KDP vs TTC vs MNST Stock Comparison

Keurig Dr Pepper, Toro and Monster Beverage Prices as of Nov 2, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (AKO-A) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
KDP Keurig Dr Pepper Inc.
$36.82 +21.2% 1M +35.6% 1Y
Market cap
$50.10B
P/E
35.1x
Revenue (TTM)
$20.09B
Div. yield
2.50%
Non-Alcoholic Beverages Consumer Staples
4 wins
TTC Toro Co
$108.82 +10.3% 1M +45.6% 1Y
Market cap
$10.30B
P/E
28.5x
Revenue (TTM)
$4.75B
Div. yield
1.43%
Industrial Machinery Industrials
5 wins
MNST Monster Beverage Corp
$48.02 +11.8% 1M -28.1% 1Y
Market cap
$94.07B
P/E
44.2x
Revenue (TTM)
$9.22B
Div. yield
–
Non-Alcoholic Beverages Consumer Staples
3 wins

Head to Head

12 decided of 12

Toro leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (Toro 5, Keurig Dr Pepper 4, Monster Beverage 3). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionKDPTTCMNSTLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $50.10B $10.30B $94.07B MNST
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 35.1x 28.5x 44.2x TTC
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 15.5x 23.0x 40.0x KDP
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +27.5% +5.2% +20.4% KDP
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 7.1% 7.6% 23.1% MNST
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 4.3% 16.4% — TTC
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 6.7x 1.2x — TTC
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 2.50% 1.43% — KDP
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +35.6% +45.6% -28.1% TTC
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +0.4%/yr +2.1%/yr +1.9%/yr TTC
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 25.7% 25.9% 73.7% KDP
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 39/100 58/100 60/100 MNST

Percentile Scorecard

KDPTTCMNST

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisKDPTTCMNST
Valuation 53 #18 of 37 53 #97 of 203 14 #32 of 37
Growth 47 #18 of 33 54 #88 of 189 66 #12 of 33
Profitability 61 #13 of 32 91 #18 of 187 94 #3 of 32
Financial Health 14 #32 of 37 40 #134 of 221 97 #2 of 37
Shareholder Returns 22 #19 of 24 53 #72 of 152 30 #17 of 24
Overall 39 58 60
  • KDP ranked among 41 companies in Beverages
  • TTC ranked among 223 companies in Machinery
  • MNST ranked among 41 companies in Beverages

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodKDPTTCMNSTSPY
1 month +21.2%+10.3%+11.8% -2.3%
3 months +19.1%+14.3%-48.7% -0.7%
6 months +27.5%+16.5%-36.1% +4.8%
Year to date +31.5%+38.2%-37.4% +10.3%
1 year +35.6%+45.6%-28.1% +10.3%
3 years +18.3%+26.4%-13.6% +73.0%
3 years, per year +5.8%+8.1%-4.7% +20.1%
5 years +2.0%+11.1%+10.0% +61.9%
5 years, per year +0.4%+2.1%+1.9% +10.1%
10 years -57.7%+131.8%+99.7% +258.6%
10 years, per year -8.2%+8.8%+7.2% +13.6%

Risk

MeasureKDPTTCMNSTSPY
Volatility, 1Y 25.7%25.9%73.7% 12.8%
Downside volatility, 1Y 24.2%24.1%107.4% 12.8%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.020.370.28 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 1.391.76-0.38 0.80
Max drawdown, 5Y -36.9%-45.3%-58.4% -25.4%
From 52-week high 0.0%0.0%-52.0% -3.5%
52-week high $36.82$108.82$99.94 $779.14
52-week low $25.31$67.99$41.62 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleKDPTTCMNST
P/E now vs peer median 35.1xmedian 27.8x 28.5xmedian 25.6x 44.2xmedian 27.8x
P/S now vs peer median 2.5xmedian 1.7x 2.2xmedian 1.9x 10.2xmedian 1.7x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 18.5xmedian 18.5x 17.5xmedian 14.4x 32.3xmedian 18.5x
P/FCF now vs peer median 25.4xmedian 18.6x 14.5xmedian 22.5x 44.8xmedian 18.6x
P/B now vs peer median 1.7xmedian 2.6x 7.7xmedian 2.2x 10.0xmedian 2.6x
PEG now vs peer median -12.69median 1.93 16.91median 1.36 2.64median 1.93

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsKDPTTCMNST
Revenue $20.09B $4.75B $9.22B
Gross profit $9.92B $1.59B $5.12B
Operating income $3.26B $489.80M $2.69B
Net income $1.50B $363.30M $2.13B
Free cash flow $1.97B $711.50M $2.10B
EPS (diluted) $1.05 $3.80 $1.08
Cash & equivalents $1.52B $175.30M $2.19B
Total debt $29.98B $962.00M –
Shares (diluted) 1.36B 95.60M 1.98B
Enterprise value $50.34B $9.41B $82.32B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricKDPTTCMNST
P/E 35.1x 28.5x 44.2x
P/FCF 25.4x 14.5x 44.8x
P/Operating cash flow 19.8x 13.0x 42.0x
P/S 2.5x 2.2x 10.2x
P/B 1.7x 7.7x 10.0x
P/Tangible book -5.6x 11.5x 11.8x
EV/EBITDA 18.5x 17.5x 32.3x
EV/EBIT 24.1x 22.6x 33.7x
EV/Revenue 3.9x 2.3x 9.8x
EV/FCF 39.9x 15.6x 43.2x
EV/Operating cash flow 31.1x 14.0x 40.5x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) -12.69 16.91 2.64

