JZXN vs EOSE vs NRGV Stock Comparison

Jiuzi Holdings, Eos Energy Enterprises and Energy Vault Holdings Prices as of Nov 4, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (ATVK) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.

Head to Head

8 decided of 12

Energy Vault Holdings leads on 6 of the 12 questions below (Energy Vault Holdings 6, Eos Energy Enterprises 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionJZXNEOSENRGVLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $1.37M $728.87M $572.21M EOSE
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only — -0.6x -5.2x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — — — –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months — +533.9% +336.8% EOSE
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months — -546.5% -48.6% NRGV
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — — -32.8% –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — -1.1x -2.2x NRGV
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield — — — –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -89.9% -84.8% -0.3% NRGV
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -86.1%/yr -28.3%/yr -20.5%/yr NRGV
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 201.9% 120.2% 103.5% NRGV
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers — 16/100 35/100 NRGV

Percentile Scorecard

JZXNEOSENRGV

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisJZXNEOSENRGV
Valuation – 8 #58 of 63 29 #45 of 63
Growth – 24 #46 of 60 54 #28 of 60
Profitability – 16 #48 of 57 38 #36 of 57
Financial Health 87 #10 of 72 28 #52 of 72 20 #58 of 72
Shareholder Returns – 3 #31 of 32 36 #21 of 32
Overall – 16 35
  • JZXN ranked among 72 companies in Clean Energy Equipment
  • EOSE ranked among 72 companies in Clean Energy Equipment
  • NRGV ranked among 72 companies in Clean Energy Equipment

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodJZXNEOSENRGVSPY
1 month -4.4%-34.6%-17.6% -1.0%
3 months -32.3%-44.0%+5.3% -0.4%
6 months +23.9%-67.3%-24.5% +4.5%
Year to date -37.0%-81.3%-31.0% +12.4%
1 year -89.9%-84.8%-0.3% +13.6%
3 years -99.7%+8.6%+39.5% +76.4%
3 years, per year -86.0%+2.8%+11.7% +20.8%
5 years -100.0%-81.0%-68.1% +63.7%
5 years, per year -86.1%-28.3%-20.5% +10.4%

Risk

MeasureJZXNEOSENRGVSPY
Volatility, 1Y 201.9%120.2%103.5% 12.8%
Downside volatility, 1Y 184.2%125.0%107.7% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 2.164.163.29 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.45-0.710.00 1.06
Max drawdown, 5Y -100.0%-94.6%-97.1% -25.4%
From 52-week high -89.9%-88.8%-51.0% -1.6%
52-week high $10.76$19.19$6.49 $779.14
52-week low $0.85$1.62$2.51 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleJZXNEOSENRGV
P/E now vs peer median —median 26.4x -0.6xmedian 26.4x -5.2xmedian 26.4x
P/S now vs peer median —median 2.6x 3.4xmedian 2.6x 2.5xmedian 2.6x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 19.6x -3.6xmedian 19.6x -10.7xmedian 19.6x
P/FCF now vs peer median —median 29.9x -1.7xmedian 29.9x -4.0xmedian 29.9x
P/B now vs peer median 0.0xmedian 1.8x -0.7xmedian 1.8x 83.4xmedian 1.8x
PEG now vs peer median —median 0.71 0.09median 0.71 -0.73median 0.71

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsJZXNEOSENRGV
Revenue – $214.25M $225.87M
Gross profit – -$181.57M $50.76M
Operating income – -$305.61M -$74.19M
Net income – -$528.67M -$109.74M
Free cash flow – -$420.19M -$144.74M
R&D – $35.73M $11.87M
EPS (diluted) – $-3.45 $-0.62
Cash & equivalents $271.07K $305.49M $93.04M
Total debt – $617.12M $243.01M
Shares (diluted) 346.87K 339.80M 178.39M
Enterprise value -$4.76M -$614.01M $358.77M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricJZXNEOSENRGV
P/E – -0.6x -5.2x
P/FCF – -1.7x -4.0x
P/Operating cash flow – -2.4x -5.6x
P/S – 3.4x 2.5x
P/B 0.0x -0.7x 83.4x
P/Tangible book 0.0x -0.7x -1,693x
EV/EBITDA – -3.6x -10.7x
EV/EBIT – -3.4x -9.7x
EV/Revenue – 4.9x 3.2x
EV/FCF – -2.5x -5.0x
EV/Operating cash flow – -3.4x -7.0x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) – 0.09 -0.73

