KODK vs ZBRA vs CMPR Stock Comparison

Eastman Kodak, Zebra Technologies and Cimpress Prices as of Nov 2, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (MMM) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
KODK Eastman Kodak Co
$8.80 -10.3% 1M +38.8% 1Y
Market cap
$861.52M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$1.14B
Div. yield
–
Office Equipment Industrials
3 wins
ZBRA Zebra Technologies Corp
$361.13 -3.9% 1M +34.1% 1Y
Market cap
$17.09B
P/E
32.0x
Revenue (TTM)
$5.85B
Div. yield
–
Electronic Components Technology
5 wins
CMPR CIMPRESS plc
$57.20 -23.8% 1M -17.4% 1Y
Market cap
$1.41B
P/E
16.4x
Revenue (TTM)
$3.81B
Div. yield
–
Office Equipment Industrials
3 wins

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Zebra Technologies leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (Zebra Technologies 5, Cimpress 3, Eastman Kodak 3). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionKODKZBRACMPRLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $861.52M $17.09B $1.41B ZBRA
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -8.8x 32.0x 16.4x CMPR
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 24.4x 16.0x 12.0x CMPR
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +9.5% +12.7% +10.0% ZBRA
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months -8.6% 9.2% 2.2% ZBRA
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 4.3% 10.6% 13.5% CMPR
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA -3.5x 2.4x 3.9x KODK
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% — — –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +38.8% +34.1% -17.4% KODK
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +4.0%/yr -9.0%/yr -9.1%/yr KODK
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 63.0% 45.6% 45.9% ZBRA
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 58/100 61/100 58/100 ZBRA

Percentile Scorecard

KODKZBRACMPR

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisKODKZBRACMPR
Valuation 91 #11 of 113 64 #41 of 112 94 #8 of 113
Growth 70 #30 of 97 47 #58 of 108 72 #28 of 97
Profitability 33 #63 of 93 85 #17 of 104 65 #33 of 93
Financial Health 77 #30 of 126 17 #96 of 116 10 #114 of 126
Shareholder Returns 18 #55 of 67 94 #6 of 80 47 #36 of 67
Overall 58 61 58
  • KODK ranked among 131 companies in Business Services
  • ZBRA ranked among 121 companies in Computer Hardware
  • CMPR ranked among 131 companies in Business Services

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodKODKZBRACMPRSPY
1 month -10.3%-3.9%-23.8% -2.3%
3 months +4.3%+23.8%-42.4% -0.7%
6 months -38.0%+61.4%-39.6% +4.8%
Year to date +4.0%+48.7%-14.1% +10.3%
1 year +38.8%+34.1%-17.4% +10.3%
3 years +126.2%+68.5%-8.2% +73.0%
3 years, per year +31.3%+19.0%-2.8% +20.1%
5 years +21.7%-37.6%-38.1% +61.9%
5 years, per year +4.0%-9.0%-9.1% +10.1%
10 years -38.0%+451.8%-31.2% +258.6%
10 years, per year -4.7%+18.6%-3.7% +13.6%

Risk

MeasureKODKZBRACMPRSPY
Volatility, 1Y 63.0%45.6%45.9% 12.8%
Downside volatility, 1Y 54.5%38.3%47.7% 12.8%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.051.700.86 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.620.75-0.38 0.80
Max drawdown, 5Y -60.3%-67.8%-79.1% -25.4%
From 52-week high -39.4%-7.6%-45.7% -3.5%
52-week high $14.51$391.00$105.31 $779.14
52-week low $5.79$199.30$57.02 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleKODKZBRACMPR
P/E now vs peer median -8.8xmedian 21.8x 32.0xmedian 29.9x 16.4xmedian 21.8x
P/S now vs peer median 0.8xmedian 0.9x 2.9xmedian 2.8x 0.4xmedian 0.9x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 10.9xmedian 12.3x 18.4xmedian 18.5x 7.6xmedian 12.3x
P/FCF now vs peer median 1.9xmedian 14.2x 18.9xmedian 28.0x 9.0xmedian 14.2x
P/B now vs peer median 1.4xmedian 2.4x 5.0xmedian 2.8x -2.8xmedian 2.4x
PEG now vs peer median 0.19median 1.00 -8.46median 1.00 0.44median 1.00

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsKODKZBRACMPR
Revenue $1.14B $5.85B $3.81B
Gross profit $274.00M $2.90B $1.74B
Operating income $32.00M $858.00M $228.07M
Net income -$94.00M $539.00M $87.61M
Free cash flow $464.00M $904.00M $156.92M
R&D $32.00M $622.00M $353.80M
EPS (diluted) $-0.95 $11.20 $3.49
Cash & equivalents $290.00M $157.00M $120.13M
Total debt $110.00M $2.77B $1.64B
Shares (diluted) 102.80M 48.13M 24.48M
Enterprise value -$417.48M $15.64B $670.54M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricKODKZBRACMPR
P/E -8.8x 32.0x 16.4x
P/FCF 1.9x 18.9x 9.0x
P/Operating cash flow 1.8x 17.5x 4.9x
P/S 0.8x 2.9x 0.4x
P/B 1.4x 5.0x -2.8x
P/Tangible book 1.4x 6.3x -2.4x
EV/EBITDA 10.9x 18.4x 7.6x
EV/EBIT 20.5x 23.0x 12.9x
EV/Revenue 0.6x 3.4x 0.8x
EV/FCF 1.4x 21.8x 18.7x
EV/Operating cash flow 1.3x 20.1x 10.2x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.19 -8.46 0.44

