LAUR vs GHC vs PRDO Stock Comparison

Laureate Education, Graham Holdings and Perdoceo Education Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (STRA) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
LAUR Laureate Education, Inc.
$38.47 +2.9% 1M +28.9% 1Y
Market cap
$5.33B
P/E
16.6x
Revenue (TTM)
$1.83B
Div. yield
–
Education Services Consumer Discretionary
4 wins
GHC Graham Holdings Co
$1,200.12 +3.8% 1M +17.4% 1Y
Market cap
$5.08B
P/E
9.4x
Revenue (TTM)
$5.07B
Div. yield
0.04%
Education Services Consumer Discretionary
4 wins
PRDO PERDOCEO EDUCATION Corp
$32.71 +7.3% 1M -11.3% 1Y
Market cap
$2.05B
P/E
11.6x
Revenue (TTM)
$858.61M
Div. yield
0.02%
Education Services Consumer Discretionary
4 wins

Head to Head

12 decided of 12

Laureate Education leads on 4 of the 12 questions below (Laureate Education 4, Graham Holdings 4, Perdoceo Education 4). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionLAURGHCPRDOLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $5.33B $5.08B $2.05B LAUR
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 16.6x 9.4x 11.6x GHC
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 19.2x 15.8x 10.6x PRDO
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +17.9% +4.8% +11.7% LAUR
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 17.6% 10.7% 20.6% PRDO
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 24.7% 3.5% — LAUR
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 0.1x -0.9x — GHC
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.04% 0.02% GHC
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +28.9% +17.4% -11.3% LAUR
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +18.3%/yr +15.5%/yr +25.4%/yr PRDO
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 33.0% 23.3% 35.9% GHC
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 71/100 40/100 76/100 PRDO

Percentile Scorecard

LAURGHCPRDO

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisLAURGHCPRDO
Valuation 34 #22 of 33 69 #11 of 33 81 #7 of 33
Growth 83 #6 of 30 28 #22 of 30 35 #20 of 30
Profitability 93 #3 of 29 25 #22 of 29 96 #2 of 29
Financial Health 58 #17 of 39 63 #15 of 39 97 #2 of 39
Shareholder Returns 85 #3 of 14 15 #12 of 14 69 #5 of 14
Overall 71 40 76
  • LAUR ranked among 39 companies in Consumer Services
  • GHC ranked among 39 companies in Consumer Services
  • PRDO ranked among 39 companies in Consumer Services

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodLAURGHCPRDOSPY
1 month +2.9%+3.8%+7.3% -0.8%
3 months +2.6%+1.7%+3.1% +3.5%
6 months +23.4%+3.3%-0.5% +7.0%
Year to date +14.3%+9.2%+11.5% +12.2%
1 year +28.9%+17.4%-11.3% +13.0%
3 years +170.2%+112.1%+82.6% +86.3%
3 years, per year +39.3%+28.5%+22.3% +23.1%
5 years +131.7%+105.8%+210.0% +68.6%
5 years, per year +18.3%+15.5%+25.4% +11.0%
10 years —+153.2%+351.2% +258.0%
10 years, per year —+9.7%+16.3% +13.6%

Risk

MeasureLAURGHCPRDOSPY
Volatility, 1Y 33.0%23.3%35.9% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 33.9%23.4%42.9% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.300.28-0.02 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.880.75-0.32 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -46.1%-20.3%-27.4% -25.4%
From 52-week high -4.9%-3.1%-13.8% -1.8%
52-week high $40.46$1,238.69$37.95 $779.14
52-week low $28.88$1,012.13$27.41 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleLAURGHCPRDO
P/E now vs peer median 16.7xmedian 15.5x 9.4xmedian 15.5x 11.6xmedian 15.5x
P/S now vs peer median 2.9xmedian 1.3x 1.0xmedian 1.3x 2.4xmedian 1.3x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 10.1xmedian 10.1x 12.1xmedian 10.1x 3.0xmedian 10.1x
P/FCF now vs peer median 18.5xmedian 14.7x 20.6xmedian 14.7x 9.4xmedian 14.7x
P/B now vs peer median 4.6xmedian 2.0x 1.1xmedian 2.0x 2.0xmedian 2.0x
PEG now vs peer median 0.31median 0.35 0.23median 0.35 0.80median 0.35

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsLAURGHCPRDO
Revenue $1.83B $5.07B $858.61M
Gross profit $498.85M $1.52B $661.90M
Operating income $446.85M $256.19M $210.88M
Net income $321.53M $550.25M $177.12M
Free cash flow $286.58M $247.96M $217.98M
EPS (diluted) $2.30 $125.75 $2.79
Cash & equivalents $161.67M $156.77M $734.82M
Total debt $223.17M $900.37M –
Shares (diluted) 139.94M 4.31M 63.59M
Enterprise value $4.62B $177.18M -$2.76B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricLAURGHCPRDO
P/E 16.7x 9.4x 11.6x
P/FCF 18.5x 20.6x 9.4x
P/Operating cash flow 13.0x 15.7x 9.1x
P/S 2.9x 1.0x 2.4x
P/B 4.6x 1.1x 2.0x
P/Tangible book 5.4x 1.1x 2.1x
EV/EBITDA 10.1x 12.1x 3.0x
EV/EBIT 12.0x 18.6x 3.5x
EV/Revenue 2.9x 0.9x 0.9x
EV/FCF 18.7x 19.2x 3.4x
EV/Operating cash flow 13.2x 14.6x 3.3x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.31 0.23 0.80

