IOT vs SAP vs MANH Stock Comparison

Samsara, Sap Se and Manhattan Associates Prices as of Oct 29, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (SPSC) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
IOT Samsara Inc.
$41.64 +9.7% 1M +5.9% 1Y
Market cap
$24.62B
P/E
271.8x
Revenue (TTM)
$1.85B
Div. yield
–
Supply Chain Software Technology
1 win
SAP Sap Se
$233.99 +11.0% 1M -9.9% 1Y
Market cap
$274.39B
P/E
28.8x
Revenue (TTM)
$45.76B
Div. yield
–
ERP Software Technology
7 wins
MANH Manhattan Associates Inc
$240.84 +20.4% 1M +35.1% 1Y
Market cap
$14.60B
P/E
68.6x
Revenue (TTM)
$1.16B
Div. yield
–
Supply Chain Software Technology
1 win

Head to Head

9 decided of 12

Sap Se leads on 7 of the 12 questions below (Sap Se 7, Samsara 1, Manhattan Associates 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionIOTSAPMANHLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $24.62B $274.39B $14.60B SAP
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 271.8x 28.8x 68.6x SAP
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 51.4x 27.5x 41.3x SAP
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +29.5% +13.5% +8.4% IOT
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 4.9% 20.8% — SAP
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — 35.6% — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — -0.4x — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +5.9% -9.9% +35.1% MANH
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years — +10.1%/yr +5.8%/yr SAP
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 59.6% 39.1% 46.3% SAP
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 51/100 63/100 39/100 SAP

Percentile Scorecard

IOTSAPMANH

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisIOTSAPMANH
Valuation 14 #77 of 89 52 #49 of 101 10 #80 of 89
Growth 99 #2 of 81 68 #32 of 97 39 #50 of 81
Profitability 57 #33 of 76 90 #10 of 93 68 #25 of 76
Financial Health 58 #40 of 93 78 #25 of 108 –
Shareholder Returns 29 #36 of 50 27 #46 of 63 –
Overall 51 63 39
  • IOT ranked among 98 companies in Vertical Software
  • SAP ranked among 114 companies in Business Applications
  • MANH ranked among 98 companies in Vertical Software

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodIOTSAPMANHSPY
1 month +9.7%+11.0%+20.4% +0.7%
3 months +16.3%+29.3%+26.1% +3.7%
6 months +44.9%+38.1%+74.7% +7.1%
Year to date +17.5%-3.7%+39.0% +12.8%
1 year +5.9%-9.9%+35.1% +11.9%
3 years +81.4%+75.1%+27.3% +85.2%
3 years, per year +22.0%+20.5%+8.4% +22.8%
5 years —+61.6%+32.7% +67.6%
5 years, per year —+10.1%+5.8% +10.9%
10 years —+166.2%+373.6% +262.0%
10 years, per year —+10.3%+16.8% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureIOTSAPMANHSPY
Volatility, 1Y 59.6%39.1%46.3% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 55.1%40.3%46.2% 12.6%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.810.630.29 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.10-0.250.76 0.94
Max drawdown, 5Y -70.4%-53.2%-61.0% -25.4%
From 52-week high -7.9%-11.4%-0.5% -1.2%
52-week high $45.22$263.96$242.17 $779.14
52-week low $24.25$146.09$120.88 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleIOTSAPMANH
P/E now vs peer median 268.6xmedian 39.2x 28.6xmedian 28.0x 66.5xmedian 39.2x
P/S now vs peer median 13.2xmedian 2.4x 6.3xmedian 2.8x 12.1xmedian 2.4x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 478.4xmedian 17.3x 11.8xmedian 16.9x —median 17.3x
P/FCF now vs peer median 95.4xmedian 20.3x 27.6xmedian 15.9x 29.2xmedian 20.3x
P/B now vs peer median 15.2xmedian 1.8x 5.5xmedian 3.2x 69.9xmedian 1.8x
PEG now vs peer median 8.20median 1.52 1.79median 0.89 6.20median 1.52

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsIOTSAPMANH
Revenue $1.85B $45.76B $1.16B
Gross profit $1.41B $33.40B –
Operating income $19.37M $22.06B –
Net income $90.55M $9.47B $212.94M
Free cash flow $255.48M $10.40B –
R&D $375.86M $8.26B $146.19M
EPS (diluted) $0.15 $8.11 $3.61
Cash & equivalents $291.39M $10.62B $199.45M
Total debt – $9.68B –
Shares (diluted) 590.46M 1.18B 59.00M
Enterprise value $21.39B $201.79B $14.60B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricIOTSAPMANH
P/E 268.6x 28.6x 66.5x
P/FCF 95.4x 27.6x 29.2x
P/Operating cash flow 84.5x 25.0x 36.0x
P/S 13.2x 6.3x 12.1x
P/B 15.2x 5.5x 69.9x
P/Tangible book 15.2x 5.8x 69.9x
EV/EBITDA 478.4x 11.8x –
EV/EBIT 1,216x 12.6x –
EV/Revenue 12.7x 6.1x 12.1x
EV/FCF 92.2x 26.6x –
EV/Operating cash flow 81.6x 24.1x 36.0x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 8.20 1.79 6.20

