LCU vs TGB vs SLSR Stock Comparison

Lion Copper, Trekor Metals and Solaris Resources Prices as of Nov 5, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (CRS) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
LCU Lion Copper Corp.
$4.38 -0.5% 1M +62.2% 1Y
Market cap
$69.75M
P/E
9.7x
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
–
Copper Basic Materials
2 wins
TGB Trekor Metals Ltd
$6.97 -20.9% 1M +60.6% 1Y
Market cap
$2.23B
P/E
29.3x
Revenue (TTM)
$1.08B
Div. yield
–
Copper Basic Materials
4 wins

Head to Head

7 decided of 12

Trekor Metals leads on 4 of the 12 questions below (Trekor Metals 4, Lion Copper 2, Solaris Resources 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionLCUTGBSLSRLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $69.75M $2.23B $1.15B TGB
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 9.7x 29.3x -21.0x LCU
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — 17.9x — –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months — +97.5% -27.3% TGB
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months — 7.0% — –
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — 25.6% — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — 1.0x — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +62.2% +60.6% +11.2% LCU
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +4.5%/yr +26.2%/yr -7.3%/yr TGB
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 153.2% 71.7% 58.4% SLSR
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 48/100 67/100 38/100 TGB

Percentile Scorecard

LCUTGBSLSR

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisLCUTGBSLSR
Valuation 77 #40 of 169 82 #32 of 169 32 #116 of 169
Growth 81 #30 of 153 95 #9 of 153 48 #80 of 153
Profitability 17 #102 of 123 81 #24 of 123 –
Financial Health 41 #98 of 165 20 #132 of 165 34 #109 of 165
Shareholder Returns 26 #86 of 116 57 #50 of 116 –
Overall 48 67 38
  • LCU ranked among 177 companies in Metals and Mining
  • TGB ranked among 177 companies in Metals and Mining
  • SLSR ranked among 177 companies in Metals and Mining

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodLCUTGBSLSRSPY
1 month -0.5%-20.9%-1.3% -5.9%
3 months -14.6%-15.4%-10.6% -4.6%
6 months -29.5%-3.9%-30.1% +0.2%
Year to date +15.9%+23.1%-11.5% +7.5%
1 year +62.2%+60.6%+11.2% +8.2%
3 years +170.4%+420.1%+94.2% +68.3%
3 years, per year +39.3%+73.3%+24.8% +19.0%
5 years +24.8%+219.7%-31.6% +56.5%
5 years, per year +4.5%+26.2%-7.3% +9.4%
10 years +224.4%+1,448.9%— +251.5%
10 years, per year +12.5%+31.5%— +13.4%

Risk

MeasureLCUTGBSLSRSPY
Volatility, 1Y 153.2%71.7%58.4% 13.6%
Downside volatility, 1Y 184.0%71.9%60.4% 14.2%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y -0.012.832.04 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.410.840.19 0.60
Max drawdown, 5Y -73.3%-61.9%-85.6% -25.4%
From 52-week high -49.5%-28.0%-36.7% -5.9%
52-week high $8.68$9.68$11.13 $779.14
52-week low $2.43$4.22$6.34 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleLCUTGBSLSR
P/E now vs peer median 9.7xmedian 12.9x 29.7xmedian 12.9x -21.4xmedian 12.9x
P/S now vs peer median —median 3.1x 2.3xmedian 3.1x -188.3xmedian 3.1x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 7.6x 5.4xmedian 7.6x -32.3xmedian 7.6x
P/FCF now vs peer median 5.4xmedian 12.2x 4.2xmedian 12.2x -14.9xmedian 12.2x
P/B now vs peer median 3.4xmedian 2.2x 2.8xmedian 2.2x -23.4xmedian 2.2x
PEG now vs peer median 0.19median 0.19 0.44median 0.19 —median 0.19

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsLCUTGBSLSR
Revenue – $1.08B -$6.25M
Gross profit – $445.68M –
Operating income -$14.76M $429.96M -$49.57M
Net income -$2.10M $77.12M -$30.06M
Free cash flow $12.93M $593.87M -$78.72M
R&D – – $16.18M
EPS (diluted) $0.45 $0.23 $-0.33
Cash & equivalents – $214.17M $54.01M
Total debt $2.61M $801.56M –
Shares (diluted) 15.93M 323.50M 165.13M
Enterprise value $69.75M $1.52B $1.02B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricLCUTGBSLSR
P/E 9.7x 29.7x -21.4x
P/FCF 5.4x 4.2x -14.9x
P/Operating cash flow 5.4x 5.0x –
P/S – 2.3x -188.3x
P/B 3.4x 2.8x -23.4x
P/Tangible book 3.4x 2.8x -23.4x
EV/EBITDA – 5.4x -32.3x
EV/EBIT -4.9x 7.2x -22.6x
EV/Revenue – 2.9x -179.6x
EV/FCF 5.6x 5.2x -14.3x
EV/Operating cash flow 5.6x 6.2x –
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.19 0.44 –

