KODK vs ZBRA vs NYT Stock Comparison

Eastman Kodak, Zebra Technologies and New York Times Prices as of Nov 5, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (PMTS) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
KODK Eastman Kodak Co
$7.41 -24.9% 1M +25.6% 1Y
Market cap
$786.94M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$1.14B
Div. yield
–
Office Equipment Industrials
2 wins
ZBRA Zebra Technologies Corp
$321.64 -16.6% 1M +20.8% 1Y
Market cap
$15.22B
P/E
25.3x
Revenue (TTM)
$6.14B
Div. yield
–
Electronic Components Technology
5 wins
NYT New York Times Co
$65.57 +2.3% 1M +13.8% 1Y
Market cap
$11.02B
P/E
27.0x
Revenue (TTM)
$3.05B
Div. yield
0.01%
Publishing Communication Services
4 wins

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Zebra Technologies leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (Zebra Technologies 5, New York Times 4, Eastman Kodak 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionKODKZBRANYTLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $786.94M $15.22B $11.02B ZBRA
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -8.5x 25.3x 27.0x ZBRA
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 20.6x 14.2x 24.2x ZBRA
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +9.3% +16.9% +10.8% ZBRA
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months -8.1% 9.8% 13.4% NYT
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 3.7% 11.9% — ZBRA
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA -4.2x 2.1x — KODK
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.01% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +25.6% +20.8% +13.8% KODK
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +1.1%/yr -12.0%/yr +5.5%/yr NYT
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 64.4% 46.4% 32.1% NYT
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 60/100 66/100 78/100 NYT

Percentile Scorecard

KODKZBRANYT

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisKODKZBRANYT
Valuation 96 #6 of 114 66 #39 of 112 31 #37 of 53
Growth 74 #26 of 98 68 #35 of 108 93 #4 of 44
Profitability 32 #65 of 95 84 #18 of 104 98 #2 of 43
Financial Health 78 #29 of 126 18 #95 of 116 90 #7 of 61
Shareholder Returns 20 #57 of 71 95 #5 of 83 79 #7 of 29
Overall 60 66 78
  • KODK ranked among 131 companies in Business Services
  • ZBRA ranked among 121 companies in Computer Hardware
  • NYT ranked among 62 companies in Advertising and Media

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodKODKZBRANYTSPY
1 month -24.9%-16.6%+2.3% -5.9%
3 months -21.6%-11.7%+1.2% -4.6%
6 months -47.6%+40.7%-18.2% +0.2%
Year to date -12.4%+32.5%-5.5% +7.5%
1 year +25.6%+20.8%+13.8% +8.2%
3 years +93.0%+56.1%+58.3% +68.3%
3 years, per year +24.5%+16.0%+16.5% +19.0%
5 years +5.6%-47.1%+30.8% +56.5%
5 years, per year +1.1%-12.0%+5.5% +9.4%
10 years -48.9%+410.8%+498.8% +251.5%
10 years, per year -6.5%+17.7%+19.6% +13.4%

Risk

MeasureKODKZBRANYTSPY
Volatility, 1Y 64.4%46.4%32.1% 13.6%
Downside volatility, 1Y 57.3%40.2%38.3% 14.2%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.791.550.11 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.400.450.43 0.60
Max drawdown, 5Y -60.0%-67.8%-43.6% -25.4%
From 52-week high -48.9%-17.7%-23.6% -5.9%
52-week high $14.51$391.00$85.86 $779.14
52-week low $5.85$199.30$57.61 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleKODKZBRANYT
P/E now vs peer median -7.8xmedian 21.1x 25.3xmedian 25.2x 25.9xmedian 14.0x
P/S now vs peer median 0.6xmedian 0.9x 2.5xmedian 2.4x 3.4xmedian 0.5x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 8.8xmedian 11.7x 15.4xmedian 16.2x 16.9xmedian 9.6x
P/FCF now vs peer median 1.6xmedian 15.3x 15.3xmedian 23.4x 17.6xmedian 8.0x
P/B now vs peer median 1.1xmedian 2.3x 4.2xmedian 2.3x 5.1xmedian 1.6x
PEG now vs peer median 0.18median 0.88 2.18median 0.98 0.89median 0.40

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsKODKZBRANYT
Revenue $1.14B $6.14B $3.05B
Gross profit $279.00M $3.00B $1.57B
Operating income $28.00M $912.00M $492.16M
Net income -$86.00M $602.00M $408.53M
Free cash flow $465.00M $988.00M $593.43M
R&D $33.00M $634.00M $279.70M
EPS (diluted) $-0.90 $12.59 $2.52
Cash & equivalents $317.00M $182.00M $221.35M
Total debt $110.00M $2.57B –
Shares (diluted) 102.80M 47.81M 162.25M
Enterprise value -$667.06M $14.64B $8.45B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricKODKZBRANYT
P/E -7.8x 25.3x 25.9x
P/FCF 1.6x 15.3x 17.6x
P/Operating cash flow 1.5x 14.2x 16.7x
P/S 0.6x 2.5x 3.4x
P/B 1.1x 4.2x 5.1x
P/Tangible book 1.1x 5.3x 5.7x
EV/EBITDA 8.8x 15.4x 16.9x
EV/EBIT 17.6x 19.2x 19.8x
EV/Revenue 0.4x 2.9x 3.2x
EV/FCF 1.1x 17.7x 16.4x
EV/Operating cash flow 1.0x 16.4x 15.6x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.18 2.18 0.89

