LFUS vs UEIC vs KN Stock Comparison

Littelfuse, Universal Electronics and Knowles Prices as of Oct 27, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (BELFA) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
LFUS Littelfuse Inc /De
$383.00 -10.8% 1M +40.9% 1Y
Market cap
$9.73B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$2.61B
Div. yield
0.80%
Electronic Components Technology
1 win
UEIC Universal Electronics Inc
$5.35 +4.5% 1M +23.3% 1Y
Market cap
$68.94M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$330.57M
Div. yield
4.49%
Electronic Components Technology
3 wins
KN Knowles Corp
$34.12 -9.1% 1M +44.8% 1Y
Market cap
$2.89B
P/E
40.6x
Revenue (TTM)
$666.10M
Div. yield
–
Electronic Components Technology
7 wins

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Knowles leads on 7 of the 12 questions below (Knowles 7, Universal Electronics 3, Littelfuse 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionLFUSUEICKNLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $9.73B $68.94M $2.89B LFUS
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -1,202x -4.5x 40.6x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 21.5x 11.1x 23.9x UEIC
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +15.4% -17.9% +16.1% KN
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months -0.3% -4.6% 10.8% KN
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 0.0% -1.7% 8.9% KN
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 0.0x -1.2x 0.5x UEIC
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.80% 4.49% — UEIC
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +40.9% +23.3% +44.8% KN
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +5.5%/yr -33.5%/yr +10.1%/yr KN
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 43.3% 55.6% 41.3% KN
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 47/100 58/100 63/100 KN

Percentile Scorecard

LFUSUEICKN

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisLFUSUEICKN
Valuation 58 #48 of 112 89 #13 of 112 48 #59 of 112
Growth 29 #78 of 109 27 #80 of 109 64 #40 of 109
Profitability 49 #54 of 104 36 #67 of 104 71 #31 of 104
Financial Health 62 #45 of 116 44 #65 of 116 60 #47 of 116
Shareholder Returns 36 #52 of 81 93 #7 of 81 74 #22 of 81
Overall 47 58 63
  • LFUS ranked among 122 companies in Computer Hardware
  • UEIC ranked among 122 companies in Computer Hardware
  • KN ranked among 122 companies in Computer Hardware

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodLFUSUEICKNSPY
1 month -10.8%+4.5%-9.1% -0.2%
3 months -2.3%+16.3%-5.0% +3.9%
6 months -1.6%+25.9%+12.5% +8.2%
Year to date +51.4%+48.2%+59.2% +12.9%
1 year +40.9%+23.3%+44.8% +12.3%
3 years +77.0%-29.0%+162.3% +87.4%
3 years, per year +21.0%-10.8%+37.9% +23.3%
5 years +30.7%-87.0%+62.1% +67.9%
5 years, per year +5.5%-33.5%+10.1% +10.9%
10 years +177.8%-92.1%+132.6% +261.1%
10 years, per year +10.8%-22.4%+8.8% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureLFUSUEICKNSPY
Volatility, 1Y 43.3%55.6%41.3% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 44.9%51.6%42.9% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.850.351.90 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.950.421.08 0.97
Max drawdown, 5Y -54.8%-93.6%-49.6% -25.4%
From 52-week high -21.7%-9.0%-20.3% -1.2%
52-week high $489.10$5.88$42.80 $779.14
52-week low $234.94$2.76$20.67 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleLFUSUEICKN
P/E now vs peer median -1,202xmedian 33.2x -4.5xmedian 33.2x 40.6xmedian 33.2x
P/S now vs peer median 3.7xmedian 2.8x 0.2xmedian 2.8x 4.3xmedian 2.8x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 41.7xmedian 20.0x 5.7xmedian 20.0x 21.7xmedian 20.0x
P/FCF now vs peer median 21.9xmedian 29.8x 8.4xmedian 29.8x 89.8xmedian 29.8x
P/B now vs peer median 3.7xmedian 3.0x 0.5xmedian 3.0x 3.6xmedian 3.0x
PEG now vs peer median 45.38median 1.17 -0.11median 1.17 1.19median 1.17

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsLFUSUEICKN
Revenue $2.61B $330.57M $666.10M
Gross profit $1.03B $97.69M $295.50M
Operating income $95.49M -$2.77M $97.10M
Net income -$8.06M -$15.10M $71.70M
Free cash flow $444.35M $8.24M $32.20M
R&D $115.22M $21.87M $43.90M
EPS (diluted) $-0.31 $-1.13 $0.82
Cash & equivalents $628.22M $32.40M $46.60M
Total debt $629.66M $86.37M $116.00M
Shares (diluted) 25.62M 13.43M 87.70M
Enterprise value $7.24B -$57.10M $2.70B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricLFUSUEICKN
P/E -1,202x -4.5x 40.6x
P/FCF 21.9x 8.4x 89.8x
P/Operating cash flow 19.0x 6.0x 28.6x
P/S 3.7x 0.2x 4.3x
P/B 3.7x 0.5x 3.6x
P/Tangible book 4.7x 0.6x 4.3x
EV/EBITDA 41.7x 5.7x 21.7x
EV/EBIT 101.9x -20.7x 30.5x
EV/Revenue 3.7x 0.2x 4.4x
EV/FCF 21.9x 7.0x 91.9x
EV/Operating cash flow 19.0x 5.0x 29.2x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 45.38 -0.11 1.19