Growth

14 metrics
MetricLCUTGBSLSR
Revenue growth (1Y) – 97.5% -27.3%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – 34.5% –
Gross profit growth (1Y) – 165.7% –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – 40.1% –
Operating income growth (1Y) -273.0% 177.5% 40.3%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -60.5% 42.1% –
Net income growth (1Y) 59.0% 238.4% 55.4%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 19.2% 21.5% –
EPS growth (1Y) 290.3% 239.3% 40.2%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 50.6% 67.5% –
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 327.6% 161.3% –
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 197.6% 78.8% –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 326.9% 125.0% 2.2%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 197.3% 66.5% –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricLCUTGBSLSR
Gross margin – 41.1% –
EBITDA margin – 52.7% –
Operating margin – 39.6% –
Pretax margin – 46.0% –
Net margin – 7.0% –
FCF margin – 54.8% –
Operating cash flow margin – 46.2% –
Return on equity -66.5% 10.8% –
Return on assets -29.7% 3.5% 38.8%
Return on invested capital – 25.6% –
Return on capital employed -55.8% 17.5% -70.0%
Asset turnover – 0.4x -0.1x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) -6.2x 6.5x –
Stock comp / revenue – 2.9% -78.9%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricLCUTGBSLSR
Debt / assets 6.0% 28.9% –
Debt / equity 0.1x 0.9x –
Net debt / EBITDA – 1.0x –
Debt / FCF 0.2x 1.3x –
Liabilities / assets 53.0% 67.8% 148.9%
Equity / assets 47.0% 32.2% -48.9%
Interest coverage – 8.3x -10.1x
Current ratio 1.1x – 8.4x
Quick ratio – 0.9x 8.2x
Cash ratio – 0.8x 8.2x
Altman Z-score – – -1.01

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricLCUTGBSLSR
Dividend yield – – –
Net buyback yield -6.0% -0.4% –
Shareholder yield -6.0% -0.4% –
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusLCUTGBSLSR
Forward P/E – 17.9xFY2026 –
EPS, next fiscal year – $0.39FY2026 $-0.18FY2026
EPS growth, next FY – +680.0%FY2026 –
EPS growth, the year after – +112.8% –
Revenue, next fiscal year – $937.17MFY2026 $0.00FY2026
Revenue growth, next FY – +91.3%FY2026 –
Revenue growth, the year after – +27.7% –

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersLCUTGBSLSR
Held by institutions – 0.2% –
Institutions holding – 4 –
Change in shares held, QoQ – -99.7% –
Institutions buying – 2 –
Institutions selling – 2 –
Buyers to sellers – 1.00 –

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

LCUTGBSLSR
LCU 1.00 -0.03 -0.08
TGB -0.03 1.00 0.77
SLSR -0.08 0.77 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, LCU, TGB and SLSR?

Trekor Metals (TGB) is the largest by market capitalisation: Lion Copper (LCU) $69.75M, Trekor Metals (TGB) $2.23B, Solaris Resources (SLSR) $1.15B.

Which stock is cheaper, LCU, TGB and SLSR?

Lion Copper (LCU) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Lion Copper (LCU) 9.7x, Trekor Metals (TGB) 29.3x, Solaris Resources (SLSR) -21.0x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Trekor Metals (TGB) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Trekor Metals (TGB) +97.5%, Solaris Resources (SLSR) -27.3%.

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Lion Copper (LCU) returned the most: Lion Copper (LCU) +62.2%, Trekor Metals (TGB) +60.6%, Solaris Resources (SLSR) +11.2%. Over five years, Trekor Metals (TGB) compounded fastest (Lion Copper (LCU) +4.5%/yr, Trekor Metals (TGB) +26.2%/yr, Solaris Resources (SLSR) -7.3%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Solaris Resources (SLSR) has been the steadiest (Lion Copper (LCU) 153.2%, Trekor Metals (TGB) 71.7%, Solaris Resources (SLSR) 58.4%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, LCU, TGB and SLSR?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Trekor Metals (TGB) leads on 4. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.