INTG vs OMAB vs XHR Stock Comparison

Intergroup, Central North Airport and Xenia Hotels & Resorts Prices as of Nov 2, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (OPEN) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
INTG Intergroup Corp
$39.51 +41.6% 1M +8.0% 1Y
Market cap
$84.90M
P/E
51.7x
Revenue (TTM)
$73.95M
Div. yield
–
Real Estate Operators Real Estate
4 wins

Head to Head

10 decided of 12

Central North Airport leads on 4 of the 12 questions below (Central North Airport 4, Intergroup 4, Xenia Hotels & Resorts 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionINTGOMABXHRLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $84.90M $5.06B $1.94B OMAB
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 51.7x 17.0x -268.3x OMAB
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — 15.9x — –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +14.9% — +1.6% INTG
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 2.2% — -0.7% INTG
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — — 2.9% –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA -0.2x — 6.0x INTG
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield — 5.17% 2.67% OMAB
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +8.0% +6.2% +70.7% XHR
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -3.6%/yr +16.7%/yr +1.8%/yr OMAB
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 67.9% 31.3% 27.2% XHR
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 63/100 45/100 46/100 INTG

Percentile Scorecard

INTGOMABXHR

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisINTGOMABXHR
Valuation 84 #7 of 38 27 #100 of 137 73 #40 of 145
Growth 78 #8 of 33 – 20 #116 of 144
Profitability 67 #11 of 31 – 34 #93 of 140
Financial Health 39 #23 of 37 35 #96 of 147 39 #89 of 146
Shareholder Returns 46 #8 of 14 73 #24 of 85 66 #45 of 132
Overall 63 45 46
  • INTG ranked among 41 companies in Property Developers
  • OMAB ranked among 150 companies in Transportation
  • XHR ranked among 149 companies in Property REITs

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodINTGOMABXHRSPY
1 month +41.6%+11.2%+15.3% -2.3%
3 months +30.3%-1.9%+2.5% -0.7%
6 months +0.5%+0.8%+31.7% +4.8%
Year to date +39.2%-3.7%+48.5% +10.3%
1 year +8.0%+6.2%+70.7% +10.3%
3 years +49.1%+59.0%+69.5% +73.0%
3 years, per year +14.3%+16.7%+19.2% +20.1%
5 years -16.6%+116.6%+9.5% +61.9%
5 years, per year -3.6%+16.7%+1.8% +10.1%
10 years +75.6%+137.0%+36.5% +258.6%
10 years, per year +5.8%+9.0%+3.2% +13.6%

Risk

MeasureINTGOMABXHRSPY
Volatility, 1Y 67.9%31.3%27.2% 12.8%
Downside volatility, 1Y 68.5%27.7%28.2% 12.8%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y -0.071.050.54 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.120.202.60 0.80
Max drawdown, 5Y -82.9%-42.1%-54.2% -25.4%
From 52-week high -19.2%-22.4%-3.8% -3.5%
52-week high $48.92$134.98$21.82 $779.14
52-week low $25.10$88.75$12.53 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleINTGOMABXHR
P/E now vs peer median 51.7xmedian 7.4x 17.0xmedian 16.1x -268.3xmedian 26.3x
P/S now vs peer median 1.1xmedian 4.8x 5.7xmedian 0.9x 1.8xmedian 4.2x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 4.0xmedian 11.2x —median 8.1x 15.4xmedian 14.4x
P/FCF now vs peer median 298.9xmedian 6.2x 12.5xmedian 11.4x 16.8xmedian 23.9x
P/B now vs peer median -0.7xmedian 0.6x 8.0xmedian 1.2x 1.7xmedian 1.3x
PEG now vs peer median 1.68median 0.34 —median 0.75 9.17median 1.98

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsINTGOMABXHR
Revenue $73.95M – $1.09B
Gross profit $30.68M – $337.00M
Operating income $11.87M – $73.11M
Net income $336.00K – -$7.69M
Free cash flow $284.00K – $115.51M
EPS (diluted) $0.71 – $-0.08
Cash & equivalents $6.36M $172.32M $112.36M
Total debt $1.41M $756.57M $1.36B
Shares (diluted) 2.31M – 92.25M
Enterprise value $25.16M $4.55B $1.45B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricINTGOMABXHR
P/E 51.7x 17.0x -268.3x
P/FCF 298.9x 12.5x 16.8x
P/Operating cash flow 24.6x – 10.7x
P/S 1.1x 5.7x 1.8x
P/B -0.7x 8.0x 1.7x
P/Tangible book -0.7x -10.2x 1.7x
EV/EBITDA 4.0x – 15.4x
EV/EBIT 6.7x – 43.6x
EV/Revenue 1.1x – 2.9x
EV/FCF 281.5x – 27.6x
EV/Operating cash flow 23.2x – 17.5x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 1.68 – 9.17