Growth

14 metrics
MetricKODKZBRACMPR
Revenue growth (1Y) 9.5% 12.7% 10.0%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) -0.9% 2.1% 6.7%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 42.0% 14.9% 5.9%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 11.2% 4.2% 5.6%
Operating income growth (1Y) 194.1% 8.1% -3.3%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 66.0% -0.9% 27.8%
Net income growth (1Y) -954.5% -1.6% 156.2%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -47.7% -6.1% 36.8%
EPS growth (1Y) -1,064% 4.8% 149.2%
EPS CAGR (3Y) -46.6% -3.8% 37.6%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 1,132% 5.8% -9.8%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 292.8% 63.5% 13.3%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 529.6% 6.0% -27.4%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 174.0% 83.6% 10.9%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricKODKZBRACMPR
Gross margin 24.1% 49.6% 45.6%
EBITDA margin 5.3% 18.3% 10.2%
Operating margin 2.8% 14.7% 6.0%
Pretax margin -6.6% 12.1% 3.5%
Net margin -8.6% 9.2% 2.2%
FCF margin 40.9% 15.5% 4.1%
Operating cash flow margin 42.7% 16.7% 7.6%
Return on equity -15.4% 15.6% –
Return on assets -6.1% 6.4% 4.0%
Return on invested capital 4.3% 10.6% 13.5%
Return on capital employed 2.5% 19.1% 16.2%
Asset turnover 0.7x 0.7x 1.7x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) -5.2x 1.8x 3.3x
Stock comp / revenue 1.4% 3.0% 1.6%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricKODKZBRACMPR
Debt / assets 7.2% 32.0% 73.2%
Debt / equity 0.2x 0.8x -3.3x
Net debt / EBITDA -3.5x 2.4x 3.9x
Debt / FCF 0.2x 3.1x 10.5x
Liabilities / assets 59.2% 60.2% 122.2%
Equity / assets 40.8% 39.8% -22.2%
Interest coverage 0.7x – –
Current ratio 2.9x 0.5x 0.6x
Quick ratio 1.8x 0.3x 0.3x
Cash ratio 1.2x 0.0x 0.1x
Altman Z-score 1.30 3.62 2.35

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricKODKZBRACMPR
Dividend yield – – –
Net buyback yield 0.8% 5.3% 3.2%
Shareholder yield 0.8% 5.3% 3.2%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusKODKZBRACMPR
Forward P/E 24.4xFY2026 16.0xFY2026 12.0xFY2027
EPS, next fiscal year $0.36FY2026 $22.59FY2026 $4.78FY2027
EPS growth, next FY – +42.6%FY2026 +26.1%FY2027
EPS growth, the year after +125.0% -4.5% +50.2%
Revenue, next fiscal year $1.21BFY2026 $6.35BFY2026 $3.74BFY2027
Revenue growth, next FY +13.1%FY2026 +17.7%FY2026 +0.1%FY2027
Revenue growth, the year after +9.0% +1.2% +20.6%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersKODKZBRACMPR
Held by institutions 38.7% 100.0% 87.4%
Institutions holding 179 646 210
Change in shares held, QoQ +11.9% +4.5% +1.8%
Institutions buying 112 309 130
Institutions selling 35 242 54
Buyers to sellers 3.20 1.28 2.41

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

KODKZBRACMPR
KODK 1.00 0.21 0.06
ZBRA 0.21 1.00 0.25
CMPR 0.06 0.25 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, KODK, ZBRA and CMPR?

Zebra Technologies (ZBRA) is the largest by market capitalisation: Eastman Kodak (KODK) $861.52M, Zebra Technologies (ZBRA) $17.09B, Cimpress (CMPR) $1.41B.

Which stock is cheaper, KODK, ZBRA and CMPR?

Cimpress (CMPR) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Eastman Kodak (KODK) -8.8x, Zebra Technologies (ZBRA) 32.0x, Cimpress (CMPR) 16.4x). On next year's consensus earnings, Cimpress (CMPR) is cheapest (Eastman Kodak (KODK) 24.4x, Zebra Technologies (ZBRA) 16.0x, Cimpress (CMPR) 12.0x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Zebra Technologies (ZBRA) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Eastman Kodak (KODK) +9.5%, Zebra Technologies (ZBRA) +12.7%, Cimpress (CMPR) +10.0%.

Which company is more profitable?

Zebra Technologies (ZBRA) has the highest net margin (Eastman Kodak (KODK) -8.6%, Zebra Technologies (ZBRA) 9.2%, Cimpress (CMPR) 2.2%). On return on invested capital, Cimpress (CMPR) leads (Eastman Kodak (KODK) 4.3%, Zebra Technologies (ZBRA) 10.6%, Cimpress (CMPR) 13.5%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Eastman Kodak (KODK) returned the most: Eastman Kodak (KODK) +38.8%, Zebra Technologies (ZBRA) +34.1%, Cimpress (CMPR) -17.4%. Over five years, Eastman Kodak (KODK) compounded fastest (Eastman Kodak (KODK) +4.0%/yr, Zebra Technologies (ZBRA) -9.0%/yr, Cimpress (CMPR) -9.1%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Zebra Technologies (ZBRA) has been the steadiest (Eastman Kodak (KODK) 63.0%, Zebra Technologies (ZBRA) 45.6%, Cimpress (CMPR) 45.9%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, KODK, ZBRA and CMPR?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Zebra Technologies (ZBRA) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.