Growth

14 metrics
MetricLAURGHCPRDO
Revenue growth (1Y) 17.9% 4.8% 11.7%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 10.4% 6.4% 5.7%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 18.0% 1.0% 9.1%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 11.5% 5.1% 3.4%
Operating income growth (1Y) 18.7% -6.6% 13.9%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 13.6% 41.6% 13.7%
Net income growth (1Y) 25.1% -20.5% 14.7%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 47.6% 36.2% 11.7%
EPS growth (1Y) 32.4% -19.4% 20.1%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 53.6% 40.4% 14.5%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 39.9% -33.9% 6.1%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 24.4% 18.1% 12.2%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 25.7% -40.8% 6.1%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 23.6% 32.3% 13.2%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricLAURGHCPRDO
Gross margin 27.3% 29.9% 77.1%
EBITDA margin 29.1% 7.8% 29.0%
Operating margin 24.4% 5.1% 24.6%
Pretax margin 24.2% 14.1% 26.9%
Net margin 17.6% 10.7% 20.6%
FCF margin 15.7% 4.9% 25.4%
Operating cash flow margin 22.3% 6.4% 26.2%
Return on equity 29.4% 11.5% 17.3%
Return on assets 13.7% 6.7% 13.4%
Return on invested capital 24.7% 3.5% –
Return on capital employed 24.3% 3.7% 18.5%
Asset turnover 0.8x 0.6x 0.7x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.3x 0.6x 1.3x
Stock comp / revenue 0.8% 0.1% 1.5%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricLAURGHCPRDO
Debt / assets 9.2% 11.1% –
Debt / equity 0.2x 0.2x –
Net debt / EBITDA 0.1x -0.9x –
Debt / FCF 0.8x 3.6x –
Liabilities / assets 52.9% 41.1% 22.6%
Equity / assets 47.1% 58.9% 77.4%
Interest coverage 35.9x 4.9x 34.1x
Current ratio 0.7x 1.9x 4.7x
Quick ratio 0.6x 1.5x 7.9x
Cash ratio 0.3x 1.0x 7.6x
Altman Z-score 4.00 3.27 6.65

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricLAURGHCPRDO
Dividend yield – 0.6% 1.9%
Net buyback yield 6.2% 2.4% 4.3%
Shareholder yield 6.2% 3.0% 6.2%
Payout ratio (earnings) – 35.0% 21.9%
Payout ratio (FCF) – 77.7% 17.8%
Dividend growth (1Y) – 528.1% 11.6%
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – 83.8% –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusLAURGHCPRDO
Forward P/E 19.2xFY2026 15.8xFY2026 10.6xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $2.00FY2026 $76.14FY2026 $3.08FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +16.3%FY2026 +14.5%FY2026 +27.3%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +17.0% -16.0% +4.9%
Revenue, next fiscal year $2.03BFY2026 $4.97BFY2026 $877.60MFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +19.6%FY2026 +1.3%FY2026 +3.7%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after -4.4% +2.0% -5.8%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersLAURGHCPRDO
Held by institutions 95.8% 83.3% 100.0%
Institutions holding 337 337 340
Change in shares held, QoQ -3.3% +0.4% +1.9%
Institutions buying 161 149 173
Institutions selling 144 110 113
Buyers to sellers 1.12 1.35 1.53

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

LAURGHCPRDO
LAUR 1.00 0.33 0.56
GHC 0.33 1.00 0.39
PRDO 0.56 0.39 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, LAUR, GHC and PRDO?

Laureate Education (LAUR) is the largest by market capitalisation: Laureate Education (LAUR) $5.33B, Graham Holdings (GHC) $5.08B, Perdoceo Education (PRDO) $2.05B.

Which stock is cheaper, LAUR, GHC and PRDO?

Graham Holdings (GHC) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Laureate Education (LAUR) 16.6x, Graham Holdings (GHC) 9.4x, Perdoceo Education (PRDO) 11.6x). On next year's consensus earnings, Perdoceo Education (PRDO) is cheapest (Laureate Education (LAUR) 19.2x, Graham Holdings (GHC) 15.8x, Perdoceo Education (PRDO) 10.6x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Laureate Education (LAUR) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Laureate Education (LAUR) +17.9%, Graham Holdings (GHC) +4.8%, Perdoceo Education (PRDO) +11.7%.

Which company is more profitable?

Perdoceo Education (PRDO) has the highest net margin (Laureate Education (LAUR) 17.6%, Graham Holdings (GHC) 10.7%, Perdoceo Education (PRDO) 20.6%). On return on invested capital, Laureate Education (LAUR) leads (Laureate Education (LAUR) 24.7%, Graham Holdings (GHC) 3.5%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Laureate Education (LAUR) returned the most: Laureate Education (LAUR) +28.9%, Graham Holdings (GHC) +17.4%, Perdoceo Education (PRDO) -11.3%. Over five years, Perdoceo Education (PRDO) compounded fastest (Laureate Education (LAUR) +18.3%/yr, Graham Holdings (GHC) +15.5%/yr, Perdoceo Education (PRDO) +25.4%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Graham Holdings (GHC) has the highest dividend yield: Laureate Education (LAUR) 0.00%, Graham Holdings (GHC) 0.04%, Perdoceo Education (PRDO) 0.02%. Laureate Education (LAUR) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Graham Holdings (GHC) has been the steadiest (Laureate Education (LAUR) 33.0%, Graham Holdings (GHC) 23.3%, Perdoceo Education (PRDO) 35.9%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, LAUR, GHC and PRDO?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Laureate Education (LAUR) leads on 4. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.