ISRG vs ABT Stock Comparison

Intuitive Surgical and Abbott Laboratories Prices as of Oct 23, 2026 Peers: Industry group
ISRG Intuitive Surgical Inc
$452.29 +13.6% 1M -18.0% 1Y
Market cap
$157.75B
P/E
53.3x
Revenue (TTM)
$11.58B
Div. yield
–
Medical Devices Healthcare
4 wins
ABT Abbott Laboratories
$103.69 +0.2% 1M -17.9% 1Y
Market cap
$182.26B
P/E
33.6x
Revenue (TTM)
$46.59B
Div. yield
0.02%
Medical Devices Healthcare
5 wins

Head to Head

9 decided of 12

Abbott Laboratories leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (Abbott Laboratories 5, Intuitive Surgical 4). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionISRGABTLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $157.75B $182.26B ABT
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 53.3x 33.6x ABT
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 40.9x 18.2x ABT
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +20.5% +8.1% ISRG
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 25.5% 11.6% ISRG
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — 6.2% –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — 2.5x –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.02% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -18.0% -17.9% ABT
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +5.8%/yr -3.9%/yr ISRG
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 34.6% 27.4% ABT
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 80/100 57/100 ISRG

Percentile Scorecard

ISRGABT

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisISRGABT
Valuation 52 #110 of 228 68 #74 of 228
Growth 80 #46 of 222 27 #162 of 222
Profitability 98 #6 of 210 85 #33 of 210
Financial Health 78 #53 of 241 38 #151 of 241
Shareholder Returns 92 #12 of 138 66 #48 of 138
Overall 80 57
  • ISRG ranked among 248 companies in Medical Devices and Diagnostics
  • ABT ranked among 248 companies in Medical Devices and Diagnostics

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodISRGABTSPY
1 month +13.6%+0.2% -1.0%
3 months +34.0%+0.6% +2.9%
6 months -6.2%+13.8% +6.4%
Year to date -20.1%-17.2% +11.4%
1 year -18.0%-17.9% +13.1%
3 years +63.1%+9.4% +79.4%
3 years, per year +17.7%+3.0% +21.5%
5 years +32.4%-18.2% +67.7%
5 years, per year +5.8%-3.9% +10.9%
10 years +500.3%+156.0% +255.2%
10 years, per year +19.6%+9.9% +13.5%

Risk

MeasureISRGABTSPY
Volatility, 1Y 34.6%27.4% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 37.5%27.5% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.890.00 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.52-0.66 1.03
Max drawdown, 5Y -49.9%-41.6% -25.4%
From 52-week high -23.7%-20.6% -2.5%
52-week high $592.85$130.59 $779.14
52-week low $332.02$82.56 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleISRGABT
P/E now vs peer median 53.4xmedian 30.7x 33.3xmedian 30.7x
P/S now vs peer median 13.5xmedian 3.0x 3.9xmedian 3.0x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 37.3xmedian 17.7x 19.1xmedian 17.7x
P/FCF now vs peer median 43.6xmedian 23.7x 22.9xmedian 23.7x
P/B now vs peer median 9.7xmedian 2.4x 3.5xmedian 2.4x
PEG now vs peer median 2.08median 0.96 18.30median 0.96

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsISRGABT
Revenue $11.58B $46.59B
Gross profit $7.78B $26.37B
Operating income $3.28B $7.35B
Net income $2.97B $5.43B
Free cash flow $3.60B $7.82B
R&D $1.49B $3.16B
EPS (diluted) $8.41 $3.11
Cash & equivalents $2.98B $5.10B
Total debt – $32.61B
Shares (diluted) 351.60M 1.74B
Enterprise value $138.04B $152.69B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricISRGABT
P/E 53.4x 33.3x
P/FCF 43.6x 22.9x
P/Operating cash flow 38.3x 18.1x
P/S 13.5x 3.9x
P/B 9.7x 3.5x
P/Tangible book 10.5x 5.2x
EV/EBITDA 37.3x 19.1x
EV/EBIT 46.5x 28.1x
EV/Revenue 13.2x 4.4x
EV/FCF 42.4x 26.4x
EV/Operating cash flow 37.3x 20.8x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 2.08 18.30