Growth

14 metrics
MetricJZXNEOSENRGV
Revenue growth (1Y) – 533.9% 336.8%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – 129.1% 13.8%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – -74.8% 385.2%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – -21.5% 31.4%
Operating income growth (1Y) – -37.8% 41.4%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – -18.2% 15.6%
Net income growth (1Y) – 35.4% 24.1%
Net income CAGR (3Y) – -16.9% -0.1%
EPS growth (1Y) – 19.6% 33.2%
EPS CAGR (3Y) – -6.9% 7.1%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) – -69.0% -227.0%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – -18.4% -5.1%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) – -93.6% -71.5%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – -27.2% -9.9%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricJZXNEOSENRGV
Gross margin – -84.7% 22.5%
EBITDA margin – -133.3% -29.8%
Operating margin – -142.6% -32.8%
Pretax margin – -246.7% -45.9%
Net margin – -546.5% -48.6%
FCF margin – -196.1% -64.1%
Operating cash flow margin – -143.7% -45.4%
Return on equity – – -588.1%
Return on assets – -62.0% -32.8%
Return on invested capital – – -32.8%
Return on capital employed – -44.0% -40.7%
Asset turnover – 0.3x 0.7x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) – 0.6x 0.9x
Stock comp / revenue – 10.4% 13.2%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricJZXNEOSENRGV
Debt / assets – 68.1% 65.6%
Debt / equity – -0.6x 35.4x
Net debt / EBITDA – -1.1x -2.2x
Debt / FCF – -1.5x -1.7x
Liabilities / assets 5.1% 213.7% 98.1%
Equity / assets 94.9% -113.7% 1.9%
Interest coverage – -7.9x -5.5x
Current ratio 17.0x 3.3x 1.2x
Quick ratio 20.9x 2.1x 0.8x
Cash ratio 0.1x 1.9x 0.6x
Altman Z-score – -3.73 -1.09

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricJZXNEOSENRGV
Dividend yield – – –
Net buyback yield – -78.5% -2.0%
Shareholder yield – -78.5% -2.0%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusJZXNEOSENRGV
EPS, next fiscal year – $-1.29FY2026 $-0.37FY2026
Revenue, next fiscal year – $317.26MFY2026 $309.42MFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY – +177.8%FY2026 +51.9%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after – +87.9% +54.4%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersJZXNEOSENRGV
Held by institutions – 67.1% 58.6%
Institutions holding – 351 174
Change in shares held, QoQ – +11.3% +31.6%
Institutions buying – 214 120
Institutions selling – 101 30
Buyers to sellers – 2.12 4.00

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

JZXNEOSENRGV
JZXN 1.00 0.12 0.06
EOSE 0.12 1.00 0.46
NRGV 0.06 0.46 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, JZXN, EOSE and NRGV?

Eos Energy Enterprises (EOSE) is the largest by market capitalisation: Jiuzi Holdings (JZXN) $1.37M, Eos Energy Enterprises (EOSE) $728.87M, Energy Vault Holdings (NRGV) $572.21M.

Which company is growing faster?

Eos Energy Enterprises (EOSE) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Eos Energy Enterprises (EOSE) +533.9%, Energy Vault Holdings (NRGV) +336.8%.

Which company is more profitable?

Energy Vault Holdings (NRGV) has the highest net margin (Eos Energy Enterprises (EOSE) -546.5%, Energy Vault Holdings (NRGV) -48.6%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Energy Vault Holdings (NRGV) returned the most: Jiuzi Holdings (JZXN) -89.9%, Eos Energy Enterprises (EOSE) -84.8%, Energy Vault Holdings (NRGV) -0.3%. Over five years, Energy Vault Holdings (NRGV) compounded fastest (Jiuzi Holdings (JZXN) -86.1%/yr, Eos Energy Enterprises (EOSE) -28.3%/yr, Energy Vault Holdings (NRGV) -20.5%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Energy Vault Holdings (NRGV) has been the steadiest (Jiuzi Holdings (JZXN) 201.9%, Eos Energy Enterprises (EOSE) 120.2%, Energy Vault Holdings (NRGV) 103.5%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, JZXN, EOSE and NRGV?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Energy Vault Holdings (NRGV) leads on 6. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.