LGN vs AOS vs CARR Stock Comparison

Legence, Smith A O and Carrier Global Prices as of Nov 2, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (TT) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
LGN Legence Corp.
$36.41 -32.1% 1M -12.0% 1Y
Market cap
$2.42B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$3.75B
Div. yield
–
HVAC Industrials
AOS Smith A O Corp
$65.42 +15.2% 1M -0.9% 1Y
Market cap
$9.12B
P/E
18.4x
Revenue (TTM)
$3.80B
Div. yield
0.02%
HVAC Industrials
8 wins
CARR CARRIER GLOBAL Corp
$55.18 +0.1% 1M -7.2% 1Y
Market cap
$46.15B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$22.79B
Div. yield
0.02%
HVAC Industrials
3 wins

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Smith A O leads on 8 of the 12 questions below (Smith A O 8, Carrier Global 3). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionLGNAOSCARRLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $2.42B $9.12B $46.15B CARR
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -53.8x 18.4x -25.6x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 28.4x 17.7x 18.8x AOS
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months — -0.7% +3.3% CARR
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months -2.0% 13.0% -7.9% AOS
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 2.1% 20.8% -4.6% AOS
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 4.7x 0.6x 52.2x AOS
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.02% 0.02% AOS
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -12.0% -0.9% -7.2% AOS
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years — -3.6%/yr +1.2%/yr CARR
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 73.6% 27.8% 35.5% AOS
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 19/100 59/100 34/100 AOS

Percentile Scorecard

LGNAOSCARR

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisLGNAOSCARR
Valuation 22 #43 of 55 63 #21 of 55 30 #39 of 55
Growth – 32 #35 of 51 38 #32 of 51
Profitability 14 #44 of 51 86 #8 of 51 16 #43 of 51
Financial Health 21 #47 of 59 71 #18 of 59 16 #50 of 59
Shareholder Returns – 43 #24 of 41 70 #13 of 41
Overall 19 59 34
  • LGN ranked among 59 companies in Construction Products
  • AOS ranked among 59 companies in Construction Products
  • CARR ranked among 59 companies in Construction Products

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodLGNAOSCARRSPY
1 month -32.1%+15.2%+0.1% -2.3%
3 months -44.2%+7.7%-12.7% -0.7%
6 months -60.2%+11.1%-16.3% +4.8%
Year to date -15.4%-2.2%+4.4% +10.3%
1 year -12.0%-0.9%-7.2% +10.3%
3 years —-8.6%+9.2% +73.0%
3 years, per year —-2.9%+3.0% +20.1%
5 years —-16.5%+6.2% +61.9%
5 years, per year —-3.6%+1.2% +10.1%
10 years —+48.6%— +258.6%
10 years, per year —+4.0%— +13.6%

Risk

MeasureLGNAOSCARRSPY
Volatility, 1Y 73.6%27.8%35.5% 12.8%
Downside volatility, 1Y 79.3%26.4%36.6% 12.8%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 2.820.701.25 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.16-0.03-0.20 0.80
Max drawdown, 5Y -64.7%-43.4%-40.4% -25.4%
From 52-week high -64.4%-18.7%-27.4% -3.5%
52-week high $102.27$80.47$76.00 $779.14
52-week low $33.32$55.34$50.36 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleLGNAOSCARR
P/E now vs peer median -41.7xmedian 21.6x 17.9xmedian 21.6x -25.2xmedian 21.6x
P/S now vs peer median 1.2xmedian 1.6x 2.3xmedian 1.6x 2.0xmedian 1.6x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 29.4xmedian 13.2x 12.1xmedian 13.2x 284.9xmedian 13.2x
P/FCF now vs peer median —median 17.4x 15.6xmedian 17.4x 19.0xmedian 17.4x
P/B now vs peer median 4.0xmedian 2.9x 4.8xmedian 2.9x 4.3xmedian 2.9x
PEG now vs peer median —median 1.00 0.80median 1.00 0.48median 1.00

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsLGNAOSCARR
Revenue $3.75B $3.80B $22.79B
Gross profit $701.93M $1.47B $6.59B
Operating income $29.45M $668.30M -$1.09B
Net income -$67.99M $494.60M -$1.73B
Free cash flow $323.18M $561.70M $2.38B
R&D – – $605.00M
EPS (diluted) $-0.59 $3.63 $-2.19
Cash & equivalents $291.98M $234.50M $1.35B
Total debt $1.03B $673.10M $11.47B
Shares (diluted) 76.03M 136.10M 821.80M
Enterprise value $1.48B $8.31B $40.53B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricLGNAOSCARR
P/E -41.7x 17.9x -25.2x
P/FCF – 15.6x 19.0x
P/Operating cash flow – 14.3x 15.8x
P/S 1.2x 2.3x 2.0x
P/B 4.0x 4.8x 4.3x
P/Tangible book 21.2x 7.1x 9.2x
EV/EBITDA 29.4x 12.1x 284.9x
EV/EBIT 121.8x 13.8x -50.8x
EV/Revenue 1.4x 2.4x 2.4x
EV/FCF – 16.4x 23.2x
EV/Operating cash flow – 15.1x 19.3x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) – 0.80 0.48

