LEGN vs NTLA vs KRYS Stock Comparison

Legend Biotech, Intellia Therapeutics and Krystal Biotech Prices as of Oct 28, 2026 Peers: Industry group
LEGN Legend Biotech Corp
$22.53 +21.0% 1M -30.8% 1Y
Market cap
$4.10B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$1.27B
Div. yield
–
Gene and Cell Therapy Healthcare
1 win
KRYS Krystal Biotech, Inc.
$321.42 -4.6% 1M +69.5% 1Y
Market cap
$9.62B
P/E
39.9x
Revenue (TTM)
$440.53M
Div. yield
–
Gene and Cell Therapy Healthcare
6 wins

Head to Head

7 decided of 12

Krystal Biotech leads on 6 of the 12 questions below (Krystal Biotech 6, Legend Biotech 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionLEGNNTLAKRYSLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $4.10B $1.81B $9.62B KRYS
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -44.7x -4.5x 39.9x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — — 46.3x –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +59.5% +12.6% +22.6% LEGN
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months -7.2% -672.2% 54.8% KRYS
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital -4.2% — — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 28.0x — — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -30.8% -4.6% +69.5% KRYS
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -15.6%/yr -36.9%/yr +45.1%/yr KRYS
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 72.3% 80.0% 38.1% KRYS
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 73/100 50/100 85/100 KRYS

Percentile Scorecard

LEGNNTLAKRYS

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisLEGNNTLAKRYS
Valuation 89 #72 of 625 34 #412 of 625 80 #127 of 625
Growth 96 #23 of 602 64 #220 of 602 93 #43 of 602
Profitability 80 #109 of 549 39 #338 of 549 96 #22 of 549
Financial Health 54 #299 of 654 72 #182 of 654 84 #104 of 654
Shareholder Returns 44 #206 of 367 40 #220 of 367 71 #109 of 367
Overall 73 50 85
  • LEGN ranked among 672 companies in Pharmaceuticals and Biotechnology
  • NTLA ranked among 672 companies in Pharmaceuticals and Biotechnology
  • KRYS ranked among 672 companies in Pharmaceuticals and Biotechnology

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodLEGNNTLAKRYSSPY
1 month +21.0%+16.6%-4.6% +0.9%
3 months +19.5%+23.3%-11.5% +5.9%
6 months -1.1%+7.1%+23.6% +8.5%
Year to date +3.6%+48.2%+30.4% +13.3%
1 year -30.8%-4.6%+69.5% +12.4%
3 years -64.6%-42.5%+181.6% +88.1%
3 years, per year -29.3%-16.8%+41.2% +23.5%
5 years -57.1%-90.0%+541.7% +68.2%
5 years, per year -15.6%-36.9%+45.1% +11.0%
10 years —+2.8%— +263.4%
10 years, per year —+0.3%— +13.8%

Risk

MeasureLEGNNTLAKRYSSPY
Volatility, 1Y 72.3%80.0%38.1% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 62.7%82.2%37.4% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.442.460.69 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.43-0.061.83 0.98
Max drawdown, 5Y -78.2%-95.5%-44.5% -25.4%
From 52-week high -37.9%-25.3%-15.0% -0.9%
52-week high $36.28$17.84$378.15 $779.14
52-week low $16.65$8.04$185.05 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleLEGNNTLAKRYS
P/E now vs peer median -45.3xmedian 17.4x -4.4xmedian 17.4x 39.3xmedian 17.4x
P/S now vs peer median 3.3xmedian 9.1x 31.3xmedian 9.1x 21.6xmedian 9.1x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median -197.3xmedian 17.1x -3.4xmedian 17.1x 42.6xmedian 17.1x
P/FCF now vs peer median -64.3xmedian 19.0x -5.3xmedian 19.0x 36.9xmedian 19.0x
P/B now vs peer median 3.4xmedian 2.2x 2.6xmedian 2.2x 7.0xmedian 2.2x
PEG now vs peer median -0.96median 0.34 -0.27median 0.34 0.76median 0.34

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsLEGNNTLAKRYS
Revenue $1.27B $59.51M $440.53M
Gross profit $727.10M – $416.91M
Operating income -$55.25M -$423.48M $197.75M
Net income -$80.39M -$399.98M $241.47M
Free cash flow -$64.60M -$348.69M $257.78M
R&D $396.15M $346.73M $59.23M
EPS (diluted) $-0.50 $-3.00 $7.88
Cash & equivalents $672.90M $106.13M $427.74M
Total debt $1.06B – –
Shares (diluted) 184.32M 133.48M 30.66M
Enterprise value $1.60B $33.98M $6.40B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricLEGNNTLAKRYS
P/E -45.3x -4.4x 39.3x
P/FCF -64.3x -5.3x 36.9x
P/Operating cash flow -46.5x -5.4x 34.9x
P/S 3.3x 31.3x 21.6x
P/B 3.4x 2.6x 7.0x
P/Tangible book 3.4x 2.6x 7.0x
EV/EBITDA -197.3x -3.4x 42.6x
EV/EBIT -65.8x -3.4x 43.8x
EV/Revenue 2.9x 24.0x 19.7x
EV/FCF -56.3x -4.1x 33.6x
EV/Operating cash flow -40.7x -4.1x 31.8x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) -0.96 -0.27 0.76

