KLAC vs SHMD vs ASML Stock Comparison

Kla, Schmid and Asml Holding Prices as of Nov 2, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (MKSI) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
KLAC Kla Corp
$153.11 -26.0% 1M +26.7% 1Y
Market cap
$196.41B
P/E
37.4x
Revenue (TTM)
$14.51B
Div. yield
0.01%
Semiconductor Equipment Technology
5 wins
SHMD SCHMID Group N.V.
$2.60 -43.1% 1M -40.9% 1Y
Market cap
$99.15M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
–
Industrial Machinery Industrials
ASML Asml Holding Nv
$1,526.14 -18.3% 1M +44.1% 1Y
Market cap
$583.37B
P/E
53.3x
Revenue (TTM)
$37.62B
Div. yield
–
Semiconductor Equipment Technology
4 wins

Head to Head

9 decided of 12

Kla leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (Kla 5, Asml Holding 4). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionKLACSHMDASMLLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $196.41B $99.15M $583.37B ASML
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 37.4x — 53.3x KLAC
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 27.5x — 32.6x KLAC
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +15.8% — +22.9% ASML
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 36.2% — 29.1% KLAC
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 43.4% — — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 0.6x — — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.01% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +26.7% -40.9% +44.1% ASML
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +31.2%/yr — +13.0%/yr KLAC
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 62.1% 123.8% 47.4% ASML
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 60/100 — 46/100 KLAC

Percentile Scorecard

KLACSHMDASML

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisKLACSHMDASML
Valuation 42 #55 of 94 – 16 #79 of 94
Growth 56 #41 of 92 – 81 #18 of 92
Profitability 97 #4 of 90 – 79 #20 of 90
Financial Health 21 #80 of 101 6 #208 of 221 15 #86 of 101
Shareholder Returns 84 #13 of 74 – 38 #46 of 74
Overall 60 – 46
  • KLAC ranked among 103 companies in Semiconductors
  • SHMD ranked among 223 companies in Machinery
  • ASML ranked among 103 companies in Semiconductors

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodKLACSHMDASMLSPY
1 month -26.0%-43.1%-18.3% -2.3%
3 months -16.2%-39.0%-7.1% -0.7%
6 months -10.6%-51.0%+10.1% +4.8%
Year to date +26.0%-58.0%+42.6% +10.3%
1 year +26.7%-40.9%+44.1% +10.3%
3 years +206.5%-76.4%+137.6% +73.0%
3 years, per year +45.3%-38.2%+33.5% +20.1%
5 years +288.9%—+83.9% +61.9%
5 years, per year +31.2%—+13.0% +10.1%
10 years +1,948.8%—+1,367.0% +258.6%
10 years, per year +35.3%—+30.8% +13.6%

Risk

MeasureKLACSHMDASMLSPY
Volatility, 1Y 62.1%123.8%47.4% 12.8%
Downside volatility, 1Y 66.4%128.0%47.6% 12.8%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 2.813.912.33 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.43-0.330.93 0.80
Max drawdown, 5Y -51.7%-82.7%-56.9% -25.4%
From 52-week high -49.3%-75.0%-23.3% -3.5%
52-week high $301.71$10.42$1,989.44 $779.14
52-week low $109.71$2.60$966.57 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleKLACSHMDASML
P/E now vs peer median 38.0xmedian 41.3x —median 25.6x 54.2xmedian 41.3x
P/S now vs peer median 13.8xmedian 6.6x —median 1.9x 15.6xmedian 6.6x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 31.0xmedian 26.2x —median 14.4x —median 26.2x
P/FCF now vs peer median 49.4xmedian 37.7x -3.6xmedian 22.5x 47.0xmedian 37.7x
P/B now vs peer median 30.6xmedian 4.3x -3.2xmedian 2.2x 25.5xmedian 4.3x
PEG now vs peer median 1.81median 1.81 —median 1.36 2.24median 1.81

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsKLACSHMDASML
Revenue $14.51B – $37.62B
Gross profit $8.92B – $19.58B
Operating income $6.19B – –
Net income $5.26B – –
Free cash flow $4.04B – –
R&D $1.57B – –
EPS (diluted) $4.01 – $28.13
Cash & equivalents $1.53B $2.62M $15.17B
Total debt $5.72B $94.41M $5.16B
Shares (diluted) 1.31B 37.97M 388.90M
Enterprise value $188.99B $55.14M $539.06B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricKLACSHMDASML
P/E 38.0x – 54.2x
P/FCF 49.4x -3.6x 47.0x
P/Operating cash flow 44.2x – –
P/S 13.8x – 15.6x
P/B 30.6x -3.2x 25.5x
P/Tangible book 31.6x -2.0x 26.3x
EV/EBITDA 31.0x – –
EV/EBIT 32.9x – –
EV/Revenue 14.0x – 15.4x
EV/FCF 50.4x – –
EV/Operating cash flow 45.1x – –
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 1.81 – 2.24

