LOGI vs PAR vs SANG Stock Comparison

Logitech International, Par Technology and Sangoma Technologies Prices as of Oct 29, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (OOMA) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
PAR Par Technology Corp
$17.77 +31.7% 1M -49.4% 1Y
Market cap
$729.02M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$496.67M
Div. yield
–
Restaurant and Retail Software Technology
2 wins
SANG Sangoma Technologies Corp
$4.71 -4.5% 1M -7.5% 1Y
Market cap
$157.25M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$203.08M
Div. yield
–
Communications Platforms Technology
2 wins

Head to Head

10 decided of 12

Logitech International leads on 6 of the 12 questions below (Logitech International 6, Par Technology 2, Sangoma Technologies 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionLOGIPARSANGLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $13.60B $729.02M $157.25M LOGI
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 16.8x -10.1x -2.0x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 18.7x 24.3x — LOGI
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +5.7% +18.8% -14.2% PAR
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 16.4% -14.5% -39.0% LOGI
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — -5.0% 54.0% SANG
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — -26.6x 0.2x PAR
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.03% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -14.6% -49.4% -7.5% SANG
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +3.6%/yr -22.3%/yr -26.5%/yr LOGI
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 39.9% 71.4% 51.2% LOGI
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 69/100 50/100 41/100 LOGI

Percentile Scorecard

LOGIPARSANG

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisLOGIPARSANG
Valuation 79 #24 of 112 44 #50 of 89 93 #3 of 29
Growth 56 #48 of 108 56 #36 of 81 0 #27 of 27
Profitability 91 #10 of 104 31 #53 of 76 44 #15 of 26
Financial Health 62 #45 of 116 46 #51 of 93 47 #17 of 31
Shareholder Returns 58 #33 of 78 71 #15 of 50 21 #12 of 15
Overall 69 50 41
  • LOGI ranked among 121 companies in Computer Hardware
  • PAR ranked among 98 companies in Vertical Software
  • SANG ranked among 32 companies in Workplace Software

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodLOGIPARSANGSPY
1 month -1.7%+31.7%-4.5% +0.7%
3 months -2.6%+5.6%+15.7% +3.7%
6 months -0.3%+32.2%+10.3% +7.1%
Year to date -1.3%-51.0%-7.1% +12.8%
1 year -14.6%-49.4%-7.5% +11.9%
3 years +27.5%-38.2%+65.3% +85.2%
3 years, per year +8.4%-14.8%+18.2% +22.8%
5 years +19.2%-71.7%-78.6% +67.6%
5 years, per year +3.6%-22.3%-26.5% +10.9%
10 years +309.6%+221.9%+124.3% +262.0%
10 years, per year +15.1%+12.4%+8.4% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureLOGIPARSANGSPY
Volatility, 1Y 39.9%71.4%51.2% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 46.4%79.8%42.2% 12.6%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.251.180.19 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.37-0.69-0.15 0.94
Max drawdown, 5Y -49.6%-85.4%-89.2% -25.4%
From 52-week high -21.9%-55.3%-12.8% -1.2%
52-week high $126.69$39.72$5.40 $779.14
52-week low $85.84$11.82$3.42 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleLOGIPARSANG
P/E now vs peer median 17.5xmedian 32.9x -10.2xmedian 39.2x -2.0xmedian 33.1x
P/S now vs peer median 2.8xmedian 2.9x 1.5xmedian 2.4x 0.8xmedian 2.5x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 13.1xmedian 20.0x -83.5xmedian 17.3x 1.7xmedian 9.8x
P/FCF now vs peer median 14.7xmedian 30.2x -46.9xmedian 20.3x 7.2xmedian 15.2x
P/B now vs peer median 6.5xmedian 2.9x 0.9xmedian 1.8x 0.9xmedian 3.1x
PEG now vs peer median 0.53median 1.08 -0.84median 1.52 0.05median 0.74

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsLOGIPARSANG
Revenue $4.95B $496.67M $203.08M
Gross profit $2.25B $209.78M $143.68M
Operating income $880.92M -$62.50M $66.76M
Net income $810.23M -$72.14M -$81.09M
Free cash flow $953.35M -$15.69M $21.92M
R&D $332.87M $85.55M $42.90M
EPS (diluted) $5.64 $-1.75 $-2.38
Cash & equivalents $1.51B $77.37M $10.43M
Total debt – $422.35M $89.10M
Shares (diluted) 143.77M 41.28M 33.24M
Enterprise value $6.78B $400.12M $98.75M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricLOGIPARSANG
P/E 17.5x -10.2x -2.0x
P/FCF 14.7x -46.9x 7.2x
P/Operating cash flow 13.8x -57.5x 6.6x
P/S 2.8x 1.5x 0.8x
P/B 6.5x 0.9x 0.9x
P/Tangible book 6.5x 1.2x 1.4x
EV/EBITDA 13.1x -83.5x 1.7x
EV/EBIT 14.2x -17.3x 2.6x
EV/Revenue 2.5x 2.2x 0.9x
EV/FCF 13.1x -68.8x 7.9x
EV/Operating cash flow 12.4x -84.4x 7.3x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.53 -0.84 0.05