Growth

14 metrics
MetricLEGNNTLAKRYS
Revenue growth (1Y) 59.5% 12.6% 22.6%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 97.6% 3.9% –
Gross profit growth (1Y) 42.4% – 24.3%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 147.5% – –
Operating income growth (1Y) 75.3% 17.3% 41.8%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 49.1% 2.7% 48.8%
Net income growth (1Y) 75.3% 16.7% 64.6%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 46.7% 4.1% 54.9%
EPS growth (1Y) 72.0% 35.3% 59.7%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 47.0% 16.5% 51.8%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 67.5% 17.2% 39.4%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 37.1% 2.0% 67.0%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 77.8% 17.3% 39.0%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 44.5% 3.2% 58.6%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricLEGNNTLAKRYS
Gross margin 57.2% – 94.6%
EBITDA margin -1.5% -696.4% 46.2%
Operating margin -4.3% -711.7% 44.9%
Pretax margin -4.4% -671.0% 51.4%
Net margin -7.2% -672.2% 54.8%
FCF margin -5.1% -586.0% 58.5%
Operating cash flow margin -7.0% -582.5% 61.8%
Return on equity -8.3% -59.2% 18.3%
Return on assets -5.5% -49.4% 16.7%
Return on invested capital -4.2% – –
Return on capital employed -4.3% -58.1% 15.0%
Asset turnover 0.8x 0.1x 0.3x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.1x 0.9x 1.1x
Stock comp / revenue 5.2% 114.1% 12.4%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricLEGNNTLAKRYS
Debt / assets 8.9% – –
Debt / equity 0.1x – –
Net debt / EBITDA 28.0x – –
Debt / FCF -2.4x – –
Liabilities / assets 29.8% 15.1% 9.4%
Equity / assets 70.2% 84.9% 90.6%
Interest coverage -4.8x – –
Current ratio 3.0x 6.6x 8.3x
Quick ratio 1.7x 5.6x 7.7x
Cash ratio 1.7x 5.5x 6.6x
Altman Z-score 6.95 3.15 41.93

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricLEGNNTLAKRYS
Dividend yield – – –
Net buyback yield -5.2% -7.1% -0.4%
Shareholder yield -5.2% -7.1% -0.4%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusLEGNNTLAKRYS
Forward P/E – – 46.3xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $-0.04FY2026 $-3.38FY2026 $6.94FY2026
EPS growth, next FY – – +1.5%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after – – +25.5%
Revenue, next fiscal year $1.37BFY2026 $48.94MFY2026 $514.54MFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +32.9%FY2026 -27.7%FY2026 +32.2%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +35.9% +158.6% +33.4%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersLEGNNTLAKRYS
Held by institutions 55.9% 100.0% 99.8%
Institutions holding 218 329 421
Change in shares held, QoQ +7.3% +30.5% +4.6%
Institutions buying 117 195 271
Institutions selling 78 78 106
Buyers to sellers 1.50 2.50 2.56

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

LEGNNTLAKRYS
LEGN 1.00 0.08 0.06
NTLA 0.08 1.00 0.29
KRYS 0.06 0.29 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, LEGN, NTLA and KRYS?

Krystal Biotech (KRYS) is the largest by market capitalisation: Legend Biotech (LEGN) $4.10B, Intellia Therapeutics (NTLA) $1.81B, Krystal Biotech (KRYS) $9.62B.

Which company is growing faster?

Legend Biotech (LEGN) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Legend Biotech (LEGN) +59.5%, Intellia Therapeutics (NTLA) +12.6%, Krystal Biotech (KRYS) +22.6%.

Which company is more profitable?

Krystal Biotech (KRYS) has the highest net margin (Legend Biotech (LEGN) -7.2%, Intellia Therapeutics (NTLA) -672.2%, Krystal Biotech (KRYS) 54.8%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Krystal Biotech (KRYS) returned the most: Legend Biotech (LEGN) -30.8%, Intellia Therapeutics (NTLA) -4.6%, Krystal Biotech (KRYS) +69.5%. Over five years, Krystal Biotech (KRYS) compounded fastest (Legend Biotech (LEGN) -15.6%/yr, Intellia Therapeutics (NTLA) -36.9%/yr, Krystal Biotech (KRYS) +45.1%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Krystal Biotech (KRYS) has been the steadiest (Legend Biotech (LEGN) 72.3%, Intellia Therapeutics (NTLA) 80.0%, Krystal Biotech (KRYS) 38.1%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, LEGN, NTLA and KRYS?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Krystal Biotech (KRYS) leads on 6. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.