KVYO vs PARA vs RAMP Stock Comparison

Klaviyo, Parabolic Technologies and LiveRamp Holdings Prices as of Nov 5, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (BRZE) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
KVYO Klaviyo, Inc.
$20.82 +25.4% 1M -22.5% 1Y
Market cap
$5.90B
P/E
745.5x
Revenue (TTM)
$1.47B
Div. yield
–
Marketing Software Technology
2 wins
RAMP LiveRamp Holdings, Inc.
$38.50 +2.6% 1M +40.9% 1Y
Market cap
$2.34B
P/E
15.0x
Revenue (TTM)
$832.10M
Div. yield
–
Marketing Software Technology
7 wins

Head to Head

9 decided of 12

LiveRamp Holdings leads on 7 of the 12 questions below (LiveRamp Holdings 7, Klaviyo 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionKVYOPARARAMPLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $5.90B $18.55K $2.34B KVYO
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 745.5x 0.0x 15.0x RAMP
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 26.0x — 12.5x RAMP
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +27.0% +19.6% +8.9% KVYO
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 0.5% -228.7% 18.7% RAMP
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — -113.0% — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — -0.3x — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -22.5% -99.6% +40.9% RAMP
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years — -93.1%/yr -6.4%/yr RAMP
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 78.4% 372.4% 37.0% RAMP
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 74/100 24/100 83/100 RAMP

Percentile Scorecard

KVYOPARARAMP

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisKVYOPARARAMP
Valuation 40 #60 of 100 27 #73 of 100 88 #13 of 100
Growth 94 #7 of 99 37 #63 of 99 86 #15 of 99
Profitability 60 #39 of 96 7 #89 of 96 74 #26 of 96
Financial Health 93 #9 of 112 25 #84 of 112 92 #10 of 112
Shareholder Returns 82 #13 of 67 – 77 #16 of 67
Overall 74 24 83
  • KVYO ranked among 113 companies in Business Applications
  • PARA ranked among 113 companies in Business Applications
  • RAMP ranked among 113 companies in Business Applications

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodKVYOPARARAMPSPY
1 month +25.4%-76.1%+2.6% -5.9%
3 months +24.4%-91.6%+1.6% -4.6%
6 months +32.0%-97.5%+27.4% +0.2%
Year to date -35.9%-99.2%+31.1% +7.5%
1 year -22.5%-99.6%+40.9% +8.2%
3 years -33.7%-100.0%+39.2% +68.3%
3 years, per year -12.8%-98.9%+11.7% +19.0%
5 years —-100.0%-28.1% +56.5%
5 years, per year —-93.1%-6.4% +9.4%
10 years ——+62.0% +251.5%
10 years, per year ——+4.9% +13.4%

Risk

MeasureKVYOPARARAMPSPY
Volatility, 1Y 78.4%372.4%37.0% 13.6%
Downside volatility, 1Y 90.2%347.7%29.8% 14.2%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.441.700.35 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.29-0.271.10 0.60
Max drawdown, 5Y -73.9%-100.0%-72.7% -25.4%
From 52-week high -37.4%-99.6%0.0% -5.9%
52-week high $33.26$38.80$38.50 $779.14
52-week low $12.86$0.16$22.42 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleKVYOPARARAMP
P/E now vs peer median 750.0xmedian 24.7x 0.0xmedian 24.7x 15.0xmedian 24.7x
P/S now vs peer median 4.1xmedian 2.8x 0.0xmedian 2.8x 2.8xmedian 2.8x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 99.4xmedian 16.5x -0.3xmedian 16.5x 17.9xmedian 16.5x
P/FCF now vs peer median 24.2xmedian 15.3x 0.0xmedian 15.3x 11.8xmedian 15.3x
P/B now vs peer median 6.9xmedian 2.7x 0.0xmedian 2.7x 2.4xmedian 2.7x
PEG now vs peer median 28.32median 0.77 0.00median 0.77 0.27median 0.77

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsKVYOPARARAMP
Revenue $1.47B $10.62M $832.10M
Gross profit $1.08B $8.63M $589.26M
Operating income -$19.55M -$18.88M $96.41M
Net income $7.92M -$24.30M $155.72M
Free cash flow $245.30M -$16.08M $198.85M
R&D $346.22M – $145.67M
EPS (diluted) $0.03 $-149.36 $2.52
Cash & equivalents $705.44M $646.00K $363.52M
Total debt – $5.51M –
Shares (diluted) 286.47M 162.70K 61.85M
Enterprise value $2.32B -$1.87M $802.20M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricKVYOPARARAMP
P/E 750.0x 0.0x 15.0x
P/FCF 24.2x 0.0x 11.8x
P/Operating cash flow 21.7x 0.0x 11.7x
P/S 4.1x 0.0x 2.8x
P/B 6.9x 0.0x 2.4x
P/Tangible book 6.9x 0.0x 2.4x
EV/EBITDA 99.4x -0.3x 17.9x
EV/EBIT -267.7x -0.3x 20.4x
EV/Revenue 3.6x 0.5x 2.4x
EV/FCF 21.3x -0.3x 9.9x
EV/Operating cash flow 19.1x -0.3x 9.8x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 28.32 0.00 0.27

