INTA vs HUBS vs SAP Stock Comparison

Intapp, Hubspot and Sap Se Prices as of Nov 4, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (CRM) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
INTA Intapp, Inc.
$45.07 +20.6% 1M +21.6% 1Y
Market cap
$3.45B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$600.04M
Div. yield
–
CRM and Sales Software Technology
1 win
HUBS Hubspot Inc
$216.77 -1.7% 1M -54.1% 1Y
Market cap
$10.59B
P/E
50.3x
Revenue (TTM)
$3.59B
Div. yield
–
CRM and Sales Software Technology
3 wins
SAP Sap Se
$240.05 +15.5% 1M -7.5% 1Y
Market cap
$294.90B
P/E
29.4x
Revenue (TTM)
$45.76B
Div. yield
1.22%
ERP Software Technology
5 wins

Head to Head

9 decided of 12

Sap Se leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (Sap Se 5, Hubspot 3, Intapp 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionINTAHUBSSAPLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $3.45B $10.59B $294.90B SAP
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -122.1x 50.3x 29.4x SAP
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 28.9x 17.2x 28.2x HUBS
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +14.4% +20.1% +13.5% HUBS
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months -4.7% 5.9% 20.8% SAP
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — — 35.6% –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — — -0.4x –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield — — 1.22% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +21.6% -54.1% -7.5% INTA
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +8.5%/yr -23.0%/yr +9.9%/yr SAP
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 62.0% 76.0% 39.3% SAP
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 56/100 79/100 62/100 HUBS

Percentile Scorecard

INTAHUBSSAP

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisINTAHUBSSAP
Valuation 34 #66 of 99 61 #39 of 99 49 #51 of 99
Growth 77 #23 of 98 95 #6 of 98 64 #36 of 98
Profitability 52 #47 of 96 77 #23 of 96 92 #9 of 96
Financial Health 47 #59 of 111 75 #29 of 111 78 #25 of 111
Shareholder Returns 71 #20 of 67 88 #9 of 67 27 #49 of 67
Overall 56 79 62
  • INTA ranked among 113 companies in Business Applications
  • HUBS ranked among 113 companies in Business Applications
  • SAP ranked among 113 companies in Business Applications

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodINTAHUBSSAPSPY
1 month +20.6%-1.7%+15.5% -1.0%
3 months +21.9%-13.4%+21.7% -0.4%
6 months +95.4%-7.8%+38.7% +4.5%
Year to date -1.6%-46.0%-1.2% +12.4%
1 year +21.6%-54.1%-7.5% +13.6%
3 years +28.1%-48.7%+72.7% +76.4%
3 years, per year +8.6%-20.0%+20.0% +20.8%
5 years +50.3%-73.0%+60.5% +63.7%
5 years, per year +8.5%-23.0%+9.9% +10.4%
10 years —+325.9%+181.3% +267.7%
10 years, per year —+15.6%+10.9% +13.9%

Risk

MeasureINTAHUBSSAPSPY
Volatility, 1Y 62.0%76.0%39.3% 12.8%
Downside volatility, 1Y 59.7%81.9%40.3% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.180.380.64 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.35-0.71-0.19 1.06
Max drawdown, 5Y -74.2%-80.0%-53.2% -25.4%
From 52-week high -6.1%-54.1%-8.0% -1.6%
52-week high $47.99$471.99$261.06 $779.14
52-week low $19.14$170.28$146.09 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleINTAHUBSSAP
P/E now vs peer median -122.1xmedian 25.3x 50.3xmedian 25.3x 29.4xmedian 25.3x
P/S now vs peer median 5.8xmedian 2.8x 3.0xmedian 2.8x 6.4xmedian 2.8x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median -343.9xmedian 16.5x 27.1xmedian 16.5x 12.1xmedian 16.5x
P/FCF now vs peer median 21.6xmedian 16.1x 12.6xmedian 16.1x 27.8xmedian 16.1x
P/B now vs peer median 11.2xmedian 2.8x 6.5xmedian 2.8x 5.6xmedian 2.8x
PEG now vs peer median -4.57median 0.84 1.02median 0.84 1.83median 0.84

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsINTAHUBSSAP
Revenue $600.04M $3.59B $45.76B
Gross profit $459.63M $2.98B $33.40B
Operating income -$26.70M $191.40M $22.06B
Net income -$28.26M $213.29M $9.47B
Free cash flow $159.56M $842.49M $10.59B
R&D $167.20M $904.09M $8.26B
EPS (diluted) $-0.37 $4.31 $8.11
Cash & equivalents $147.69M $1.12B $10.62B
Total debt – – $9.68B
Shares (diluted) 76.59M 49.54M 1.18B
Enterprise value $2.81B $4.56B $222.88B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricINTAHUBSSAP
P/E -122.1x 50.3x 29.4x
P/FCF 21.6x 12.6x 27.8x
P/Operating cash flow 21.4x 11.7x 25.7x
P/S 5.8x 3.0x 6.4x
P/B 11.2x 6.5x 5.6x
P/Tangible book 12.3x 6.7x 6.0x
EV/EBITDA -343.9x 27.1x 12.1x
EV/EBIT -123.8x 48.5x 12.9x
EV/Revenue 5.5x 2.6x 6.2x
EV/FCF 20.7x 11.0x 26.9x
EV/Operating cash flow 20.5x 10.2x 24.8x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) -4.57 1.02 1.83

