1M -47.1% 1Y
Market cap
$134.38M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
–
Real Estate Operators Real Estate
2 wins
RNGE Range Impact, Inc.
$0.56 -27.3% 1M +250.0% 1Y
Market cap
$68.16M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
–
Real Estate Operators Real Estate
2 wins

Head to Head

4 decided of 12

Belpointe PREP leads on 2 of the 12 questions below (Belpointe PREP 2, Range Impact 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionLPAOZRNGELeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $82.52M $134.38M $68.16M OZ
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 4.8x — — –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 21.7x — — –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +32,091.6% — — –
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 0.1% — — –
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 9.1% — — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 5.3x — — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield — — — –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -19.9% -47.1% +250.0% RNGE
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years — -19.2%/yr +13.3%/yr RNGE
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 66.8% 32.5% 131.5% OZ
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 64/100 — — –

Percentile Scorecard

LPAOZRNGE

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisLPAOZRNGE
Valuation 95 #3 of 39 – –
Growth 65 #12 of 32 – –
Profitability 61 #12 of 29 – –
Financial Health 36 #24 of 37 – –
Shareholder Returns – – –
Overall 64 – –
  • LPA ranked among 42 companies in Property Developers
  • OZ ranked among 42 companies in Property Developers
  • RNGE ranked among 42 companies in Property Developers

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodLPAOZRNGESPY
1 month -9.1%-17.8%-27.3% +0.7%
3 months -12.1%-23.7%-37.8% +3.7%
6 months -26.9%-33.2%+211.1% +7.1%
Year to date -4.4%-47.1%+273.3% +12.8%
1 year -19.9%-47.1%+250.0% +11.9%
3 years —-50.2%+250.0% +85.2%
3 years, per year —-20.7%+51.9% +22.8%
5 years —-65.6%+86.7% +67.6%
5 years, per year —-19.2%+13.3% +10.9%
10 years ——-60.8% +262.0%
10 years, per year ——-9.0% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureLPAOZRNGESPY
Volatility, 1Y 66.8%32.5%131.5% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 65.2%38.6%154.8% 12.6%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.060.251.27 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.30-1.451.90 0.94
Max drawdown, 5Y -99.1%-66.8%-73.0% -25.4%
From 52-week high -35.1%-49.4%-41.7% -1.2%
52-week high $4.02$67.99$0.96 $779.14
52-week low $2.38$33.95$0.13 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleLPAOZRNGE
P/E now vs peer median 4.8xmedian 8.7x —median 8.7x —median 8.7x
P/S now vs peer median 0.0xmedian 4.7x —median 4.7x —median 4.7x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 6.7xmedian 12.5x —median 12.5x —median 12.5x
P/FCF now vs peer median -94.0xmedian 6.2x —median 6.2x —median 6.2x
P/B now vs peer median 0.3xmedian 0.6x —median 0.6x —median 0.6x
PEG now vs peer median —median 0.28 —median 0.28 —median 0.28

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsLPAOZRNGE
Revenue $14.78B – –
Net income $77.06M – –
Free cash flow -$878.16K – –
EPS (diluted) $0.54 – –
Cash & equivalents $33.58M – –
Total debt $320.79M – –
Shares (diluted) 31.74M 3.90M 115.42M
Enterprise value $123.99M $134.38M $68.16M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricLPAOZRNGE
P/E 4.8x – –
P/FCF -94.0x – –
P/Operating cash flow -113.3x – –
P/S 0.0x – –
P/B 0.3x – –
P/Tangible book 0.3x – –
EV/EBITDA 6.7x – –
EV/EBIT 6.8x – –
EV/Revenue 0.0x – –
EV/FCF -451.0x – –
EV/Operating cash flow -543.7x – –
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) – – –

Growth

14 metrics
MetricLPAOZRNGE
Revenue growth (1Y) 32,092% – –
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – – –
Gross profit growth (1Y) – – –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – – –
Operating income growth (1Y) – – –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – – –
Net income growth (1Y) 294.3% – –
Net income CAGR (3Y) – – –
EPS growth (1Y) 144.4% – –
EPS CAGR (3Y) – – –
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -103.5% – –
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – – –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -104.2% – –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – – –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricLPAOZRNGE
Gross margin – – –
EBITDA margin 0.4% – –
Operating margin – – –
Pretax margin 0.3% – –
Net margin 0.1% – –
FCF margin 0.0% – –
Operating cash flow margin 0.0% – –
Return on equity 8.7% – –
Return on assets 3.2% – –
Return on invested capital 9.1% – –
Return on capital employed 8.4% – –
Asset turnover 20.4x – –
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 0.0x – –
Stock comp / revenue 0.0% – –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricLPAOZRNGE
Debt / assets 43.0% – –
Debt / equity 1.2x – –
Net debt / EBITDA 5.3x – –
Debt / FCF -365.3x – –
Liabilities / assets 63.3% – –
Equity / assets 36.7% – –
Interest coverage 2.9x – –
Current ratio 1.8x – –
Quick ratio 0.3x – –
Cash ratio 0.3x – –
Altman Z-score 20.34 – –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricLPAOZRNGE
Dividend yield – – –
Net buyback yield – – –
Shareholder yield – – –
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusLPAOZRNGE
Forward P/E 21.7xFY2026 – –
EPS, next fiscal year $0.12FY2026 – –
EPS growth, next FY -76.5%FY2026 – –
EPS growth, the year after +150.0% – –
Revenue, next fiscal year $51.73MFY2026 – –
Revenue growth, next FY +4.3%FY2026 – –
Revenue growth, the year after +26.5% – –

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersLPAOZRNGE
Held by institutions 1.9% 31.8% –
Institutions holding 34 45 –
Change in shares held, QoQ -11.9% -6.0% –
Institutions buying 21 8 –
Institutions selling 10 13 –
Buyers to sellers 2.10 0.62 –

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

LPAOZRNGE
LPA 1.00 0.04 -0.02
OZ 0.04 1.00 -0.01
RNGE -0.02 -0.01 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, LPA, OZ and RNGE?

Belpointe PREP (OZ) is the largest by market capitalisation: Logistic Properties of the Americas (LPA) $82.52M, Belpointe PREP (OZ) $134.38M, Range Impact (RNGE) $68.16M.

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Range Impact (RNGE) returned the most: Logistic Properties of the Americas (LPA) -19.9%, Belpointe PREP (OZ) -47.1%, Range Impact (RNGE) +250.0%. Over five years, Range Impact (RNGE) compounded fastest (Belpointe PREP (OZ) -19.2%/yr, Range Impact (RNGE) +13.3%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Belpointe PREP (OZ) has been the steadiest (Logistic Properties of the Americas (LPA) 66.8%, Belpointe PREP (OZ) 32.5%, Range Impact (RNGE) 131.5%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, LPA, OZ and RNGE?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Belpointe PREP (OZ) leads on 2. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.