Growth

14 metrics
MetricKODKZBRANYT
Revenue growth (1Y) 9.3% 16.9% 10.8%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) -0.1% 6.5% 8.0%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 29.2% 18.1% 13.3%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 10.6% 8.4% 10.8%
Operating income growth (1Y) 500.0% 16.0% 18.1%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 20.5% 11.0% 27.0%
Net income growth (1Y) -1,533% 17.6% 20.9%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -46.1% 9.0% 28.3%
EPS growth (1Y) -377.9% 25.8% 22.5%
EPS CAGR (3Y) -43.2% 11.6% 29.2%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 9,880% 23.3% 9.5%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 140.9% 106.1% 29.3%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 1,030% 24.7% 10.6%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 287.4% 170.4% 31.0%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricKODKZBRANYT
Gross margin 24.4% 48.9% 51.7%
EBITDA margin 4.9% 18.6% 18.9%
Operating margin 2.5% 14.9% 16.2%
Pretax margin -5.9% 12.2% 17.1%
Net margin -8.1% 9.8% 13.4%
FCF margin 40.7% 16.1% 19.5%
Operating cash flow margin 42.8% 17.4% 20.6%
Return on equity -13.5% 17.2% 20.0%
Return on assets -5.6% 6.9% 13.6%
Return on invested capital 3.7% 11.9% –
Return on capital employed 2.2% 19.3% 21.3%
Asset turnover 0.7x 0.7x 1.0x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) -5.7x 1.8x 1.5x
Stock comp / revenue 2.0% 2.8% 2.6%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricKODKZBRANYT
Debt / assets 7.1% 29.1% –
Debt / equity 0.2x 0.7x –
Net debt / EBITDA -4.2x 2.1x –
Debt / FCF 0.2x 2.6x –
Liabilities / assets 57.5% 59.5% 32.2%
Equity / assets 42.5% 40.5% 67.8%
Interest coverage 0.9x – –
Current ratio 3.2x 0.6x 1.5x
Quick ratio 1.9x 0.3x 1.3x
Cash ratio 1.4x 0.0x 1.0x
Altman Z-score 1.26 3.45 9.40

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricKODKZBRANYT
Dividend yield – – 1.3%
Net buyback yield 1.0% 6.2% 2.2%
Shareholder yield 1.0% 6.2% 3.5%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – 32.8%
Payout ratio (FCF) – – 22.6%
Dividend growth (1Y) – – 30.9%
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – 26.5%

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusKODKZBRANYT
Forward P/E 20.6xFY2026 14.2xFY2026 24.2xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $0.36FY2026 $22.61FY2026 $2.71FY2026
EPS growth, next FY – +42.7%FY2026 +10.2%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +125.0% -4.6% +18.8%
Revenue, next fiscal year $1.21BFY2026 $6.37BFY2026 $3.24BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +13.1%FY2026 +17.9%FY2026 +14.8%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +9.0% +1.5% +6.7%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersKODKZBRANYT
Held by institutions 38.7% 100.0% 100.0%
Institutions holding 179 646 633
Change in shares held, QoQ +11.9% +4.5% +2.3%
Institutions buying 112 309 314
Institutions selling 35 242 224
Buyers to sellers 3.20 1.28 1.40

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

KODKZBRANYT
KODK 1.00 0.22 -0.05
ZBRA 0.22 1.00 0.04
NYT -0.05 0.04 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, KODK, ZBRA and NYT?

Zebra Technologies (ZBRA) is the largest by market capitalisation: Eastman Kodak (KODK) $786.94M, Zebra Technologies (ZBRA) $15.22B, New York Times (NYT) $11.02B.

Which stock is cheaper, KODK, ZBRA and NYT?

Zebra Technologies (ZBRA) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Eastman Kodak (KODK) -8.5x, Zebra Technologies (ZBRA) 25.3x, New York Times (NYT) 27.0x). On next year's consensus earnings, Zebra Technologies (ZBRA) is cheapest (Eastman Kodak (KODK) 20.6x, Zebra Technologies (ZBRA) 14.2x, New York Times (NYT) 24.2x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Zebra Technologies (ZBRA) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Eastman Kodak (KODK) +9.3%, Zebra Technologies (ZBRA) +16.9%, New York Times (NYT) +10.8%.

Which company is more profitable?

New York Times (NYT) has the highest net margin (Eastman Kodak (KODK) -8.1%, Zebra Technologies (ZBRA) 9.8%, New York Times (NYT) 13.4%). On return on invested capital, Zebra Technologies (ZBRA) leads (Eastman Kodak (KODK) 3.7%, Zebra Technologies (ZBRA) 11.9%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Eastman Kodak (KODK) returned the most: Eastman Kodak (KODK) +25.6%, Zebra Technologies (ZBRA) +20.8%, New York Times (NYT) +13.8%. Over five years, New York Times (NYT) compounded fastest (Eastman Kodak (KODK) +1.1%/yr, Zebra Technologies (ZBRA) -12.0%/yr, New York Times (NYT) +5.5%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Eastman Kodak (KODK) 0.00%, Zebra Technologies (ZBRA) 0.00%, New York Times (NYT) 0.01%. Eastman Kodak (KODK) and Zebra Technologies (ZBRA) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, New York Times (NYT) has been the steadiest (Eastman Kodak (KODK) 64.4%, Zebra Technologies (ZBRA) 46.4%, New York Times (NYT) 32.1%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, KODK, ZBRA and NYT?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Zebra Technologies (ZBRA) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.