ITW vs SWK vs FTV Stock Comparison

Illinois Tool Works, Stanley Black & Decker and Fortive Prices as of Oct 27, 2026 Peers: Industry group
ITW Illinois Tool Works Inc
$275.93 +0.7% 1M +11.3% 1Y
Market cap
$78.58B
P/E
24.0x
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
2.37%
Industrial Machinery Industrials
4 wins
FTV Fortive Corp
$61.62 +9.8% 1M +24.6% 1Y
Market cap
$18.65B
P/E
35.1x
Revenue (TTM)
$4.32B
Div. yield
0.41%
Industrial Machinery Industrials
3 wins

Head to Head

12 decided of 12

Stanley Black & Decker leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (Stanley Black & Decker 5, Illinois Tool Works 4, Fortive 3). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionITWSWKFTVLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $78.58B $15.01B $18.65B ITW
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 24.0x 24.0x 35.1x ITW
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 25.9x 17.1x 19.3x SWK
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months — +0.6% +5.6% FTV
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months — 4.1% 12.4% FTV
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — 6.6% 7.4% FTV
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — 2.3x 2.5x SWK
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 2.37% 3.35% 0.41% SWK
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +11.3% +37.9% +24.6% SWK
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +4.0%/yr -11.7%/yr -3.8%/yr ITW
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 21.3% 36.5% 26.7% ITW
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 49/100 59/100 47/100 SWK

Percentile Scorecard

ITWSWKFTV

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisITWSWKFTV
Valuation 24 #154 of 203 90 #22 of 203 45 #112 of 203
Growth 35 #123 of 188 81 #36 of 188 19 #153 of 188
Profitability – 51 #91 of 183 73 #50 of 183
Financial Health – 28 #157 of 217 39 #133 of 217
Shareholder Returns 87 #21 of 153 46 #83 of 153 61 #61 of 153
Overall 49 59 47
  • ITW ranked among 222 companies in Machinery
  • SWK ranked among 222 companies in Machinery
  • FTV ranked among 222 companies in Machinery

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodITWSWKFTVSPY
1 month +0.7%+8.8%+9.8% -0.2%
3 months -6.5%+5.5%-4.0% +3.9%
6 months +2.8%+26.9%-0.2% +8.2%
Year to date +12.0%+33.8%+11.6% +12.9%
1 year +11.3%+37.9%+24.6% +12.3%
3 years +23.6%+21.1%-5.2% +87.4%
3 years, per year +7.3%+6.6%-1.8% +23.3%
5 years +21.8%-46.3%-17.8% +67.9%
5 years, per year +4.0%-11.7%-3.8% +10.9%
10 years +143.5%-13.6%+29.8% +261.1%
10 years, per year +9.3%-1.5%+2.6% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureITWSWKFTVSPY
Volatility, 1Y 21.3%36.5%26.7% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 20.7%32.3%26.0% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.471.410.60 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.531.040.92 0.97
Max drawdown, 5Y -28.9%-71.6%-46.1% -25.4%
From 52-week high -7.9%-4.5%-4.0% -1.2%
52-week high $299.60$104.00$64.16 $779.14
52-week low $241.07$62.12$49.16 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleITWSWKFTV
P/E now vs peer median 24.0xmedian 25.2x 24.0xmedian 25.2x 35.1xmedian 25.2x
P/S now vs peer median 4.6xmedian 1.9x 1.0xmedian 1.9x 4.3xmedian 1.9x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 14.0x 10.6xmedian 14.0x 17.6xmedian 14.0x
P/FCF now vs peer median 26.0xmedian 21.7x 11.6xmedian 21.7x 19.9xmedian 21.7x
P/B now vs peer median 25.0xmedian 2.3x 1.7xmedian 2.3x 3.1xmedian 2.3x
PEG now vs peer median —median 1.32 -4.57median 1.32 -4.25median 1.32

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsITWSWKFTV
Revenue – $15.25B $4.32B
Gross profit – $4.86B $2.73B
Operating income – $1.32B $786.70M
Net income $3.23B $620.50M $534.40M
Free cash flow – $1.29B $937.60M
R&D – – $262.00M
EPS (diluted) – $4.12 $1.74
Cash & equivalents $809.00M $592.40M $374.20M
Total debt – $4.76B $3.51B
Shares (diluted) 287.00M 150.65M 307.60M
Enterprise value $78.59B $13.53B $17.12B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricITWSWKFTV
P/E 24.0x 24.0x 35.1x
P/FCF 26.0x 11.6x 19.9x
P/Operating cash flow 24.1x 9.7x 17.7x
P/S 4.6x 1.0x 4.3x
P/B 25.0x 1.7x 3.1x
P/Tangible book 30.2x 2.5x 4.6x
EV/EBITDA – 10.6x 17.6x
EV/EBIT – 14.5x 27.7x
EV/Revenue – 1.3x 5.0x
EV/FCF – 14.9x 23.2x
EV/Operating cash flow 24.1x 12.4x 20.7x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) – -4.57 -4.25

