LAMR vs OMC vs BOC Stock Comparison

Lamar Advertising, Omnicom and Boston Omaha Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group
LAMR Lamar Advertising Co/New
$157.01 +9.0% 1M +30.6% 1Y
Market cap
$15.75B
P/E
28.3x
Revenue (TTM)
$2.33B
Div. yield
0.04%
Billboard REITs Real Estate
8 wins
OMC Omnicom Group Inc.
$79.86 +4.9% 1M +1.1% 1Y
Market cap
$21.54B
P/E
30.6x
Revenue (TTM)
$24.76B
Div. yield
0.04%
Advertising Agencies Communication Services
4 wins
BOC BOSTON OMAHA Corp
$12.62 -6.5% 1M -9.7% 1Y
Market cap
$387.89M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$102.32M
Div. yield
–
Billboard REITs Real Estate

Head to Head

12 decided of 12

Lamar Advertising leads on 8 of the 12 questions below (Lamar Advertising 8, Omnicom 4). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionLAMROMCBOCLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $15.75B $21.54B $387.89M OMC
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 28.3x 30.6x -29.0x LAMR
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 25.0x 7.7x — OMC
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +4.4% +54.1% -2.6% OMC
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 23.9% 2.8% -13.1% LAMR
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 16.1% 4.0% -0.6% LAMR
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 3.2x 7.4x — LAMR
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.04% 0.04% 0.00% LAMR
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +30.6% +1.1% -9.7% LAMR
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +6.9%/yr +3.0%/yr -18.6%/yr LAMR
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 20.9% 36.1% 32.2% LAMR
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 58/100 67/100 35/100 OMC

Percentile Scorecard

LAMROMCBOC

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisLAMROMCBOC
Valuation 70 #4 of 11 64 #20 of 54 40 #7 of 11
Growth 44 #6 of 10 75 #12 of 45 11 #9 of 10
Profitability 56 #5 of 10 64 #16 of 43 0 #10 of 10
Financial Health 60 #5 of 11 46 #34 of 62 90 #2 of 11
Shareholder Returns – 88 #4 of 26 –
Overall 58 67 35
  • LAMR ranked among 11 companies in Infrastructure REITs
  • OMC ranked among 62 companies in Advertising and Media
  • BOC ranked among 11 companies in Infrastructure REITs

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodLAMROMCBOCSPY
1 month +9.0%+4.9%-6.5% -0.8%
3 months -2.5%-3.1%-11.9% +3.5%
6 months +15.7%+5.1%+3.6% +7.0%
Year to date +24.0%-1.1%+2.0% +12.2%
1 year +30.6%+1.1%-9.7% +13.0%
3 years +95.4%+7.9%-10.2% +86.3%
3 years, per year +25.0%+2.6%-3.5% +23.1%
5 years +39.7%+15.7%-64.3% +68.6%
5 years, per year +6.9%+3.0%-18.6% +11.0%
10 years +145.5%+0.3%— +258.0%
10 years, per year +9.4%+0.0%— +13.6%

Risk

MeasureLAMROMCBOCSPY
Volatility, 1Y 20.9%36.1%32.2% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 20.5%35.1%29.2% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.320.390.17 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 1.460.03-0.30 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -35.8%-36.2%-69.5% -25.4%
From 52-week high -4.5%-10.2%-16.4% -1.8%
52-week high $164.33$88.95$15.09 $779.14
52-week low $116.11$67.27$11.06 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleLAMROMCBOC
P/E now vs peer median 28.7xmedian 24.3x 31.0xmedian 18.4x -28.7xmedian 24.3x
P/S now vs peer median 5.9xmedian 6.4x 0.9xmedian 0.6x 3.8xmedian 6.4x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 15.8xmedian 15.8x 17.4xmedian 11.0x —median 15.8x
P/FCF now vs peer median 19.1xmedian 18.4x 7.6xmedian 9.1x —median 18.4x
P/B now vs peer median 13.7xmedian 2.3x 2.1xmedian 1.6x 0.7xmedian 2.3x
PEG now vs peer median 2.84median 0.72 -1.09median 0.44 0.36median 0.72

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsLAMROMCBOC
Revenue $2.33B $24.76B $102.32M
Gross profit $1.57B $3.11B $69.69M
Operating income $739.17M $1.58B -$3.43M
Net income $565.31M $702.70M -$18.04M
Free cash flow $718.05M $2.86B –
EPS (diluted) $5.47 $2.56 $-0.44
Cash & equivalents $67.95M $3.80B $15.10M
Total debt $13.78B $19.92B $47.58M
Shares (diluted) 101.59M 275.40M 30.42M
Enterprise value $15.56B $3.24B $183.41M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricLAMROMCBOC
P/E 28.7x 31.0x -28.7x
P/FCF 19.1x 7.6x –
P/Operating cash flow 15.1x 7.1x –
P/S 5.9x 0.9x 3.8x
P/B 13.7x 2.1x 0.7x
P/Tangible book -110.2x 3.9x 0.8x
EV/EBITDA 15.8x 17.4x –
EV/EBIT 23.2x 23.9x -116.8x
EV/Revenue 7.4x 1.5x 3.9x
EV/FCF 23.9x 13.2x –
EV/Operating cash flow 18.9x 12.3x –
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 2.84 -1.09 0.36

