LOGC vs MTX vs MTRN Stock Comparison

ContextLogic Holdings, Minerals Technologies and Materion Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (EAF) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
MTX Minerals Technologies Inc
$62.35 -7.0% 1M +4.4% 1Y
Market cap
$1.95B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$2.15B
Div. yield
0.01%
Industrial Minerals Basic Materials
4 wins
MTRN MATERION Corp
$226.43 -14.5% 1M +68.5% 1Y
Market cap
$4.87B
P/E
54.0x
Revenue (TTM)
$2.10B
Div. yield
0.00%
Industrial Minerals Basic Materials
6 wins

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Materion leads on 6 of the 12 questions below (Materion 6, Minerals Technologies 4, ContextLogic Holdings 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionLOGCMTXMTRNLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $704.35M $1.95B $4.87B MTRN
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -306.2x -29.0x 54.0x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — 10.3x 30.5x MTX
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +20.3% +4.1% +21.6% MTRN
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months -2.9% -3.1% 4.3% MTRN
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — -0.9% 8.1% MTRN
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 6.0x 9.4x 2.1x MTRN
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.01% 0.00% MTX
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +99.2% +4.4% +68.5% LOGC
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -36.6%/yr -2.5%/yr +26.2%/yr MTRN
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 27.3% 25.3% 61.7% MTX
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 30/100 49/100 48/100 MTX

Percentile Scorecard

LOGCMTXMTRN

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisLOGCMTXMTRN
Valuation 44 #91 of 162 80 #34 of 162 56 #72 of 162
Growth 10 #133 of 147 26 #109 of 147 52 #71 of 147
Profitability 38 #76 of 122 40 #74 of 122 55 #56 of 122
Financial Health 29 #118 of 165 16 #139 of 165 27 #120 of 165
Shareholder Returns 28 #77 of 107 82 #20 of 107 48 #56 of 107
Overall 30 49 48
  • LOGC ranked among 176 companies in Metals and Mining
  • MTX ranked among 176 companies in Metals and Mining
  • MTRN ranked among 176 companies in Metals and Mining

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodLOGCMTXMTRNSPY
1 month +3.3%-7.0%-14.5% -0.8%
3 months +62.5%-15.9%-6.4% +3.5%
6 months +79.3%-13.7%+24.7% +7.0%
Year to date +101.1%+2.3%+82.1% +12.2%
1 year +99.2%+4.4%+68.5% +13.0%
3 years +315.3%+17.5%+136.8% +86.3%
3 years, per year +60.8%+5.5%+33.3% +23.1%
5 years -89.8%-11.9%+220.3% +68.6%
5 years, per year -36.6%-2.5%+26.2% +11.0%
10 years —-7.4%+671.5% +258.0%
10 years, per year —-0.8%+22.7% +13.6%

Risk

MeasureLOGCMTXMTRNSPY
Volatility, 1Y 27.3%25.3%61.7% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 25.9%24.4%63.4% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.340.632.15 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 3.630.171.11 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -97.8%-42.7%-48.1% -25.4%
From 52-week high 0.0%-24.7%-29.3% -1.8%
52-week high $15.24$82.84$320.08 $779.14
52-week low $7.05$55.09$111.50 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleLOGCMTXMTRN
P/E now vs peer median -303.1xmedian 12.8x -28.9xmedian 12.8x 52.3xmedian 12.8x
P/S now vs peer median 8.8xmedian 3.1x 0.9xmedian 3.1x 2.2xmedian 3.1x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 27.0xmedian 7.0x 39.0xmedian 7.0x 25.8xmedian 7.0x
P/FCF now vs peer median -16.0xmedian 15.2x 16.1xmedian 15.2x 80.3xmedian 15.2x
P/B now vs peer median 0.9xmedian 2.1x 1.2xmedian 2.1x 4.7xmedian 2.1x
PEG now vs peer median —median 0.29 0.73median 0.29 -16.56median 0.29

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsLOGCMTXMTRN
Revenue $79.50M $2.15B $2.10B
Gross profit $41.90M $526.40M $335.97M
Operating income -$9.90M -$28.70M $125.67M
Net income -$300.00K -$62.60M $90.12M
Free cash flow -$43.60M $120.30M $58.73M
R&D – $23.40M $25.74M
EPS (diluted) $-0.05 $-2.16 $4.28
Cash & equivalents $11.00M $342.20M $19.99M
Total debt $211.50M $958.90M $440.69M
Shares (diluted) 45.74M 31.10M 21.08M
Enterprise value $311.55M $620.33M $4.80B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricLOGCMTXMTRN
P/E -303.1x -28.9x 52.3x
P/FCF -16.0x 16.1x 80.3x
P/Operating cash flow -17.6x 8.4x 43.6x
P/S 8.8x 0.9x 2.2x
P/B 0.9x 1.2x 4.7x
P/Tangible book 2.0x 1.4x 5.3x
EV/EBITDA 27.0x 39.0x 25.8x
EV/EBIT -90.7x -89.0x 40.9x
EV/Revenue 11.3x 1.2x 2.4x
EV/FCF -20.6x 21.2x 87.5x
EV/Operating cash flow -22.6x 11.1x 47.4x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) – 0.73 -16.56

