LNG vs COP vs GLNG Stock Comparison

Cheniere Energy, Conocophillips and Golar Lng Prices as of Oct 29, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (VG) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
LNG Cheniere Energy, Inc.
$318.94 +19.3% 1M +51.1% 1Y
Market cap
$69.04B
P/E
22.7x
Revenue (TTM)
$23.22B
Div. yield
–
LNG and Gas Processing Energy
COP Conocophillips
$150.02 +19.6% 1M +70.3% 1Y
Market cap
$186.47B
P/E
20.1x
Revenue (TTM)
$65.28B
Div. yield
0.02%
Oil and Gas Exploration and Production Energy
5 wins
GLNG Golar Lng Ltd
$46.74 -3.1% 1M +15.0% 1Y
Market cap
$4.79B
P/E
29.2x
Revenue (TTM)
$523.38M
Div. yield
–
LNG and Gas Processing Energy
6 wins

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Golar Lng leads on 6 of the 12 questions below (Golar Lng 6, Conocophillips 5). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionLNGCOPGLNGLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $69.04B $186.47B $4.79B COP
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 22.7x 20.1x 29.2x COP
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 29.4x 13.5x 42.1x COP
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +22.5% +8.5% +109.6% GLNG
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months — 14.2% 31.3% GLNG
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — 22.5% 22.6% GLNG
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — 0.4x 5.3x COP
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.02% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +51.1% +70.3% +15.0% COP
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +25.3%/yr +15.0%/yr +29.1%/yr GLNG
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 29.7% 30.1% 27.2% GLNG
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 27/100 59/100 60/100 GLNG

Percentile Scorecard

LNGCOPGLNG

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisLNGCOPGLNG
Valuation 62 #14 of 35 42 #58 of 99 24 #27 of 35
Growth 12 #30 of 34 52 #47 of 97 91 #4 of 34
Profitability – 86 #14 of 96 80 #7 of 31
Financial Health – 68 #33 of 102 75 #9 of 33
Shareholder Returns 7 #29 of 31 45 #43 of 77 30 #22 of 31
Overall 27 59 60
  • LNG ranked among 35 companies in Oil and Gas Midstream
  • COP ranked among 103 companies in Oil and Gas Upstream
  • GLNG ranked among 35 companies in Oil and Gas Midstream

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodLNGCOPGLNGSPY
1 month +19.3%+19.6%-3.1% +0.7%
3 months +23.6%+26.1%-3.1% +3.7%
6 months +16.0%+19.3%-15.0% +7.1%
Year to date +64.1%+60.3%+25.6% +12.8%
1 year +51.1%+70.3%+15.0% +11.9%
3 years +91.2%+27.0%+108.6% +85.2%
3 years, per year +24.1%+8.3%+27.8% +22.8%
5 years +208.5%+101.4%+258.7% +67.6%
5 years, per year +25.3%+15.0%+29.1% +10.9%
10 years +723.1%+233.6%+106.7% +262.0%
10 years, per year +23.5%+12.8%+7.5% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureLNGCOPGLNGSPY
Volatility, 1Y 29.7%30.1%27.2% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 28.3%29.6%27.3% 12.6%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y -0.64-0.710.13 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 1.722.340.55 0.94
Max drawdown, 5Y -25.6%-38.7%-34.1% -25.4%
From 52-week high 0.0%-0.9%-18.5% -1.2%
52-week high $318.94$151.41$57.36 $779.14
52-week low $188.83$85.66$35.33 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleLNGCOPGLNG
P/E now vs peer median 21.9xmedian 19.6x 19.6xmedian 11.9x 29.5xmedian 19.6x
P/S now vs peer median 2.8xmedian 2.8x 2.8xmedian 2.0x 9.0xmedian 2.8x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 11.1x 4.5xmedian 5.9x 19.3xmedian 11.1x
P/FCF now vs peer median 19.8xmedian 16.9x 17.9xmedian 10.0x 8.1xmedian 16.9x
P/B now vs peer median —median 2.4x 2.8xmedian 1.5x 2.4xmedian 2.4x
PEG now vs peer median -0.64median 1.68 -1.86median 1.36 1.94median 1.68

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsLNGCOPGLNG
Revenue $23.22B $65.28B $523.38M
Gross profit – $41.24B $343.33M
Operating income $6.52B $31.28B $273.22M
Net income – $9.28B $226.50M
Free cash flow – $10.06B $583.87M
R&D – $393.00M $14.62M
EPS (diluted) $14.50 $7.64 $1.49
Cash & equivalents $1.66B $6.57B $870.50M
Total debt – $23.29B $2.68B
Shares (diluted) 209.50M 1.21B 109.49M
Enterprise value $69.04B $159.17B $1.15B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricLNGCOPGLNG
P/E 21.9x 19.6x 29.5x
P/FCF 19.8x 17.9x 8.1x
P/Operating cash flow – 8.2x 11.2x
P/S 2.8x 2.8x 9.0x
P/B – 2.8x 2.4x
P/Tangible book – 2.8x 2.4x
EV/EBITDA – 4.5x 19.3x
EV/EBIT – 6.3x 23.9x
EV/Revenue 2.8x 3.0x 12.5x
EV/FCF – 19.5x 11.2x
EV/Operating cash flow – 8.9x 15.5x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) -0.64 -1.86 1.94

