LAC vs SLDP vs ABAT Stock Comparison

Lithium Americas, Solid Power and American Battery Technology Prices as of Oct 29, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (BLTH) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
LAC Lithium Americas Corp.
$2.13 -19.3% 1M -63.0% 1Y
Market cap
$747.26M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
–
Lithium Basic Materials
3 wins
SLDP Solid Power, Inc.
$2.03 -10.6% 1M -63.2% 1Y
Market cap
$440.65M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$11.53M
Div. yield
–
Lithium Basic Materials
2 wins

Head to Head

7 decided of 12

Lithium Americas leads on 3 of the 12 questions below (Lithium Americas 3, American Battery Technology 2, Solid Power 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionLACSLDPABATLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $747.26M $440.65M $180.53M LAC
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -25.0x -4.9x -2.5x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — — — –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months — -49.1% +406.8% ABAT
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months — -778.5% -337.5% ABAT
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — — — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — — 0.6x –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -63.0% -63.2% -70.8% LAC
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years — -30.2%/yr -39.3%/yr SLDP
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 66.6% 81.8% 94.8% LAC
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers — 30/100 29/100 SLDP

Percentile Scorecard

LACSLDPABAT

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisLACSLDPABAT
Valuation 94 #11 of 163 17 #136 of 163 14 #141 of 163
Growth – 27 #109 of 148 35 #96 of 148
Profitability – 14 #106 of 123 12 #109 of 123
Financial Health 45 #91 of 164 83 #29 of 164 79 #36 of 164
Shareholder Returns – 9 #98 of 108 8 #99 of 108
Overall – 30 29
  • LAC ranked among 176 companies in Metals and Mining
  • SLDP ranked among 176 companies in Metals and Mining
  • ABAT ranked among 176 companies in Metals and Mining

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodLACSLDPABATSPY
1 month -19.3%-10.6%-28.8% +0.7%
3 months -26.6%-1.9%-23.5% +3.7%
6 months -62.8%-41.2%-53.8% +7.1%
Year to date -51.1%-52.2%-53.3% +12.8%
1 year -63.0%-63.2%-70.8% +11.9%
3 years -68.3%+63.7%-71.1% +85.2%
3 years, per year -31.8%+17.9%-33.9% +22.8%
5 years —-83.4%-91.7% +67.6%
5 years, per year —-30.2%-39.3% +10.9%
10 years ——-71.1% +262.0%
10 years, per year ——-11.7% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureLACSLDPABATSPY
Volatility, 1Y 66.6%81.8%94.8% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 64.6%79.7%91.1% 12.6%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 2.573.033.58 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.95-0.77-0.75 0.94
Max drawdown, 5Y -82.8%-93.5%-97.0% -25.4%
From 52-week high -66.9%-76.1%-70.8% -1.2%
52-week high $6.44$8.51$5.35 $779.14
52-week low $2.01$1.95$1.28 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleLACSLDPABAT
P/E now vs peer median -26.5xmedian 13.2x -5.1xmedian 13.2x -2.7xmedian 13.2x
P/S now vs peer median —median 3.1x 40.0xmedian 3.1x 10.2xmedian 3.1x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 7.2x -2.5xmedian 7.2x -2.6xmedian 7.2x
P/FCF now vs peer median —median 15.2x -6.3xmedian 15.2x -5.8xmedian 15.2x
P/B now vs peer median 0.4xmedian 2.2x 0.9xmedian 2.2x 1.7xmedian 2.2x
PEG now vs peer median —median 0.30 —median 0.30 0.63median 0.30

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsLACSLDPABAT
Revenue – $11.53M $21.74M
Gross profit – -$3.63M -$3.09M
Operating income – -$107.57M -$74.71M
Net income -$73.07M -$89.77M -$73.38M
Free cash flow – -$72.93M -$37.81M
R&D -$1.00K $72.26M $17.87M
EPS (diluted) $-0.07 $-0.40 $-0.58
Cash & equivalents $822.78M $24.28M $49.52M
Total debt $988.02M – $8.00M
Shares (diluted) 401.74M 225.97M 127.58M
Enterprise value -$1.54B -$559.19M $12.91M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricLACSLDPABAT
P/E -26.5x -5.1x -2.7x
P/FCF – -6.3x -5.8x
P/Operating cash flow – -7.7x -9.1x
P/S – 40.0x 10.2x
P/B 0.4x 0.9x 1.7x
P/Tangible book 0.4x 0.9x 1.8x
EV/EBITDA – -2.5x -2.6x
EV/EBIT – -2.0x -2.4x
EV/Revenue – 19.0x 8.2x
EV/FCF – -3.0x -4.7x
EV/Operating cash flow – -3.7x -7.4x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) – – 0.63

