IQV vs CRL vs TMO Stock Comparison

Iqvia Holdings, Charles River Laboratories International and Thermo Fisher Scientific Prices as of Nov 2, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (LDOS) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
IQV Iqvia Holdings Inc.
$258.37 +0.0% 1M +19.4% 1Y
Market cap
$43.64B
P/E
31.3x
Revenue (TTM)
$17.31B
Div. yield
–
Contract Research Healthcare
5 wins

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Thermo Fisher Scientific leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (Thermo Fisher Scientific 5, Iqvia Holdings 5, Charles River Laboratories International 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionIQVCRLTMOLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $43.64B $16.73B $261.15B TMO
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 31.3x -70.2x 36.9x IQV
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 21.6x 32.3x 27.0x IQV
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +8.8% -0.7% +8.3% IQV
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 8.1% -6.0% 14.9% TMO
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 8.2% 1.6% 8.0% IQV
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 3.9x 6.3x 3.1x TMO
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +19.4% +88.0% +20.3% CRL
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +0.3%/yr -2.7%/yr +1.2%/yr TMO
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 40.7% 46.4% 30.0% TMO
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 71/100 45/100 59/100 IQV

Percentile Scorecard

IQVCRLTMO

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisIQVCRLTMO
Valuation 80 #3 of 11 60 #5 of 11 60 #91 of 227
Growth 80 #3 of 11 10 #10 of 11 39 #135 of 220
Profitability 90 #2 of 11 70 #4 of 11 83 #36 of 209
Financial Health 33 #9 of 13 42 #8 of 13 31 #166 of 240
Shareholder Returns – – 83 #25 of 138
Overall 71 45 59
  • IQV ranked among 13 companies in Pharma Services
  • CRL ranked among 13 companies in Pharma Services
  • TMO ranked among 247 companies in Medical Devices and Diagnostics

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodIQVCRLTMOSPY
1 month +0.0%+16.7%+4.2% -2.3%
3 months +10.7%+46.6%+18.9% -0.7%
6 months +60.5%+96.4%+47.6% +4.8%
Year to date +14.6%+69.7%+17.8% +10.3%
1 year +19.4%+88.0%+20.3% +10.3%
3 years +31.0%+86.1%+50.1% +73.0%
3 years, per year +9.4%+23.0%+14.5% +20.1%
5 years +1.5%-12.7%+6.3% +61.9%
5 years, per year +0.3%-2.7%+1.2% +10.1%
10 years +257.1%+382.7%+368.3% +258.6%
10 years, per year +13.6%+17.1%+16.7% +13.6%

Risk

MeasureIQVCRLTMOSPY
Volatility, 1Y 40.7%46.4%30.0% 12.8%
Downside volatility, 1Y 39.9%43.9%28.6% 12.8%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.771.330.63 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.481.890.68 0.80
Max drawdown, 5Y -51.5%-74.7%-41.5% -25.4%
From 52-week high -7.5%-9.9%-3.7% -3.5%
52-week high $279.38$375.83$709.29 $779.14
52-week low $156.66$149.93$438.34 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleIQVCRLTMO
P/E now vs peer median 30.5xmedian 35.0x -68.2xmedian 35.0x 35.8xmedian 28.4x
P/S now vs peer median 2.5xmedian 2.5x 4.0xmedian 2.5x 5.3xmedian 3.0x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 16.2xmedian 28.8x 47.9xmedian 28.8x 24.9xmedian 18.0x
P/FCF now vs peer median 20.5xmedian 20.5x 43.6xmedian 20.5x 33.2xmedian 25.0x
P/B now vs peer median 6.3xmedian 2.7x 5.7xmedian 2.7x 4.6xmedian 2.3x
PEG now vs peer median 2.65median 1.94 1.88median 1.94 4.73median 0.93

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsIQVCRLTMO
Revenue $17.31B $4.00B $47.35B
Gross profit $5.72B $1.31B $19.45B
Operating income $2.22B $90.14M $8.47B
Net income $1.40B -$239.23M $7.09B
Free cash flow $2.08B $370.61M $7.60B
R&D – – $1.40B
EPS (diluted) $8.35 $-4.97 $19.06
Cash & equivalents $2.25B $192.03M $5.46B
Total debt $16.07B $2.62B $41.37B
Shares (diluted) 167.00M 48.02M 371.00M
Enterprise value $34.89B $15.93B $237.66B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricIQVCRLTMO
P/E 30.5x -68.2x 35.8x
P/FCF 20.5x 43.6x 33.2x
P/Operating cash flow 15.6x 27.7x 27.1x
P/S 2.5x 4.0x 5.3x
P/B 6.3x 5.7x 4.6x
P/Tangible book 20.7x 6.2x 6.9x
EV/EBITDA 16.2x 47.9x 24.9x
EV/EBIT 25.3x 206.1x 34.0x
EV/Revenue 3.2x 4.6x 6.1x
EV/FCF 27.0x 50.1x 37.9x
EV/Operating cash flow 20.5x 31.9x 30.9x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 2.65 1.88 4.73

