ISRG vs ABT vs DXCM Stock Comparison

Intuitive Surgical, Abbott Laboratories and Dexcom Prices as of Oct 23, 2026 Peers: Industry group
ISRG Intuitive Surgical Inc
$452.29 +13.6% 1M -18.0% 1Y
Market cap
$157.75B
P/E
53.3x
Revenue (TTM)
$11.58B
Div. yield
–
Medical Devices Healthcare
4 wins
ABT Abbott Laboratories
$103.69 +0.2% 1M -17.9% 1Y
Market cap
$182.26B
P/E
33.6x
Revenue (TTM)
$46.59B
Div. yield
0.02%
Medical Devices Healthcare
3 wins
DXCM Dexcom Inc
$77.94 -11.2% 1M +9.7% 1Y
Market cap
$30.03B
P/E
30.0x
Revenue (TTM)
$4.97B
Div. yield
–
Medical Devices Healthcare
2 wins

Head to Head

9 decided of 12

Intuitive Surgical leads on 4 of the 12 questions below (Intuitive Surgical 4, Abbott Laboratories 3, Dexcom 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionISRGABTDXCMLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $157.75B $182.26B $30.03B ABT
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 53.3x 33.6x 30.0x DXCM
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 40.9x 18.2x 27.5x ABT
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +20.5% +8.1% +15.5% ISRG
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 25.5% 11.6% 20.1% ISRG
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — 6.2% — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — 2.5x — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.02% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -18.0% -17.9% +9.7% DXCM
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +5.8%/yr -3.9%/yr -11.3%/yr ISRG
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 34.6% 27.4% 40.7% ABT
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 80/100 57/100 78/100 ISRG

Percentile Scorecard

ISRGABTDXCM

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisISRGABTDXCM
Valuation 52 #110 of 228 68 #74 of 228 72 #64 of 228
Growth 80 #46 of 222 27 #162 of 222 97 #8 of 222
Profitability 98 #6 of 210 85 #33 of 210 100 #1 of 210
Financial Health 78 #53 of 241 38 #151 of 241 35 #158 of 241
Shareholder Returns 92 #12 of 138 66 #48 of 138 87 #19 of 138
Overall 80 57 78
  • ISRG ranked among 248 companies in Medical Devices and Diagnostics
  • ABT ranked among 248 companies in Medical Devices and Diagnostics
  • DXCM ranked among 248 companies in Medical Devices and Diagnostics

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodISRGABTDXCMSPY
1 month +13.6%+0.2%-11.2% -1.0%
3 months +34.0%+0.6%+8.9% +2.9%
6 months -6.2%+13.8%+26.6% +6.4%
Year to date -20.1%-17.2%+17.4% +11.4%
1 year -18.0%-17.9%+9.7% +13.1%
3 years +63.1%+9.4%-9.7% +79.4%
3 years, per year +17.7%+3.0%-3.4% +21.5%
5 years +32.4%-18.2%-45.0% +67.7%
5 years, per year +5.8%-3.9%-11.3% +10.9%
10 years +500.3%+156.0%+286.4% +255.2%
10 years, per year +19.6%+9.9%+14.5% +13.5%

Risk

MeasureISRGABTDXCMSPY
Volatility, 1Y 34.6%27.4%40.7% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 37.5%27.5%40.2% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.890.000.63 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.52-0.660.24 1.03
Max drawdown, 5Y -49.9%-41.6%-66.3% -25.4%
From 52-week high -23.7%-20.6%-15.6% -2.5%
52-week high $592.85$130.59$92.34 $779.14
52-week low $332.02$82.56$54.84 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleISRGABTDXCM
P/E now vs peer median 53.4xmedian 30.7x 33.3xmedian 30.7x 29.8xmedian 30.7x
P/S now vs peer median 13.5xmedian 3.0x 3.9xmedian 3.0x 5.9xmedian 3.0x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 37.3xmedian 17.7x 19.1xmedian 17.7x 19.6xmedian 17.7x
P/FCF now vs peer median 43.6xmedian 23.7x 22.9xmedian 23.7x 20.9xmedian 23.7x
P/B now vs peer median 9.7xmedian 2.4x 3.5xmedian 2.4x 11.2xmedian 2.4x
PEG now vs peer median 2.08median 0.96 18.30median 0.96 0.65median 0.96

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsISRGABTDXCM
Revenue $11.58B $46.59B $4.97B
Gross profit $7.78B $26.37B $3.10B
Operating income $3.28B $7.35B $1.14B
Net income $2.97B $5.43B $999.70M
Free cash flow $3.60B $7.82B $1.41B
R&D $1.49B $3.16B $604.00M
EPS (diluted) $8.41 $3.11 $2.56
Cash & equivalents $2.98B $5.10B $1.11B
Total debt – $32.61B –
Shares (diluted) 351.60M 1.74B 390.10M
Enterprise value $138.04B $152.69B $20.34B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricISRGABTDXCM
P/E 53.4x 33.3x 29.8x
P/FCF 43.6x 22.9x 20.9x
P/Operating cash flow 38.3x 18.1x 16.8x
P/S 13.5x 3.9x 5.9x
P/B 9.7x 3.5x 11.2x
P/Tangible book 10.5x 5.2x 11.7x
EV/EBITDA 37.3x 19.1x 19.6x
EV/EBIT 46.5x 28.1x 24.1x
EV/Revenue 13.2x 4.4x 5.5x
EV/FCF 42.4x 26.4x 19.5x
EV/Operating cash flow 37.3x 20.8x 15.7x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 2.08 18.30 0.65