Growth

14 metrics
MetricLNGCOPGLNG
Revenue growth (1Y) 22.5% 8.5% 109.6%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) -2.0% -2.0% 23.3%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – 5.5% 147.7%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – 0.6% 19.9%
Operating income growth (1Y) -7.5% 6.2% 1,754%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -30.9% -2.0% 104.0%
Net income growth (1Y) – 1.1% 894.0%
Net income CAGR (3Y) – -10.5% 18.5%
EPS growth (1Y) -20.4% 4.8% 2,539%
EPS CAGR (3Y) -34.4% -10.6% 15.2%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) – 10.6% 1.1%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – -3.8% 11.3%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) – 45.4% -5.5%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – -3.5% 60.4%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricLNGCOPGLNG
Gross margin – 63.2% 65.6%
EBITDA margin – 66.0% 64.6%
Operating margin – 47.9% 52.2%
Pretax margin – 22.4% 62.0%
Net margin – 14.2% 31.3%
FCF margin – 15.4% 111.6%
Operating cash flow margin – 33.6% 80.8%
Return on equity – 14.3% 1,387%
Return on assets 9.6% 7.5% 4.2%
Return on invested capital – 22.5% 22.6%
Return on capital employed – 28.2% 5.6%
Asset turnover 0.5x 0.5x 0.1x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) – 2.4x 1.9x
Stock comp / revenue – – 1.9%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricLNGCOPGLNG
Debt / assets – 18.7% 50.1%
Debt / equity – 0.4x 1.4x
Net debt / EBITDA – 0.4x 5.3x
Debt / FCF – 2.3x 4.6x
Liabilities / assets 75.5% 47.4% 63.6%
Equity / assets – 52.6% 36.4%
Interest coverage – 39.2x 16.5x
Current ratio 0.9x 1.5x 2.3x
Quick ratio – 1.2x 2.2x
Cash ratio – 0.6x 1.8x
Altman Z-score – 4.08 –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricLNGCOPGLNG
Dividend yield 0.7% 2.2% 2.1%
Net buyback yield – 3.0% 0.7%
Shareholder yield 0.7% 5.2% 2.9%
Payout ratio (earnings) – 43.8% –
Payout ratio (FCF) – 40.4% –
Dividend growth (1Y) – 7.4% –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – -15.4% –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusLNGCOPGLNG
Forward P/E 29.4xFY2026 13.5xFY2026 42.1xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $10.83FY2026 $11.12FY2026 $1.11FY2026
EPS growth, next FY -55.1%FY2026 +80.5%FY2026 -27.5%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +53.6% -3.1% -53.2%
Revenue, next fiscal year $24.37BFY2026 $76.43BFY2026 $409.44MFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +22.0%FY2026 +24.2%FY2026 +4.0%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after -1.0% -5.8% -2.6%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersLNGCOPGLNG
Held by institutions 88.1% 84.0% 81.4%
Institutions holding 1,332 2,437 311
Change in shares held, QoQ +2.5% -1.6% -0.4%
Institutions buying 686 1,120 153
Institutions selling 464 961 105
Buyers to sellers 1.48 1.17 1.46

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

LNGCOPGLNG
LNG 1.00 0.54 0.44
COP 0.54 1.00 0.28
GLNG 0.44 0.28 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, LNG, COP and GLNG?

Conocophillips (COP) is the largest by market capitalisation: Cheniere Energy (LNG) $69.04B, Conocophillips (COP) $186.47B, Golar Lng (GLNG) $4.79B.

Which stock is cheaper, LNG, COP and GLNG?

Conocophillips (COP) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Cheniere Energy (LNG) 22.7x, Conocophillips (COP) 20.1x, Golar Lng (GLNG) 29.2x). On next year's consensus earnings, Conocophillips (COP) is cheapest (Cheniere Energy (LNG) 29.4x, Conocophillips (COP) 13.5x, Golar Lng (GLNG) 42.1x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Golar Lng (GLNG) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Cheniere Energy (LNG) +22.5%, Conocophillips (COP) +8.5%, Golar Lng (GLNG) +109.6%.

Which company is more profitable?

Golar Lng (GLNG) has the highest net margin (Conocophillips (COP) 14.2%, Golar Lng (GLNG) 31.3%). On return on invested capital, Golar Lng (GLNG) leads (Conocophillips (COP) 22.5%, Golar Lng (GLNG) 22.6%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Conocophillips (COP) returned the most: Cheniere Energy (LNG) +51.1%, Conocophillips (COP) +70.3%, Golar Lng (GLNG) +15.0%. Over five years, Golar Lng (GLNG) compounded fastest (Cheniere Energy (LNG) +25.3%/yr, Conocophillips (COP) +15.0%/yr, Golar Lng (GLNG) +29.1%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Cheniere Energy (LNG) 0.00%, Conocophillips (COP) 0.02%, Golar Lng (GLNG) 0.00%. Cheniere Energy (LNG) and Golar Lng (GLNG) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Golar Lng (GLNG) has been the steadiest (Cheniere Energy (LNG) 29.7%, Conocophillips (COP) 30.1%, Golar Lng (GLNG) 27.2%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, LNG, COP and GLNG?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Golar Lng (GLNG) leads on 6. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.