Growth

14 metrics
MetricISRGABT
Revenue growth (1Y) 20.5% 8.1%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 19.1% 5.0%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 21.9% 9.2%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 19.5% 5.9%
Operating income growth (1Y) 16.6% -2.2%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 24.8% 6.2%
Net income growth (1Y) 7.5% -61.2%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 24.4% 1.7%
EPS growth (1Y) 10.8% -61.0%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 25.7% 1.8%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 38.1% 9.6%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 26.4% 9.9%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 58.4% 15.5%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 42.0% 12.5%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricISRGABT
Gross margin 67.2% 56.6%
EBITDA margin 35.3% 23.2%
Operating margin 28.4% 15.8%
Pretax margin 31.3% 16.1%
Net margin 25.5% 11.6%
FCF margin 31.1% 16.8%
Operating cash flow margin 35.3% 21.3%
Return on equity 17.3% 10.4%
Return on assets 14.8% 4.9%
Return on invested capital – 6.2%
Return on capital employed 18.7% 8.0%
Asset turnover 0.6x 0.4x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.4x 1.8x
Stock comp / revenue 7.2% 1.5%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricISRGABT
Debt / assets – 29.9%
Debt / equity – 0.6x
Net debt / EBITDA – 2.5x
Debt / FCF – 4.2x
Liabilities / assets 16.7% 52.6%
Equity / assets 83.3% 47.4%
Interest coverage – 9.6x
Current ratio 3.3x 1.4x
Quick ratio 2.3x 0.8x
Cash ratio 1.6x 0.3x
Altman Z-score 30.96 3.23

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricISRGABT
Dividend yield – 2.4%
Net buyback yield 2.7% 0.9%
Shareholder yield 2.7% 3.3%
Payout ratio (earnings) – 78.5%
Payout ratio (FCF) – 54.5%
Dividend growth (1Y) – 7.2%
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – 7.5%

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusISRGABT
Forward P/E 40.9xFY2026 18.2xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $11.05FY2026 $5.69FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +23.7%FY2026 +10.5%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +5.5% +12.8%
Revenue, next fiscal year $11.45BFY2026 $53.32BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +13.9%FY2026 +20.3%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +12.2% -1.0%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersISRGABT
Held by institutions 86.2% 79.2%
Institutions holding 2,235 2,977
Change in shares held, QoQ +4.6% +0.3%
Institutions buying 1,070 1,258
Institutions selling 877 1,376
Buyers to sellers 1.22 0.91

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

ISRGABT
ISRG 1.00 0.32
ABT 0.32 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, ISRG and ABT?

Abbott Laboratories (ABT) is the largest by market capitalisation: Intuitive Surgical (ISRG) $157.75B, Abbott Laboratories (ABT) $182.26B.

Which stock is cheaper, ISRG and ABT?

Abbott Laboratories (ABT) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Intuitive Surgical (ISRG) 53.3x, Abbott Laboratories (ABT) 33.6x). On next year's consensus earnings, Abbott Laboratories (ABT) is cheapest (Intuitive Surgical (ISRG) 40.9x, Abbott Laboratories (ABT) 18.2x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Intuitive Surgical (ISRG) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Intuitive Surgical (ISRG) +20.5%, Abbott Laboratories (ABT) +8.1%.

Which company is more profitable?

Intuitive Surgical (ISRG) has the highest net margin (Intuitive Surgical (ISRG) 25.5%, Abbott Laboratories (ABT) 11.6%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Abbott Laboratories (ABT) returned the most: Intuitive Surgical (ISRG) -18.0%, Abbott Laboratories (ABT) -17.9%. Over five years, Intuitive Surgical (ISRG) compounded fastest (Intuitive Surgical (ISRG) +5.8%/yr, Abbott Laboratories (ABT) -3.9%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Intuitive Surgical (ISRG) 0.00%, Abbott Laboratories (ABT) 0.02%. Intuitive Surgical (ISRG) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Abbott Laboratories (ABT) has been the steadiest (Intuitive Surgical (ISRG) 34.6%, Abbott Laboratories (ABT) 27.4%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Do ISRG and ABT move together?

Their daily returns over the past year have a correlation of 0.32, a weak relationship. Holding both diversifies more than two closely linked stocks would.

Which is the better stock, ISRG and ABT?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Abbott Laboratories (ABT) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.