LDOS vs LHX vs MOB Stock Comparison

Leidos Holdings, L3Harris Technologies and Mobilicom Prices as of Oct 29, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (ESLT) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
LDOS Leidos Holdings, Inc.
$141.02 +14.6% 1M -25.1% 1Y
Market cap
$17.94B
P/E
13.0x
Revenue (TTM)
$17.63B
Div. yield
0.01%
Defense Industrials
4 wins
MOB Mobilicom Ltd
$3.30 -28.1% 1M
Market cap
$5.43B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
–
Defense Industrials

Head to Head

7 decided of 12

Leidos Holdings leads on 4 of the 12 questions below (Leidos Holdings 4, L3Harris Technologies 3). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionLDOSLHXMOBLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $17.94B $51.63B $5.43B LHX
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 13.0x 23.9x — LDOS
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 11.1x 24.4x — LDOS
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +3.4% — — –
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 7.8% — — –
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 13.9% — — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 2.3x — — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.01% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -25.1% -2.9% — LHX
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +7.1%/yr +3.9%/yr — LDOS
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 35.6% 29.4% 94.3% LHX
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 69/100 68/100 — LDOS

Percentile Scorecard

LDOSLHXMOB

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisLDOSLHXMOB
Valuation 98 #3 of 100 81 #20 of 100 –
Growth 58 #41 of 96 – –
Profitability 84 #16 of 95 – –
Financial Health 31 #73 of 105 30 #74 of 105 84 #18 of 105
Shareholder Returns 72 #19 of 65 94 #5 of 65 –
Overall 69 68 –
  • LDOS ranked among 107 companies in Aerospace and Defense
  • LHX ranked among 107 companies in Aerospace and Defense
  • MOB ranked among 107 companies in Aerospace and Defense

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodLDOSLHXMOBSPY
1 month +14.6%+17.9%-28.1% +0.7%
3 months +25.4%+2.5%-29.8% +3.7%
6 months -5.5%-13.1%-47.5% +7.1%
Year to date -21.8%-5.1%-45.9% +12.8%
1 year -25.1%-2.9%— +11.9%
3 years +53.6%+59.8%— +85.2%
3 years, per year +15.4%+16.9%— +22.8%
5 years +41.0%+20.9%— +67.6%
5 years, per year +7.1%+3.9%— +10.9%
10 years +240.6%+211.7%— +262.0%
10 years, per year +13.0%+12.0%— +13.7%

Risk

MeasureLDOSLHXMOBSPY
Volatility, 1Y 35.6%29.4%94.3% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 37.1%29.1%93.7% 12.6%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.260.182.54 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.70-0.10— 0.94
Max drawdown, 5Y -50.3%-40.4%-67.9% -25.4%
From 52-week high -29.3%-26.4%-64.4% -1.2%
52-week high $199.55$378.48$9.26 $779.14
52-week low $100.00$233.68$2.97 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleLDOSLHXMOB
P/E now vs peer median 12.9xmedian 26.9x 23.9xmedian 26.9x —median 26.9x
P/S now vs peer median 1.0xmedian 3.0x 1.1xmedian 3.0x —median 3.0x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 9.9xmedian 15.0x —median 15.0x —median 15.0x
P/FCF now vs peer median 8.2xmedian 27.2x 15.8xmedian 27.2x —median 27.2x
P/B now vs peer median 3.3xmedian 2.5x 2.6xmedian 2.5x 482.8xmedian 2.5x
PEG now vs peer median 0.45median 0.93 —median 0.93 —median 0.93

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsLDOSLHXMOB
Revenue $17.63B – –
Gross profit $3.14B – –
Operating income $2.03B – –
Net income $1.40B – –
Free cash flow $2.16B – –
EPS (diluted) $10.92 – –
Cash & equivalents $748.00M $2.47B $15.20M
Total debt $21.66B – –
Shares (diluted) 126.00M 187.30M 1.67B
Enterprise value $14.65B $51.63B $5.38B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricLDOSLHXMOB
P/E 12.9x 23.9x –
P/FCF 8.2x 15.8x –
P/Operating cash flow 7.7x – –
P/S 1.0x 1.1x –
P/B 3.3x 2.6x 482.8x
P/Tangible book 4.0x 3.7x 482.8x
EV/EBITDA 9.9x – –
EV/EBIT 11.3x – –
EV/Revenue 1.3x – –
EV/FCF 10.6x – –
EV/Operating cash flow 10.0x – –
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.45 – –

