KBSX vs RGR vs UMAC Stock Comparison

Fst, Sturm Ruger and Unusual Machines Prices as of Nov 5, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (JOUT) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
KBSX FST Corp.
$1.20 -27.3% 1M -18.4% 1Y
Market cap
$60.04M
P/E
741.6x
Revenue (TTM)
$53.22M
Div. yield
–
Sporting Goods Consumer Discretionary
1 win
RGR Sturm Ruger & Co Inc
$49.56 +13.5% 1M +13.0% 1Y
Market cap
$805.99M
P/E
49.1x
Revenue (TTM)
$598.10M
Div. yield
–
Sporting Goods Consumer Discretionary
6 wins
UMAC Unusual Machines, Inc.
$10.74 -52.0% 1M -9.8% 1Y
Market cap
$593.62M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$43.62M
Div. yield
–
Sporting Goods Consumer Discretionary
1 win

Head to Head

8 decided of 12

Sturm Ruger leads on 6 of the 12 questions below (Sturm Ruger 6, Fst 1, Unusual Machines 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionKBSXRGRUMACLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $60.04M $805.99M $593.62M RGR
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 741.6x 49.1x -17.9x RGR
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 20.0x 32.4x — KBSX
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +18.6% +10.6% +425.2% UMAC
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 0.2% 2.7% -75.9% RGR
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 0.9% — — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — — — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -18.4% +13.0% -9.8% RGR
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years — -7.5%/yr — –
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 83.1% 39.2% 127.8% RGR
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 44/100 49/100 30/100 RGR

Percentile Scorecard

KBSXRGRUMAC

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisKBSXRGRUMAC
Valuation 27 #25 of 34 39 #21 of 34 12 #30 of 34
Growth 90 #4 of 32 52 #16 of 32 32 #22 of 32
Profitability 42 #19 of 32 55 #15 of 32 13 #28 of 32
Financial Health 16 #28 of 33 81 #7 of 33 91 #4 of 33
Shareholder Returns – 17 #16 of 19 0 #19 of 19
Overall 44 49 30
  • KBSX ranked among 34 companies in Leisure Products
  • RGR ranked among 34 companies in Leisure Products
  • UMAC ranked among 34 companies in Leisure Products

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodKBSXRGRUMACSPY
1 month -27.3%+13.5%-52.0% -5.9%
3 months +27.7%+30.9%-55.5% -4.6%
6 months -3.2%+26.6%-20.4% +0.2%
Year to date -14.3%+51.8%-15.7% +7.5%
1 year -18.4%+13.0%-9.8% +8.2%
3 years -89.0%+8.5%— +68.3%
3 years, per year -52.2%+2.8%— +19.0%
5 years —-32.4%— +56.5%
5 years, per year —-7.5%— +9.4%
10 years —-22.4%— +251.5%
10 years, per year —-2.5%— +13.4%

Risk

MeasureKBSXRGRUMACSPY
Volatility, 1Y 83.1%39.2%127.8% 13.6%
Downside volatility, 1Y 77.7%45.2%120.7% 14.2%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.500.813.96 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.220.33-0.08 0.60
Max drawdown, 5Y -94.0%-61.9%-75.6% -25.4%
From 52-week high -30.2%-1.4%-68.3% -5.9%
52-week high $1.72$50.25$33.87 $779.14
52-week low $0.84$28.81$7.76 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleKBSXRGRUMAC
P/E now vs peer median 659.2xmedian 18.6x 48.2xmedian 18.6x -16.2xmedian 18.6x
P/S now vs peer median 1.0xmedian 1.0x 1.3xmedian 1.0x 12.3xmedian 1.0x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 9.9x 17.7xmedian 9.9x -9.8xmedian 9.9x
P/FCF now vs peer median -57.4xmedian 10.6x 28.7xmedian 10.6x -5.9xmedian 10.6x
P/B now vs peer median 3.3xmedian 1.5x 2.7xmedian 1.5x 1.5xmedian 1.5x
PEG now vs peer median —median 0.94 -1.51median 0.94 —median 0.94

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsKBSXRGRUMAC
Revenue $53.22M $598.10M $43.62M
Gross profit $25.31M $119.30M $15.15M
Operating income $1.55M $15.09M -$33.19M
Net income $501.64K $16.40M -$33.11M
Free cash flow -$935.29K $27.63M -$90.33M
R&D $1.68M – $965.03K
EPS (diluted) $0.00 $1.01 $-0.66
Cash & equivalents $6.13M $24.22M $161.97M
Total debt $29.89M – –
Shares (diluted) 44.48M 16.30M 49.97M
Enterprise value $31.15M $389.44M -$312.41M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricKBSXRGRUMAC
P/E 659.2x 48.2x -16.2x
P/FCF -57.4x 28.7x -5.9x
P/Operating cash flow 60.9x 19.9x -6.4x
P/S 1.0x 1.3x 12.3x
P/B 3.3x 2.7x 1.5x
P/Tangible book 4.5x 2.7x 1.5x
EV/EBITDA – 17.7x -9.8x
EV/EBIT 50.1x 45.8x -9.7x
EV/Revenue 1.5x 1.2x 7.4x
EV/FCF -82.8x 25.0x -3.6x
EV/Operating cash flow 87.9x 17.4x -3.9x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) – -1.51 –