Growth

14 metrics
MetricIOTSAPMANH
Revenue growth (1Y) 29.5% 13.5% 8.4%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 33.3% 11.7% 9.2%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 28.7% 12.6% –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 35.7% 12.1% –
Operating income growth (1Y) 115.4% 30.9% –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 27.5% 52.1% –
Net income growth (1Y) 203.0% 18.5% -1.4%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 33.5% 16.4% 8.7%
EPS growth (1Y) 199.7% 22.0% 1.9%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 32.8% 16.0% 10.7%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 49.7% 43.3% 12.5%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 581.0% 19.0% 22.4%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 50.6% 43.7% –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 142.3% 20.9% –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricIOTSAPMANH
Gross margin 76.4% 73.0% –
EBITDA margin 2.7% 51.5% –
Operating margin 1.0% 48.2% –
Pretax margin 5.6% 29.2% –
Net margin 4.9% 20.8% –
FCF margin 13.8% 22.7% –
Operating cash flow margin 15.6% 25.1% 33.8%
Return on equity 5.8% 18.5% –
Return on assets 3.4% 11.2% –
Return on invested capital – 35.6% –
Return on capital employed 1.1% 34.0% –
Asset turnover 0.7x 0.5x 1.6x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 3.2x 1.2x 1.8x
Stock comp / revenue 17.9% 3.9% 10.4%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricIOTSAPMANH
Debt / assets – 11.2% –
Debt / equity – 0.2x –
Net debt / EBITDA – -0.4x –
Debt / FCF – 0.9x –
Liabilities / assets 42.1% 39.1% –
Equity / assets 57.9% 60.9% 26.7%
Interest coverage – 8.3x –
Current ratio 1.6x 1.2x 1.1x
Quick ratio 1.2x 0.9x –
Cash ratio 0.9x 0.9x –
Altman Z-score 12.69 7.44 –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricIOTSAPMANH
Dividend yield – 1.3% –
Net buyback yield -0.1% -0.1% –
Shareholder yield -0.1% 1.2% –
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusIOTSAPMANH
Forward P/E 51.4xFY2026 27.5xFY2026 41.3xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $0.81FY2026 $8.52FY2026 $5.83FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +44.6%FY2026 +16.1%FY2026 +15.2%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +23.5% +4.9% +11.1%
Revenue, next fiscal year $1.93BFY2026 $42.86BFY2026 $1.09BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +19.3%FY2026 -2.4%FY2026 +0.9%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +30.8% +14.3% +11.5%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersIOTSAPMANH
Held by institutions 100.0% 7.2% 100.0%
Institutions holding 550 821 507
Change in shares held, QoQ +9.1% -3.0% -0.7%
Institutions buying 318 460 249
Institutions selling 166 245 198
Buyers to sellers 1.92 1.88 1.26

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

IOTSAPMANH
IOT 1.00 0.57 0.64
SAP 0.57 1.00 0.61
MANH 0.64 0.61 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, IOT, SAP and MANH?

Sap Se (SAP) is the largest by market capitalisation: Samsara (IOT) $24.62B, Sap Se (SAP) $274.39B, Manhattan Associates (MANH) $14.60B.

Which stock is cheaper, IOT, SAP and MANH?

Sap Se (SAP) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Samsara (IOT) 271.8x, Sap Se (SAP) 28.8x, Manhattan Associates (MANH) 68.6x). On next year's consensus earnings, Sap Se (SAP) is cheapest (Samsara (IOT) 51.4x, Sap Se (SAP) 27.5x, Manhattan Associates (MANH) 41.3x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Samsara (IOT) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Samsara (IOT) +29.5%, Sap Se (SAP) +13.5%, Manhattan Associates (MANH) +8.4%.

Which company is more profitable?

Sap Se (SAP) has the highest net margin (Samsara (IOT) 4.9%, Sap Se (SAP) 20.8%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Manhattan Associates (MANH) returned the most: Samsara (IOT) +5.9%, Sap Se (SAP) -9.9%, Manhattan Associates (MANH) +35.1%. Over five years, Sap Se (SAP) compounded fastest (Sap Se (SAP) +10.1%/yr, Manhattan Associates (MANH) +5.8%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Sap Se (SAP) has been the steadiest (Samsara (IOT) 59.6%, Sap Se (SAP) 39.1%, Manhattan Associates (MANH) 46.3%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, IOT, SAP and MANH?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Sap Se (SAP) leads on 7. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.