KLAC vs LRCX vs ONTO Stock Comparison

Kla, Lam Research and Onto Innovation Prices as of Nov 2, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (ACLS) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
KLAC Kla Corp
$153.11 -26.0% 1M +26.7% 1Y
Market cap
$199.50B
P/E
38.0x
Revenue (TTM)
$14.51B
Div. yield
0.30%
Semiconductor Equipment Technology
2 wins
LRCX Lam Research Corp
$227.56 -34.5% 1M +44.5% 1Y
Market cap
$284.26B
P/E
33.7x
Revenue (TTM)
$26.13B
Div. yield
0.49%
Semiconductor Equipment Technology
10 wins
ONTO Onto Innovation Inc.
$191.40 -41.6% 1M +41.8% 1Y
Market cap
$9.38B
P/E
71.3x
Revenue (TTM)
$1.12B
Div. yield
–
Semiconductor Equipment Technology

Head to Head

12 decided of 12

Lam Research leads on 10 of the 12 questions below (Lam Research 10, Kla 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionKLACLRCXONTOLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $199.50B $284.26B $9.38B LRCX
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 38.0x 33.7x 71.3x LRCX
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 27.0x 22.5x 22.7x LRCX
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +15.8% +33.4% +8.1% LRCX
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 36.2% 32.3% 11.8% KLAC
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 43.4% 49.6% — LRCX
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 0.6x -0.4x — LRCX
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.30% 0.49% — LRCX
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +26.7% +44.5% +41.8% LRCX
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +31.2%/yr +31.4%/yr +17.8%/yr LRCX
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 62.1% 66.3% 73.1% KLAC
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 60/100 67/100 61/100 LRCX

Percentile Scorecard

KLACLRCXONTO

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisKLACLRCXONTO
Valuation 42 #55 of 94 51 #47 of 94 60 #38 of 94
Growth 56 #41 of 92 84 #16 of 92 32 #63 of 92
Profitability 97 #4 of 90 96 #5 of 90 58 #38 of 90
Financial Health 21 #80 of 101 45 #56 of 101 58 #43 of 101
Shareholder Returns 84 #13 of 74 60 #30 of 74 95 #5 of 74
Overall 60 67 61
  • KLAC ranked among 103 companies in Semiconductors
  • LRCX ranked among 103 companies in Semiconductors
  • ONTO ranked among 103 companies in Semiconductors

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodKLACLRCXONTOSPY
1 month -26.0%-34.5%-41.6% -2.3%
3 months -16.2%-22.8%-28.7% -0.7%
6 months -10.6%-12.0%-36.1% +4.8%
Year to date +26.0%+32.9%+21.2% +10.3%
1 year +26.7%+44.5%+41.8% +10.3%
3 years +206.5%+258.9%+61.0% +73.0%
3 years, per year +45.3%+53.1%+17.2% +20.1%
5 years +288.9%+291.4%+127.1% +61.9%
5 years, per year +31.2%+31.4%+17.8% +10.1%
10 years +1,948.8%+2,272.9%— +258.6%
10 years, per year +35.3%+37.3%— +13.6%

Risk

MeasureKLACLRCXONTOSPY
Volatility, 1Y 62.1%66.3%73.1% 12.8%
Downside volatility, 1Y 66.4%65.9%74.8% 12.8%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 2.813.303.27 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.430.670.57 0.80
Max drawdown, 5Y -51.7%-56.8%-62.8% -25.4%
From 52-week high -49.3%-47.5%-49.4% -3.5%
52-week high $301.71$433.33$378.45 $779.14
52-week low $109.71$139.59$124.09 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleKLACLRCXONTO
P/E now vs peer median 38.0xmedian 41.3x 33.7xmedian 41.3x 71.3xmedian 41.3x
P/S now vs peer median 13.8xmedian 6.6x 10.9xmedian 6.6x 8.4xmedian 6.6x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 31.0xmedian 26.2x 27.7xmedian 26.2x 34.4xmedian 26.2x
P/FCF now vs peer median 49.4xmedian 37.7x 43.5xmedian 37.7x 37.2xmedian 37.7x
P/B now vs peer median 30.6xmedian 4.3x 20.4xmedian 4.3x 4.9xmedian 4.3x
PEG now vs peer median 1.81median 1.81 1.08median 1.81 -8.10median 1.81

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsKLACLRCXONTO
Revenue $14.51B $26.13B $1.12B
Gross profit $8.92B $13.34B $564.06M
Operating income $6.19B $9.65B $134.61M
Net income $5.26B $8.45B $132.61M
Free cash flow $4.04B $6.54B $252.47M
R&D $1.57B $2.47B $142.63M
EPS (diluted) $4.01 $6.73 $2.67
Cash & equivalents $1.53B $7.44B $1.25B
Total debt $5.72B $3.74B –
Shares (diluted) 1.31B 1.26B 49.68M
Enterprise value $192.08B $260.31B $5.23B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricKLACLRCXONTO
P/E 38.0x 33.7x 71.3x
P/FCF 49.4x 43.5x 37.2x
P/Operating cash flow 44.2x 37.5x 35.3x
P/S 13.8x 10.9x 8.4x
P/B 30.6x 20.4x 4.9x
P/Tangible book 31.6x 20.4x 5.6x
EV/EBITDA 31.0x 27.7x 34.4x
EV/EBIT 32.9x 29.1x 55.7x
EV/Revenue 14.0x 10.7x 6.7x
EV/FCF 50.4x 42.9x 29.7x
EV/Operating cash flow 45.1x 37.0x 28.2x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 1.81 1.08 -8.10