Growth

14 metrics
MetricLACSLDPABAT
Revenue growth (1Y) – -49.1% 406.8%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – -9.8% –
Gross profit growth (1Y) – -480.9% 70.8%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – -21.2% –
Operating income growth (1Y) – -4.9% -77.8%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – -12.0% -49.3%
Net income growth (1Y) -33.9% 4.0% -56.9%
Net income CAGR (3Y) – -26.6% -49.0%
EPS growth (1Y) 63.7% 23.4% 1.2%
EPS CAGR (3Y) – – -4.3%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) – 7.2% 16.2%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – -8.2% -21.9%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) – 5.3% -20.1%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 8.7% 8.9%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricLACSLDPABAT
Gross margin – -31.4% -14.2%
EBITDA margin – -770.0% -320.6%
Operating margin – -932.8% -343.6%
Pretax margin – -773.8% -339.1%
Net margin – -778.5% -337.5%
FCF margin – -632.4% -173.9%
Operating cash flow margin – -518.8% -111.4%
Return on equity – -17.4% -61.7%
Return on assets – -16.5% -58.5%
Return on invested capital – – –
Return on capital employed – -20.5% -62.4%
Asset turnover – 0.0x 0.2x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) – 0.7x 0.3x
Stock comp / revenue – 94.0% 213.9%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricLACSLDPABAT
Debt / assets 27.9% – 6.0%
Debt / equity 0.5x – 0.1x
Net debt / EBITDA – – 0.6x
Debt / FCF – – -0.2x
Liabilities / assets 44.9% 4.8% 4.9%
Equity / assets 55.1% 95.2% 95.1%
Interest coverage – -498.0x -76.2x
Current ratio 5.5x 14.6x 9.5x
Quick ratio 3.5x 14.3x 8.9x
Cash ratio 3.5x 14.1x 7.7x
Altman Z-score – 9.98 15.81

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricLACSLDPABAT
Dividend yield – – –
Net buyback yield – -28.3% -34.6%
Shareholder yield – -28.3% -34.6%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusLACSLDPABAT
EPS, next fiscal year $-0.08FY2026 $-0.38FY2026 –
Revenue, next fiscal year $0.00FY2026 $5.25MFY2026 –
Revenue growth, next FY – -70.7%FY2026 –
Revenue growth, the year after – +29.9% –

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersLACSLDPABAT
Held by institutions 30.8% 35.5% 36.6%
Institutions holding 275 193 176
Change in shares held, QoQ -0.6% -14.0% +5.9%
Institutions buying 150 114 102
Institutions selling 57 34 33
Buyers to sellers 2.63 3.35 3.09

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

LACSLDPABAT
LAC 1.00 0.48 0.67
SLDP 0.48 1.00 0.56
ABAT 0.67 0.56 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, LAC, SLDP and ABAT?

Lithium Americas (LAC) is the largest by market capitalisation: Lithium Americas (LAC) $747.26M, Solid Power (SLDP) $440.65M, American Battery Technology (ABAT) $180.53M.

Which company is growing faster?

American Battery Technology (ABAT) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Solid Power (SLDP) -49.1%, American Battery Technology (ABAT) +406.8%.

Which company is more profitable?

American Battery Technology (ABAT) has the highest net margin (Solid Power (SLDP) -778.5%, American Battery Technology (ABAT) -337.5%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Lithium Americas (LAC) returned the most: Lithium Americas (LAC) -63.0%, Solid Power (SLDP) -63.2%, American Battery Technology (ABAT) -70.8%. Over five years, Solid Power (SLDP) compounded fastest (Solid Power (SLDP) -30.2%/yr, American Battery Technology (ABAT) -39.3%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Lithium Americas (LAC) has been the steadiest (Lithium Americas (LAC) 66.6%, Solid Power (SLDP) 81.8%, American Battery Technology (ABAT) 94.8%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, LAC, SLDP and ABAT?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Lithium Americas (LAC) leads on 3. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.