Growth

14 metrics
MetricKBSXRGRUMAC
Revenue growth (1Y) 18.6% 10.6% 425.2%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – 2.1% –
Gross profit growth (1Y) 27.8% 36.5% 463.9%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – -5.4% –
Operating income growth (1Y) 137.2% 449.3% -17.3%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – -37.4% –
Net income growth (1Y) 106.2% 530.5% 7.4%
Net income CAGR (3Y) – -34.0% –
EPS growth (1Y) 101.2% 533.2% 43.3%
EPS CAGR (3Y) – -31.9% –
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 126.9% -32.3% -557.6%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – -3.5% –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 83.0% -35.0% -535.1%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 7.7% –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricKBSXRGRUMAC
Gross margin 47.5% 19.9% 34.7%
EBITDA margin – 6.5% -75.0%
Operating margin 2.9% 2.5% -76.1%
Pretax margin 3.4% 3.5% -25.8%
Net margin 0.2% 2.7% -75.9%
FCF margin -1.8% 4.6% -207.1%
Operating cash flow margin 1.7% 6.7% -191.1%
Return on equity 3.1% 5.6% -3.0%
Return on assets 0.8% 4.4% -2.9%
Return on invested capital 0.9% – –
Return on capital employed 5.0% 5.2% -8.7%
Asset turnover 0.8x 1.6x 0.1x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.8x 2.4x 2.5x
Stock comp / revenue – 1.1% 48.5%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricKBSXRGRUMAC
Debt / assets 47.2% – –
Debt / equity 1.8x – –
Net debt / EBITDA – – –
Debt / FCF -32.0x – –
Liabilities / assets 74.0% 23.2% 3.4%
Equity / assets 26.0% 76.8% 96.6%
Interest coverage 3.3x 75.1x -28,415x
Current ratio 0.9x 3.0x 34.6x
Quick ratio 0.4x 2.4x 23.1x
Cash ratio 0.2x 1.2x 21.2x
Altman Z-score 1.62 9.18 25.33

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricKBSXRGRUMAC
Dividend yield – 0.9% –
Net buyback yield – – -54.0%
Shareholder yield – 0.9% -54.0%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusKBSXRGRUMAC
Forward P/E 20.0xFY2026 32.4xFY2026 –
EPS, next fiscal year $0.06FY2026 $1.53FY2026 $-0.29FY2026
EPS growth, next FY – +82.1%FY2026 –
EPS growth, the year after +83.3% +28.1% –
Revenue, next fiscal year $59.34MFY2026 $550.45MFY2026 $53.31MFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +23.7%FY2026 +0.8%FY2026 +376.0%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +11.1% +1.3% +116.9%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersKBSXRGRUMAC
Held by institutions – 59.6% 59.7%
Institutions holding – 172 183
Change in shares held, QoQ – -1.4% +23.8%
Institutions buying – 76 134
Institutions selling – 45 40
Buyers to sellers – 1.69 3.35

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

KBSXRGRUMAC
KBSX 1.00 0.16 0.19
RGR 0.16 1.00 0.14
UMAC 0.19 0.14 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, KBSX, RGR and UMAC?

Sturm Ruger (RGR) is the largest by market capitalisation: Fst (KBSX) $60.04M, Sturm Ruger (RGR) $805.99M, Unusual Machines (UMAC) $593.62M.

Which stock is cheaper, KBSX, RGR and UMAC?

Sturm Ruger (RGR) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Fst (KBSX) 741.6x, Sturm Ruger (RGR) 49.1x, Unusual Machines (UMAC) -17.9x). On next year's consensus earnings, Fst (KBSX) is cheapest (Fst (KBSX) 20.0x, Sturm Ruger (RGR) 32.4x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Unusual Machines (UMAC) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Fst (KBSX) +18.6%, Sturm Ruger (RGR) +10.6%, Unusual Machines (UMAC) +425.2%.

Which company is more profitable?

Sturm Ruger (RGR) has the highest net margin (Fst (KBSX) 0.2%, Sturm Ruger (RGR) 2.7%, Unusual Machines (UMAC) -75.9%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Sturm Ruger (RGR) returned the most: Fst (KBSX) -18.4%, Sturm Ruger (RGR) +13.0%, Unusual Machines (UMAC) -9.8%. Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Sturm Ruger (RGR) has been the steadiest (Fst (KBSX) 83.1%, Sturm Ruger (RGR) 39.2%, Unusual Machines (UMAC) 127.8%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, KBSX, RGR and UMAC?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Sturm Ruger (RGR) leads on 6. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.