ITW vs MMM vs TS Stock Comparison

Illinois Tool Works, 3M and Tenaris Prices as of Oct 28, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (FTV) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
ITW Illinois Tool Works Inc
$276.03 +0.8% 1M +12.3% 1Y
Market cap
$78.45B
P/E
24.3x
Revenue (TTM)
$16.65B
Div. yield
2.37%
Industrial Machinery Industrials
5 wins
MMM 3M Co
$172.82 +2.0% 1M +3.6% 1Y
Market cap
$89.30B
P/E
25.4x
Revenue (TTM)
$25.25B
Div. yield
1.78%
Industrial Machinery Industrials
1 win
TS Tenaris Sa
$60.41 +7.6% 1M +60.2% 1Y
Market cap
$64.76B
P/E
33.4x
Revenue (TTM)
$12.04B
Div. yield
2.95%
Metal Fabrication Industrials
6 wins

Head to Head

12 decided of 12

Tenaris leads on 6 of the 12 questions below (Tenaris 6, Illinois Tool Works 5, 3M 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionITWMMMTSLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $78.45B $89.30B $64.76B MMM
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 24.3x 25.4x 33.4x ITW
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 25.9x 19.5x 15.2x TS
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +4.8% +1.7% +2.3% ITW
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 19.4% 14.0% 15.9% ITW
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 27.1% 22.0% 12.7% ITW
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 1.8x 1.6x -3.1x TS
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 2.37% 1.78% 2.95% TS
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +12.3% +3.6% +60.2% TS
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +3.9%/yr +3.0%/yr +22.1%/yr TS
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 21.2% 25.6% 28.9% ITW
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 50/100 50/100 58/100 TS

Percentile Scorecard

ITWMMMTS

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisITWMMMTS
Valuation 29 #145 of 203 38 #126 of 203 42 #118 of 203
Growth 34 #124 of 188 59 #77 of 188 17 #157 of 188
Profitability 100 #2 of 184 87 #24 of 184 81 #36 of 184
Financial Health 26 #160 of 217 19 #177 of 217 99 #4 of 217
Shareholder Returns 62 #59 of 153 47 #82 of 153 53 #72 of 153
Overall 50 50 58
  • ITW ranked among 222 companies in Machinery
  • MMM ranked among 222 companies in Machinery
  • TS ranked among 222 companies in Machinery

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodITWMMMTSSPY
1 month +0.8%+2.0%+7.6% +0.9%
3 months -5.6%-2.9%+8.2% +5.9%
6 months +3.9%+20.1%-4.9% +8.5%
Year to date +12.1%+7.9%+57.1% +13.3%
1 year +12.3%+3.6%+60.2% +12.4%
3 years +23.6%+136.2%+92.3% +88.1%
3 years, per year +7.3%+33.2%+24.4% +23.5%
5 years +21.1%+15.7%+171.1% +68.2%
5 years, per year +3.9%+3.0%+22.1% +11.0%
10 years +142.5%+24.7%+112.2% +263.4%
10 years, per year +9.3%+2.2%+7.8% +13.8%

Risk

MeasureITWMMMTSSPY
Volatility, 1Y 21.2%25.6%28.9% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 20.8%24.6%29.4% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.470.690.33 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.580.142.08 0.98
Max drawdown, 5Y -28.9%-53.4%-33.7% -25.4%
From 52-week high -7.9%-6.0%-5.6% -0.9%
52-week high $299.60$183.81$64.02 $779.14
52-week low $241.07$141.20$37.70 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleITWMMMTS
P/E now vs peer median 24.3xmedian 25.4x 25.4xmedian 25.4x 33.4xmedian 25.4x
P/S now vs peer median 4.7xmedian 1.9x 3.5xmedian 1.9x 5.4xmedian 1.9x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 18.0xmedian 14.3x 16.1xmedian 14.3x 19.6xmedian 14.3x
P/FCF now vs peer median 27.4xmedian 21.8x 33.4xmedian 21.8x 23.3xmedian 21.8x
P/B now vs peer median 25.0xmedian 2.2x 21.4xmedian 2.2x 3.8xmedian 2.2x
PEG now vs peer median 8.41median 1.41 0.71median 1.41 —median 1.41

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsITWMMMTS
Revenue $16.65B $25.25B $12.04B
Gross profit $7.38B $9.98B $4.08B
Operating income $4.43B $4.74B $2.23B
Net income $3.23B $3.58B $1.97B
Free cash flow $2.87B $2.68B $2.78B
R&D – $1.21B –
EPS (diluted) $11.31 $6.77 –
Cash & equivalents $809.00M $4.84B $9.02B
Total debt $9.37B $15.00B $1.27B
Shares (diluted) 285.30M 522.60M –
Enterprise value $75.12B $71.72B $36.05B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricITWMMMTS
P/E 24.3x 25.4x 33.4x
P/FCF 27.4x 33.4x 23.3x
P/Operating cash flow 24.0x 24.6x 28.9x
P/S 4.7x 3.5x 5.4x
P/B 25.0x 21.4x 3.8x
P/Tangible book 30.2x 42.2x 3.8x
EV/EBITDA 18.0x 16.1x 19.6x
EV/EBIT 19.6x 20.9x 25.1x
EV/Revenue 5.2x 3.9x 4.7x
EV/FCF 30.3x 37.0x 20.1x
EV/Operating cash flow 26.7x 27.3x 25.0x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 8.41 0.71 –