Growth

14 metrics
MetricITWSWKFTV
Revenue growth (1Y) – 0.6% 5.6%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – -2.0% -10.3%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – 9.3% 4.2%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – 11.2% -7.9%
Operating income growth (1Y) – 51.4% 9.4%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – 149.6% -9.9%
Net income growth (1Y) 6.7% 29.7% -30.5%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 0.9% -7.7% -12.6%
EPS growth (1Y) – 30.7% -22.8%
EPS CAGR (3Y) – -5.3% -8.3%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -0.5% 104.3% -30.6%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -0.5% 96.8% -6.6%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) – 211.7% -34.8%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 110.2% -7.5%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricITWSWKFTV
Gross margin – 31.9% 63.2%
EBITDA margin – 11.9% 28.6%
Operating margin – 8.6% 18.2%
Pretax margin – 5.6% 15.6%
Net margin – 4.1% 12.4%
FCF margin – 8.5% 21.7%
Operating cash flow margin – 10.2% 24.4%
Return on equity 106.9% 6.9% 8.8%
Return on assets – 3.0% 4.6%
Return on invested capital – 6.6% 7.4%
Return on capital employed – 8.0% 7.6%
Asset turnover – 0.7x 0.4x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.0x 2.5x 2.0x
Stock comp / revenue – 0.5% 2.7%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricITWSWKFTV
Debt / assets – 23.7% 30.2%
Debt / equity – 0.5x 0.6x
Net debt / EBITDA – 2.3x 2.5x
Debt / FCF – 3.7x 3.7x
Liabilities / assets – 55.4% 47.7%
Equity / assets – 44.6% 52.3%
Interest coverage – 2.8x 12.8x
Current ratio 1.3x 1.4x 1.2x
Quick ratio – 0.5x 0.9x
Cash ratio – 0.1x 0.3x
Altman Z-score – 2.48 3.33

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricITWSWKFTV
Dividend yield 2.4% 3.4% 0.4%
Net buyback yield – 1.8% 10.6%
Shareholder yield 2.4% 5.1% 11.0%
Payout ratio (earnings) – 81.0% 10.6%
Payout ratio (FCF) – 39.0% 6.0%
Dividend growth (1Y) – 1.3% -48.4%
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – 1.9% -17.0%

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusITWSWKFTV
Forward P/E 25.9xFY2026 17.1xFY2026 19.3xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $10.67FY2026 $5.81FY2026 $3.20FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +1.7%FY2026 +24.4%FY2026 +18.1%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +19.3% +5.2% -3.1%
Revenue, next fiscal year $16.46BFY2026 $16.13BFY2026 $4.63BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +2.6%FY2026 +6.6%FY2026 +11.4%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +11.4% +0.4% -6.7%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersITWSWKFTV
Held by institutions 84.9% 95.7% 100.0%
Institutions holding 1,969 771 803
Change in shares held, QoQ +0.8% +5.3% +2.8%
Institutions buying 846 417 350
Institutions selling 750 243 301
Buyers to sellers 1.13 1.72 1.16

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

ITWSWKFTV
ITW 1.00 0.62 0.57
SWK 0.62 1.00 0.46
FTV 0.57 0.46 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, ITW, SWK and FTV?

Illinois Tool Works (ITW) is the largest by market capitalisation: Illinois Tool Works (ITW) $78.58B, Stanley Black & Decker (SWK) $15.01B, Fortive (FTV) $18.65B.

Which stock is cheaper, ITW, SWK and FTV?

Illinois Tool Works (ITW) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Illinois Tool Works (ITW) 24.0x, Stanley Black & Decker (SWK) 24.0x, Fortive (FTV) 35.1x). On next year's consensus earnings, Stanley Black & Decker (SWK) is cheapest (Illinois Tool Works (ITW) 25.9x, Stanley Black & Decker (SWK) 17.1x, Fortive (FTV) 19.3x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Fortive (FTV) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Stanley Black & Decker (SWK) +0.6%, Fortive (FTV) +5.6%.

Which company is more profitable?

Fortive (FTV) has the highest net margin (Stanley Black & Decker (SWK) 4.1%, Fortive (FTV) 12.4%). On return on invested capital, Fortive (FTV) leads (Stanley Black & Decker (SWK) 6.6%, Fortive (FTV) 7.4%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Stanley Black & Decker (SWK) returned the most: Illinois Tool Works (ITW) +11.3%, Stanley Black & Decker (SWK) +37.9%, Fortive (FTV) +24.6%. Over five years, Illinois Tool Works (ITW) compounded fastest (Illinois Tool Works (ITW) +4.0%/yr, Stanley Black & Decker (SWK) -11.7%/yr, Fortive (FTV) -3.8%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Stanley Black & Decker (SWK) has the highest dividend yield: Illinois Tool Works (ITW) 2.37%, Stanley Black & Decker (SWK) 3.35%, Fortive (FTV) 0.41%.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Illinois Tool Works (ITW) has been the steadiest (Illinois Tool Works (ITW) 21.3%, Stanley Black & Decker (SWK) 36.5%, Fortive (FTV) 26.7%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, ITW, SWK and FTV?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Stanley Black & Decker (SWK) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.