Growth

14 metrics
MetricINTGOMABXHR
Revenue growth (1Y) 14.9% – 1.6%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 8.7% – 1.5%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 14.7% – 3.0%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 9.8% – 0.5%
Operating income growth (1Y) 55.3% – -30.4%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 39.9% – -13.2%
Net income growth (1Y) 104.5% – -111.5%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 26.7% – -28.8%
EPS growth (1Y) 128.6% – -112.2%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 30.7% – -29.3%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -41.5% – 5.2%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 224.7% – -1.3%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -85.1% – 356.7%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 26.7% – 2.7%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricINTGOMABXHR
Gross margin 41.5% – 30.8%
EBITDA margin 26.8% – 18.9%
Operating margin 16.0% – 6.7%
Pretax margin 3.5% – -0.6%
Net margin 2.2% – -0.7%
FCF margin 0.4% – 10.6%
Operating cash flow margin 4.7% – 16.6%
Return on equity – – -0.7%
Return on assets 0.3% – -0.3%
Return on invested capital – – 2.9%
Return on capital employed – – –
Asset turnover 0.7x – 0.4x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 10.3x – -23.7x
Stock comp / revenue 0.1% – 1.2%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricINTGOMABXHR
Debt / assets 1.4% 44.0% 50.0%
Debt / equity 0.0x 1.2x 1.2x
Net debt / EBITDA -0.2x – 6.0x
Debt / FCF 5.0x – 11.8x
Liabilities / assets 209.0% 63.1% 57.2%
Equity / assets -109.0% 36.9% 42.8%
Interest coverage 0.9x – 0.9x
Current ratio – 1.3x –
Quick ratio – 1.2x –
Cash ratio – 0.7x –
Altman Z-score – – –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricINTGOMABXHR
Dividend yield – 5.2% 2.7%
Net buyback yield 0.1% – 2.5%
Shareholder yield 0.1% 5.2% 5.2%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – -9.9%
Payout ratio (FCF) – – 0.7%
Dividend growth (1Y) – – 32.3%
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – -68.0%

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusINTGOMABXHR
Forward P/E – 15.9xFY2026 –
EPS, next fiscal year – $6.60FY2026 $-0.02FY2026
EPS growth, next FY – +3.3%FY2026 -103.1%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after – +28.5% –
Revenue, next fiscal year – $933.64MFY2026 $1.08BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY – +1.1%FY2026 -0.1%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after – +19.6% +10.6%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersINTGOMABXHR
Held by institutions – 12.3% 95.2%
Institutions holding – 163 300
Change in shares held, QoQ – +5.4% -2.2%
Institutions buying – 77 161
Institutions selling – 59 92
Buyers to sellers – 1.31 1.75

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

INTGOMABXHR
INTG 1.00 -0.07 -0.06
OMAB -0.07 1.00 0.28
XHR -0.06 0.28 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, INTG, OMAB and XHR?

Central North Airport (OMAB) is the largest by market capitalisation: Intergroup (INTG) $84.90M, Central North Airport (OMAB) $5.06B, Xenia Hotels & Resorts (XHR) $1.94B.

Which stock is cheaper, INTG, OMAB and XHR?

Central North Airport (OMAB) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Intergroup (INTG) 51.7x, Central North Airport (OMAB) 17.0x, Xenia Hotels & Resorts (XHR) -268.3x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Intergroup (INTG) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Intergroup (INTG) +14.9%, Xenia Hotels & Resorts (XHR) +1.6%.

Which company is more profitable?

Intergroup (INTG) has the highest net margin (Intergroup (INTG) 2.2%, Xenia Hotels & Resorts (XHR) -0.7%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Xenia Hotels & Resorts (XHR) returned the most: Intergroup (INTG) +8.0%, Central North Airport (OMAB) +6.2%, Xenia Hotels & Resorts (XHR) +70.7%. Over five years, Central North Airport (OMAB) compounded fastest (Intergroup (INTG) -3.6%/yr, Central North Airport (OMAB) +16.7%/yr, Xenia Hotels & Resorts (XHR) +1.8%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Central North Airport (OMAB) has the highest dividend yield: Central North Airport (OMAB) 5.17%, Xenia Hotels & Resorts (XHR) 2.67%. Intergroup (INTG) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Xenia Hotels & Resorts (XHR) has been the steadiest (Intergroup (INTG) 67.9%, Central North Airport (OMAB) 31.3%, Xenia Hotels & Resorts (XHR) 27.2%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, INTG, OMAB and XHR?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Central North Airport (OMAB) leads on 4. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.