Growth

14 metrics
MetricITWMMMTS
Revenue growth (1Y) 4.8% 1.7% 2.3%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 1.1% 10.7% -6.7%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 5.7% -1.8% 2.7%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 2.8% 17.0% -13.9%
Operating income growth (1Y) 6.4% -3.7% 0.0%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 3.1% 33.4% -20.6%
Net income growth (1Y) 6.7% 4.8% -3.3%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 0.9% 35.4% -18.8%
EPS growth (1Y) 9.1% 7.1% –
EPS CAGR (3Y) 2.9% 35.8% –
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -0.5% 42.8% -11.7%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -0.5% -18.1% -9.6%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 0.8% 68.6% -13.2%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 0.4% -18.0% -7.8%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricITWMMMTS
Gross margin 44.3% 39.5% 33.9%
EBITDA margin 29.0% 24.4% 23.7%
Operating margin 26.6% 18.8% 18.5%
Pretax margin 25.2% 17.5% 20.5%
Net margin 19.4% 14.0% 15.9%
FCF margin 17.2% 10.6% 23.1%
Operating cash flow margin 19.6% 14.4% 18.6%
Return on equity 106.9% 101.3% 11.4%
Return on assets 19.6% 9.8% 9.7%
Return on invested capital 27.1% 22.0% 12.7%
Return on capital employed 38.9% 18.7% 11.0%
Asset turnover 1.0x 0.7x 0.6x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.0x 1.0x 1.1x
Stock comp / revenue 0.5% 0.8% –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricITWMMMTS
Debt / assets 56.8% 37.9% 1.5%
Debt / equity 3.0x 3.6x 0.0x
Net debt / EBITDA 1.8x 1.6x -3.1x
Debt / FCF 3.3x 5.6x 0.1x
Liabilities / assets 81.0% 89.5% 15.2%
Equity / assets 19.0% 10.5% 84.8%
Interest coverage 14.3x – 45.4x
Current ratio 1.3x 1.4x –
Quick ratio 0.8x 0.8x 70.8x
Cash ratio 0.2x 0.4x 58.2x
Altman Z-score 8.17 4.10 –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricITWMMMTS
Dividend yield 2.4% 1.8% 2.9%
Net buyback yield 2.1% 3.1% -1.5%
Shareholder yield 4.4% 4.8% 1.4%
Payout ratio (earnings) 57.4% 44.8% –
Payout ratio (FCF) 64.6% 59.9% –
Dividend growth (1Y) 5.2% 3.2% –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) 5.1% -21.4% –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusITWMMMTS
Forward P/E 25.9xFY2026 19.5xFY2026 15.2xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $10.67FY2026 $8.88FY2026 $3.97FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +1.7%FY2026 +10.2%FY2026 +8.5%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +19.3% +16.7% +1.5%
Revenue, next fiscal year $16.46BFY2026 $23.87BFY2026 $12.99BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +2.6%FY2026 -1.8%FY2026 +8.4%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +11.4% +17.6% -6.1%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersITWMMMTS
Held by institutions 84.9% 74.5% 3.6%
Institutions holding 1,969 2,210 283
Change in shares held, QoQ +0.8% +0.8% -2.4%
Institutions buying 846 916 154
Institutions selling 750 837 78
Buyers to sellers 1.13 1.09 1.97

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

ITWMMMTS
ITW 1.00 0.55 0.10
MMM 0.55 1.00 0.08
TS 0.10 0.08 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, ITW, MMM and TS?

3M (MMM) is the largest by market capitalisation: Illinois Tool Works (ITW) $78.45B, 3M (MMM) $89.30B, Tenaris (TS) $64.76B.

Which stock is cheaper, ITW, MMM and TS?

Illinois Tool Works (ITW) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Illinois Tool Works (ITW) 24.3x, 3M (MMM) 25.4x, Tenaris (TS) 33.4x). On next year's consensus earnings, Tenaris (TS) is cheapest (Illinois Tool Works (ITW) 25.9x, 3M (MMM) 19.5x, Tenaris (TS) 15.2x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Illinois Tool Works (ITW) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Illinois Tool Works (ITW) +4.8%, 3M (MMM) +1.7%, Tenaris (TS) +2.3%.

Which company is more profitable?

Illinois Tool Works (ITW) has the highest net margin (Illinois Tool Works (ITW) 19.4%, 3M (MMM) 14.0%, Tenaris (TS) 15.9%). On return on invested capital, Illinois Tool Works (ITW) leads (Illinois Tool Works (ITW) 27.1%, 3M (MMM) 22.0%, Tenaris (TS) 12.7%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Tenaris (TS) returned the most: Illinois Tool Works (ITW) +12.3%, 3M (MMM) +3.6%, Tenaris (TS) +60.2%. Over five years, Tenaris (TS) compounded fastest (Illinois Tool Works (ITW) +3.9%/yr, 3M (MMM) +3.0%/yr, Tenaris (TS) +22.1%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Tenaris (TS) has the highest dividend yield: Illinois Tool Works (ITW) 2.37%, 3M (MMM) 1.78%, Tenaris (TS) 2.95%.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Illinois Tool Works (ITW) has been the steadiest (Illinois Tool Works (ITW) 21.2%, 3M (MMM) 25.6%, Tenaris (TS) 28.9%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, ITW, MMM and TS?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Tenaris (TS) leads on 6. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.