Growth

14 metrics
MetricIQVCRLTMO
Revenue growth (1Y) 8.8% -0.7% 8.3%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 5.2% -1.5% 2.9%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 6.6% -0.1% 7.8%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 3.4% -5.5% 4.0%
Operating income growth (1Y) 1.7% -27.6% 12.8%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 6.2% -48.2% 7.2%
Net income growth (1Y) 9.0% -268.7% 7.9%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 7.8% -35.5% 6.2%
EPS growth (1Y) 11.7% -253.8% 9.7%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 11.5% -36.2% 7.6%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -2.4% -26.1% 21.9%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 11.7% -2.3% 4.5%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -6.0% -35.9% 24.3%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 16.3% 8.6% 5.1%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricIQVCRLTMO
Gross margin 33.1% 32.7% 41.1%
EBITDA margin 20.0% 9.7% 24.4%
Operating margin 12.8% 2.3% 17.9%
Pretax margin 9.0% -4.6% 16.7%
Net margin 8.1% -6.0% 14.9%
FCF margin 12.0% 9.3% 16.0%
Operating cash flow margin 15.8% 14.6% 19.7%
Return on equity 21.4% -8.2% 13.2%
Return on assets 4.6% -3.1% 6.2%
Return on invested capital 8.2% 1.6% 8.0%
Return on capital employed 9.9% 1.4% 8.5%
Asset turnover 0.6x 0.5x 0.4x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 2.0x -2.4x 1.3x
Stock comp / revenue 1.8% 2.1% 0.7%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricIQVCRLTMO
Debt / assets 52.7% 34.8% 36.2%
Debt / equity 2.4x 0.9x 0.8x
Net debt / EBITDA 3.9x 6.3x 3.1x
Debt / FCF 7.7x 7.1x 5.4x
Liabilities / assets 77.7% 62.2% 52.1%
Equity / assets 22.3% 37.8% 47.9%
Interest coverage 2.8x 0.8x 5.5x
Current ratio 0.8x 1.3x 1.8x
Quick ratio 1.0x 0.8x 1.2x
Cash ratio 0.3x 0.2x 0.4x
Altman Z-score 2.22 2.96 4.11

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricIQVCRLTMO
Dividend yield – – 0.3%
Net buyback yield 2.7% 2.0% 1.6%
Shareholder yield 2.7% 2.0% 1.9%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – 9.5%
Payout ratio (FCF) – – 8.9%
Dividend growth (1Y) – – 8.0%
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – 10.1%

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusIQVCRLTMO
Forward P/E 21.6xFY2026 32.3xFY2026 27.0xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $12.14FY2026 $10.90FY2026 $25.91FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +1.8%FY2026 +6.0%FY2026 +13.3%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +13.3% +20.5% +2.0%
Revenue, next fiscal year $18.58BFY2026 $3.82BFY2026 $50.12BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +13.9%FY2026 -4.9%FY2026 +12.5%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after -3.5% +0.7% -2.8%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersIQVCRLTMO
Held by institutions 94.1% 100.0% 90.2%
Institutions holding 1,085 571 2,625
Change in shares held, QoQ +0.3% -0.7% +0.8%
Institutions buying 532 271 1,144
Institutions selling 424 204 1,145
Buyers to sellers 1.25 1.33 1.00

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

IQVCRLTMO
IQV 1.00 0.71 0.67
CRL 0.71 1.00 0.65
TMO 0.67 0.65 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, IQV, CRL and TMO?

Thermo Fisher Scientific (TMO) is the largest by market capitalisation: Iqvia Holdings (IQV) $43.64B, Charles River Laboratories International (CRL) $16.73B, Thermo Fisher Scientific (TMO) $261.15B.

Which stock is cheaper, IQV, CRL and TMO?

Iqvia Holdings (IQV) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Iqvia Holdings (IQV) 31.3x, Charles River Laboratories International (CRL) -70.2x, Thermo Fisher Scientific (TMO) 36.9x). On next year's consensus earnings, Iqvia Holdings (IQV) is cheapest (Iqvia Holdings (IQV) 21.6x, Charles River Laboratories International (CRL) 32.3x, Thermo Fisher Scientific (TMO) 27.0x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Iqvia Holdings (IQV) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Iqvia Holdings (IQV) +8.8%, Charles River Laboratories International (CRL) -0.7%, Thermo Fisher Scientific (TMO) +8.3%.

Which company is more profitable?

Thermo Fisher Scientific (TMO) has the highest net margin (Iqvia Holdings (IQV) 8.1%, Charles River Laboratories International (CRL) -6.0%, Thermo Fisher Scientific (TMO) 14.9%). On return on invested capital, Iqvia Holdings (IQV) leads (Iqvia Holdings (IQV) 8.2%, Charles River Laboratories International (CRL) 1.6%, Thermo Fisher Scientific (TMO) 8.0%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Charles River Laboratories International (CRL) returned the most: Iqvia Holdings (IQV) +19.4%, Charles River Laboratories International (CRL) +88.0%, Thermo Fisher Scientific (TMO) +20.3%. Over five years, Thermo Fisher Scientific (TMO) compounded fastest (Iqvia Holdings (IQV) +0.3%/yr, Charles River Laboratories International (CRL) -2.7%/yr, Thermo Fisher Scientific (TMO) +1.2%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Iqvia Holdings (IQV) 0.00%, Charles River Laboratories International (CRL) 0.00%, Thermo Fisher Scientific (TMO) 0.00%. Iqvia Holdings (IQV) and Charles River Laboratories International (CRL) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Thermo Fisher Scientific (TMO) has been the steadiest (Iqvia Holdings (IQV) 40.7%, Charles River Laboratories International (CRL) 46.4%, Thermo Fisher Scientific (TMO) 30.0%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, IQV, CRL and TMO?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Thermo Fisher Scientific (TMO) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.