IPGP vs LASR vs FTV Stock Comparison

Ipg Photonics, Nlight and Fortive Prices as of Oct 27, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (SYM) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
IPGP Ipg Photonics Corp
$74.34 -4.8% 1M -14.7% 1Y
Market cap
$3.16B
P/E
114.6x
Revenue (TTM)
$1.07B
Div. yield
–
Industrial Machinery Industrials
1 win
LASR Nlight, Inc.
$38.07 -5.6% 1M +13.5% 1Y
Market cap
$2.20B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$310.70M
Div. yield
–
Industrial Machinery Industrials
2 wins
FTV Fortive Corp
$61.62 +9.8% 1M +24.6% 1Y
Market cap
$18.65B
P/E
35.1x
Revenue (TTM)
$4.32B
Div. yield
0.41%
Industrial Machinery Industrials
7 wins

Head to Head

10 decided of 12

Fortive leads on 7 of the 12 questions below (Fortive 7, Nlight 2, Ipg Photonics 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionIPGPLASRFTVLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $3.16B $2.20B $18.65B FTV
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 114.6x -173.9x 35.1x FTV
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 70.8x 71.8x 19.3x FTV
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +13.0% +43.2% +5.6% LASR
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 2.6% -4.0% 12.4% FTV
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — -3.8% 7.4% FTV
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — — 2.5x –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% — 0.41% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -14.7% +13.5% +24.6% FTV
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -14.1%/yr +6.3%/yr -3.8%/yr LASR
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 72.0% 87.3% 26.7% FTV
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 58/100 46/100 47/100 IPGP

Percentile Scorecard

IPGPLASRFTV

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisIPGPLASRFTV
Valuation 40 #123 of 203 12 #179 of 203 45 #112 of 203
Growth 31 #130 of 188 98 #5 of 188 19 #153 of 188
Profitability 31 #126 of 183 26 #136 of 183 73 #50 of 183
Financial Health 96 #9 of 217 89 #25 of 217 39 #133 of 217
Shareholder Returns 93 #11 of 153 7 #143 of 153 61 #61 of 153
Overall 58 46 47
  • IPGP ranked among 222 companies in Machinery
  • LASR ranked among 222 companies in Machinery
  • FTV ranked among 222 companies in Machinery

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodIPGPLASRFTVSPY
1 month -4.8%-5.6%+9.8% -0.2%
3 months -11.5%-39.9%-4.0% +3.9%
6 months -33.8%-42.1%-0.2% +8.2%
Year to date +3.8%+1.5%+11.6% +12.9%
1 year -14.7%+13.5%+24.6% +12.3%
3 years -15.7%+360.3%-5.2% +87.4%
3 years, per year -5.5%+66.4%-1.8% +23.3%
5 years -53.2%+35.7%-17.8% +67.9%
5 years, per year -14.1%+6.3%-3.8% +10.9%
10 years -21.0%—+29.8% +261.1%
10 years, per year -2.3%—+2.6% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureIPGPLASRFTVSPY
Volatility, 1Y 72.0%87.3%26.7% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 77.3%88.7%26.0% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 2.143.190.60 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.200.160.92 0.97
Max drawdown, 5Y -72.0%-80.5%-46.1% -25.4%
From 52-week high -51.7%-55.2%-4.0% -1.2%
52-week high $153.91$84.95$64.16 $779.14
52-week low $69.41$28.60$49.16 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleIPGPLASRFTV
P/E now vs peer median 114.6xmedian 25.2x -173.9xmedian 25.2x 35.1xmedian 25.2x
P/S now vs peer median 3.0xmedian 1.9x 7.1xmedian 1.9x 4.3xmedian 1.9x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 30.5xmedian 14.0x -598.8xmedian 14.0x 17.6xmedian 14.0x
P/FCF now vs peer median 152.0xmedian 21.7x 52.5xmedian 21.7x 19.9xmedian 21.7x
P/B now vs peer median 1.5xmedian 2.3x 5.0xmedian 2.3x 3.1xmedian 2.3x
PEG now vs peer median -3.37median 1.32 -4.11median 1.32 -4.25median 1.32

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsIPGPLASRFTV
Revenue $1.07B $310.70M $4.32B
Gross profit $410.10M $97.95M $2.73B
Operating income $7.97M -$16.99M $786.70M
Net income $27.56M -$12.48M $534.40M
Free cash flow $20.80M $41.83M $937.60M
R&D $123.44M $50.56M $262.00M
EPS (diluted) $0.64 $-0.22 $1.74
Cash & equivalents $399.23M $295.76M $374.20M
Total debt – $60.00M $3.51B
Shares (diluted) 42.91M 56.98M 307.60M
Enterprise value -$231.98M $1.28B $17.12B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricIPGPLASRFTV
P/E 114.6x -173.9x 35.1x
P/FCF 152.0x 52.5x 19.9x
P/Operating cash flow 32.8x 41.3x 17.7x
P/S 3.0x 7.1x 4.3x
P/B 1.5x 5.0x 3.1x
P/Tangible book 1.5x 5.0x 4.6x
EV/EBITDA 30.5x -598.8x 17.6x
EV/EBIT 287.5x -109.7x 27.7x
EV/Revenue 2.1x 6.0x 5.0x
EV/FCF 110.1x 44.6x 23.2x
EV/Operating cash flow 23.8x 35.1x 20.7x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) -3.37 -4.11 -4.25

