LPA vs OPEN Stock Comparison

Logistic Properties of the Americas and Opendoor Technologies Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group

Head to Head

8 decided of 12

Logistic Properties of the Americas leads on 6 of the 12 questions below (Logistic Properties of the Americas 6, Opendoor Technologies 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionLPAOPENLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $83.03M $1.85B OPEN
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 4.8x -1.2x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 22.0x — –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +32,091.6% -37.2% LPA
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 0.1% -46.7% LPA
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 9.1% -20.2% LPA
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 5.3x -2.2x OPEN
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -27.1% -75.8% LPA
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years — -39.6%/yr –
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 67.2% 79.4% LPA
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 62/100 12/100 LPA

Percentile Scorecard

LPAOPEN

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisLPAOPEN
Valuation 95 #3 of 39 0 #39 of 39
Growth 63 #13 of 33 19 #27 of 33
Profitability 59 #13 of 30 17 #25 of 30
Financial Health 32 #26 of 38 22 #30 of 38
Shareholder Returns – 0 #14 of 14
Overall 62 12
  • LPA ranked among 42 companies in Property Developers
  • OPEN ranked among 42 companies in Property Developers

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodLPAOPENSPY
1 month -9.3%-24.9% -0.8%
3 months -15.7%-49.9% +3.5%
6 months -25.6%-64.2% +7.0%
Year to date -3.3%-66.9% +12.2%
1 year -27.1%-75.8% +13.0%
3 years —-7.2% +86.3%
3 years, per year —-2.5% +23.1%
5 years —-91.9% +68.6%
5 years, per year —-39.6% +11.0%

Risk

MeasureLPAOPENSPY
Volatility, 1Y 67.2%79.4% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 65.7%81.0% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.063.02 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.40-0.95 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -99.1%-97.9% -25.4%
From 52-week high -34.3%-79.4% -1.8%
52-week high $4.02$9.37 $779.14
52-week low $2.38$1.93 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleLPAOPEN
P/E now vs peer median 4.8xmedian 7.8x -1.2xmedian 7.8x
P/S now vs peer median 0.0xmedian 4.9x 0.6xmedian 4.9x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 6.7xmedian 11.2x -6.1xmedian 11.2x
P/FCF now vs peer median -95.1xmedian 6.4x -3.9xmedian 6.4x
P/B now vs peer median 0.3xmedian 0.6x 2.0xmedian 0.6x
PEG now vs peer median —median 0.33 -0.13median 0.33

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsLPAOPEN
Revenue $14.78B $3.25B
Gross profit – $281.00M
Operating income – -$521.00M
Net income $77.06M -$1.52B
Free cash flow -$878.16K -$474.00M
R&D – $88.00M
EPS (diluted) $0.54 $-1.57
Cash & equivalents $33.58M $896.00M
Total debt $1.21B $1.96B
Shares (diluted) 31.74M 965.78M
Enterprise value $55.91M -$1.97B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricLPAOPEN
P/E 4.8x -1.2x
P/FCF -95.1x -3.9x
P/Operating cash flow -114.6x -4.1x
P/S 0.0x 0.6x
P/B 0.3x 2.0x
P/Tangible book 0.3x 2.0x
EV/EBITDA 6.7x -6.1x
EV/EBIT 6.8x -5.6x
EV/Revenue 0.0x 0.9x
EV/FCF -452.1x -6.2x
EV/Operating cash flow -545.0x -6.4x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) – -0.13

Growth

14 metrics
MetricLPAOPEN
Revenue growth (1Y) 32,092% -37.2%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – -34.0%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – -32.6%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – 115.6%
Operating income growth (1Y) – -126.5%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – 25.8%
Net income growth (1Y) 294.3% -398.7%
Net income CAGR (3Y) – -2.7%
EPS growth (1Y) 144.4% -276.7%
EPS CAGR (3Y) – 9.2%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -103.5% -187.3%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – -28.3%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -104.2% -192.8%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – -28.4%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricLPAOPEN
Gross margin – 8.6%
EBITDA margin 0.4% -14.8%
Operating margin – -16.0%
Pretax margin 0.3% -46.7%
Net margin 0.1% -46.7%
FCF margin 0.0% -14.6%
Operating cash flow margin 0.0% -14.1%
Return on equity 8.7% -162.9%
Return on assets 3.2% -57.3%
Return on invested capital 9.1% -20.2%
Return on capital employed 8.4% -30.9%
Asset turnover 20.4x 1.2x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 0.0x 0.3x
Stock comp / revenue 0.0% 11.4%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricLPAOPEN
Debt / assets 43.0% 66.1%
Debt / equity 1.2x 2.1x
Net debt / EBITDA 5.3x -2.2x
Debt / FCF -365.3x -4.1x
Liabilities / assets 63.3% 69.1%
Equity / assets 36.7% 30.9%
Interest coverage 2.9x -4.6x
Current ratio 1.8x 2.9x
Quick ratio 0.3x 0.9x
Cash ratio 0.3x 0.9x
Altman Z-score 20.34 -0.71

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricLPAOPEN
Dividend yield – –
Net buyback yield – -13.1%
Shareholder yield – -13.1%
Payout ratio (earnings) – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusLPAOPEN
Forward P/E 22.0xFY2026 –
EPS, next fiscal year $0.12FY2026 $-0.61FY2026
EPS growth, next FY -76.5%FY2026 –
EPS growth, the year after +150.0% –
Revenue, next fiscal year $51.73MFY2026 $3.69BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +4.3%FY2026 -15.5%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +26.5% +102.2%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersLPAOPEN
Held by institutions 1.9% 57.7%
Institutions holding 34 393
Change in shares held, QoQ -11.9% +18.5%
Institutions buying 21 227
Institutions selling 10 83
Buyers to sellers 2.10 2.73

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

LPAOPEN
LPA 1.00 0.17
OPEN 0.17 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, LPA and OPEN?

Opendoor Technologies (OPEN) is the largest by market capitalisation: Logistic Properties of the Americas (LPA) $83.03M, Opendoor Technologies (OPEN) $1.85B.

Which company is growing faster?

Logistic Properties of the Americas (LPA) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Logistic Properties of the Americas (LPA) +32,091.6%, Opendoor Technologies (OPEN) -37.2%.

Which company is more profitable?

Logistic Properties of the Americas (LPA) has the highest net margin (Logistic Properties of the Americas (LPA) 0.1%, Opendoor Technologies (OPEN) -46.7%). On return on invested capital, Logistic Properties of the Americas (LPA) leads (Logistic Properties of the Americas (LPA) 9.1%, Opendoor Technologies (OPEN) -20.2%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Logistic Properties of the Americas (LPA) returned the most: Logistic Properties of the Americas (LPA) -27.1%, Opendoor Technologies (OPEN) -75.8%. Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Logistic Properties of the Americas (LPA) has been the steadiest (Logistic Properties of the Americas (LPA) 67.2%, Opendoor Technologies (OPEN) 79.4%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Do LPA and OPEN move together?

Their daily returns over the past year have a correlation of 0.17, a weak relationship. Holding both diversifies more than two closely linked stocks would.

Which is the better stock, LPA and OPEN?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Logistic Properties of the Americas (LPA) leads on 6. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.