KHOBF vs ESSI vs MNDO Stock Comparison

Kheoba, Eco Science Solutions and Mind Cti Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group
KHOBF KHEOBA Ltd
$2.50 0.0% 1M 0.0% 1Y
Market cap
$20.23M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
–
ERP Software Technology
3 wins
MNDO Mind Cti Ltd
$0.90 -10.0% 1M -17.4% 1Y
Market cap
$18.21M
P/E
5.6x
Revenue (TTM)
$19.41M
Div. yield
–
ERP Software Technology
1 win

Head to Head

7 decided of 12

Kheoba leads on 3 of the 12 questions below (Kheoba 3, Eco Science Solutions 3, Mind Cti 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionKHOBFESSIMNDOLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $20.23M $9.53M $18.21M KHOBF
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only — 1.0x 5.6x ESSI
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — — — –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months — — -3.7% –
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months — 429,904.4% 16.9% ESSI
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — — — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — -0.3x — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield — — 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months 0.0% -60.0% -17.4% KHOBF
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years — +29.2%/yr -23.2%/yr ESSI
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 0.0% 585.9% 38.8% KHOBF
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers — 28/100 59/100 MNDO

Percentile Scorecard

KHOBFESSIMNDO

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisKHOBFESSIMNDO
Valuation – 23 #78 of 101 100 #1 of 101
Growth – 82 #18 of 97 16 #82 of 97
Profitability – 5 #89 of 94 70 #29 of 94
Financial Health 82 #20 of 108 3 #105 of 108 94 #7 of 108
Shareholder Returns – – 13 #56 of 64
Overall – 28 59
  • KHOBF ranked among 114 companies in Business Applications
  • ESSI ranked among 114 companies in Business Applications
  • MNDO ranked among 114 companies in Business Applications

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodKHOBFESSIMNDOSPY
1 month 0.0%+63.6%-10.0% -0.2%
3 months 0.0%+260.0%-13.5% +3.9%
6 months 0.0%-40.0%-15.9% +8.2%
Year to date 0.0%-35.7%-21.7% +12.9%
1 year 0.0%-60.0%-17.4% +12.3%
3 years —+1,700.0%-51.6% +87.4%
3 years, per year —+162.2%-21.5% +23.3%
5 years —+260.0%-73.2% +67.9%
5 years, per year —+29.2%-23.2% +10.9%
10 years —-99.4%-59.8% +261.1%
10 years, per year —-39.7%-8.7% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureKHOBFESSIMNDOSPY
Volatility, 1Y 0.0%585.9%38.8% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y —836.2%43.1% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.004.550.22 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y —-0.10-0.45 0.97
Max drawdown, 5Y -37.5%-99.5%-73.9% -25.4%
From 52-week high 0.0%-64.0%-28.6% -1.2%
52-week high $2.50$0.50$1.26 $779.14
52-week low $2.50$0.01$0.88 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleKHOBFESSIMNDO
P/E now vs peer median —median 28.3x 1.0xmedian 28.3x 5.6xmedian 28.3x
P/S now vs peer median —median 2.8x 4,323xmedian 2.8x 0.9xmedian 2.8x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 17.3x -10.3xmedian 17.3x 1.5xmedian 17.3x
P/FCF now vs peer median —median 15.8x -42.9xmedian 15.8x 5.9xmedian 15.8x
P/B now vs peer median 122.0xmedian 3.2x -6.1xmedian 3.2x 0.8xmedian 3.2x
PEG now vs peer median —median 0.85 0.01median 0.85 -0.41median 0.85

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsKHOBFESSIMNDO
Revenue – $2.21K $19.41M
Gross profit – – $10.56M
Operating income – -$939.20K $3.06M
Net income – $9.48M $3.27M
Free cash flow – -$222.45K $3.13M
R&D – $269.84K $4.15M
EPS (diluted) – $0.38 $0.16
Cash & equivalents $318.16K $15.55K $3.08M
Total debt – $5.67M –
Shares (diluted) 8.09M 24.95M 20.63M
Enterprise value $19.91M $9.47M -$29.62M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricKHOBFESSIMNDO
P/E – 1.0x 5.6x
P/FCF – -42.9x 5.9x
P/Operating cash flow – -42.9x 5.9x
P/S – 4,323x 0.9x
P/B 122.0x -6.1x 0.8x
P/Tangible book 125.8x -5.8x 0.8x
EV/EBITDA – -10.3x 1.5x
EV/EBIT – -10.5x 1.6x
EV/Revenue – 4,475x 0.3x
EV/FCF – -44.4x 1.6x
EV/Operating cash flow – -44.4x 1.6x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) – 0.01 -0.41