Growth

14 metrics
MetricKDPTTCMNST
Revenue growth (1Y) 27.5% 5.2% 20.4%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 11.3% 0.1% 11.3%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 14.6% 5.6% 21.2%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 8.9% -1.2% 13.6%
Operating income growth (1Y) 22.4% 14.9% 30.3%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 10.4% 0.2% 13.9%
Net income growth (1Y) -2.7% 9.1% 35.2%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -2.3% -1.2% 14.0%
EPS growth (1Y) -7.2% 13.0% 34.6%
EPS CAGR (3Y) -2.8% 1.7% 16.7%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 19.4% 34.0% 9.0%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 9.0% 38.5% 13.8%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 23.0% 44.6% 13.1%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 6.4% 79.1% 15.9%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricKDPTTCMNST
Gross margin 49.4% 33.4% 55.5%
EBITDA margin 21.2% 13.4% 30.5%
Operating margin 16.2% 10.3% 29.2%
Pretax margin 9.8% 9.7% 30.1%
Net margin 7.1% 7.6% 23.1%
FCF margin 9.8% 15.0% 22.8%
Operating cash flow margin 12.6% 16.6% 24.3%
Return on equity 5.1% 26.9% 23.5%
Return on assets 1.9% 10.0% 19.1%
Return on invested capital 4.3% 16.4% –
Return on capital employed 5.4% 19.1% 28.6%
Asset turnover 0.2x 1.3x 0.8x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.7x 2.2x 1.1x
Stock comp / revenue 0.6% 0.5% 1.5%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricKDPTTCMNST
Debt / assets 34.2% 27.2% –
Debt / equity 1.0x 0.7x –
Net debt / EBITDA 6.7x 1.2x –
Debt / FCF 15.2x 1.4x –
Liabilities / assets 66.6% 62.2% 17.7%
Equity / assets 33.4% 37.8% 82.3%
Interest coverage – 8.7x –
Current ratio 0.5x 1.6x 3.7x
Quick ratio 0.2x 0.6x 3.1x
Cash ratio 0.1x 0.2x 2.0x
Altman Z-score 0.81 5.35 31.34

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricKDPTTCMNST
Dividend yield 2.5% 1.4% –
Net buyback yield -8.8% 3.1% 0.1%
Shareholder yield -6.3% 4.5% 0.1%
Payout ratio (earnings) – 41.3% –
Payout ratio (FCF) – 21.1% –
Dividend growth (1Y) – -0.4% –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – 2.9% –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusKDPTTCMNST
Forward P/E 15.5xFY2026 23.0xFY2026 40.0xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $2.37FY2026 $4.73FY2026 $1.20FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +15.6%FY2026 +12.6%FY2026 +16.5%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +11.8% +16.3% +5.8%
Revenue, next fiscal year $25.28BFY2026 $4.56BFY2026 $10.20BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +52.3%FY2026 +1.1%FY2026 +23.0%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +13.6% +3.0% +2.2%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersKDPTTCMNST
Held by institutions 100.0% 92.3% 67.5%
Institutions holding 854 592 1,361
Change in shares held, QoQ +12.9% +1.1% +2.9%
Institutions buying 471 297 740
Institutions selling 284 194 456
Buyers to sellers 1.66 1.53 1.62

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

KDPTTCMNST
KDP 1.00 0.17 0.24
TTC 0.17 1.00 0.06
MNST 0.24 0.06 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, KDP, TTC and MNST?

Monster Beverage (MNST) is the largest by market capitalisation: Keurig Dr Pepper (KDP) $50.10B, Toro (TTC) $10.30B, Monster Beverage (MNST) $94.07B.

Which stock is cheaper, KDP, TTC and MNST?

Toro (TTC) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Keurig Dr Pepper (KDP) 35.1x, Toro (TTC) 28.5x, Monster Beverage (MNST) 44.2x). On next year's consensus earnings, Keurig Dr Pepper (KDP) is cheapest (Keurig Dr Pepper (KDP) 15.5x, Toro (TTC) 23.0x, Monster Beverage (MNST) 40.0x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Keurig Dr Pepper (KDP) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Keurig Dr Pepper (KDP) +27.5%, Toro (TTC) +5.2%, Monster Beverage (MNST) +20.4%.

Which company is more profitable?

Monster Beverage (MNST) has the highest net margin (Keurig Dr Pepper (KDP) 7.1%, Toro (TTC) 7.6%, Monster Beverage (MNST) 23.1%). On return on invested capital, Toro (TTC) leads (Keurig Dr Pepper (KDP) 4.3%, Toro (TTC) 16.4%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Toro (TTC) returned the most: Keurig Dr Pepper (KDP) +35.6%, Toro (TTC) +45.6%, Monster Beverage (MNST) -28.1%. Over five years, Toro (TTC) compounded fastest (Keurig Dr Pepper (KDP) +0.4%/yr, Toro (TTC) +2.1%/yr, Monster Beverage (MNST) +1.9%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Keurig Dr Pepper (KDP) has the highest dividend yield: Keurig Dr Pepper (KDP) 2.50%, Toro (TTC) 1.43%. Monster Beverage (MNST) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Keurig Dr Pepper (KDP) has been the steadiest (Keurig Dr Pepper (KDP) 25.7%, Toro (TTC) 25.9%, Monster Beverage (MNST) 73.7%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, KDP, TTC and MNST?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Toro (TTC) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.