Growth

14 metrics
MetricLOGCMTXMTRN
Revenue growth (1Y) 20.3% 4.1% 21.6%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – 0.0% 7.2%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 63.7% 0.4% 1.0%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – 4.2% -2.4%
Operating income growth (1Y) -186.8% -138.2% 120.8%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – -29.1% -3.7%
Net income growth (1Y) -106.5% -1,198% 453.5%
Net income CAGR (3Y) – -37.8% -2.9%
EPS growth (1Y) -129.1% -3,351% 447.1%
EPS CAGR (3Y) – -39.7% -3.2%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -590.1% 21.9% -26.2%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 14.9% -13.1%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -1,218% 35.6% -36.0%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 23.6% -1.8%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricLOGCMTXMTRN
Gross margin 52.7% 24.5% 16.0%
EBITDA margin 41.8% 3.0% 9.5%
Operating margin -12.5% -1.3% 6.0%
Pretax margin -19.6% -3.8% 4.6%
Net margin -2.9% -3.1% 4.3%
FCF margin -54.8% 5.6% 2.8%
Operating cash flow margin -49.9% 10.7% 5.2%
Return on equity -2.1% -3.8% 9.2%
Return on assets -1.6% -1.8% 4.8%
Return on invested capital – -0.9% 8.1%
Return on capital employed -1.0% -1.1% 8.0%
Asset turnover 0.1x 0.6x 1.1x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 132.3x -3.7x 1.2x
Stock comp / revenue 14.5% – 0.7%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricLOGCMTXMTRN
Debt / assets 21.8% 27.4% 23.6%
Debt / equity 0.3x 0.6x 0.4x
Net debt / EBITDA 6.0x 9.4x 2.1x
Debt / FCF -4.9x 8.0x 7.5x
Liabilities / assets 24.0% 54.9% 46.8%
Equity / assets 76.0% 45.1% 53.2%
Interest coverage – – 4.1x
Current ratio 1.9x 1.4x 2.9x
Quick ratio 1.2x 0.9x 1.1x
Cash ratio 0.5x 0.4x 0.1x
Altman Z-score -2.97 2.25 5.67

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricLOGCMTXMTRN
Dividend yield – 0.8% 0.2%
Net buyback yield -3.7% 1.2% –
Shareholder yield -3.7% 1.9% 0.2%
Payout ratio (earnings) – -23.5% 13.0%
Payout ratio (FCF) – 12.2% 20.0%
Dividend growth (1Y) – 7.3% 3.8%
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – 31.3% 4.4%

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusLOGCMTXMTRN
Forward P/E – 10.3xFY2026 30.5xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $-0.17FY2026 $6.03FY2026 $7.43FY2026
EPS growth, next FY – +9.2%FY2026 +36.6%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after – +8.5% +18.8%
Revenue, next fiscal year $0.00FY2025 $2.33BFY2026 $2.50BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY -100.0%FY2025 +12.3%FY2026 +39.7%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after – +3.8% +8.4%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersLOGCMTXMTRN
Held by institutions – 100.0% 97.0%
Institutions holding – 292 404
Change in shares held, QoQ – +2.6% +3.3%
Institutions buying – 176 238
Institutions selling – 69 121
Buyers to sellers – 2.55 1.97

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

LOGCMTXMTRN
LOGC 1.00 0.07 0.10
MTX 0.07 1.00 0.36
MTRN 0.10 0.36 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, LOGC, MTX and MTRN?

Materion (MTRN) is the largest by market capitalisation: ContextLogic Holdings (LOGC) $704.35M, Minerals Technologies (MTX) $1.95B, Materion (MTRN) $4.87B.

Which company is growing faster?

Materion (MTRN) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: ContextLogic Holdings (LOGC) +20.3%, Minerals Technologies (MTX) +4.1%, Materion (MTRN) +21.6%.

Which company is more profitable?

Materion (MTRN) has the highest net margin (ContextLogic Holdings (LOGC) -2.9%, Minerals Technologies (MTX) -3.1%, Materion (MTRN) 4.3%). On return on invested capital, Materion (MTRN) leads (Minerals Technologies (MTX) -0.9%, Materion (MTRN) 8.1%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year ContextLogic Holdings (LOGC) returned the most: ContextLogic Holdings (LOGC) +99.2%, Minerals Technologies (MTX) +4.4%, Materion (MTRN) +68.5%. Over five years, Materion (MTRN) compounded fastest (ContextLogic Holdings (LOGC) -36.6%/yr, Minerals Technologies (MTX) -2.5%/yr, Materion (MTRN) +26.2%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Minerals Technologies (MTX) has the highest dividend yield: ContextLogic Holdings (LOGC) 0.00%, Minerals Technologies (MTX) 0.01%, Materion (MTRN) 0.00%. ContextLogic Holdings (LOGC) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Minerals Technologies (MTX) has been the steadiest (ContextLogic Holdings (LOGC) 27.3%, Minerals Technologies (MTX) 25.3%, Materion (MTRN) 61.7%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, LOGC, MTX and MTRN?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Materion (MTRN) leads on 6. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.