Growth

14 metrics
MetricIPGPLASRFTV
Revenue growth (1Y) 13.0% 43.2% 5.6%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) -7.9% 11.5% -10.3%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 25.1% 113.2% 4.2%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) -6.8% 29.0% -7.9%
Operating income growth (1Y) 103.4% 67.4% 9.4%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -62.6% 33.0% -9.9%
Net income growth (1Y) 112.8% 73.4% -30.5%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -36.2% 37.9% -12.6%
EPS growth (1Y) 112.7% 76.9% -22.8%
EPS CAGR (3Y) -34.0% 42.3% -8.3%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -36.2% 587.2% -30.6%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -24.2% 119.1% -6.6%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -67.8% 311.1% -34.8%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -43.0% 65.8% -7.5%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricIPGPLASRFTV
Gross margin 38.4% 31.5% 63.2%
EBITDA margin 7.0% -1.0% 28.6%
Operating margin 0.7% -5.5% 18.2%
Pretax margin 3.7% -3.8% 15.6%
Net margin 2.6% -4.0% 12.4%
FCF margin 1.9% 13.5% 21.7%
Operating cash flow margin 9.0% 17.1% 24.4%
Return on equity 1.3% -2.9% 8.8%
Return on assets 1.1% -2.4% 4.6%
Return on invested capital – -3.8% 7.4%
Return on capital employed 0.4% -3.7% 7.6%
Asset turnover 0.4x 0.6x 0.4x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 3.5x -4.3x 2.0x
Stock comp / revenue 3.9% 13.8% 2.7%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricIPGPLASRFTV
Debt / assets – – 30.2%
Debt / equity – – 0.6x
Net debt / EBITDA – – 2.5x
Debt / FCF – – 3.7x
Liabilities / assets 12.3% 15.0% 47.7%
Equity / assets 87.7% 85.0% 52.3%
Interest coverage – -14.7x 12.8x
Current ratio 6.2x 8.2x 1.2x
Quick ratio 4.4x 6.9x 0.9x
Cash ratio 3.6x 6.0x 0.3x
Altman Z-score 8.98 17.41 3.33

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricIPGPLASRFTV
Dividend yield – – 0.4%
Net buyback yield 4.2% -8.9% 10.6%
Shareholder yield 4.2% -8.9% 11.0%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – 10.6%
Payout ratio (FCF) – – 6.0%
Dividend growth (1Y) – – -48.4%
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – -17.0%

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusIPGPLASRFTV
Forward P/E 70.8xFY2026 71.8xFY2026 19.3xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $1.05FY2026 $0.53FY2026 $3.20FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +43.8%FY2026 +120.8%FY2026 +18.1%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +109.5% +13.2% -3.1%
Revenue, next fiscal year $1.18BFY2026 $313.28MFY2026 $4.63BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +18.1%FY2026 +19.9%FY2026 +11.4%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +7.7% +17.9% -6.7%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersIPGPLASRFTV
Held by institutions 71.5% 89.4% 100.0%
Institutions holding 356 357 803
Change in shares held, QoQ +4.7% +5.4% +2.8%
Institutions buying 214 220 350
Institutions selling 96 112 301
Buyers to sellers 2.23 1.96 1.16

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

IPGPLASRFTV
IPGP 1.00 0.39 0.01
LASR 0.39 1.00 0.02
FTV 0.01 0.02 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, IPGP, LASR and FTV?

Fortive (FTV) is the largest by market capitalisation: Ipg Photonics (IPGP) $3.16B, Nlight (LASR) $2.20B, Fortive (FTV) $18.65B.

Which stock is cheaper, IPGP, LASR and FTV?

Fortive (FTV) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Ipg Photonics (IPGP) 114.6x, Nlight (LASR) -173.9x, Fortive (FTV) 35.1x). On next year's consensus earnings, Fortive (FTV) is cheapest (Ipg Photonics (IPGP) 70.8x, Nlight (LASR) 71.8x, Fortive (FTV) 19.3x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Nlight (LASR) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Ipg Photonics (IPGP) +13.0%, Nlight (LASR) +43.2%, Fortive (FTV) +5.6%.

Which company is more profitable?

Fortive (FTV) has the highest net margin (Ipg Photonics (IPGP) 2.6%, Nlight (LASR) -4.0%, Fortive (FTV) 12.4%). On return on invested capital, Fortive (FTV) leads (Nlight (LASR) -3.8%, Fortive (FTV) 7.4%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Fortive (FTV) returned the most: Ipg Photonics (IPGP) -14.7%, Nlight (LASR) +13.5%, Fortive (FTV) +24.6%. Over five years, Nlight (LASR) compounded fastest (Ipg Photonics (IPGP) -14.1%/yr, Nlight (LASR) +6.3%/yr, Fortive (FTV) -3.8%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Ipg Photonics (IPGP) 0.00%, Fortive (FTV) 0.41%. Ipg Photonics (IPGP) and Nlight (LASR) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Fortive (FTV) has been the steadiest (Ipg Photonics (IPGP) 72.0%, Nlight (LASR) 87.3%, Fortive (FTV) 26.7%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, IPGP, LASR and FTV?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Fortive (FTV) leads on 7. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.