Growth

14 metrics
MetricKLACLRCXONTO
Revenue growth (1Y) 15.8% 33.4% 8.1%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 12.6% 18.2% 7.7%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 16.1% 38.1% 5.6%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 13.8% 23.4% 5.4%
Operating income growth (1Y) 18.2% 49.3% -29.5%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 17.8% 29.0% -8.3%
Net income growth (1Y) 24.1% 45.4% -33.7%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 19.2% 28.6% -8.6%
EPS growth (1Y) 25.3% 47.0% -34.5%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 21.0% 31.1% -8.8%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 6.2% 18.7% -2.5%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 8.4% 15.3% 17.7%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 4.1% 17.8% 5.9%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 7.9% 13.2% 22.0%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricKLACLRCXONTO
Gross margin 61.5% 51.1% 50.4%
EBITDA margin 45.4% 38.7% 19.5%
Operating margin 42.6% 37.0% 12.0%
Pretax margin 42.2% 37.2% 14.1%
Net margin 36.2% 32.3% 11.8%
FCF margin 27.8% 25.0% 22.5%
Operating cash flow margin 31.1% 29.0% 23.8%
Return on equity 81.7% 64.1% 6.5%
Return on assets 28.9% 33.9% 4.4%
Return on invested capital 43.4% 49.6% –
Return on capital employed 45.4% 54.8% 4.8%
Asset turnover 0.8x 1.0x 0.4x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 0.9x 0.9x 2.0x
Stock comp / revenue 2.2% 1.5% 2.8%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricKLACLRCXONTO
Debt / assets 31.1% 14.2% –
Debt / equity 0.9x 0.3x –
Net debt / EBITDA 0.6x -0.4x –
Debt / FCF 1.4x 0.6x –
Liabilities / assets 64.6% 47.2% 48.0%
Equity / assets 35.4% 52.8% 52.0%
Interest coverage 22.0x – –
Current ratio 2.8x 2.5x 9.7x
Quick ratio 1.0x 1.8x 8.2x
Cash ratio 0.3x 1.0x 6.9x
Altman Z-score 12.80 18.38 4.68

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricKLACLRCXONTO
Dividend yield 0.3% 0.5% –
Net buyback yield 1.3% 1.3% 2.0%
Shareholder yield 1.6% 1.8% 2.0%
Payout ratio (earnings) 21.1% – –
Payout ratio (FCF) 27.5% – –
Dividend growth (1Y) 15.7% – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) 15.2% – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusKLACLRCXONTO
Forward P/E 27.0xFY2027 22.5xFY2027 22.7xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $5.67FY2027 $10.12FY2027 $8.42FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +50.8%FY2027 +73.9%FY2027 +70.4%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +16.6% +12.6% +43.5%
Revenue, next fiscal year $19.18BFY2027 $32.96BFY2027 $1.37BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +41.2%FY2027 +41.9%FY2027 +35.5%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +8.6% +25.0% +41.1%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersKLACLRCXONTO
Held by institutions 91.0% 85.6% 98.3%
Institutions holding 2,480 3,134 690
Change in shares held, QoQ +4.2% +6.2% +2.3%
Institutions buying 1,286 1,698 376
Institutions selling 983 1,163 232
Buyers to sellers 1.31 1.46 1.62

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

KLACLRCXONTO
KLAC 1.00 0.88 0.82
LRCX 0.88 1.00 0.84
ONTO 0.82 0.84 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, KLAC, LRCX and ONTO?

Lam Research (LRCX) is the largest by market capitalisation: Kla (KLAC) $199.50B, Lam Research (LRCX) $284.26B, Onto Innovation (ONTO) $9.38B.

Which stock is cheaper, KLAC, LRCX and ONTO?

Lam Research (LRCX) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Kla (KLAC) 38.0x, Lam Research (LRCX) 33.7x, Onto Innovation (ONTO) 71.3x). On next year's consensus earnings, Lam Research (LRCX) is cheapest (Kla (KLAC) 27.0x, Lam Research (LRCX) 22.5x, Onto Innovation (ONTO) 22.7x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Lam Research (LRCX) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Kla (KLAC) +15.8%, Lam Research (LRCX) +33.4%, Onto Innovation (ONTO) +8.1%.

Which company is more profitable?

Kla (KLAC) has the highest net margin (Kla (KLAC) 36.2%, Lam Research (LRCX) 32.3%, Onto Innovation (ONTO) 11.8%). On return on invested capital, Lam Research (LRCX) leads (Kla (KLAC) 43.4%, Lam Research (LRCX) 49.6%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Lam Research (LRCX) returned the most: Kla (KLAC) +26.7%, Lam Research (LRCX) +44.5%, Onto Innovation (ONTO) +41.8%. Over five years, Lam Research (LRCX) compounded fastest (Kla (KLAC) +31.2%/yr, Lam Research (LRCX) +31.4%/yr, Onto Innovation (ONTO) +17.8%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Lam Research (LRCX) has the highest dividend yield: Kla (KLAC) 0.30%, Lam Research (LRCX) 0.49%. Onto Innovation (ONTO) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Kla (KLAC) has been the steadiest (Kla (KLAC) 62.1%, Lam Research (LRCX) 66.3%, Onto Innovation (ONTO) 73.1%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, KLAC, LRCX and ONTO?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Lam Research (LRCX) leads on 10. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.