Growth

14 metrics
MetricLDOSLHXMOB
Revenue growth (1Y) 3.4% – –
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 5.9% – –
Gross profit growth (1Y) 4.8% – –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 14.4% – –
Operating income growth (1Y) -0.4% – –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 21.1% – –
Net income growth (1Y) -0.8% – –
Net income CAGR (3Y) 24.8% – –
EPS growth (1Y) 1.3% – –
EPS CAGR (3Y) 28.6% – –
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 54.9% – –
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 35.7% – –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 63.2% – –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 41.7% – –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricLDOSLHXMOB
Gross margin 17.8% – –
EBITDA margin 13.2% – –
Operating margin 11.5% – –
Pretax margin 10.2% – –
Net margin 7.8% – –
FCF margin 12.3% – –
Operating cash flow margin 13.0% – –
Return on equity 26.8% – –
Return on assets 9.0% – –
Return on invested capital 13.9% – –
Return on capital employed 16.5% – –
Asset turnover 1.1x – –
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.6x – –
Stock comp / revenue 0.6% – –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricLDOSLHXMOB
Debt / assets 38.6% – –
Debt / equity 1.1x – –
Net debt / EBITDA 2.3x – –
Debt / FCF 2.8x – –
Liabilities / assets 65.9% 51.5% 38.5%
Equity / assets 34.1% 46.2% 61.5%
Interest coverage – – –
Current ratio 1.6x 1.2x 10.8x
Quick ratio 1.4x – 630,161x
Cash ratio 0.2x – 9.1x
Altman Z-score 3.21 – –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricLDOSLHXMOB
Dividend yield 1.2% 1.8% –
Net buyback yield 3.7% – –
Shareholder yield 4.9% 1.8% –
Payout ratio (earnings) 15.5% – –
Payout ratio (FCF) 10.0% – –
Dividend growth (1Y) 3.3% – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) 2.8% – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusLDOSLHXMOB
Forward P/E 11.1xFY2026 24.4xFY2026 –
EPS, next fiscal year $12.75FY2026 $11.44FY2026 –
EPS growth, next FY +6.3%FY2026 +6.6%FY2026 –
EPS growth, the year after -9.0% +10.6% –
Revenue, next fiscal year $17.52BFY2026 $24.16BFY2026 –
Revenue growth, next FY +2.0%FY2026 +10.5%FY2026 –
Revenue growth, the year after +14.9% +0.3% –

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersLDOSLHXMOB
Held by institutions 79.3% 87.5% –
Institutions holding 774 1,692 –
Change in shares held, QoQ +4.1% -0.5% –
Institutions buying 380 848 –
Institutions selling 295 570 –
Buyers to sellers 1.29 1.49 –

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

LDOSLHXMOB
LDOS 1.00 0.43 0.12
LHX 0.43 1.00 0.10
MOB 0.12 0.10 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, LDOS, LHX and MOB?

L3Harris Technologies (LHX) is the largest by market capitalisation: Leidos Holdings (LDOS) $17.94B, L3Harris Technologies (LHX) $51.63B, Mobilicom (MOB) $5.43B.

Which stock is cheaper, LDOS, LHX and MOB?

Leidos Holdings (LDOS) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Leidos Holdings (LDOS) 13.0x, L3Harris Technologies (LHX) 23.9x). On next year's consensus earnings, Leidos Holdings (LDOS) is cheapest (Leidos Holdings (LDOS) 11.1x, L3Harris Technologies (LHX) 24.4x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year L3Harris Technologies (LHX) returned the most: Leidos Holdings (LDOS) -25.1%, L3Harris Technologies (LHX) -2.9%. Over five years, Leidos Holdings (LDOS) compounded fastest (Leidos Holdings (LDOS) +7.1%/yr, L3Harris Technologies (LHX) +3.9%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Leidos Holdings (LDOS) 0.01%, L3Harris Technologies (LHX) 0.00%, Mobilicom (MOB) 0.00%. L3Harris Technologies (LHX) and Mobilicom (MOB) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, L3Harris Technologies (LHX) has been the steadiest (Leidos Holdings (LDOS) 35.6%, L3Harris Technologies (LHX) 29.4%, Mobilicom (MOB) 94.3%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, LDOS, LHX and MOB?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Leidos Holdings (LDOS) leads on 4. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.