KIM vs SKT vs KRG Stock Comparison

Kimco Realty, Tanger and Kite Realty Group Trust Prices as of Nov 4, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (BRX) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
KIM Kimco Realty Corp
$25.89 +17.4% 1M +26.7% 1Y
Market cap
$17.09B
P/E
23.8x
Revenue (TTM)
$2.20B
Div. yield
0.04%
Retail REITs Real Estate
3 wins
SKT Tanger Inc.
$38.45 +11.2% 1M +14.2% 1Y
Market cap
$4.39B
P/E
17.8x
Revenue (TTM)
$612.31M
Div. yield
–
Retail REITs Real Estate
3 wins
KRG Kite Realty Group Trust
$25.91 +7.3% 1M +17.4% 1Y
Market cap
$5.20B
P/E
15.3x
Revenue (TTM)
$792.17M
Div. yield
0.05%
Retail REITs Real Estate
5 wins

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Kite Realty Group Trust leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (Kite Realty Group Trust 5, Kimco Realty 3, Tanger 3). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionKIMSKTKRGLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $17.09B $4.39B $5.20B KIM
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 23.8x 17.8x 15.3x KRG
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 32.0x 35.0x 29.8x KRG
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +3.5% +11.4% -7.0% SKT
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 32.7% 40.3% 42.9% KRG
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 4.6% — — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 5.2x 3.1x — SKT
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.04% 0.00% 0.05% KRG
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +26.7% +14.2% +17.4% KIM
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +1.2%/yr +12.5%/yr +3.2%/yr SKT
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 18.6% 21.1% 18.3% KRG
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 67/100 61/100 60/100 KIM

Percentile Scorecard

KIMSKTKRG

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisKIMSKTKRG
Valuation 48 #76 of 146 70 #45 of 146 57 #64 of 146
Growth 75 #37 of 145 77 #34 of 145 43 #83 of 145
Profitability 79 #30 of 141 99 #3 of 141 79 #31 of 141
Financial Health 64 #53 of 146 48 #77 of 146 39 #90 of 146
Shareholder Returns 70 #41 of 136 10 #123 of 136 84 #22 of 136
Overall 67 61 60
  • KIM ranked among 149 companies in Property REITs
  • SKT ranked among 149 companies in Property REITs
  • KRG ranked among 149 companies in Property REITs

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodKIMSKTKRGSPY
1 month +17.4%+11.2%+7.3% -1.0%
3 months +4.2%-5.2%-5.3% -0.4%
6 months +8.8%+4.3%-2.8% +4.5%
Year to date +27.7%+15.2%+8.1% +12.4%
1 year +26.7%+14.2%+17.4% +13.6%
3 years +38.1%+60.7%+16.8% +76.4%
3 years, per year +11.4%+17.2%+5.3% +20.8%
5 years +6.4%+80.1%+17.2% +63.7%
5 years, per year +1.2%+12.5%+3.2% +10.4%
10 years +3.2%+16.1%+8.6% +267.7%
10 years, per year +0.3%+1.5%+0.8% +13.9%

Risk

MeasureKIMSKTKRGSPY
Volatility, 1Y 18.6%21.1%18.3% 12.8%
Downside volatility, 1Y 16.5%19.0%18.1% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.040.25-0.02 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 1.440.670.95 1.06
Max drawdown, 5Y -37.8%-36.8%-29.9% -25.4%
From 52-week high -1.9%-8.7%-13.1% -1.6%
52-week high $26.39$42.10$29.82 $779.14
52-week low $19.78$31.63$22.00 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleKIMSKTKRG
P/E now vs peer median 24.0xmedian 26.6x 17.9xmedian 26.6x 15.4xmedian 26.6x
P/S now vs peer median 7.8xmedian 4.3x 7.2xmedian 4.3x 6.5xmedian 4.3x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 16.3xmedian 14.7x 12.6xmedian 14.7x —median 14.7x
P/FCF now vs peer median 26.2xmedian 22.1x 13.7xmedian 22.1x 125.0xmedian 22.1x
P/B now vs peer median 1.7xmedian 1.3x 6.3xmedian 1.3x 1.9xmedian 1.3x
PEG now vs peer median 1.63median 2.01 2.04median 2.01 0.14median 2.01

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsKIMSKTKRG
Revenue $2.20B $612.31M $792.17M
Operating income $881.20M – –
Net income $755.69M $246.96M $344.15M
Free cash flow $657.16M $323.28M $41.02M
EPS (diluted) $1.07 $2.13 $1.67
Cash & equivalents $544.92M $176.88M $32.54M
Total debt $8.47B $1.62B $2.81B
Shares (diluted) 669.19M 115.73M 203.20M
Enterprise value $15.46B $3.93B $4.95B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricKIMSKTKRG
P/E 24.0x 17.9x 15.4x
P/FCF 26.2x 13.7x 125.0x
P/Operating cash flow 13.9x 7.4x 13.3x
P/S 7.8x 7.2x 6.5x
P/B 1.7x 6.3x 1.9x
P/Tangible book 1.7x 6.3x 1.9x
EV/EBITDA 16.3x 12.6x –
EV/EBIT 28.5x 19.8x –
EV/Revenue 11.4x 9.5x 10.0x
EV/FCF 38.2x 18.1x 192.7x
EV/Operating cash flow 20.3x 9.8x 20.4x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 1.63 2.04 0.14