Growth

14 metrics
MetricKLACSHMDASML
Revenue growth (1Y) 15.8% – 22.9%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 12.6% – 19.4%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 16.1% – 24.9%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 13.8% – 20.6%
Operating income growth (1Y) 18.2% – –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 17.8% – –
Net income growth (1Y) 24.1% – –
Net income CAGR (3Y) 19.2% – –
EPS growth (1Y) 25.3% – 35.2%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 21.0% – 24.2%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 6.2% – –
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 8.4% – –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 4.1% – –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 7.9% – –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricKLACSHMDASML
Gross margin 61.5% – 52.0%
EBITDA margin 45.4% – –
Operating margin 42.6% – –
Pretax margin 42.2% – –
Net margin 36.2% – 29.1%
FCF margin 27.8% – –
Operating cash flow margin 31.1% – –
Return on equity 81.7% – –
Return on assets 28.9% – –
Return on invested capital 43.4% – –
Return on capital employed 45.4% – –
Asset turnover 0.8x – 0.7x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 0.9x – –
Stock comp / revenue 2.2% – –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricKLACSHMDASML
Debt / assets 31.1% 65.0% 8.7%
Debt / equity 0.9x -2.7x 0.2x
Net debt / EBITDA 0.6x – –
Debt / FCF 1.4x – –
Liabilities / assets 64.6% 124.2% 61.2%
Equity / assets 35.4% -24.2% 38.8%
Interest coverage 22.0x – –
Current ratio 2.8x 0.9x 1.3x
Quick ratio 1.0x 0.7x 0.7x
Cash ratio 0.3x 0.2x 0.5x
Altman Z-score 12.80 – –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricKLACSHMDASML
Dividend yield 0.3% – 0.6%
Net buyback yield 1.3% – –
Shareholder yield 1.6% – 0.6%
Payout ratio (earnings) 21.1% – –
Payout ratio (FCF) 27.5% – –
Dividend growth (1Y) 15.7% – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) 15.2% – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusKLACSHMDASML
Forward P/E 27.5xFY2027 – 32.6xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $5.67FY2027 – $47.62FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +50.8%FY2027 – +61.2%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +16.6% – +42.0%
Revenue, next fiscal year $19.18BFY2027 – $47.18BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +41.2%FY2027 – +20.9%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +8.6% – +42.9%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersKLACSHMDASML
Held by institutions 91.0% 18.6% 19.8%
Institutions holding 2,480 43 2,492
Change in shares held, QoQ +4.2% +99.4% +8.0%
Institutions buying 1,286 34 1,359
Institutions selling 983 7 782
Buyers to sellers 1.31 4.86 1.74

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

KLACSHMDASML
KLAC 1.00 0.36 0.81
SHMD 0.36 1.00 0.42
ASML 0.81 0.42 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, KLAC, SHMD and ASML?

Asml Holding (ASML) is the largest by market capitalisation: Kla (KLAC) $196.41B, Schmid (SHMD) $99.15M, Asml Holding (ASML) $583.37B.

Which stock is cheaper, KLAC, SHMD and ASML?

Kla (KLAC) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Kla (KLAC) 37.4x, Asml Holding (ASML) 53.3x). On next year's consensus earnings, Kla (KLAC) is cheapest (Kla (KLAC) 27.5x, Asml Holding (ASML) 32.6x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Asml Holding (ASML) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Kla (KLAC) +15.8%, Asml Holding (ASML) +22.9%.

Which company is more profitable?

Kla (KLAC) has the highest net margin (Kla (KLAC) 36.2%, Asml Holding (ASML) 29.1%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Asml Holding (ASML) returned the most: Kla (KLAC) +26.7%, Schmid (SHMD) -40.9%, Asml Holding (ASML) +44.1%. Over five years, Kla (KLAC) compounded fastest (Kla (KLAC) +31.2%/yr, Asml Holding (ASML) +13.0%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Kla (KLAC) 0.01%, Schmid (SHMD) 0.00%, Asml Holding (ASML) 0.00%. Schmid (SHMD) and Asml Holding (ASML) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Asml Holding (ASML) has been the steadiest (Kla (KLAC) 62.1%, Schmid (SHMD) 123.8%, Asml Holding (ASML) 47.4%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, KLAC, SHMD and ASML?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Kla (KLAC) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.