Growth

14 metrics
MetricKVYOPARARAMP
Revenue growth (1Y) 27.0% 19.6% 8.9%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 31.7% – 11.0%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 24.3% 23.0% 8.7%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 31.7% – 10.8%
Operating income growth (1Y) 80.6% -14.9% 439.4%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 59.7% -23.4% 44.0%
Net income growth (1Y) 112.0% 30.2% 979.7%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 26.6% 9.0% 54.3%
EPS growth (1Y) 112.6% 95.9% 1,065%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 26.5% 37.1% 56.0%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 48.1% -8.8% 36.0%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 39.2% -22.2% 29.0%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 39.7% -8.8% 35.9%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 35.1% -22.2% 30.0%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricKVYOPARARAMP
Gross margin 73.5% 81.2% 70.8%
EBITDA margin 3.6% -166.3% 13.2%
Operating margin -1.3% -177.7% 11.6%
Pretax margin 0.9% -227.9% 13.3%
Net margin 0.5% -228.7% 18.7%
FCF margin 16.7% -151.4% 23.9%
Operating cash flow margin 18.7% -151.4% 24.1%
Return on equity 0.9% -239.1% 16.0%
Return on assets 0.6% -77.4% 12.1%
Return on invested capital – -113.0% –
Return on capital employed -1.9% -141.2% 9.2%
Asset turnover 1.1x 0.3x 0.6x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 34.6x 0.7x 1.3x
Stock comp / revenue 11.8% 38.3% 9.4%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricKVYOPARARAMP
Debt / assets – 17.6% –
Debt / equity – 0.5x –
Net debt / EBITDA – -0.3x –
Debt / FCF – -0.3x –
Liabilities / assets 33.1% 60.9% 23.6%
Equity / assets 66.9% 39.1% 76.4%
Interest coverage – -4.6x –
Current ratio 2.8x 0.1x 2.7x
Quick ratio 2.5x 0.1x 2.5x
Cash ratio 2.2x 0.0x 1.6x
Altman Z-score 8.98 -7.38 7.55

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricKVYOPARARAMP
Dividend yield – – –
Net buyback yield 8.0% -11,039% 7.6%
Shareholder yield 8.0% -11,039% 7.6%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusKVYOPARARAMP
Forward P/E 26.0xFY2026 – 12.5xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $0.80FY2026 $-81.25FY2026 $3.07FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +19.4%FY2026 – +35.2%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +36.3% – +11.1%
Revenue, next fiscal year $1.58BFY2026 $14.14MFY2026 $843.08MFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +28.3%FY2026 +16.3%FY2026 +3.7%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +11.0% +53.6% +8.2%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersKVYOPARARAMP
Held by institutions 100.0% 0.1% 100.0%
Institutions holding 276 1 309
Change in shares held, QoQ -7.7% – +0.5%
Institutions buying 168 1 166
Institutions selling 75 0 106
Buyers to sellers 2.24 – 1.57

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

KVYOPARARAMP
KVYO 1.00 -0.01 0.34
PARA -0.01 1.00 -0.08
RAMP 0.34 -0.08 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, KVYO, PARA and RAMP?

Klaviyo (KVYO) is the largest by market capitalisation: Klaviyo (KVYO) $5.90B, Parabolic Technologies (PARA) $18.55K, LiveRamp Holdings (RAMP) $2.34B.

Which stock is cheaper, KVYO, PARA and RAMP?

LiveRamp Holdings (RAMP) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Klaviyo (KVYO) 745.5x, Parabolic Technologies (PARA) 0.0x, LiveRamp Holdings (RAMP) 15.0x). On next year's consensus earnings, LiveRamp Holdings (RAMP) is cheapest (Klaviyo (KVYO) 26.0x, LiveRamp Holdings (RAMP) 12.5x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Klaviyo (KVYO) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Klaviyo (KVYO) +27.0%, Parabolic Technologies (PARA) +19.6%, LiveRamp Holdings (RAMP) +8.9%.

Which company is more profitable?

LiveRamp Holdings (RAMP) has the highest net margin (Klaviyo (KVYO) 0.5%, Parabolic Technologies (PARA) -228.7%, LiveRamp Holdings (RAMP) 18.7%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year LiveRamp Holdings (RAMP) returned the most: Klaviyo (KVYO) -22.5%, Parabolic Technologies (PARA) -99.6%, LiveRamp Holdings (RAMP) +40.9%. Over five years, LiveRamp Holdings (RAMP) compounded fastest (Parabolic Technologies (PARA) -93.1%/yr, LiveRamp Holdings (RAMP) -6.4%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, LiveRamp Holdings (RAMP) has been the steadiest (Klaviyo (KVYO) 78.4%, Parabolic Technologies (PARA) 372.4%, LiveRamp Holdings (RAMP) 37.0%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, KVYO, PARA and RAMP?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, LiveRamp Holdings (RAMP) leads on 7. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.