Growth

14 metrics
MetricKIMSKTKRG
Revenue growth (1Y) 3.5% 11.4% -7.0%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 7.4% 11.0% -1.4%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – – –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – – –
Operating income growth (1Y) 19.1% – –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 12.7% – –
Net income growth (1Y) 24.4% 21.3% 146.1%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 16.6% 12.0% 108.3%
EPS growth (1Y) 28.3% 19.5% 163.0%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 14.7% 8.8% 112.5%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 12.3% 10.4% -10.9%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 6.0% 10.9% -1.8%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 39.6% 63.7% -81.1%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 19.7% 10.6% -38.8%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricKIMSKTKRG
Gross margin – – –
EBITDA margin 70.0% 75.4% –
Operating margin 40.1% – –
Pretax margin 27.1% 36.4% –
Net margin 32.7% 40.3% 42.9%
FCF margin 29.9% 52.8% 5.2%
Operating cash flow margin 56.3% 97.5% 48.8%
Return on equity 7.3% 18.9% 12.4%
Return on assets 3.8% 4.6% 5.7%
Return on invested capital 4.6% – –
Return on capital employed 4.4% – –
Asset turnover 0.1x 0.2x 0.1x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.6x 2.4x 1.1x
Stock comp / revenue 1.6% 4.3% 1.5%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricKIMSKTKRG
Debt / assets 43.0% 56.6% 46.6%
Debt / equity 0.8x 2.3x 1.0x
Net debt / EBITDA 5.2x 3.1x –
Debt / FCF 12.9x 5.0x 68.4x
Liabilities / assets 47.7% 75.5% 54.5%
Equity / assets 52.3% 24.5% 45.5%
Interest coverage 2.6x 4.1x –
Current ratio – – –
Quick ratio 13.7x – –
Cash ratio 8.0x – –
Altman Z-score – – –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricKIMSKTKRG
Dividend yield 4.1% 3.2% 5.0%
Net buyback yield 2.3% -1.1% 9.2%
Shareholder yield 6.4% 2.1% 14.2%
Payout ratio (earnings) 98.4% – 77.2%
Payout ratio (FCF) 113.1% – 647.3%
Dividend growth (1Y) 4.8% – 12.9%
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – 8.8%

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusKIMSKTKRG
Forward P/E 32.0xFY2026 35.0xFY2026 29.8xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $0.81FY2026 $1.10FY2026 $0.87FY2026
EPS growth, next FY -1.2%FY2026 +11.1%FY2026 -36.5%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +7.4% +10.0% -50.6%
Revenue, next fiscal year $2.12BFY2026 $638.63MFY2026 $750.31MFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +0.0%FY2026 +15.9%FY2026 -9.7%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +4.1% -9.1% +12.5%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersKIMSKTKRG
Held by institutions 99.4% 93.8% 100.0%
Institutions holding 695 362 399
Change in shares held, QoQ +1.8% +2.8% -2.3%
Institutions buying 370 173 179
Institutions selling 202 122 146
Buyers to sellers 1.83 1.42 1.23

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

KIMSKTKRG
KIM 1.00 0.69 0.80
SKT 0.69 1.00 0.66
KRG 0.80 0.66 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, KIM, SKT and KRG?

Kimco Realty (KIM) is the largest by market capitalisation: Kimco Realty (KIM) $17.09B, Tanger (SKT) $4.39B, Kite Realty Group Trust (KRG) $5.20B.

Which stock is cheaper, KIM, SKT and KRG?

Kite Realty Group Trust (KRG) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Kimco Realty (KIM) 23.8x, Tanger (SKT) 17.8x, Kite Realty Group Trust (KRG) 15.3x). On next year's consensus earnings, Kite Realty Group Trust (KRG) is cheapest (Kimco Realty (KIM) 32.0x, Tanger (SKT) 35.0x, Kite Realty Group Trust (KRG) 29.8x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Tanger (SKT) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Kimco Realty (KIM) +3.5%, Tanger (SKT) +11.4%, Kite Realty Group Trust (KRG) -7.0%.

Which company is more profitable?

Kite Realty Group Trust (KRG) has the highest net margin (Kimco Realty (KIM) 32.7%, Tanger (SKT) 40.3%, Kite Realty Group Trust (KRG) 42.9%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Kimco Realty (KIM) returned the most: Kimco Realty (KIM) +26.7%, Tanger (SKT) +14.2%, Kite Realty Group Trust (KRG) +17.4%. Over five years, Tanger (SKT) compounded fastest (Kimco Realty (KIM) +1.2%/yr, Tanger (SKT) +12.5%/yr, Kite Realty Group Trust (KRG) +3.2%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Kite Realty Group Trust (KRG) has the highest dividend yield: Kimco Realty (KIM) 0.04%, Tanger (SKT) 0.00%, Kite Realty Group Trust (KRG) 0.05%. Tanger (SKT) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Kite Realty Group Trust (KRG) has been the steadiest (Kimco Realty (KIM) 18.6%, Tanger (SKT) 21.1%, Kite Realty Group Trust (KRG) 18.3%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, KIM, SKT and KRG?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Kite Realty Group Trust (KRG) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.