LMAT vs ISRG vs DXCM Stock Comparison

Lemaitre Vascular, Intuitive Surgical and Dexcom Prices as of Nov 2, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (EW) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
LMAT Lemaitre Vascular Inc
$81.26 +2.9% 1M -6.2% 1Y
Market cap
$1.86B
P/E
28.3x
Revenue (TTM)
$262.43M
Div. yield
1.17%
Medical Devices Healthcare
4 wins
ISRG Intuitive Surgical Inc
$436.87 +11.5% 1M -18.2% 1Y
Market cap
$151.42B
P/E
51.6x
Revenue (TTM)
$11.58B
Div. yield
–
Medical Devices Healthcare
4 wins
DXCM Dexcom Inc
$84.76 -0.7% 1M +45.6% 1Y
Market cap
$31.62B
P/E
32.0x
Revenue (TTM)
$5.10B
Div. yield
–
Medical Devices Healthcare
1 win

Head to Head

9 decided of 12

Intuitive Surgical leads on 4 of the 12 questions below (Intuitive Surgical 4, Lemaitre Vascular 4, Dexcom 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionLMATISRGDXCMLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $1.86B $151.42B $31.62B ISRG
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 28.3x 51.6x 32.0x LMAT
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 27.5x 38.1x 30.0x LMAT
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +11.8% +20.5% +13.0% ISRG
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 25.0% 25.5% 19.4% ISRG
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — — — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — — — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 1.17% — — –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -6.2% -18.2% +45.6% DXCM
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +9.1%/yr +3.9%/yr -11.4%/yr LMAT
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 46.5% 34.8% 37.5% ISRG
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 83/100 79/100 74/100 LMAT

Percentile Scorecard

LMATISRGDXCM

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisLMATISRGDXCM
Valuation 74 #61 of 227 50 #113 of 227 66 #78 of 227
Growth 90 #24 of 220 79 #47 of 220 81 #43 of 220
Profitability 96 #10 of 209 97 #7 of 209 99 #3 of 209
Financial Health 90 #25 of 240 78 #54 of 240 35 #157 of 240
Shareholder Returns 69 #44 of 138 92 #12 of 138 88 #17 of 138
Overall 83 79 74
  • LMAT ranked among 247 companies in Medical Devices and Diagnostics
  • ISRG ranked among 247 companies in Medical Devices and Diagnostics
  • DXCM ranked among 247 companies in Medical Devices and Diagnostics

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodLMATISRGDXCMSPY
1 month +2.9%+11.5%-0.7% -2.3%
3 months -21.6%+16.4%-2.9% -0.7%
6 months -27.1%-3.4%+41.2% +4.8%
Year to date +0.2%-22.9%+27.7% +10.3%
1 year -6.2%-18.2%+45.6% +10.3%
3 years +67.6%+56.9%-13.0% +73.0%
3 years, per year +18.8%+16.2%-4.6% +20.1%
5 years +54.5%+20.9%-45.3% +61.9%
5 years, per year +9.1%+3.9%-11.4% +10.1%
10 years +296.6%+489.9%+438.8% +258.6%
10 years, per year +14.8%+19.4%+18.3% +13.6%

Risk

MeasureLMATISRGDXCMSPY
Volatility, 1Y 46.5%34.8%37.5% 12.8%
Downside volatility, 1Y 53.9%37.8%33.6% 12.8%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.480.900.61 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.13-0.521.22 0.80
Max drawdown, 5Y -33.5%-49.9%-66.3% -25.4%
From 52-week high -30.8%-26.3%-8.2% -3.5%
52-week high $117.39$592.85$92.34 $779.14
52-week low $78.80$332.02$54.84 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleLMATISRGDXCM
P/E now vs peer median 28.3xmedian 28.4x 51.6xmedian 28.4x 32.0xmedian 28.4x
P/S now vs peer median 7.1xmedian 3.0x 13.1xmedian 3.0x 6.2xmedian 3.0x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 16.7xmedian 18.0x 36.0xmedian 18.0x 19.9xmedian 18.0x
P/FCF now vs peer median 25.2xmedian 25.0x 42.1xmedian 25.0x 28.8xmedian 25.0x
P/B now vs peer median 4.4xmedian 2.3x 9.4xmedian 2.3x 12.5xmedian 2.3x
PEG now vs peer median 0.84median 0.93 2.01median 0.93 0.74median 0.93

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsLMATISRGDXCM
Revenue $262.43M $11.58B $5.10B
Gross profit $191.31M $7.78B $3.24B
Operating income $77.32M $3.28B $1.22B
Net income $65.67M $2.97B $991.00M
Free cash flow $73.83M $3.60B $1.10B
R&D $15.41M $1.49B $608.10M
EPS (diluted) $2.68 $8.41 $2.58
Cash & equivalents $26.63M $2.98B $961.40M
Shares (diluted) 24.53M 351.60M 383.50M
Enterprise value $412.36M $131.84B $23.44B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricLMATISRGDXCM
P/E 28.3x 51.6x 32.0x
P/FCF 25.2x 42.1x 28.8x
P/Operating cash flow 22.4x 37.0x 22.4x
P/S 7.1x 13.1x 6.2x
P/B 4.4x 9.4x 12.5x
P/Tangible book 4.8x 10.2x 12.9x
EV/EBITDA 16.7x 36.0x 19.9x
EV/EBIT 19.2x 44.9x 24.3x
EV/Revenue 5.6x 12.7x 5.8x
EV/FCF 20.1x 41.0x 27.1x
EV/Operating cash flow 17.9x 36.0x 21.1x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.84 2.01 0.74