Growth

14 metrics
MetricISRGABTDXCM
Revenue growth (1Y) 20.5% 8.1% 15.5%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 19.1% 5.0% 15.8%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 21.9% 9.2% 22.8%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 19.5% 5.9% 14.9%
Operating income growth (1Y) 16.6% -2.2% 65.8%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 24.8% 6.2% 36.5%
Net income growth (1Y) 7.5% -61.2% 74.9%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 24.4% 1.7% 40.9%
EPS growth (1Y) 10.8% -61.0% 83.0%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 25.7% 1.8% 45.7%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 38.1% 9.6% 77.0%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 26.4% 9.9% 31.4%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 58.4% 15.5% 146.1%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 42.0% 12.5% 44.5%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricISRGABTDXCM
Gross margin 67.2% 56.6% 62.5%
EBITDA margin 35.3% 23.2% 28.2%
Operating margin 28.4% 15.8% 22.9%
Pretax margin 31.3% 16.1% 25.8%
Net margin 25.5% 11.6% 20.1%
FCF margin 31.1% 16.8% 28.3%
Operating cash flow margin 35.3% 21.3% 35.2%
Return on equity 17.3% 10.4% 35.8%
Return on assets 14.8% 4.9% 15.3%
Return on invested capital – 6.2% –
Return on capital employed 18.7% 8.0% 27.2%
Asset turnover 0.6x 0.4x 0.8x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.4x 1.8x 1.7x
Stock comp / revenue 7.2% 1.5% 3.3%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricISRGABTDXCM
Debt / assets – 29.9% –
Debt / equity – 0.6x –
Net debt / EBITDA – 2.5x –
Debt / FCF – 4.2x –
Liabilities / assets 16.7% 52.6% 59.4%
Equity / assets 83.3% 47.4% 40.6%
Interest coverage – 9.6x –
Current ratio 3.3x 1.4x 1.7x
Quick ratio 2.3x 0.8x 1.4x
Cash ratio 1.6x 0.3x 0.8x
Altman Z-score 30.96 3.23 6.90

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricISRGABTDXCM
Dividend yield – 2.4% –
Net buyback yield 2.7% 0.9% 1.6%
Shareholder yield 2.7% 3.3% 1.6%
Payout ratio (earnings) – 78.5% –
Payout ratio (FCF) – 54.5% –
Dividend growth (1Y) – 7.2% –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – 7.5% –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusISRGABTDXCM
Forward P/E 40.9xFY2026 18.2xFY2026 27.5xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $11.05FY2026 $5.69FY2026 $2.83FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +23.7%FY2026 +10.5%FY2026 +35.4%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +5.5% +12.8% +4.9%
Revenue, next fiscal year $11.45BFY2026 $53.32BFY2026 $5.08BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +13.9%FY2026 +20.3%FY2026 +9.0%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +12.2% -1.0% +16.6%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersISRGABTDXCM
Held by institutions 86.2% 79.2% 100.0%
Institutions holding 2,235 2,977 974
Change in shares held, QoQ +4.6% +0.3% +6.3%
Institutions buying 1,070 1,258 519
Institutions selling 877 1,376 344
Buyers to sellers 1.22 0.91 1.51

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

ISRGABTDXCM
ISRG 1.00 0.32 0.34
ABT 0.32 1.00 0.29
DXCM 0.34 0.29 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, ISRG, ABT and DXCM?

Abbott Laboratories (ABT) is the largest by market capitalisation: Intuitive Surgical (ISRG) $157.75B, Abbott Laboratories (ABT) $182.26B, Dexcom (DXCM) $30.03B.

Which stock is cheaper, ISRG, ABT and DXCM?

Dexcom (DXCM) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Intuitive Surgical (ISRG) 53.3x, Abbott Laboratories (ABT) 33.6x, Dexcom (DXCM) 30.0x). On next year's consensus earnings, Abbott Laboratories (ABT) is cheapest (Intuitive Surgical (ISRG) 40.9x, Abbott Laboratories (ABT) 18.2x, Dexcom (DXCM) 27.5x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Intuitive Surgical (ISRG) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Intuitive Surgical (ISRG) +20.5%, Abbott Laboratories (ABT) +8.1%, Dexcom (DXCM) +15.5%.

Which company is more profitable?

Intuitive Surgical (ISRG) has the highest net margin (Intuitive Surgical (ISRG) 25.5%, Abbott Laboratories (ABT) 11.6%, Dexcom (DXCM) 20.1%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Dexcom (DXCM) returned the most: Intuitive Surgical (ISRG) -18.0%, Abbott Laboratories (ABT) -17.9%, Dexcom (DXCM) +9.7%. Over five years, Intuitive Surgical (ISRG) compounded fastest (Intuitive Surgical (ISRG) +5.8%/yr, Abbott Laboratories (ABT) -3.9%/yr, Dexcom (DXCM) -11.3%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Intuitive Surgical (ISRG) 0.00%, Abbott Laboratories (ABT) 0.02%, Dexcom (DXCM) 0.00%. Intuitive Surgical (ISRG) and Dexcom (DXCM) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Abbott Laboratories (ABT) has been the steadiest (Intuitive Surgical (ISRG) 34.6%, Abbott Laboratories (ABT) 27.4%, Dexcom (DXCM) 40.7%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, ISRG, ABT and DXCM?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Intuitive Surgical (ISRG) leads on 4. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.