Growth

14 metrics
MetricLGNAOSCARR
Revenue growth (1Y) – -0.7% 3.3%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – 0.0% 11.1%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – -0.4% 12.3%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – 0.1% 28.1%
Operating income growth (1Y) – -7.2% -138.2%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – -3.9% -39.5%
Net income growth (1Y) – -6.8% -142.1%
Net income CAGR (3Y) – 18.2% -49.6%
EPS growth (1Y) – -3.5% -147.3%
EPS CAGR (3Y) – 22.5% -52.7%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) – -6.6% 55.7%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – -0.2% 2.3%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) – -1.8% 75.1%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 0.5% 0.4%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricLGNAOSCARR
Gross margin 19.5% 38.6% 28.9%
EBITDA margin 4.8% 20.1% 0.9%
Operating margin 1.2% 17.6% -4.8%
Pretax margin -1.9% 16.8% -6.4%
Net margin -2.0% 13.0% -7.9%
FCF margin – 14.8% 10.4%
Operating cash flow margin – 16.1% 12.5%
Return on equity -10.5% 27.0% -14.0%
Return on assets -2.9% 13.6% -4.7%
Return on invested capital 2.1% 20.8% -4.6%
Return on capital employed 1.9% 24.0% -4.1%
Asset turnover 1.0x 1.0x 0.6x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) – 1.2x -1.7x
Stock comp / revenue – 0.4% –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricLGNAOSCARR
Debt / assets 27.7% 18.4% 34.2%
Debt / equity 1.1x 0.4x 1.1x
Net debt / EBITDA 4.7x 0.6x 52.2x
Debt / FCF – 1.2x 4.8x
Liabilities / assets 73.9% 50.1% 69.0%
Equity / assets 26.1% 49.9% 31.0%
Interest coverage 0.4x 26.4x –
Current ratio 1.3x 1.6x 1.0x
Quick ratio 1.3x 1.0x 0.6x
Cash ratio 0.2x 0.3x 0.2x
Altman Z-score 1.79 6.30 2.15

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricLGNAOSCARR
Dividend yield – 2.2% 1.7%
Net buyback yield – 3.7% 3.6%
Shareholder yield – 5.9% 5.3%
Payout ratio (earnings) – 40.3% -45.6%
Payout ratio (FCF) – 35.5% 33.1%
Dividend growth (1Y) – 2.4% 6.5%
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – 3.1% 10.1%

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusLGNAOSCARR
Forward P/E 28.4xFY2026 17.7xFY2026 18.8xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $1.38FY2026 $3.60FY2026 $2.95FY2026
EPS growth, next FY – -6.5%FY2026 +13.9%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +79.0% +15.0% +9.2%
Revenue, next fiscal year $4.58BFY2026 $3.73BFY2026 $22.69BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +79.7%FY2026 -2.6%FY2026 +4.3%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +22.8% +3.9% +5.0%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersLGNAOSCARR
Held by institutions 78.9% 91.9% 87.4%
Institutions holding 265 616 1,630
Change in shares held, QoQ +17.6% +7.1% +1.0%
Institutions buying 194 317 807
Institutions selling 58 226 544
Buyers to sellers 3.34 1.40 1.48

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

LGNAOSCARR
LGN 1.00 -0.02 0.30
AOS -0.02 1.00 0.51
CARR 0.30 0.51 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, LGN, AOS and CARR?

Carrier Global (CARR) is the largest by market capitalisation: Legence (LGN) $2.42B, Smith A O (AOS) $9.12B, Carrier Global (CARR) $46.15B.

Which company is growing faster?

Carrier Global (CARR) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Smith A O (AOS) -0.7%, Carrier Global (CARR) +3.3%.

Which company is more profitable?

Smith A O (AOS) has the highest net margin (Legence (LGN) -2.0%, Smith A O (AOS) 13.0%, Carrier Global (CARR) -7.9%). On return on invested capital, Smith A O (AOS) leads (Legence (LGN) 2.1%, Smith A O (AOS) 20.8%, Carrier Global (CARR) -4.6%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Smith A O (AOS) returned the most: Legence (LGN) -12.0%, Smith A O (AOS) -0.9%, Carrier Global (CARR) -7.2%. Over five years, Carrier Global (CARR) compounded fastest (Smith A O (AOS) -3.6%/yr, Carrier Global (CARR) +1.2%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Smith A O (AOS) has the highest dividend yield: Legence (LGN) 0.00%, Smith A O (AOS) 0.02%, Carrier Global (CARR) 0.02%. Legence (LGN) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Smith A O (AOS) has been the steadiest (Legence (LGN) 73.6%, Smith A O (AOS) 27.8%, Carrier Global (CARR) 35.5%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, LGN, AOS and CARR?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Smith A O (AOS) leads on 8. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.