Growth

14 metrics
MetricINTAHUBSSAP
Revenue growth (1Y) 14.4% 20.1% 13.5%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 17.2% 20.3% 11.7%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 17.9% 18.5% 12.6%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 21.7% 19.8% 12.1%
Operating income growth (1Y) 22.7% 470.5% 30.9%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 25.3% 44.8% 52.1%
Net income growth (1Y) -0.8% 6,139% 18.5%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 24.1% 49.1% 16.4%
EPS growth (1Y) -7.7% 6,521% 22.0%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 26.7% 49.3% 16.0%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 43.0% 28.2% 43.3%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 65.1% 39.2% 19.0%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 43.7% 28.6% 46.4%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 67.1% 40.2% 21.7%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricINTAHUBSSAP
Gross margin 76.6% 83.0% 73.0%
EBITDA margin -1.6% 9.6% 51.5%
Operating margin -4.5% 5.3% 48.2%
Pretax margin -4.0% 6.7% 29.2%
Net margin -4.7% 5.9% 20.8%
FCF margin 26.6% 23.5% 23.1%
Operating cash flow margin 26.9% 25.3% 25.1%
Return on equity -9.0% 13.0% 18.5%
Return on assets -3.9% 6.1% 11.2%
Return on invested capital – – 35.6%
Return on capital employed -7.2% 9.9% 34.0%
Asset turnover 0.8x 1.0x 0.5x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) -5.7x 4.3x 1.2x
Stock comp / revenue 21.0% 14.0% 3.9%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricINTAHUBSSAP
Debt / assets – – 11.2%
Debt / equity – – 0.2x
Net debt / EBITDA – – -0.4x
Debt / FCF – – 0.9x
Liabilities / assets 55.1% 53.2% 39.1%
Equity / assets 44.9% 46.8% 60.9%
Interest coverage – 180.1x 8.3x
Current ratio 0.7x 1.3x 1.2x
Quick ratio 0.6x 1.1x 0.9x
Cash ratio 0.4x 0.8x 0.9x
Altman Z-score 4.31 4.58 7.57

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricINTAHUBSSAP
Dividend yield – – 1.2%
Net buyback yield 6.9% 8.9% -0.1%
Shareholder yield 6.9% 8.9% 1.1%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusINTAHUBSSAP
Forward P/E 28.9xFY2027 17.2xFY2026 28.2xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $1.56FY2027 $12.58FY2026 $8.52FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +22.8%FY2027 +29.7%FY2026 +16.1%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +18.6% +30.9% +4.9%
Revenue, next fiscal year $679.07MFY2027 $3.46BFY2026 $42.86BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +17.5%FY2027 +10.5%FY2026 -2.4%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +8.8% +26.7% +14.3%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersINTAHUBSSAP
Held by institutions 85.1% 96.4% 7.2%
Institutions holding 250 597 816
Change in shares held, QoQ -0.1% -0.6% -3.0%
Institutions buying 129 320 458
Institutions selling 90 221 243
Buyers to sellers 1.43 1.45 1.88

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

INTAHUBSSAP
INTA 1.00 0.60 0.51
HUBS 0.60 1.00 0.62
SAP 0.51 0.62 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, INTA, HUBS and SAP?

Sap Se (SAP) is the largest by market capitalisation: Intapp (INTA) $3.45B, Hubspot (HUBS) $10.59B, Sap Se (SAP) $294.90B.

Which stock is cheaper, INTA, HUBS and SAP?

Sap Se (SAP) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Intapp (INTA) -122.1x, Hubspot (HUBS) 50.3x, Sap Se (SAP) 29.4x). On next year's consensus earnings, Hubspot (HUBS) is cheapest (Intapp (INTA) 28.9x, Hubspot (HUBS) 17.2x, Sap Se (SAP) 28.2x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Hubspot (HUBS) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Intapp (INTA) +14.4%, Hubspot (HUBS) +20.1%, Sap Se (SAP) +13.5%.

Which company is more profitable?

Sap Se (SAP) has the highest net margin (Intapp (INTA) -4.7%, Hubspot (HUBS) 5.9%, Sap Se (SAP) 20.8%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Intapp (INTA) returned the most: Intapp (INTA) +21.6%, Hubspot (HUBS) -54.1%, Sap Se (SAP) -7.5%. Over five years, Sap Se (SAP) compounded fastest (Intapp (INTA) +8.5%/yr, Hubspot (HUBS) -23.0%/yr, Sap Se (SAP) +9.9%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Sap Se (SAP) 1.22%. Intapp (INTA) and Hubspot (HUBS) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Sap Se (SAP) has been the steadiest (Intapp (INTA) 62.0%, Hubspot (HUBS) 76.0%, Sap Se (SAP) 39.3%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, INTA, HUBS and SAP?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Sap Se (SAP) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.