Growth

14 metrics
MetricKHOBFESSIMNDO
Revenue growth (1Y) – – -3.7%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – – -3.2%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – – 7.7%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – – -1.3%
Operating income growth (1Y) – 7.6% 13.4%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – 15.0% -14.9%
Net income growth (1Y) – 966.3% 4.3%
Net income CAGR (3Y) – 238.8% -13.8%
EPS growth (1Y) – 1,939% 4.0%
EPS CAGR (3Y) – 144.2% -13.7%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) – 35.2% 8.6%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 17.3% -13.9%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) – 35.2% 8.6%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 17.3% -14.3%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricKHOBFESSIMNDO
Gross margin – – 54.4%
EBITDA margin – -43,599% 17.1%
Operating margin – -42,594% 15.8%
Pretax margin – -46,947% 18.3%
Net margin – 429,904% 16.9%
FCF margin – -10,088% 16.1%
Operating cash flow margin – -10,088% 16.0%
Return on equity – – 13.7%
Return on assets – -935.3% 10.8%
Return on invested capital – – –
Return on capital employed – – 11.4%
Asset turnover – 0.0x 0.6x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) – 0.0x 1.0x
Stock comp / revenue – – 0.9%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricKHOBFESSIMNDO
Debt / assets – 332.3% –
Debt / equity – -0.2x –
Net debt / EBITDA – -0.3x –
Debt / FCF – -1.6x –
Liabilities / assets 49.8% 1,589% 19.9%
Equity / assets 50.2% -1,489% 80.1%
Interest coverage – -11.0x –
Current ratio 2.0x 0.0x 4.7x
Quick ratio 2.0x 0.0x 4.6x
Cash ratio 1.9x 0.0x 3.8x
Altman Z-score – -972.32 3.26

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricKHOBFESSIMNDO
Dividend yield – – –
Net buyback yield – – -3.7%
Shareholder yield – – -3.7%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusKHOBFESSIMNDO

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersKHOBFESSIMNDO
Held by institutions – – 8.0%
Institutions holding – – 16
Change in shares held, QoQ – – -1.3%
Institutions buying – – 6
Institutions selling – – 6
Buyers to sellers – – 1.00

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

KHOBFESSIMNDO
KHOBF – – –
ESSI – 1.00 0.04
MNDO – 0.04 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, KHOBF, ESSI and MNDO?

Kheoba (KHOBF) is the largest by market capitalisation: Kheoba (KHOBF) $20.23M, Eco Science Solutions (ESSI) $9.53M, Mind Cti (MNDO) $18.21M.

Which stock is cheaper, KHOBF, ESSI and MNDO?

Eco Science Solutions (ESSI) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Eco Science Solutions (ESSI) 1.0x, Mind Cti (MNDO) 5.6x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is more profitable?

Eco Science Solutions (ESSI) has the highest net margin (Eco Science Solutions (ESSI) 429,904.4%, Mind Cti (MNDO) 16.9%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Kheoba (KHOBF) returned the most: Kheoba (KHOBF) 0.0%, Eco Science Solutions (ESSI) -60.0%, Mind Cti (MNDO) -17.4%. Over five years, Eco Science Solutions (ESSI) compounded fastest (Eco Science Solutions (ESSI) +29.2%/yr, Mind Cti (MNDO) -23.2%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Kheoba (KHOBF) has been the steadiest (Kheoba (KHOBF) 0.0%, Eco Science Solutions (ESSI) 585.9%, Mind Cti (MNDO) 38.8%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, KHOBF, ESSI and MNDO?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Kheoba (KHOBF) leads on 3. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.