Growth

14 metrics
MetricLMATISRGDXCM
Revenue growth (1Y) 11.8% 20.5% 13.0%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 14.0% 19.1% 14.5%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 18.0% 21.9% 21.5%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 18.8% 19.5% 14.2%
Operating income growth (1Y) 41.2% 16.6% 57.4%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 36.4% 24.8% 34.2%
Net income growth (1Y) 39.4% 7.5% 37.5%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 37.6% 24.4% 38.0%
EPS growth (1Y) 30.1% 10.8% 46.1%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 33.6% 25.7% 43.0%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 41.2% 38.1% -2.3%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 48.0% 26.4% 23.7%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 41.1% 58.4% 3.4%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 57.4% 42.0% 30.0%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricLMATISRGDXCM
Gross margin 72.9% 67.2% 63.4%
EBITDA margin 33.8% 35.3% 29.4%
Operating margin 29.5% 28.4% 24.0%
Pretax margin 32.3% 31.3% 24.7%
Net margin 25.0% 25.5% 19.4%
FCF margin 28.1% 31.1% 21.5%
Operating cash flow margin 31.6% 35.3% 27.7%
Return on equity 15.9% 17.3% 38.4%
Return on assets 10.3% 14.8% 15.6%
Return on invested capital – – –
Return on capital employed 12.8% 18.7% 29.9%
Asset turnover 0.4x 0.6x 0.8x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.3x 1.4x 1.4x
Stock comp / revenue 3.0% 7.2% 3.0%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricLMATISRGDXCM
Debt / assets – – –
Debt / equity – – –
Net debt / EBITDA – – –
Debt / FCF – – –
Liabilities / assets 34.4% 16.7% 59.4%
Equity / assets 65.6% 83.3% 40.6%
Interest coverage 14.9x – –
Current ratio 16.3x 3.3x 1.7x
Quick ratio 13.8x 2.3x 1.3x
Cash ratio 12.6x 1.6x 0.8x
Altman Z-score 7.18 29.97 7.62

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricLMATISRGDXCM
Dividend yield 1.2% – –
Net buyback yield -0.3% 2.8% 2.2%
Shareholder yield 0.9% 2.8% 2.2%
Payout ratio (earnings) 31.2% – –
Payout ratio (FCF) 27.8% – –
Dividend growth (1Y) 26.3% – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) 20.5% – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusLMATISRGDXCM
Forward P/E 27.5xFY2026 38.1xFY2026 30.0xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $2.95FY2026 $11.47FY2026 $2.83FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +17.1%FY2026 +28.4%FY2026 +35.4%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +12.9% +4.5% +4.9%
Revenue, next fiscal year $266.90MFY2026 $11.60BFY2026 $5.08BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +6.9%FY2026 +15.3%FY2026 +9.0%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +19.4% +11.3% +16.6%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersLMATISRGDXCM
Held by institutions 99.3% 86.2% 100.0%
Institutions holding 327 2,238 977
Change in shares held, QoQ +2.8% +4.6% +6.3%
Institutions buying 172 1,072 522
Institutions selling 98 878 344
Buyers to sellers 1.76 1.22 1.52

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

LMATISRGDXCM
LMAT 1.00 0.24 0.27
ISRG 0.24 1.00 0.36
DXCM 0.27 0.36 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, LMAT, ISRG and DXCM?

Intuitive Surgical (ISRG) is the largest by market capitalisation: Lemaitre Vascular (LMAT) $1.86B, Intuitive Surgical (ISRG) $151.42B, Dexcom (DXCM) $31.62B.

Which stock is cheaper, LMAT, ISRG and DXCM?

Lemaitre Vascular (LMAT) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Lemaitre Vascular (LMAT) 28.3x, Intuitive Surgical (ISRG) 51.6x, Dexcom (DXCM) 32.0x). On next year's consensus earnings, Lemaitre Vascular (LMAT) is cheapest (Lemaitre Vascular (LMAT) 27.5x, Intuitive Surgical (ISRG) 38.1x, Dexcom (DXCM) 30.0x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Intuitive Surgical (ISRG) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Lemaitre Vascular (LMAT) +11.8%, Intuitive Surgical (ISRG) +20.5%, Dexcom (DXCM) +13.0%.

Which company is more profitable?

Intuitive Surgical (ISRG) has the highest net margin (Lemaitre Vascular (LMAT) 25.0%, Intuitive Surgical (ISRG) 25.5%, Dexcom (DXCM) 19.4%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Dexcom (DXCM) returned the most: Lemaitre Vascular (LMAT) -6.2%, Intuitive Surgical (ISRG) -18.2%, Dexcom (DXCM) +45.6%. Over five years, Lemaitre Vascular (LMAT) compounded fastest (Lemaitre Vascular (LMAT) +9.1%/yr, Intuitive Surgical (ISRG) +3.9%/yr, Dexcom (DXCM) -11.4%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Lemaitre Vascular (LMAT) 1.17%. Intuitive Surgical (ISRG) and Dexcom (DXCM) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Intuitive Surgical (ISRG) has been the steadiest (Lemaitre Vascular (LMAT) 46.5%, Intuitive Surgical (ISRG) 34.8%, Dexcom (DXCM) 37.5%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, LMAT, ISRG and DXCM?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Intuitive Surgical (ISRG) leads on 4. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.