Growth

14 metrics
MetricLFUSUEICKN
Revenue growth (1Y) 15.4% -17.9% 16.1%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 1.5% -12.1% 25.5%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 23.4% -16.7% 20.8%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 0.9% -8.1% 13.2%
Operating income growth (1Y) -52.6% 58.6% 62.1%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -40.7% 63.9% -33.2%
Net income growth (1Y) -107.5% 7.8% 71.9%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -26.5% 40.4% 33.7%
EPS growth (1Y) -107.3% 9.3% 71.2%
EPS CAGR (3Y) -26.5% 41.3% 34.0%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 31.5% -61.7% -15.4%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 8.0% -34.8% 7.5%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 41.0% -68.0% -31.0%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 12.0% -32.6% -9.0%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricLFUSUEICKN
Gross margin 39.3% 29.6% 44.4%
EBITDA margin 8.9% 3.0% 20.4%
Operating margin 3.7% -0.8% 14.6%
Pretax margin 3.0% -2.4% 13.7%
Net margin -0.3% -4.6% 10.8%
FCF margin 17.0% 2.5% 4.8%
Operating cash flow margin 19.6% 3.5% 15.2%
Return on equity -0.3% -10.7% 9.0%
Return on assets -0.2% -5.8% 6.7%
Return on invested capital 0.0% -1.7% 8.9%
Return on capital employed 2.8% -1.9% 10.1%
Asset turnover 0.7x 1.3x 0.6x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) -63.5x -0.8x 1.4x
Stock comp / revenue 1.1% 0.9% 4.4%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricLFUSUEICKN
Debt / assets 15.7% 7.8% 10.8%
Debt / equity 0.2x 0.1x 0.1x
Net debt / EBITDA 0.0x -1.2x 0.5x
Debt / FCF 1.4x 2.5x 3.6x
Liabilities / assets 34.7% 46.5% 25.8%
Equity / assets 65.3% 53.5% 74.2%
Interest coverage 3.2x – –
Current ratio 2.8x 1.8x 2.9x
Quick ratio 1.8x 1.1x 1.5x
Cash ratio 1.1x 0.3x 0.4x
Altman Z-score 5.85 2.90 6.75

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricLFUSUEICKN
Dividend yield 0.8% 4.5% –
Net buyback yield -1.0% 3.4% 1.7%
Shareholder yield -0.2% 7.9% 1.7%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusLFUSUEICKN
Forward P/E 21.5xFY2026 11.1xFY2026 23.9xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $17.78FY2026 $0.48FY2026 $1.43FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +66.5%FY2026 +54.8%FY2026 +28.8%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +12.1% +16.7% +21.0%
Revenue, next fiscal year $3.11BFY2026 $288.89MFY2026 $712.60MFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +30.3%FY2026 -21.6%FY2026 +20.1%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +0.2% +11.6% +12.1%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersLFUSUEICKN
Held by institutions 99.4% 53.5% 100.0%
Institutions holding 606 46 340
Change in shares held, QoQ +1.6% -2.2% +0.5%
Institutions buying 295 18 198
Institutions selling 209 16 93
Buyers to sellers 1.41 1.13 2.13

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

LFUSUEICKN
LFUS 1.00 0.17 0.77
UEIC 0.17 1.00 0.17
KN 0.77 0.17 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, LFUS, UEIC and KN?

Littelfuse (LFUS) is the largest by market capitalisation: Littelfuse (LFUS) $9.73B, Universal Electronics (UEIC) $68.94M, Knowles (KN) $2.89B.

Which company is growing faster?

Knowles (KN) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Littelfuse (LFUS) +15.4%, Universal Electronics (UEIC) -17.9%, Knowles (KN) +16.1%.

Which company is more profitable?

Knowles (KN) has the highest net margin (Littelfuse (LFUS) -0.3%, Universal Electronics (UEIC) -4.6%, Knowles (KN) 10.8%). On return on invested capital, Knowles (KN) leads (Littelfuse (LFUS) 0.0%, Universal Electronics (UEIC) -1.7%, Knowles (KN) 8.9%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Knowles (KN) returned the most: Littelfuse (LFUS) +40.9%, Universal Electronics (UEIC) +23.3%, Knowles (KN) +44.8%. Over five years, Knowles (KN) compounded fastest (Littelfuse (LFUS) +5.5%/yr, Universal Electronics (UEIC) -33.5%/yr, Knowles (KN) +10.1%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Universal Electronics (UEIC) has the highest dividend yield: Littelfuse (LFUS) 0.80%, Universal Electronics (UEIC) 4.49%. Knowles (KN) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Knowles (KN) has been the steadiest (Littelfuse (LFUS) 43.3%, Universal Electronics (UEIC) 55.6%, Knowles (KN) 41.3%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, LFUS, UEIC and KN?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Knowles (KN) leads on 7. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.