Growth

14 metrics
MetricLOGIPARSANG
Revenue growth (1Y) 5.7% 18.8% -14.2%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 5.1% 23.0% -7.0%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 12.4% 12.0% -11.2%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 11.3% 36.6% -6.0%
Operating income growth (1Y) 27.0% 3.4% -18.1%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 25.0% 5.4% -18.7%
Net income growth (1Y) 22.6% 16.4% -1,519%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 28.5% -0.8% -40.8%
EPS growth (1Y) 26.6% 17.9% -1,493%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 32.9% 12.1% -39.6%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 18.6% -10.0% -43.3%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 1.8% 31.6% -9.9%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 20.0% -17.2% -50.4%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 2.8% 28.9% -8.2%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricLOGIPARSANG
Gross margin 45.5% 42.2% 70.7%
EBITDA margin 19.3% -2.6% 50.3%
Operating margin 17.8% -12.6% 32.9%
Pretax margin 19.0% -13.8% -41.7%
Net margin 16.4% -14.5% -39.0%
FCF margin 19.2% -3.2% 10.8%
Operating cash flow margin 20.5% -2.6% 11.7%
Return on equity 35.9% -8.8% -87.1%
Return on assets 20.4% -5.2% –
Return on invested capital – -5.0% 54.0%
Return on capital employed 34.2% -4.9% –
Asset turnover 1.2x 0.4x –
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.3x 0.2x -0.3x
Stock comp / revenue 2.2% 5.9% 1.2%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricLOGIPARSANG
Debt / assets – 30.8% 11.6%
Debt / equity – 0.5x 0.2x
Net debt / EBITDA – -26.6x 0.2x
Debt / FCF – -26.9x 1.2x
Liabilities / assets 44.8% 40.6% 25.8%
Equity / assets 55.2% 59.4% 74.2%
Interest coverage – – 33.0x
Current ratio 2.1x 2.2x 0.8x
Quick ratio 1.6x 1.5x 0.5x
Cash ratio 1.1x 0.7x 0.2x
Altman Z-score 8.55 0.71 1.94

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricLOGIPARSANG
Dividend yield 1.4% – –
Net buyback yield 3.9% 4.3% -0.1%
Shareholder yield 5.2% 4.3% -0.1%
Payout ratio (earnings) 57.8% – –
Payout ratio (FCF) 49.1% – –
Dividend growth (1Y) 101.0% – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusLOGIPARSANG
Forward P/E 18.7xFY2026 24.3xFY2026 –
EPS, next fiscal year $5.30FY2026 $0.73FY2026 $-0.17FY2027
EPS growth, next FY -8.3%FY2026 +386.7%FY2026 –
EPS growth, the year after +5.5% +91.8% –
Revenue, next fiscal year $4.99BFY2026 $536.83MFY2026 $192.47MFY2027
Revenue growth, next FY +3.1%FY2026 +17.8%FY2026 -3.8%FY2027
Revenue growth, the year after +9.1% +11.3% +3.5%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersLOGIPARSANG
Held by institutions – 100.0% –
Institutions holding – 207 –
Change in shares held, QoQ – -1.7% –
Institutions buying – 125 –
Institutions selling – 54 –
Buyers to sellers – 2.31 –

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

LOGIPARSANG
LOGI 1.00 0.17 0.05
PAR 0.17 1.00 0.02
SANG 0.05 0.02 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, LOGI, PAR and SANG?

Logitech International (LOGI) is the largest by market capitalisation: Logitech International (LOGI) $13.60B, Par Technology (PAR) $729.02M, Sangoma Technologies (SANG) $157.25M.

Which company is growing faster?

Par Technology (PAR) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Logitech International (LOGI) +5.7%, Par Technology (PAR) +18.8%, Sangoma Technologies (SANG) -14.2%.

Which company is more profitable?

Logitech International (LOGI) has the highest net margin (Logitech International (LOGI) 16.4%, Par Technology (PAR) -14.5%, Sangoma Technologies (SANG) -39.0%). On return on invested capital, Sangoma Technologies (SANG) leads (Par Technology (PAR) -5.0%, Sangoma Technologies (SANG) 54.0%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Sangoma Technologies (SANG) returned the most: Logitech International (LOGI) -14.6%, Par Technology (PAR) -49.4%, Sangoma Technologies (SANG) -7.5%. Over five years, Logitech International (LOGI) compounded fastest (Logitech International (LOGI) +3.6%/yr, Par Technology (PAR) -22.3%/yr, Sangoma Technologies (SANG) -26.5%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Logitech International (LOGI) 0.03%, Par Technology (PAR) 0.00%, Sangoma Technologies (SANG) 0.00%. Par Technology (PAR) and Sangoma Technologies (SANG) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Logitech International (LOGI) has been the steadiest (Logitech International (LOGI) 39.9%, Par Technology (PAR) 71.4%, Sangoma Technologies (SANG) 51.2%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, LOGI, PAR and SANG?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Logitech International (LOGI) leads on 6. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.