Growth

14 metrics
MetricLAMROMCBOC
Revenue growth (1Y) 4.4% 54.1% -2.6%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 3.9% 19.5% 4.0%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 5.1% 6.9% -3.8%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 4.1% 5.1% 1.4%
Operating income growth (1Y) 20.8% -24.9% -3.1%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 8.0% -9.0% 20.0%
Net income growth (1Y) 28.2% -50.5% -1,201%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 10.5% -21.8% -110.3%
EPS growth (1Y) 26.7% -62.6% -1,914%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 10.1% -28.4% -79.3%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 4.9% 68.4% –
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 5.3% 56.8% –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -0.6% 71.7% –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 6.7% 58.3% –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricLAMROMCBOC
Gross margin 67.4% 12.6% 68.1%
EBITDA margin 46.5% 8.8% –
Operating margin 31.8% 6.4% -3.3%
Pretax margin 24.8% 5.1% -18.2%
Net margin 23.9% 2.8% -13.1%
FCF margin 30.9% 11.6% –
Operating cash flow margin 39.0% 12.4% –
Return on equity 57.2% 7.8% -3.4%
Return on assets 8.1% 1.6% -2.6%
Return on invested capital 16.1% 4.0% -0.6%
Return on capital employed 12.0% 6.5% -0.5%
Asset turnover 0.3x 0.5x 0.1x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.6x 4.4x –
Stock comp / revenue 1.8% 0.4% –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricLAMROMCBOC
Debt / assets 50.3% 40.1% 7.0%
Debt / equity 3.5x 1.9x 0.1x
Net debt / EBITDA 3.2x 7.4x –
Debt / FCF 4.9x 7.0x –
Liabilities / assets 85.8% 79.2% 24.6%
Equity / assets 14.2% 20.8% 75.4%
Interest coverage 4.5x 3.5x -1.4x
Current ratio 0.6x 0.9x 2.0x
Quick ratio 0.6x 0.7x 0.6x
Cash ratio 0.1x 0.1x 0.5x
Altman Z-score 1.77 1.21 1.58

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricLAMROMCBOC
Dividend yield 4.2% 4.0% –
Net buyback yield -0.1% 16.3% –
Shareholder yield 4.1% 20.3% –
Payout ratio (earnings) 117.7% 119.4% –
Payout ratio (FCF) 92.7% 29.3% –
Dividend growth (1Y) 5.8% 52.4% –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) 7.9% 13.9% –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusLAMROMCBOC
Forward P/E 25.0xFY2026 7.7xFY2026 –
EPS, next fiscal year $6.29FY2026 $10.43FY2026 $-0.08FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +9.0%FY2026 +20.6%FY2026 –
EPS growth, the year after +2.5% +3.0% –
Revenue, next fiscal year $2.48BFY2026 $25.52BFY2026 $116.04MFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +9.4%FY2026 +47.8%FY2026 +1.5%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +2.5% +5.0% +1.2%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersLAMROMCBOC
Held by institutions 98.1% 100.0% 64.3%
Institutions holding 775 1,102 137
Change in shares held, QoQ 0.0% -4.3% -3.0%
Institutions buying 426 468 81
Institutions selling 232 483 24
Buyers to sellers 1.84 0.97 3.38

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

LAMROMCBOC
LAMR 1.00 0.25 0.11
OMC 0.25 1.00 0.23
BOC 0.11 0.23 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, LAMR, OMC and BOC?

Omnicom (OMC) is the largest by market capitalisation: Lamar Advertising (LAMR) $15.75B, Omnicom (OMC) $21.54B, Boston Omaha (BOC) $387.89M.

Which stock is cheaper, LAMR, OMC and BOC?

Lamar Advertising (LAMR) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Lamar Advertising (LAMR) 28.3x, Omnicom (OMC) 30.6x, Boston Omaha (BOC) -29.0x). On next year's consensus earnings, Omnicom (OMC) is cheapest (Lamar Advertising (LAMR) 25.0x, Omnicom (OMC) 7.7x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Omnicom (OMC) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Lamar Advertising (LAMR) +4.4%, Omnicom (OMC) +54.1%, Boston Omaha (BOC) -2.6%.

Which company is more profitable?

Lamar Advertising (LAMR) has the highest net margin (Lamar Advertising (LAMR) 23.9%, Omnicom (OMC) 2.8%, Boston Omaha (BOC) -13.1%). On return on invested capital, Lamar Advertising (LAMR) leads (Lamar Advertising (LAMR) 16.1%, Omnicom (OMC) 4.0%, Boston Omaha (BOC) -0.6%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Lamar Advertising (LAMR) returned the most: Lamar Advertising (LAMR) +30.6%, Omnicom (OMC) +1.1%, Boston Omaha (BOC) -9.7%. Over five years, Lamar Advertising (LAMR) compounded fastest (Lamar Advertising (LAMR) +6.9%/yr, Omnicom (OMC) +3.0%/yr, Boston Omaha (BOC) -18.6%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Lamar Advertising (LAMR) has the highest dividend yield: Lamar Advertising (LAMR) 0.04%, Omnicom (OMC) 0.04%, Boston Omaha (BOC) 0.00%. Boston Omaha (BOC) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Lamar Advertising (LAMR) has been the steadiest (Lamar Advertising (LAMR) 20.9%, Omnicom (OMC) 36.1%, Boston Omaha (BOC) 32.2%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, LAMR, OMC and BOC?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Lamar Advertising (LAMR) leads on 8. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.